[1]牛宁,李占军,金素娟,等.大豆应答逆境胁迫的蛋白质组学研究进展[J].大豆科学,2016,35(02):330-336.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.02.0337]
　NIU Ning,LI Zhan-jun,JIN Su-juan,et al.Advances on Proteomics of Soybean under Stress[J].Soybean Science,2016,35(02):330-336.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.02.0337]
点击复制

大豆应答逆境胁迫的蛋白质组学研究进展

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S] 卷: 第35卷 期数: 2016年02期 页码: 330-336 栏目: 出版日期: 2016-03-20
Title:
Advances on Proteomics of Soybean under Stress
作者:
牛宁; 李占军; 金素娟; 赵璇; 赵春华; 王玉岭
石家庄市农林科学研究院，河北 石家庄 050041
Author(s):
NIU Ning;  LI Zhan-jun;  JIN Su-juan;  ZHAO Xuan;  ZHAO Chunhua;  WANG Yu-ling
Shijiazhuang Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050041, China
关键词:
大豆; 蛋白质组学; 逆境胁迫
Keywords:
Soybean;  Proteomics;  Stress
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.02.0337
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
文章对近年来国内外科研人员应用蛋白质组学技术研究大豆应答逆境胁迫的相关成果进行总结归纳，综述了大豆抗逆蛋白质组学研究的最新进展，并对大豆抗逆蛋白质组学研究今后的发展方向进行了展望，以期为进一步开展大豆抗逆蛋白质组学研究提供参考与借鉴。
Abstract:
Based on recent achievements of proteomics application in soybean under stress at home and abroad, this paper reviewed advances on proteomics in soybean under stress and provided a new perspective of future development of soybean proteomics in future. The main aim was to supply useful information so as to promote the development of soybean proteomics under stress in China

参考文献/References:

［1］Yin X J, Sakata K, Komatsu S.Phosphoproteomics reveals the effect of ethylene in soybean root under flooding stress ［J］. Journal of Proteome Research, 2014, 13(12): 5618-5634.

