[1]申宏波,姚文秋,于永梅,等.不同类型生物农药对大豆疫霉根腐病的防治效果[J].大豆科学,2011,30(06):1054-1056.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2011.06.1054]
　SHEN Hong-bo,YAO Wen-qiu,YU Yong-mei,et al.Control Efficiency of Different Biopesticides on Soybean Phytophthora Root Rot[J].Soybean Science,2011,30(06):1054-1056.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2011.06.1054]
点击复制

不同类型生物农药对大豆疫霉根腐病的防治效果

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S] 卷: 第30卷 期数: 2011年06期 页码: 1054-1056 栏目: 出版日期: 2011-12-25
Title:
Control Efficiency of Different Biopesticides on Soybean Phytophthora Root Rot
文章编号:
1000-9841（2011）06-1054-03
作者:
申宏波1; 姚文秋1; 于永梅1; 丁俊杰2; 顾鑫2; 杨晓贺2; 赵海红2 ; 文景芝3
1.黑龙江农业职业技术学院，黑龙江 佳木斯 154007；
2.黑龙江省农业科学院 佳木斯分院，农业部佳木斯作物有害生物科学观测实验站，黑龙江 佳木斯 154007；
3.东北农业大学 农学院，黑龙江 哈尔滨 150030
Author(s):
SHEN Hong-bo1; YAO Wen-qiu1; YU Yong-mei1; DING Jun-jie2; GU Xin2; YANG Xiao-he2; ZHAO Hai-hong2; WEN Jing-zhi3
1.Heilongjiang Agricultural College of Vocational Technology，Jiamusi 154007;
2.Ministry of Agriculture Harmful Biology of Crop Scientific Monitoring Station Jiamusi Experiment Station,Jiamusi Branch of Heilongjiang Academy of Agriculture Sciences,Jiamusi 154007;
3.College of Agriculture，Northeast Agricultural University，Harbin 150030,Heilongjiang，China
关键词:
生物农药; 大豆疫霉根腐病; Harpins蛋白; 防治效果
Keywords:
Biopesticide;  Soybean Phytophthora root rot; Harpins protein; Control efficiency
分类号:
S565.1
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2011.06.1054
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
对Harpins蛋白、B5、G3、嗜线虫杆菌、蜡介轮支菌菌土、“818”发酵液和恩益碧种衣剂7种不同类型生物农药对大豆疫霉根腐病的防治效果进行了比较，结果表明：以南京农业大学提供的Harpins 蛋白在使用浓度为45 mg·L-1时防治效果最好，大豆疫霉根腐病的平均发病率仅为0.12%，防治效果达到75%，平均产量比对照增加7%。其次是中国农业科学院生物防治所提供的“818”发酵液，防治效果达到58.3%。45 mg·L-1Harpins蛋白、“818”发酵液防效与对照的差异均达极显著水平。
Abstract:
The control effects of seven different types of biological pesticide on soybean Phytophthora root rot were compared in this research. The incidence and prevention efficiency of phytophthora root rat, as well as soybean yield were determined. The results showed that 45 mg·L-1Harpins protein from Nanjing Agricultural University had the best control effect，the average incidence of Phytophthora root rot of was 0.12%，the prevention effect reached 75% and average yield was 7% higher than CK.The second was “818” fermentation liquid provided by the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,the prevention effect reached 58.3%.The control effect of 45 mg·L-1 Harpins protein and “818” fermentation liquid were extremely significant different with CK.

参考文献/References:

[1]朱振东.大豆疫霉根腐病的发生和防治研究进展[J].植保技术与推广，2002,22(7):40-42.(Zhu Z D.Study on the occurrence and control of progress of Phytophthora sojae[J].Plant Protection Technology and Extension，2002，22(7):40-42.)

[2]李熙英，黄世臣，韩明月，等.延边地区大豆疫霉根腐病的发生及其防治[J].延边大学农学学报，2005,27(4)：258-260.(Li X Y，Huang S C，Han M Y.Occur & cure and prevention of quarantine disease-root rot of soybean caused by phytophthora in Yanbian area[J].Journal of Agricultural Science Yanbian University，2005，27(4):258-260.)

[3]Hildebrand A A.A root and stalk rot caused by P.me.var.sojae[J].Canadian Journal of Botany，1959，37：927-957.

[4]Jee H J，Kim W G，Cho W D，et al.Occurance of Phytophthora root rot on soybean and identification of the causal fungus[J].RAD Journal of Crop Protection，1998，40：16-22.

[5]Pegg K G，Kochman J K，Vock N T.Root and stem rot of soybean caused by Phytophthora megasperma var.sojae in Australia[ J].Australasian Plant Pathology，1980，9：15.

[6]沈崇尧，苏彦纯.中国大豆疫霉菌的发现及初步研究[J].植物病理学报,1991,21(4):298.(Shen C Y，Su Y C.Discovery and preliminary studies of Phytophthora megasperma on soybean in China[J].Acta Phytopathologica Sinica，1991，21(4):298.

[7]韩晓增，何志鸿，张增敏.大豆主要病虫害防治技术[J].大豆通报，1998(6):5-6.(Han X Z,He Z H,Zhang Z M.Prevention and control technology of soybean main disease[J].Soybean Bulletin，1998(6):5-6.

[8]许修宏，曲娟娟，张喜萍，等.大豆疫霉根腐病研究进展[J].东北农业大学学报,2003,34(4):368-371.(Xu X H，Qu J J，Zhang X P，et al.Progress of research on Phytophthora root rot[J].Journal of Northeast Agricultural University，2003，34(4)：368-371.)

[9]马淑梅.Harpin防治大豆灰斑病效果的研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2007(6):51-52.(Ma S M.Stuy on prevention and cure effect of Harpin for soybean frogeye leaf spot[J].Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences,2007(6):51-52.)

