[1]苏彤,姚陆铭,张鑫,等.大豆愈伤原生质体的制备和培养方式探究[J].大豆科学,2018,37(05):741-747.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.05.0741]
　SU Tong,YAO Lu-ming,ZHANG Xin,et al.Study on the Preparation and Cultivation of Soybean Callus Protoplasts[J].Soybean Science,2018,37(05):741-747.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.05.0741]
点击复制

大豆愈伤原生质体的制备和培养方式探究

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S] 卷: 第37卷 期数: 2018年05期 页码: 741-747 栏目: 出版日期: 2018-09-20
Title:
Study on the Preparation and Cultivation of Soybean Callus Protoplasts
作者:
（1.上海交通大学 农业与生物学院，上海 200240; 2.上海师范大学 生命与环境科学学院，上海 200234）
Author(s):
SU Tong1;  YAO Lu-ming1;  ZHANG Xin2;  WANG Biao1;  WU Tian-long1
(1.School of Agricultural and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China; 2.College of Life and Environment Science, Shanghai Normal University，Shanghai 200234, China)
关键词:
大豆; 愈伤组织; 原生质体; 再生; 正交设计
Keywords:
Soybean;  Callus;  Protoplasts;  Regeneration;  Orthogonal design
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.05.0741
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
具有植物细胞全能性的原生质体是探究植物遗传转化和基因功能的理想材料，为了高效率制备大豆原生质体及其稳定培养，以交大05-133大豆未成熟子叶诱导的愈伤组织为材料，采用正交设计，对纤维素酶、 果胶酶和离析酶等酶解液成分进行分析，研究原生质体高效制备方法的酶解液配比，同时探讨不同酶解时间对原生质体产量的影响，以确定最佳的原生质体酶解条件；通过对比在低熔点琼脂固体液滴培养与液体培养这两种不同培养方式下细胞的增值速率，以期建立高效的愈伤原生质体再生体系。结果显示，最佳酶解液配比为：2%纤维素酶+0.1%果胶酶+1%离析酶，在该酶解液配比下酶解5 h，所得到原生质体产量和活力最高，达到（3.976±0.86）×106个·g-1。用KP8培养基对原生质体进行培养，结果显示固体液滴的培养方式更适合原生质体的分裂，原生质体植板率高于液体培养，并且在25 d内分裂形成致密的细胞团。
Abstract:
Protoplasts with cell totipotency are ideal materials for exploring genetic transformation and gene function of plants. In order to product and culture effectively protoplast of soybean, the callus induced by immature cotyledons of Jiaoda 05-133 was used as materials preparing for protoplasts in this study. Cellulase onozuka R-10, pectolyase Y-23 and macerozyme R-10 were designed according to the orthogonal array, at the same time, the influence of different enzymatic hydrolysis time on the protoplast yield were explored for optimizing protoplast preparation conditions. Two culture methods with agarose bead and liquid culture were compared to establish an efficient protoplasm regeneration system. The results showed that, the enzyme combination containing cellulase onozuka R-10(2%)， Pectolyase Y-23(0.1%)， macerozyme R-10(1%) was the optimal for protoplasts isolation of Jiaoda 05-133 callus. Under this condition, the appropriate time for Jiaoda 05-133 callus protoplasts isolation was 5 h in enzyme solution and the amounts of protoplasts reaching（3.976±0.86）×106·g-1 with high quality and vigour were attained. Comparing the two culture methods, the results showed that the agarose bead culture with higher plating rate is more suitable for the cell

参考文献/References:

