[1]曹帅,杜仲阳,向殿军,等.18份大豆品种耐盐碱性筛选与综合鉴定[J].大豆科学,2019,38(03):344-352.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2019.03.0344]
　CAO Shuai,DU Zhong-yang,XIANG Dian-jun,et al.Salt and Alkaline Tolerance Screening and Comprehensive Identification of Eighteen Soybean Varieties[J].Soybean Science,2019,38(03):344-352.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2019.03.0344]
点击复制

18份大豆品种耐盐碱性筛选与综合鉴定

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S] 卷: 第38卷 期数: 2019年03期 页码: 344-352 栏目: 出版日期: 2019-05-20
Title:
Salt and Alkaline Tolerance Screening and Comprehensive Identification of Eighteen Soybean Varieties
作者:
（1.内蒙古民族大学 农学院，内蒙古 通辽 028042；2.山西中医药大学 制药与食品工程学院，山西 晋中 030619）
Author(s):
（1.Agricultural College of Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities，Tongliao 028000，China；2.College of Pharmaceutical and Food Engineering，Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine，Jinzhong 030619， China）
关键词:
大豆; 盐碱胁迫; 隶属函数; 主成分分析
Keywords:
Soybean;  Saline-alkali stress;  Membership function;  Principal component analysis
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2019.03.0344
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
采用水培方法，用60 mmol?L-1混合盐（NaHCO3∶Na2CO3的摩尔比为9∶1）溶液，对18份大豆品种的幼苗进行盐碱胁迫。处理7 d后，测定株高、茎粗、叶面积、主根长、地上干重、净光合速率（Pn）、胞间CO2浓度（Ci）、蒸腾速率（Tr）和气孔导度（Gs）等指标，通过主成分分析法和模糊数学隶属函数法对18份大豆品种进行耐盐碱性综合评价，并进行聚类分析，筛选出相对耐盐碱的大豆品种，从而为盐碱地大豆品种的应用提供理论依据。结果表明：经主成分分析，株高、主根长和净光合速率（Pn）的负荷量最大，可作为衡量大豆耐盐碱性与品种筛选的主要指标。不同品种大豆材料经过模糊数学隶属函数法进行耐盐碱性排序，品种间耐盐碱性表现出明显差异，最后通过聚类分析，18份大豆品种可以被分为三大类，其中杂交豆5号等4个品种为耐盐碱品种，吉育611和吉育299等11个品种为中等耐盐碱品种，吉育256和东农63为盐碱敏感品种。
Abstract:
Under hydroponic conditions, the seedlings of eighteen soybean varieties were treated with water containing 60 mmol?L-1 mixed salt (NaHCO3 and Na2CO3 with the molar ratio of 9∶1).To evaluate the saline-alkali tolerance of different soybean varieties, conduct cluster analysis and provid theoretical basis for the utilization of soybean in saline-alkali land, the indexes of plant height, stem diameter, leaf area, main root length, dry weight above ground, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci), transpiration rate (Tr) and stomatal conductance (Gs)were measured after 7 d stress treatment, and the principal component analysis and membership function of fuzzy mathematics were conducted. The results showed that the factor loadings of plant height, main root length and net photosynthetic rate (Pn) indexes were the largest by principal component analysis, which could be used as the main identification indicators for the selection of salt and alkali tolerant soybean varieties. Varieties were sorted according to the membership function, Eighteen soybean varieties showed significant differences in salt and alkali tolerance, and they could be divided into three categories. Among them, four soybean materials including hybrid soybean 5 were salt-alkali tolerant varieties, eleven varieties materials including Jiyu 611 and Jiyu 299 were medium saline-alkali tolerant varieties, and two materials, Jiyu 256 and Dongnong 63, were saline-alkali sensitive tolerant varieties.

