[1]李俐俐,刘天学,赵霞.大豆种子萌发期对渗透胁迫的响应[J].大豆科学,2007,26(04):550-554.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2007.04.019]
　LI Li-li,LIU Tian-xue,ZHAO Xia.RESPONSE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES TO OSMOTIC STRESS AT GERMINATION STAGE[J].Soybean Science,2007,26(04):550-554.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2007.04.019]
点击复制

大豆种子萌发期对渗透胁迫的响应

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S] 卷: 第26卷 期数: 2007年04期 页码: 550-554 栏目: 出版日期: 2007-08-25
Title:
RESPONSE OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES TO OSMOTIC STRESS AT GERMINATION STAGE
文章编号:
1000-9841(2007)04-0550-05
作者:
李俐俐1; 刘天学1; 2; 赵霞2
1. 周口师范学院生命科学系，周口 466000；
2.河南农业大学农学院，郑州 450002
Author(s):
LI Li-li1; LIU Tian-xue1; 2; ZHAO Xia2
1Department of Life Science，Zhoukou Normal University，Zhoukou 466000;
?2College of Agronomy，Henan Agricultural University，Zhengzhou 450002
关键词:
大豆; 萌发期; 渗透胁迫; 隶属函数
Keywords:
Soybean (Glycine max(L) Merr);  Germination stage;  Osmotic stress;  Subordinate function value
分类号:
S565.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2007.04.019
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在PEG模拟干旱条件下，研究了五种大豆种子萌发期对渗透胁迫的响应。结果发现，在25%(W/V)聚乙二醇（PEG6000）渗透胁迫环境中，五种大豆种子吸水率为豫豆26>豫豆22>地神2>中黄20>周C-4-1。在15%(W/V)PEG6000渗透胁迫下，五种大豆种子的发芽势和发芽率均显著下降，但相对发芽势除周C-4-1较低外，其余四种无显著差异；相对发芽率除周C-4-1和中黄20较低外，其余三种无显著差异。渗透胁迫有利于大豆种子胚根的生长，而抑制下胚轴的生长，在豫豆26、豫豆22和地神2表现得尤为显著。用隶属函数法对五种大豆萌发期抗旱性的综合评价结果表明，豫豆22和豫豆26属强抗旱型，地神2属较强抗旱型，中黄20的抗旱能力中等，周C-4-1则属干旱敏感型。
Abstract:
Response of five soybean varieties to polyethylene glycol (PEG) osmotic stress at germination stage was investigated.The sequence of inhale water rate of five soybean varieties，under 25%(W/V)PEG-6000 osmotic stress，was Yudou 26 >Yudou 22 >Dishen 2 >Zhonghuang 20 >Zhou C-4-1.The germination energy and germination rate of five soybean varieties decreased significantly (P<0.05) under 15%(W/V)PEG-6000 osmotic stress，but the relative germination energy，except Zhou C-4-1，were no evident difference among the rest soybean varieties.The relative germination rate，except Zhou C-4-1 and Zhonghuang 20，were not markedly different among the rest soybean varieties.And the results showed that osmotic stress was in favor of radicle growth，but against hypocotyls growth，which were especially notable in Yudou 26，Yudou 22 and Dishen 2.The comprehensive evaluation on drought-resistance of five soybean varieties at germination stage was given based on subordinate function values analysis.The results suggested that Yudou 22 and Yudou 26 were high-drought-tolerant，followed by Dishen 2; Zhonghuang 20 is mid-drought-tolerant，while Zhou C-4-1 was drought-sensitive.

参考文献/References:

［1］汤章城.植物对渗透和淹水胁迫的适应机理见：余叔文，汤章城主编.植物生理和分子生物学[M].北京：科学出版社，1998，739－751.