［1］彭章, 童华荣, 梁国鲁, 等. 茶树叶片和胚根原生质体的分离及PEG诱导融合［J］. 作物学报,2018,44(3):463-470. (Peng Z, Tong H R, Liang G L. Protoplast isolation and fusion induced by PEG with leaves and roots of tea plant. (Camellia sinensis L. O. Kuntze) ［J］. Acta Agronomica Sinica,2018,44(3):463-470.
［2］Nanjareddy K, Arthikala M K, Blanco L, et al. Protoplast isolation, transient transformation of leaf mesophyll protoplasts and improved Agrobacterium-mediated leaf discinfiltration of Phaseolus vulgaris: Tools for rapid gene expression analysis［J］. BMC Biotechnol, 2016, 16: 53.
［3］Wei Z M, Xu Z H. Plant regeneration from protoplasts soybean［J］. Plant Cell Reports, 1988, 7: 348-351.
［4］张晓慧, 韩榕. 两种瞬时表达体系研究拟南芥Profilin-1的亚细胞定位［J］. 生物技术通报, 2017, 33(5): 57-62. (Zhang X H, Han R. Subcellular localization of profilin-1 from Arabidopsis utilizing two transient expression systems［J］. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2017, 33(5): 57-62.)
［5］Walter M, Chaban C, Schütze K, et al. Visualization of protein interactions in living plant cells using bimolecular fluorescence complementation［J］. Plant Journal, 2004, 40(3): 428-438.
［6］Lin C S, Hsu C T, Yang L H, et al. Application of protoplast technology to CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis: From single cell mutation detection to mutant plant regeneration［J］. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2017, 12: 1111-1287.
［7］文峰, 肖诗鑫, 聂扬眉, 等. 木薯脆性胚性愈伤组织原生质体培养与植株再生［J］. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(19): 4050-4056. (Wen F, Xiao S X, Nie Y M, et al. Protoplasts culture isolated from friable embryogenic callus of cassava and plant regeneration［J］. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(19): 4050-4056.)
［8］罗希明, 简玉瑜. 大豆叶肉细胞原生质体的游离和培养［J］. 吉林农业科学, 1984, 2: 20-24. (Luo X M, Jian Y Y. Isolation and cultivation of soybean mesophyll protoplast［J］. Journal of Jilin Agricultural Sciences, 1984, 2: 20-24.)
［9］吕慧能, 盖钧锰, 马育华, 等. 不同激素条件下大豆原生质体培养和植株再生［J］. 作物学报, 1993, 19: 328-333. (Lyu H N, Gai J Y, Ma Y H, et al. Soybean protoplast culture under different hormone conditions and plantlet regeneration［J］. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1993, 19: 328-333. )
［10］Finer K R, Finer J J. Use of Agrobacterium expressing green fluorescent protein to evaluate colonization of sonication assisted Agrobacterium mediated transformation treated soybean cotyledons［J］. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 2000, 30: 406-410.
［11］Christou P, Murphy J E, Swain W F. Stable transformation of soybean by electroporation and root formation from transformed callus［J］. PNAS, 1987, 84: 3962-3966.
［12］Dhir S K, Dhir S, Savka M A, et al. Regeneration of transgenic soybean (Glycine max) plants from electroporated protoplasts［J］. Plant Physiology, 1992, 99: 81-88.
［13］Sun X, Hu Z, Chen R, et al. Targeted mutagenesis in soybean using the CRISPR-Cas9 system［J］. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5:10342.
［14］张龄丹. PEG介导玉米叶肉细胞原生质体瞬时基因转化体系的应用研究［D］. 安徽：安徽农业大学, 2016. (Zhang L D. A study on the application of PEG-mediated transient gene expression system in maize mesophyll protoplasts［D］. Anhui: Anhui Agricultural University, 2016.)