［2］Mustafa G, Komatsu S.Quantitative proteomics reveals the effect of protein glycosylation in soybean root under flooding stress ［J］.Frontiers in Plant Science, 2014, 5: 627.
［3］Oh M W, Nanjo Y, Komatsu S. Gel-free proteomic analysis of soybean root proteins affected by calcium under flooding stress［J］. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2014, 5: 559.
［4］Oh M W, Nanjo Y, Komatsu S. Analysis of soybean root proteins affected by gibberellic acid treatment under flooding stress ［J］. Protein and Peptide Letters, 2014, 21(9): 911-947.
［5］Yin X J, Sakata K, Nanjo Y, et al. Analysis of initial changes in the proteins of soybean root tip under flooding stress using gel-free and gel-based proteomic techniques ［J］.Journal of Proteomics, 2014, 106: 1-16.
［6］Oh M W, Nanjo Y, Komatsu S. Identification of nuclear proteins in soybean under flooding stress using proteomic technique ［J］. Protein and Peptide Letters, 2014, 21(5): 458-467.
［7］Nanjo Y, Jang H Y, Kim H S, et al.Analyses of flooding tolerance of soybean varieties at emergence and varietal differences in their proteomes ［J］. Phytochemistry, 2014, 106: 25-36.
［8］Komatsu S, Nakamura T, Sugimoto Y, et al. Proteomic and metabolomic analyses of soybean root tips under flooding stress ［J］.Protein and Peptide Letters, 2014, 21(9): 865-884.
［9］Komatsu S, Han C, Nanjo Y, et al.Label-free quantitative proteomic analysis of abscisic acid effect in early-stage soybean under flooding［J］.Journal of Proteome Research, 2013, 12 (11): 4769-4784.
［10］Komatsu S, Nanjo Y, Nishimura M.Proteomic analysis of the flooding tolerance mechanism in mutant soybean［J］. Journal of Proteomics, 2013, 79: 231-250.
［11］Nanjo Y, Nakamura T, Komatsu S. Identification of indicator proteins associated with flooding injury in soybean seedlings using label-free quantitative proteomics［J］. Journal of Proteome Research, 2013, 12 (11): 4785-4798.
［12］Khatoon A, Rehman S, Oh W M, et al.Analysis of response mechanism in soybean under low oxygen and flooding stresses using gel-base proteomics technique［J］. Molecular Biology Reports, 2012, 39:10581-10594.
［13］Salavati A, Khatoon A, Nanjo Y, et al.Analysis of proteomic changes in roots of soybean seedlings during recovery after flooding［J］. Journal of Proteomics, 2012, 75: 878-893.
［14］Khatoon A, Rehman S, Hiraga S, et al. Organ-specific proteomics analysis for identification of response mechanism in soybean seedlings under flooding stress［J］. Journal of Proteomics, 2012, 75: 5706-5723.
［15］Komatsu S, Makino T, Yasue H. Proteomic and biochemical analyses of the cotyledon and root of flooding-stressed soybean plants［J］.PLoS One, 2013, 8(6): e65301.
［16］Nanjo Y, Skultety L, Uvácˇková L, et al.Mass spectrometry-based analysis of proteomic changes in the root tips of flooded soybean seedlings［J］. Journal of Proteome Research, 2012, 11(1): 372-385.
［17］Khatoon A, Rehman S, Salavati A, et al. A comparative proteomics analysis in roots of soybean to compatible symbiotic bacteria under flooding stress［J］.Amino Acids, 2012, 43:2513-2525.
［18］Alam I, Sharmin S A, Kim K H, et al. Comparative proteomic approach to identify proteins involved in flooding combined with salinity stress in soybean［J］. Plant Soil, 2011, 346:45-62.
［19］Komatsu S, Thibaut D, Hiraga S, et al. Characterization of a novel flooding stress-responsive alcohol dehydrogenase expressed in soybean roots［J］. Plant Molecular Biology, 2011, 77:309-322.
［20］Komatsu S, Kuji R, Nanjo Y, et al. Comprehensive analysis of endoplasmic reticulum-enriched fraction in root tips of soybean under flooding stress using proteomics techniques［J］.Journal of Proteomics, 2012, 77: 531-560.
［21］Komatsu S, Yamamoto A, Nakamura T, et al. Comprehensive analysis of mitochondria in roots and hypocotyls of soybean under flooding stress using proteomics and metabolomics techniques［J］. Journal of Proteome Research, 2011, 10: 3993-4004.
［22］Mohammadi P P, Moieni A, Hiraga S, et al. Organ-specific proteomic analysis of drought-stressed soybean seedlings［J］ Journal of Proteomics, 2012, 75: 1906-1923.
［23］Gil-Quintana E, Larrainzar E, Seminario A, et al. Local inhibition of nitrogen fixation and nodule metabolism in drought-stressed soybean［J］. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2013, 64(8): 2171-2182,?