[10]仝赞华，马淑梅，王昌家，等.到AS818 生防菌剂防大豆根腐病田间效果评价[C].第三届全国绿色环保农药新技术、新产品交流会暨第二届全国生物农药研讨会，2004：397-401.(Tong Z H，Ma S M,Wang C J, etal.Field efficacy evaluation of AS818 biocontrol fungicide on soybean root rot[C].The third national green pesticide new technology，new products and exchange of the second National Symposium of biological pesticide,2004:397-401.)

[11]叶廷峰，陈美华.美国农业高科技产品NEB（恩益碧）在农业上的应用[J].现代农业科技,2007(14):93.(Ye T F，Chen M H.The United States agricultural high-tech products NEB application in agriculture[J].Modern Agricultural Sciences and Technology,2007(14):93.)


相似文献/References:

[1]韩英鹏,程 章,赵 雪,等.大豆花叶病毒病和疫霉根腐病抗性的SSR标记辅助鉴定[J].大豆科学,2013,32(06):740.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.06.0740]
[2]程鹏,徐鹏飞,范素杰,等.野生大豆接种大豆疫霉根腐病菌后过氧化物酶（POD）活性变化[J].大豆科学,2013,32(02):197.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.02.013]
　CHENG Peng,XU Peng-fei,FAN Su-jie,et al.Response of POD Activity in Glycine soja ?Inoculated by Phytophthora sojae[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(06):197.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.02.013]
[3]韩英鹏,赵 雪,李修平,等.大豆种质对花叶病毒病和疫霉根腐病抗病性的SSR标记辅助鉴定[J].大豆科学,2014,33(01):27.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2014.01.0027]
　HAN Yingpeng,ZHAO Xue,LI Xiuping,et al.SSR Identification of Soybean Cultivar with Resistance to Soybean Mosaic Virus and Phytophthpra Root Rot[J].Soybean Science,2014,33(06):27.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2014.01.0027]
[4]程莹鑫,梁吉利,刘庆莉,等.疫霉根腐病菌毒素对大豆不同组织中总多酚含量的影响[J].大豆科学,2014,33(04):524.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2014.04.0524]
　CHENG Ying-xin,LIANG Ji-li,LIU Qing-li,et al.Changes of Total Polyphenol Content in Soybean Treated by Pathotoxin Produced by Phytophthora sojae[J].Soybean Science,2014,33(06):524.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2014.04.0524]
[5]张淑珍,靳立梅,徐鹏飞,等.野生大豆接种大豆疫霉根腐病后苯丙氨酸解氨酶（PAL）活性的变化[J].大豆科学,2009,28(06):1044.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.06.1044]
　ZHANG Shu-zhen,JIN Li-mei,XU Peng-fei,et al.Response of PAL Activity to Phytophthora sojae Inoculation in Glycine soja[J].Soybean Science,2009,28(06):1044.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.06.1044]
[6]任龙翚,张宝强,武晓玲,等.大豆种质对大豆疫霉菌株Pm8的抗性分析[J].大豆科学,2010,29(01):77.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2010.01.0077]
　REN Long-hui,ZHANG Bao-qiang,WU Xiao-ing,et al.Resistance of Soybean Germplasm to Phytophthora sojae Pm8[J].Soybean Science,2010,29(06):77.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2010.01.0077]
[7]徐鹏飞,吴俊江,范素杰,等.大豆疫霉根腐病菌的分离鉴定及种质资源对3号生理小种的抗性评价[J].大豆科学,2010,29(02):272.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2010.02.0272]
　XU Peng-fei,WU Jun-jiang,FAN Su-jie,et al.Isolation of Phytophthora sojae and Identification of Resistance to Race 3 in Soybean Germplasm[J].Soybean Science,2010,29(06):272.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2010.02.0272]
[8]马淑梅,金娜,邵红涛.黑龙江省大豆疫霉根腐病菌毒力类型分布及品种抗性评价[J].大豆科学,2010,29(03):466.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2010.03.0466]
　MA Shu-mei,JIN Na,SHAO Hong-tao.Virulence Distribution and Cultivars Resistance Evaluation of Phytophthora Megasperma in Heilongjiang Province[J].Soybean Science,2010,29(06):466.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2010.03.0466]
[9]任海龙,宋恩亮,马启彬,等.南方三省（区）抗大豆疫霉根腐病野生大豆资源的筛选[J].大豆科学,2010,29(06):1012.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2010.06.1012]
　REN Hai-long,SONG En-liang,MA Qi-bin,et al.Screening for Resistance Sources to Phytophthora Root Rot in Glycine soja from Three Provinces of Southern China[J].Soybean Science,2010,29(06):1012.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2010.06.1012]
[10]于安亮,徐鹏飞,陈晨,等.大豆疫霉根腐病子叶接种法抗病性鉴定[J].大豆科学,2009,28(05):879.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.05.0879]
　YU An-liang,XU Peng-fei,CHEN Chen,et al.Screening on Soybean Resistance to Phytophthora sojae using Cotyledon Inoculation Method[J].Soybean Science,2009,28(06):879.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.05.0879]

备注/Memo

基金项目：黑龙江省教育厅高职高专院校科研资助项目(11555059)；黑龙江省科技计划项目（GA09B103-9）；公益性行业（农业）科研专项（201103015）。

第一作者简介：申宏波（1974-），女，硕士，副教授，研究方向为大豆病害。E-mail：shenhongbo708@126.com。
通讯作者：丁俊杰（1974-），男，博士，副研究员，研究方向为大豆病虫害。E-mail：me999@126.com。

更新日期/Last Update: 2014-08-18