［15］Lin C S, Hsu C T, Yang L H, et al. Application of protoplast technology to CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis: From single cell mutation detection to mutant plant regeneration［J］. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2017, 12: 1111-12870.
［16］Finer J J, Nagasawa A. Development of an embryogenic suspension culture of soybean (Glycine max Merrill.)［J］. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 1988, 15(2): 125-136.
［17］张玉梅, 王彪, 张忠滨, 等. 优质、丰产菜用大豆新品种交大05-133的选育［J］. 种子, 2013, 32(3): 102-104. (Zhang Y M, Wang B, Zhang Z B, et al. Breeding for fine quality and high yield of vegetable soybean Jiaoda 133［J］. Seed, 2013, 32(3): 102-104.)
［18］程静琳, 闫军辉, 钟云鹏, 等. 大豆高效体细胞胚诱导和增殖方法的研究［J］. 大豆科学, 2014, 33(3): 305-310. (Cheng J L, Yan J H, Zhong Y P, et al. Research to the effective methods of soybean somatic embryo induction and Proliferation［J］. Soybean Science, 2014, 33(3): 305-310.)
［19］Hinchee M A W, Connor-Ward D V, Newell C A, et al. Production of transgenic soybean plants using Agrobacterium mediated DNA transfer［J］. Nature Biotechnology, 1988, 6: 915-922.
［20］Dhir S K, Dhir S, Widholm J M. Regeneration of fertile plants from protoplasts of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.): Genotypic differences in culture response［J］. Plant Cell Reports, 1992, 11: 285-289.
［21］Dhir S K, Dhir S, Wildhom J M. Plantlet regeneration from immature cotyledon protoplasts of soybean (Glycine max L.) ［J］. Plant Cell Report, 1991, 10: 39-43.
［22］Sarwan K, Dhir S D, Jack M, et al. Regeneration of fertile plants from protoplasts of soybean ［Glycine max (L.) Merrill］: Genotypic differences in culture response［J］. Plant Cell Reports, 1992, 11: 285-289.
［23］王娟, 李玉珠, 师尚礼. 苜蓿愈伤组织原生质体游离与培养［J］. 草地学报, 2010, 18(2): 258-262. (Wang J, Li Y Z, Shi S L. Dissociation and culture of callus protoplasts of Medicago sativa L［J］. Acta Agrectir Sinica, 2010, 18(2): 258-262.)
［24］公维丽, 王禄山, 张怀强. 植物细胞壁多糖合成酶系及真菌降解酶系［J］. 生物技术通报, 2015, 31(4): 149-165. (Gong W L, Wang L S, Zhang H Q. Diverse synthetases and fungi degradation enzymes for the polysaccharides of plant cell walls［J］. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2015, 31(4): 149-165.)
［25］肖文言, 王连铮. 大豆幼荚子叶原生质体培养及植株再生［J］. 作物学报, 1994, 20(6): 665-670. (Xiao W Y, Wang L Z. Protoplast culture and plant regeneration of immature cotyledons of soybean (Glycine max L.) ［J］. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1994, 20(6): 665-670.)
［26］Shu Y J, Huang L Y, Chen M, et al. Establishment and optimization of systems for protoplasts isolation of soybean and chickpea that used in subcellular location［J］. Chinese Journal of Biotechnology, 2017, 33: 976-985.
［27］林开江, 袁康培, 王坤元, 等. 植物细胞离析酶的制备和应用［J］. 生物工程学报, 1994, 10(1): 71-75. (Lin K J, Yuan K P, Wang K Y, et al. Preparation and application of Maceration enzyme from Aspergillus sp［J］. Chinese Journal of Biotechnology, 1994, 10(1): 71-75.)
［28］陶茸, 李玉珠, 王娟, 等. 扁蓿豆愈伤组织原生质体分离条件的研究［J］. 草业学报, 2011, 19(2): 288-293. (Tao R , Li Y Z, Wang J, et al. Protoplasts isolation conditions of Melilotoides ruthenica Callus［J］. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 19(2): 288-293.)