［2］康绍忠.新的农业科技革命与21世纪我国节水农业的发展[J].干旱地区农业研究，1998，17(1)：11-17.
［3］杨鹏辉，李贵全，郭丽，等.干旱胁迫对不同抗旱大豆品种花荚期质膜透性的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究，2003，2l(3)：127-130.
［4］孙祖东，陈怀珠，杨守臻等.大豆抗旱性研究进展[J]大豆科学，2001，20（3）：224－225.
［5］吴伟，陈学珍，谢皓，等.干旱胁迫下大豆抗旱性鉴定[J]分子植物育种，2005， 3（2）：188－194.
［6］刘学义.大豆抗旱性鉴定与指标的综合评价[J].中国油料，1986，（4）：23－26.
［7］谢甫绨，董钻，刘宛，等.渗透胁迫下大豆抗旱机理的初步研究[J].沈阳农业大学学报，1995，26（1）：8-12.
［8］Liu F L，Andersen M N，Jensen C R.Root signal controls pod growth in drought -stressed soybean during the critical，abortion-sensitive phase of pod development[J].Field Crops Research，2004，85：159-166.
［9］Hudak C M，Patterson R P.Root distribution and soil moisture depletion pattern of a drought-resistant soybean plant introduction[J].Agron Journal，1996 ，(88)：478-486.
［10］Hoogenboom G M，Huck C M，Peterson R P.Root growth rate of soybean as affected by drought stress[J].Agron Journal，1987，79：607-614.
［11］Garay A F，Wilhelm W W.Root system characteristics of two soybean isolines undergoing water stress conditions[J].Agron Journal ，1983 ，75 (6)：973-977.
［12］Hudak C M，Patterson R P.Vegetative growth analysis of a drought-resistant soybean plant introduction[J].Crop Science，1995 ，35:464-471.
［13］岳爱琴，杜维俊，赵晋忠，等.不同大豆品种抗旱性的研究[J].山西农业大学学报，2005，25（2）：157-160.
［14］张海燕，焦碧婵，李贵全.大豆抗旱性鉴定指标评价的研究[J].大豆科学，2005，24（3）：183-188.
［15］张海燕，李贵全.大豆抗旱性与生理生态指标关系的研究[J].中国农学通报，2005，21（8）：140-142.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘章雄,李卫东,孙石,等.1983～2010年北京大豆育成品种的亲本地理来源及其遗传贡献[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.002]
　LIU Zhang-xiong,LI Wei-dong,SUN Shi,et al.Geographical Sources of Germplasm and Their Nuclear Contribution to Soybean Cultivars Released during 1983 to 2010 in Beijing[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(04):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.002]
[2]李彩云,余永亮,杨红旗,等.大豆脂质转运蛋白基因GmLTP3的特征分析[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.003]
　LI Cai-yun,YU Yong-liang,YANG Hong-qi,et al.Characteristics of a Lipid-transfer Protein Gene GmLTP3 in Glycine max[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(04):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.003]
[3]王明霞,崔晓霞,薛晨晨,等.大豆耐盐基因GmHAL3a的克隆及RNAi载体的构建[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.004]
　WANG Ming-xia,CUI Xiao-xia,XUE Chen-chen,et al.Cloning of Halotolerance 3 Gene and Construction of Its RNAi Vector in Soybean (Glycine max)[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(04):12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.004]
[4]张春宝,李玉秋,彭宝,等.线粒体ISSR与SCAR标记鉴定大豆细胞质雄性不育系与保持系[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.005]
　ZHANG Chun-bao,LI Yu-qiu,PENG Bao,et al.Identification of Soybean Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Line and Maintainer Line with Mitochondrial ISSR and SCAR Markers[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(04):19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.005]
[5]卢清瑶,赵琳,李冬梅,等.RAV基因对拟南芥和大豆不定芽再生的影响[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.006]
　LU Qing-yao,ZHAO Lin,LI Dong-mei,et al.Effects of RAV gene on Shoot Regeneration of Arabidopsis and Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(04):23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.006]
[6]杜景红,刘丽君.大豆fad3c基因沉默载体的构建[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.007]
　DU Jing-hong,LIU Li-jun.Construction of fad3c Gene Silencing Vector in Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(04):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.007]
[7]张力伟,樊颖伦,牛腾飞,等.大豆“冀黄13”突变体筛选及突变体库的建立[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.008]
　ZHANG Li-wei,FAN Ying-lun,NIU Teng-fei?,et al.Screening of Mutants and Construction of Mutant Population for Soybean Cultivar "Jihuang13”[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(04):33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.008]
[8]盖江南,张彬彬,吴瑶,等.大豆不定胚悬浮培养基因型筛选及基因枪遗传转化的研究[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.009]
　GAI Jiang-nan,ZHANG Bin-bin,WU Yao,et al.Screening of Soybean Genotypes Suitable for Suspension Culture with Adventitious Embryos and Genetic Transformation by Particle Bombardment[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(04):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.009]
[9]王鹏飞,刘丽君,唐晓飞,等.适于体细胞胚发生的大豆基因型筛选[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.010]
　WANG Peng-fei,LIU Li-jun,TANG Xiao-fei,et al.Screening of Soybean Genotypes Suitable for Somatic Embryogenesis[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(04):43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.010]
[10]刘德兴,年海,杨存义,等.耐酸铝大豆品种资源的筛选与鉴定[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.011]
　LIU De-xing,NIAN Hai,YANG Cun-yi,et al.Screening and Identifying Soybean Germplasm Tolerant to Acid Aluminum[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(04):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.011]
[11]张兆宁,李江辉,赵怡宇,等.不同程度盐胁迫下大豆萌发期耐盐性鉴定[J].大豆科学,2023,42(03):335.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2023.03.0335]
[12]李阳阳,董岭超,王英男,等.东北地区大豆种质资源萌发期耐盐性鉴定[J].大豆科学,2024,43(04):431.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.10009841.2024.04.0431]
[13]孙晓环,等.播期和萌发期冷处理对不同耐低温性大豆生态性状的影响[J].大豆科学,2025,(01):61.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2025.01.0061]

备注/Memo

基金项目：河南省教育厅自然科学基金（2006210010）

作者简介：李俐俐（1973-），女，讲师，硕士，主要从事植物生理教学与研究。
通讯作者： E-mail：fxcs@zknu.edu.cn；Tel：0371-63555687.

更新日期/Last Update: 2014-10-20