［24］Hakeem K R, Khan F, Chandna R, et al. Genotypic variability among soybean genotypes under NaCl stress and proteome analysis of salt-tolerant genotype［J］.Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2012, 168: 2309-2329.
［25］Ma H Y, Song L R, Shu Y J, et al.Comparative proteomic analysis of seedling leaves of different salt tolerant soybean genotypes［J］. Journal of Proteomics, 2012, 75: 1529-1546.
［26］Ma H Y, Song L R, Huang Z G, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis reveals molecular mechanism of seedling roots of different salt tolerant soybean genotypes in responses to salinity stress ［J］. EuPA Open Proteomics, 2014, 4: 40-57.［27］Ahsan N, Donnart T, Nouri M Z, et al. Tissue-specific defense and thermo-adaptive mechanisms of soybean seedlings under heat stress revealed by proteomic approach［J］. Journal of Proteome Research, 2010, 9(8): 4189-4204.［28］Wang L Q, Ma H, Song L R, et al. Comparative proteomics analysis reveals the mechanism of pre-harvest seed deterioration of soybean under high temperature and humidity stress［J］. Journal of Proteomics, 2012, 75: 2109-2127.［29］Tian X, Liu Y, Huang Z G, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of seedling leaves of cold-tolerant and sensitive spring soybean cultivars［J］. Molecular Biology Reports, 2014, 42(3): 581-601.
［30］Swigonska S, Weidner S.Proteomic analysis of response to long-term continuous stress in roots of germinating soybean seeds［J］. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2013, 170: 470-479.
［31］Hossain Z, Hajika M, Komatsu S.Comparative proteome analysis of high and low cadmium accumulating soybeans under cadmium stress［J］.Amino Acids, 2012, 43: 2393-2416.
［32］Hossain Z, Makino T, Komatsu S. Proteomic study of β-aminobutyric acid-mediated cadmium stress alleviation in soybean［J］.Journal of Proteomics, 2012, 75(13): 4151-4164.
［33］Duressa D, Soliman K, Taylor R, et al. Proteomic analysis of soybean roots under aluminum stress［J］. International Journal of Plant Genomics, 2011, 282531.
［34］Chen Z J, Cui Q Q, Liang C Y, et al. Identification of differentially expressed proteins in soybean nodules under phosphorus deficiency through proteomic analysis［J］.Proteomics, 2011, 11: 4648-4659.
［35］Galant A, Koester R P, Ainsworth E A, et al. From climate change to molecular response: Redox proteomics of ozoneinduced responses in soybean［J］. New Phytologist, 2012, 194: 220-229.
［36］Yang H, Huang Y P, Zhi H J, et al. Proteomicsbased analysis of novel genes involved in response toward soybean mosaic virus infection［J］. Molecular Biology Reports, 2011, 38:511-521.
［37］Wang Y, Yuan X Z, Hu H, et al. Proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins in resistant soybean leaves after Phakopsora pachyrhizi infection［J］. Journal of Phytopathol, 2012, 160:554-560.
［38］Zhang Y M, Zhao J M, Xiang Y, et al. Proteomics study of changes in soybean lines resistant and sensitive to Phytophthora sojae［J］.Proteome Science, 2011, 9:52
［39］Timbo R V, Hermes-Lima M, Silva L P, et al. Biochemical aspects of the soybean response to herbivory injury by the brown stink bug Euschistus heros (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) ［J］. PLoS One, 2014, 9(10): e109735.
［40］Liu D W, Chen L J, Duan Y X.Differential proteomic analysis of the resistant soybean infected by soybean cyst nematode, Heterodera glycines Race 3［J］. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2011, 3(4): 160-167.
［41］Fan R, Wang H, Wang Y L, et al. Proteomic analysis of soybean defense response induced by cotton worm (prodenia litura, fabricius) feeding［J］.Proteome Science, 2012, 10:16.
［42］Schmutz J, Cannon S B，Schlueter J，et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean［J］. Nature, 2010, 463: 178-183.［43］Yu S, Zhang X, Guan Q, et al.Expression of a carbonic anhydrase gene is induced by environmental stresses in rice (Oryza sativa L)［J］.Biotechnology Letters, 2007, 29: 89-94.
［44］Feng L L, Han Y J, Liu G, et al. Overexpression of sedoheptulose1,7-bisphosphatase enhances photosynthesis and growth under salt stress in transgenic rice plants［J］.Functional Plant Biology, 2007, 34: 822-834.
［45］Gupta A S, Webb R P, Holaday A S, et al.Overexpression of superoxide sismutase protects plants from oxidative stress (induction of ascorbate peroxidase in superoxide dismutaseoverexpressing plants)［J］. Plant Physiology, 1993, 103: 1067-1073.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘章雄,李卫东,孙石,等.1983～2010年北京大豆育成品种的亲本地理来源及其遗传贡献[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.002]