参考文献/References:

［1］王志春, 杨福, 陈渊, 等. 苏打盐碱胁迫下水稻体内的Na+、K+响应［J］.生态环境, 2008,17(3): 1198-1203.（Wang Z C, Yang F, Chen Y,et al. The response of soda saline stress of Na+ and K+on rice［J］. Ecology Environment, 2008, 17(3): 1198-1203. ）
［2］Yang Z, Wan B. Progress in techniques of improvement and utilization of saline-alkali land in China and its future trend［J］. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 2014, 2: 1-11.
［3］刘玉兰, 陈殿元, 元明浩, 等. 盐胁迫对小粒大豆幼苗生长发育及光合特性的影响［J］. 大豆科学, 2017, 36(6): 913-920.（Liu Y L, Chen D Y, Yuan M H, et al. Effects of salt stress on seedling growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Glycine gracilis ［J］.Soybean Science, 2017, 36 (6): 913-920.）
［4］Deng X X, Zhang X Q, Song X J, et al. Response of transgenic rice at germination traits under salt and alkali stress［J］. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2011, 6(18): 4335-4339.
［5］季平, 张鹏, 徐克章,等. 不同类型盐碱胁迫对大豆植株生长性状和产量的影响［J］. 大豆科学, 2013, 32(4): 477-481.（Ji P，Zhang P，Xu K Z，et al. Effects of salt and alkaline stress on plant growth traits and yield of soybean［J］．Soybean Science，2013，32(4): 477-481.）
［6］赵俊香, 任翠梅, 吴凤芝, 等. 16份菊芋种质苗期耐盐碱性筛选与综合鉴定［J］. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(5): 620-627.（Zhao J X, Ren C M, Wu F Z, et al. Comprehensive identification of saline-alkaline tolerance of 16 Jerusalem artichoke accessions at seedling stage ［J］. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2015, 23 (5): 620-627.）
［7］李丰先, 周宇飞, 王艺陶, 等. 高粱品种萌发期耐碱性筛选与综合鉴定［J］. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(9): 1762-1771.（Li F X, Zhou Y F, Wang Y T, et al. Screening and identification of sorghum cultivars for alkali tolerance during germination［J］. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(9): 1762-1771.）
［8］沈一, 刘永惠, 陈志德, 等. 花生幼苗期耐盐品种的筛选与评价［J］. 花生学报, 2012, 41(1): 10-15.（Shen Y, Liu Y H, Chen Z D, et al. Selection and evaluation of peanut varieties based on seedling salt tolerance［J］. Journal of Peanut Science, 2012, 41(1): 10-15.）
［9］张春宵, 刘晓鑫, 周波, 等. 吉林省26份主推玉米杂交种的苗期耐盐碱性分析［J］. 作物杂志, 2010(1): 66-69.（Zhang C X, Liu X X, Zhou B, et al. The alkali analysis of Jilin 26 main maize hybrid on seedling stage. Crops,2010(1): 66-69.）
［10］宁丽华, 张大勇, 刘佳, 等. 盐胁迫下苗期栽培大豆生理响应及Na+动态平衡关键基因的表达［J］. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(24): 4714-4725.（Ning L H, Zhang D Y, Liu J, et al. Effect of salt stress on physiological reponses and the expression of key genes involved in Na+ Homeostasis of soybean seedlings［J］. Agricultural Science of China, 2016, 49 (24): 4714-4725.）
［11］徐芬芬, 楚婕妤, 刘誉, 等.盐胁迫对大豆种子萌发过程中吸水和水解酶活性的影响［J］. 大豆科学, 2017, 36(1): 74-77.（Xu F F, Chu J H, Liu Y, et al. Effects of salt stress on water uptake and hydrolytic enzyme activities during soybean seed germination［J］.Soybean Science, 2017, 36 (1): 74-77.）