相似文献/References:

[1]刘章雄,李卫东,孙石,等.1983～2010年北京大豆育成品种的亲本地理来源及其遗传贡献[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.002]
　LIU Zhang-xiong,LI Wei-dong,SUN Shi,et al.Geographical Sources of Germplasm and Their Nuclear Contribution to Soybean Cultivars Released during 1983 to 2010 in Beijing[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(05):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.002]
[2]李彩云,余永亮,杨红旗,等.大豆脂质转运蛋白基因GmLTP3的特征分析[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.003]
　LI Cai-yun,YU Yong-liang,YANG Hong-qi,et al.Characteristics of a Lipid-transfer Protein Gene GmLTP3 in Glycine max[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(05):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.003]
[3]王明霞,崔晓霞,薛晨晨,等.大豆耐盐基因GmHAL3a的克隆及RNAi载体的构建[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.004]
　WANG Ming-xia,CUI Xiao-xia,XUE Chen-chen,et al.Cloning of Halotolerance 3 Gene and Construction of Its RNAi Vector in Soybean (Glycine max)[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(05):12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.004]
[4]张春宝,李玉秋,彭宝,等.线粒体ISSR与SCAR标记鉴定大豆细胞质雄性不育系与保持系[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.005]
　ZHANG Chun-bao,LI Yu-qiu,PENG Bao,et al.Identification of Soybean Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Line and Maintainer Line with Mitochondrial ISSR and SCAR Markers[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(05):19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.005]
[5]卢清瑶,赵琳,李冬梅,等.RAV基因对拟南芥和大豆不定芽再生的影响[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.006]
　LU Qing-yao,ZHAO Lin,LI Dong-mei,et al.Effects of RAV gene on Shoot Regeneration of Arabidopsis and Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(05):23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.006]
[6]杜景红,刘丽君.大豆fad3c基因沉默载体的构建[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.007]
　DU Jing-hong,LIU Li-jun.Construction of fad3c Gene Silencing Vector in Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(05):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.007]
[7]张力伟,樊颖伦,牛腾飞,等.大豆“冀黄13”突变体筛选及突变体库的建立[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.008]
　ZHANG Li-wei,FAN Ying-lun,NIU Teng-fei?,et al.Screening of Mutants and Construction of Mutant Population for Soybean Cultivar "Jihuang13”[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(05):33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.008]
[8]盖江南,张彬彬,吴瑶,等.大豆不定胚悬浮培养基因型筛选及基因枪遗传转化的研究[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.009]
　GAI Jiang-nan,ZHANG Bin-bin,WU Yao,et al.Screening of Soybean Genotypes Suitable for Suspension Culture with Adventitious Embryos and Genetic Transformation by Particle Bombardment[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(05):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.009]
[9]王鹏飞,刘丽君,唐晓飞,等.适于体细胞胚发生的大豆基因型筛选[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.010]
　WANG Peng-fei,LIU Li-jun,TANG Xiao-fei,et al.Screening of Soybean Genotypes Suitable for Somatic Embryogenesis[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(05):43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.010]
[10]刘德兴,年海,杨存义,等.耐酸铝大豆品种资源的筛选与鉴定[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.011]
　LIU De-xing,NIAN Hai,YANG Cun-yi,et al.Screening and Identifying Soybean Germplasm Tolerant to Acid Aluminum[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(05):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.011]
[11]孙明杰,魏玄,邹丹丹,等.大豆子叶节高频愈伤组织诱导及其植株再生[J].大豆科学,2011,30(04):546.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2011.04.0546]
　SUN Ming-jie,WEI Xuan,ZOU Dan-dan,et al.High Frequency Induction of Callus from Soybean Cotyledonary Node Explants and Its Plant Regeneration[J].Soybean Science,2011,30(05):546.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2011.04.0546]
[12]张庆林,赵艳,张艳,等.不同基因型大豆愈伤组织对农杆菌EHA105的敏感性研究[J].大豆科学,2011,30(04):566.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2011.04.0566]
　ZHANG Qing-lin,ZHAO Yan,ZHANG Yan,et al.Sensitivity of Different Genotype Soybean Callus to Agrobacterium EHA105[J].Soybean Science,2011,30(05):566.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2011.04.0566]
[13]葛正珍,杨光宇,仲艳,等.硼对大豆愈伤组织的细胞结构及形态的影响[J].大豆科学,2009,28(02):225.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.02.0225]
　GE Zheng-zhen,YANG Guang-yu,ZHONG Yan,et al.Effect of Boron on Cell Structure and Shape in Soybean(Glycine max)Callus[J].Soybean Science,2009,28(05):225.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.02.0225]
[14]李文霞,李文滨,吕文河,等.农杆菌介导大豆子叶节系统的两个问题突破[J].大豆科学,2008,27(01):173.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2008.01.0173]
　LI Wen-xia,LI Wen-bin,Lv Wen-he,et al.Breakthrough of Two Questions on the Agrobacterium-mediated Soybean Cotyledonary Node Systems[J].Soybean Science,2008,27(05):173.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2008.01.0173]
[15]张郁松.影响大豆愈伤组织的诱导因素研究[J].大豆科学,2007,26(01):66.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2007.01.015]
　ZHANG Yu-song.RESEARCH ON AFFECTIVE FACTOR OF SOYBEAN CALLUS INDUCTION[J].Soybean Science,2007,26(05):66.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2007.01.015]
[16]张郁松,寇炜材.大豆愈伤组织继代培养的最佳条件研究[J].大豆科学,2007,26(02):190.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2007.02.015]
　ZHANG Yu-song,KOU Wei-cai.RESEARCH ON THE OPTIMUM CONDITIONS FOR SOYBEAN CALLUS SUBCULTURE[J].Soybean Science,2007,26(05):190.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2007.02.015]

备注/Memo

收稿日期：2018-06-28

基金项目：国家重点研发计划（2017YFD0101500）；国家自然科学基金（31601321，31871645）。
第一作者简介：苏彤（1994-），女，硕士，主要从事豆类分子生物学研究。 E-mail：st_ajd@sjtu.edu.cn。
通讯作者：王彪（1973-），男，博士，副研究员，主要从事作物遗传育种与分子改良研究。E-mail：wangbiao@sjtu.edu.cn。

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-10-08