　LIU Zhang-xiong,LI Wei-dong,SUN Shi,et al.Geographical Sources of Germplasm and Their Nuclear Contribution to Soybean Cultivars Released during 1983 to 2010 in Beijing[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(02):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.002]
[2]李彩云,余永亮,杨红旗,等.大豆脂质转运蛋白基因GmLTP3的特征分析[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.003]
　LI Cai-yun,YU Yong-liang,YANG Hong-qi,et al.Characteristics of a Lipid-transfer Protein Gene GmLTP3 in Glycine max[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(02):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.003]
[3]王明霞,崔晓霞,薛晨晨,等.大豆耐盐基因GmHAL3a的克隆及RNAi载体的构建[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.004]
　WANG Ming-xia,CUI Xiao-xia,XUE Chen-chen,et al.Cloning of Halotolerance 3 Gene and Construction of Its RNAi Vector in Soybean (Glycine max)[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(02):12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.004]
[4]张春宝,李玉秋,彭宝,等.线粒体ISSR与SCAR标记鉴定大豆细胞质雄性不育系与保持系[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.005]
　ZHANG Chun-bao,LI Yu-qiu,PENG Bao,et al.Identification of Soybean Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Line and Maintainer Line with Mitochondrial ISSR and SCAR Markers[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(02):19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.005]
[5]卢清瑶,赵琳,李冬梅,等.RAV基因对拟南芥和大豆不定芽再生的影响[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.006]
　LU Qing-yao,ZHAO Lin,LI Dong-mei,et al.Effects of RAV gene on Shoot Regeneration of Arabidopsis and Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(02):23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.006]
[6]杜景红,刘丽君.大豆fad3c基因沉默载体的构建[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.007]
　DU Jing-hong,LIU Li-jun.Construction of fad3c Gene Silencing Vector in Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(02):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.007]
[7]张力伟,樊颖伦,牛腾飞,等.大豆“冀黄13”突变体筛选及突变体库的建立[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.008]
　ZHANG Li-wei,FAN Ying-lun,NIU Teng-fei?,et al.Screening of Mutants and Construction of Mutant Population for Soybean Cultivar "Jihuang13”[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(02):33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.008]
[8]盖江南,张彬彬,吴瑶,等.大豆不定胚悬浮培养基因型筛选及基因枪遗传转化的研究[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.009]
　GAI Jiang-nan,ZHANG Bin-bin,WU Yao,et al.Screening of Soybean Genotypes Suitable for Suspension Culture with Adventitious Embryos and Genetic Transformation by Particle Bombardment[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(02):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.009]
[9]王鹏飞,刘丽君,唐晓飞,等.适于体细胞胚发生的大豆基因型筛选[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.010]
　WANG Peng-fei,LIU Li-jun,TANG Xiao-fei,et al.Screening of Soybean Genotypes Suitable for Somatic Embryogenesis[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(02):43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.010]
[10]刘德兴,年海,杨存义,等.耐酸铝大豆品种资源的筛选与鉴定[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.011]
　LIU De-xing,NIAN Hai,YANG Cun-yi,et al.Screening and Identifying Soybean Germplasm Tolerant to Acid Aluminum[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(02):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.011]
[11]刘春,麻浩,刘健晖,等.大豆蛋白质组学研究进展[J].大豆科学,2010,29(04):712.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2010.04.0712]
　LIU Chun,MA Hao,LIU Jian-hui,et al.Advances in Soybean Proteomics[J].Soybean Science,2010,29(02):712.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2010.04.0712]
[12]赫卫,姜振峰,赵琳,等.不同光长条件下大豆蛋白质组比较研究[J].大豆科学,2009,28(03):388.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.03.0388]
　HE Wei,JIANG Zhen-feng,ZHAO Lin,et al.A Comparative Study on Soybean Leaf Proteomics under Different Photoperiod Treatments[J].Soybean Science,2009,28(02):388.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.03.0388]

备注/Memo

基金项目：河北省自然科学基金（C2015106059）。

第一作者简介：牛宁（1980-），男，博士，助理研究员，主要从事大豆遗传育种与蛋白质组学研究。E-mail: niuning1980@163.com。
通讯作者：王玉岭（1957-），男，研究员，主要从事大豆遗传育种与栽培研究。E-mail: wangyuling0313@163.com。

更新日期/Last Update: 2016-04-04