［12］胡卫静,何丽君,何劲莉, 等. NaCl胁迫对野生与栽培大豆杂交后代株系生理指标的影响［J］.大豆科学,2013,32(3):349-354.（Hu W J, He L J, He J L, et al. Effects of NaCl stress on physiological characters of soybean hybrids from Glycine max×Glycine soja［J］.Soybean Science, 2013, 32 (3): 349-354.）
［13］孟强,姜奇彦,牛风娟, 等.盐胁迫下不同抗性野生大豆(Glycine soja)生理生化性状比较分析［J］.中国农业科技导报,2017,19(8):25-32.（Meng Q, Jiang Q Y, Niu F J, et al. Comparative analysis of physiological and biochemical characters of Glycine soja under NaCl stress ［J］.China Agricultural Science and Technology Report, 2017, 19 (8): 25-32.）
［14］牛远,杨修艳,戴存凤,等.大豆芽期和苗期耐盐性评价指标筛选［J］.大豆科学,2018,37(2):215-223.（Niu Y, Yang X Y, Dai C F, et al. Related indices selection of soybean salt tolerance at germination and seedling stages ［J］. Soybean Science, 2018, 37 (2): 215-223.）
［15］吴杨, 高慧纯, 张必弦, 等. 24-表油菜素内酯对盐碱胁迫下大豆生育、生理及细胞超微结构的影响［J］. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(5): 811-821.（Wu Y, Gao H C, Zhang B X, et al. Effects of 24-Brassinolide on the fertility, physiological characteristics and cell ultra-structure of soybean under saline-alkali stress［J］. Agricultural Science of China, 2017, 50 (5): 811-821.）
［16］牛陆. 盐、碱胁迫对大豆属植物的结构演化及生理特性的影响［D］. 长春：东北师范大学, 2013.（Nui L. Effects of salt and alkali stress on the structural evolution and physiological characteristics of soybean ［D］. Changchun:Northeast Normal University, 2013.）
［17］范富, 张庆国, 邰继承, 等.通辽市盐碱地形成及类型划分［J］. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 24(4):409-413.（Fan F, Zhang Q G, T J C, et al. The formation and classification of saline-alkali soil in tongliao city［J］. Journal of Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities (Natural Science Edition), 2009, 24 (4): 409-413.）
［18］郝黎仁, 樊元, 郝哲欧. SPSS实用统计分析［M］. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社,2003.（Hao L R, Fan Y, Hao Z O. Practical statistical analysis of SPSS［M］. Beijing: China Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power Press, 2003.）
［19］陈德明, 俞仁培, 杨劲松. 盐渍条件下小麦抗盐性的隶属函数值法评价［J］. 土壤学报, 2002(3): 368-374.（Chen D M, Yu R P, Yang J S. The membership function value evaluation method of under the salted stress on wheat［J］. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2002, 39(3): 368-373.）
［20］宋江峰, 李大婧, 刘春泉, 等. 甜糯玉米软罐头主要挥发性物质主成分分析和聚类分析［J］. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(10): 2122-2131.（Song J F, Li D J, Liu C Q, et al. Principal components analysis and cluster analysis of flavor compositions in waxy corn soft can［J］. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(10): 2122-2131.）
［21］李广鲁, 王文果, 陈志新, 等. 钙对盐胁迫下冰叶日中花不同器官离子含量和根部K+、Na+吸收的影响［J］. 植物科学学报, 2018,36(2):282-290.（Li G L, Wang W G, Chen Z X, et al. Effect of calcium on ion contents in different organs and absorption of K+ and Na+in the root tips of Mesemberyanthemum crystallinum L.under NaCl stress［J］.Journal of Plant Science, 2018,36(2):282-290.）
［22］王聪,刘艳华,董永义, 等. NaCl胁迫对菜用大豆光合作用及叶绿体抗氧化系统的影响［J］.西南农业学报,2016,29(12):2824-2829.（Wang C, Liu Y H, Dong Y Y, et al. Effects of NaCl stress on photosynthesis and chloroplast antioxidant system of vegetable soybean［J］. Southwest Agricultural Journal, 2016, 29 (12): 2824-2829.）
［23］刘志萍,李琲琲,薛海楠, 等. NaCl胁迫对大麦籽粒抗坏血酸-谷胱甘肽循环的影响［J］.麦类作物学报,2016,36(6):736-741.（Liu Z P, Li B B, Xue H N, et al. Effect of NaCl stress on antioxidant system and ascorbate-glutathione cycle in barley seeds［J］. Journal of Wheat Crops, 2016, 36 (6): 736-741.）
［24］姜梦婷, 王秋岭, 周鑫, 等. 不同油料作物油脂体氧化稳定性差异的研究［J］. 中国粮油学报, 2018, 33(10): 63-70.（Jiang M T, Wang Q L, Zhou X, et al. Differences in oxidation stability of oil bodies from diverse oilseed crops［J］. Chinese Journal of Cereals and Oils, 2018, 33 (10): 63-70.）
［25］张威, 廖锡良, 喻德跃, 等. 大豆耐盐性研究进展［J］. 土壤与作物, 2018, 7(3): 284-292.（Zhang W, Liao X L, Yu D Y, et al. A review of salt tolerance in soybean ［Glycine max (L.) Merill］［J］. Soil and Crops, 2018, 7 (3): 284-292.）
［26］韩飞,诸葛玉平,娄燕宏,等. 63份谷子种质的耐盐综合评价及耐盐品种筛选［J］.植物遗传资源学报,2018,19(4):685-693.（Han F, Zhu-Ge Y P, Lou Y H, et al. Evaluation of salt tolerance and screening for salt tolerant accessions of 63 foxtail millet germplasm［J］. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2018, 19 (4): 685-693.）
［27］孙东雷,卞能飞,陈志德, 等.花生萌发期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选［J］.植物遗传资源学报,2017,18(6):1079-1087.（Sun D L, Bian N F, Chen Z D, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance and screening for salt tolerant accessions of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L．) at germination stage［J］. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2017, 18 (6): 1079-1087.）
［28］薛忠财,高辉远,柳洁.野生大豆和栽培大豆光合机构对NaCl胁迫的不同响应［J］.生态学报,2011,31(11):3101-3109.（Xue Z C, Gao H Y, Liu J. Different response of photosynthetic apparatus between wild soybean (Glycine soja) and cultivated soybean (Glycine max) to NaCl stress ［J］. Journal of Ecology, 2011, 31 (11): 3101-3109.）
［29］郑世英, 萧蓓蕾, 金桂芳. NaCl胁迫对野生大豆和栽培大豆叶绿素及光合特性的影响［J］. 大豆科学, 2013, 32(4): 486-489.（Zheng S Y, Xiao B L, Jin G F. Effect of NaCl stress on chlorophyll content and photosynthetic characteristics of Glycine soja and Glycine max［J］.Soybean Science, 2013, 32 (4): 486-489.）
［30］Yang J Y, Zheng W, Tian Y, et al. Effects of various mixed salt-alkaline stresses on growth, photosynthesis and photosynthetic pigment concentrations of Medicago ruthenica seedlings［J］. Photosynthetica, 2011, 49(2): 275-284.
［31］吴泽龙,谭晓风,袁军, 等.油茶不同叶龄叶片形态与光合参数的测定［J］.经济林研究,2016,34(2):24-29.（Wu Z L, Tan X F, Yuan J, et al. Morphology and photosynthetic parameters of Camellia oleifera leaves at different ages［J］. Economic Forest Research, 2016, 34 (2): 24-29.）
［32］张树文,杨久春,李颖, 等.1950s中期以来东北地区盐碱地时空变化及成因分析［J］.自然资源学报,2010,25(3):435-442.（Zhang S W, Yang J C, Li Y, et al. Changes of saline-alkali land in northeast China and its causes since the Mid-1950s ［J］. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25 (3): 435-442.）

相似文献/References:

[1]刘章雄,李卫东,孙石,等.1983～2010年北京大豆育成品种的亲本地理来源及其遗传贡献[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.002]
　LIU Zhang-xiong,LI Wei-dong,SUN Shi,et al.Geographical Sources of Germplasm and Their Nuclear Contribution to Soybean Cultivars Released during 1983 to 2010 in Beijing[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.002]
[2]李彩云,余永亮,杨红旗,等.大豆脂质转运蛋白基因GmLTP3的特征分析[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.003]
　LI Cai-yun,YU Yong-liang,YANG Hong-qi,et al.Characteristics of a Lipid-transfer Protein Gene GmLTP3 in Glycine max[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.003]
[3]王明霞,崔晓霞,薛晨晨,等.大豆耐盐基因GmHAL3a的克隆及RNAi载体的构建[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.004]
　WANG Ming-xia,CUI Xiao-xia,XUE Chen-chen,et al.Cloning of Halotolerance 3 Gene and Construction of Its RNAi Vector in Soybean (Glycine max)[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.004]
[4]张春宝,李玉秋,彭宝,等.线粒体ISSR与SCAR标记鉴定大豆细胞质雄性不育系与保持系[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.005]
　ZHANG Chun-bao,LI Yu-qiu,PENG Bao,et al.Identification of Soybean Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Line and Maintainer Line with Mitochondrial ISSR and SCAR Markers[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.005]
[5]卢清瑶,赵琳,李冬梅,等.RAV基因对拟南芥和大豆不定芽再生的影响[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.006]
　LU Qing-yao,ZHAO Lin,LI Dong-mei,et al.Effects of RAV gene on Shoot Regeneration of Arabidopsis and Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.006]
[6]杜景红,刘丽君.大豆fad3c基因沉默载体的构建[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.007]
　DU Jing-hong,LIU Li-jun.Construction of fad3c Gene Silencing Vector in Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.007]
[7]张力伟,樊颖伦,牛腾飞,等.大豆“冀黄13”突变体筛选及突变体库的建立[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.008]
　ZHANG Li-wei,FAN Ying-lun,NIU Teng-fei?,et al.Screening of Mutants and Construction of Mutant Population for Soybean Cultivar "Jihuang13”[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.008]
[8]盖江南,张彬彬,吴瑶,等.大豆不定胚悬浮培养基因型筛选及基因枪遗传转化的研究[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.009]
　GAI Jiang-nan,ZHANG Bin-bin,WU Yao,et al.Screening of Soybean Genotypes Suitable for Suspension Culture with Adventitious Embryos and Genetic Transformation by Particle Bombardment[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.009]
[9]王鹏飞,刘丽君,唐晓飞,等.适于体细胞胚发生的大豆基因型筛选[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.010]
　WANG Peng-fei,LIU Li-jun,TANG Xiao-fei,et al.Screening of Soybean Genotypes Suitable for Somatic Embryogenesis[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.010]
[10]刘德兴,年海,杨存义,等.耐酸铝大豆品种资源的筛选与鉴定[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.011]
　LIU De-xing,NIAN Hai,YANG Cun-yi,et al.Screening and Identifying Soybean Germplasm Tolerant to Acid Aluminum[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.011]
[11]季 平,张 鹏,徐克章,等.不同类型盐碱胁迫对大豆植株生长性状和产量的影响[J].大豆科学,2013,32(04):477.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.04.0477]
　JI Ping,ZHANG Peng,XU Ke-zhang,et al.Effects of Salt and Alkaline Stress on Plant Growth Traits and Yield of Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):477.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.04.0477]
[12]王春雨,朱冠雄,田艺心,等.大豆耐盐碱生理机制及种质筛选研究进展[J].大豆科学,2024,43(01):107.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.10009841.2024.01.0107]

备注/Memo

收稿日期：2019-01-10

基金项目：内蒙古自治区科技计划（KJJH1702）；通辽市与内蒙古民族大学合作项目（SXYB2012050）；内蒙古民族大学硕士研究生科研创新项目 （NMDSS1867）；内蒙古自治区科技储备项目（2018MDCB02）。
第一作者简介：曹帅（1994-），男，硕士，主要从事作物种质资源与利用研究。E-mail：caoshuai0229@163.com。
通讯作者：刘鹏（1973-），男，博士，教授，主要从事作物遗传育种研究。E-mail：mindaliupeng@126.com。

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-05-30