[1]闫春娟,王文斌,曹永强,等.不同耐旱型大豆生理特性对不同降雨条件的响应[J].大豆科学,2018,37(03):359-365.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.03.0359]
　YAN Chun-juan,WANG Wen-bin,CAO Yong-qiang,et al.Response of Physiological Characteristics of Different Drought-tolerant Soybean Varieties to Different Rainfall Climatic Conditions[J].Soybean Science,2018,37(03):359-365.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.03.0359]
点击复制

不同耐旱型大豆生理特性对不同降雨条件的响应

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S] 卷: 第37卷 期数: 2018年03期 页码: 359-365 栏目: 出版日期: 2018-05-20
Title:
Response of Physiological Characteristics of Different Drought-tolerant Soybean Varieties to Different Rainfall Climatic Conditions
作者:
闫春娟; 王文斌; 曹永强; 孙旭刚; 宋书宏; 王昌陵; 张立军
(辽宁省农业科学院 作物所，辽宁 沈阳 110161)
Author(s):
YAN Chun-juan;  WANG Wen-bin;  CAO Yong-qiang;  SUN Xu-gang; SONG Shu-hong;  WANG Chang-ling;  ZHANG Li-jun
(Crop Institute of Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Science, Shenyang 110161, China)
关键词:
生理特性; 大豆; 耐旱型; 降雨特征
Keywords:
Physiological characteristics;  Soybean;  Drought-tolerant variety;  Rainfall characteristics
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.03.0359
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为明确不同耐旱基因型大豆生理性状对不同降雨气候条件的响应，田间条件下，以耐旱型品种辽豆14和干旱敏感型品种辽豆21为研究对象，探讨半干旱地区阜新和湿润半湿润地区沈阳对两品种生理特性及产量的影响。分别比较大豆植株V4、R2、R4和R6时期的叶绿素含量、株高、植株各部位鲜重、干重。结果表明：一般而言，在湿润半湿润地区沈阳种植的大豆植株的叶绿素含量高于半干旱地区阜新。一般情况下，植株根、茎、叶、叶柄和豆荚的含水量均表现为，同一时期，同一品种，沈阳的值高于阜新，但部分取样时期处理间未达显著差异水平；品种对根含水量的影响则因取样时期和地点的不同而表现出差异；大豆植株茎、叶、叶柄、豆荚的含水量均表现为，同一时期，同一地点，耐旱品种辽豆14的值高于干旱敏感型品种辽豆21，但多数情况下处理间未达到显著差异水平。植株各部位器官生物量的变化表现为，除R4期植株的根生物量和茎生物量、R6期的豆荚生物量表现为，同一品种辽豆14阜新种植高于沈阳种植，且差异不显著外；其它各时期各器官的生物量均表现为，同一品种辽豆14或者辽豆21，沈阳种植均高于阜新种植。成熟期大豆植株的器官分配比例表现为：子粒>荚皮>根、茎。子粒的分配比例为，辽豆14>辽豆21；而荚皮、根、茎的分配比例则为，辽豆21>辽豆14。大豆单株荚数与产量变化相一致。干旱胁迫降低了单株荚数、每荚粒数、单株产量和小区产量却提高了百粒重。辽豆14的单株荚数、每荚粒数、单株产量和小区产量均高于辽豆21，但百粒重却低于辽豆21。本研究结果明确了耐旱型大豆应答干旱胁迫的生理优势，丰富了辽宁省大豆抗逆栽培的理论知识。
Abstract:
Field experiments were conducted to study the effects of different rainfall climatic conditions on the physiological characteristics of different soybean varieties. Compared the chlorophyll content, plant height, fresh and dry weight of soybean plant at V4, R2, R4 and R6 stages. Results indicated that, in general, the chlorophyll content of Shenyang located in humid and semi-humid area were higher than that of Fuxin located in semi-arid region. Generally, plant root water content, stem water content, leaf water content, petiole water content and bean pod moisture content had the similar change trends, the value of Shenyang in the same cultivar were higher than that of Fuxin, but the difference were not significant between some sampling periods, the effect of varieties on root water content was different at different sampling periods and locations. In general, stem water content, leaf water content, petiole water content and bean pod moisture content of soybean plants all showed that the value of Liaodou 14 was higher than that of Liaodou 21 in the same period and the same location, but in most cases it did not reach significant differences level between treatments. The changes of the biomass of different parts of the plant showed that, except for root biomass, stem biomass of R4 and bean pod biomass of R6, the value of Fuxin was higher than that in Liaodou 14 in Shenyang, and the difference was not significant. The biomass of other organs in all stages showed that the value of Shenyang were higher than the value of Fuxin with the same variety, but only a few significant differences were found among the treatments. The organs distributed proportion of soybean plants at mature stage showed the order of seed > pod > root or stem. Liaodou 14 had higher seed distribution ratio than Liaodou 21, while showed lower the distribution ratio of the pods, roots and stems. This tendency of pods per plant was consistent with yield. Drought stress reduced the pods per plant, seeds per pods, yield per plant and plot yield, but increased the 100-seed weight. Liaodou 14 showed higher pods per plant, seeds per pods, yield per plant and plot yield than Liaodou 21, but lower 100-seed weight than Liaodou 21. Therefore, the results could clarify the physiological advantages of drought-tolerant soybean in response to drought stress and further enrich the theoretical knowledge of soybean resistant cultivation in Liaoning province.

参考文献/References:

［1］Sánchez F J, Andrés E F, Tenorio J L, et al. Growth of epicotyls, turgor maintenance and osmotic adjustment in pea plants (Pisum sativum L.) subjected to water stress ［J］. Field Crops Research, 2004, 86: 81-90.
［2］阎勇，罗兴录，张兴思，等．不同供水条件下玉米耐旱生理特性比较［J］．中国农学通报，2007, 23(9):323-326.（Yan Y, Luo X L, Zhang X S, et al. Comparison of maize physiological characters under different treatment of irrigation ［J］. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 23(9):323-326.）
［3］Rolando O T, Kenneth L M, Casiana V C, et al. Screening of rice genebank germplasm for yield and selection of new drought tolerance donors ［J］. Field Crops Research, 2013, 147: 12-22.
［4］Serraj J K, Kumar J, Chandra S, et al. Variation in root traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) grown under terminal drought ［J］. Field Crops Research, 2004, 88: 115-127.
［5］Chu G, Chen T, Wang Z, et al.Morphological and physiological traits of roots and their relationships with water productivity in water-saving and drought-resistant rice ［J］. Field Crops Research, 2014, 162(6):108-119.
［6］赵跃．辽宁主栽花生品种耐旱性差异及其对干旱胁迫的响应机制研究［D］．沈阳: 沈阳农业大学，2016.（Zhao Y. Studies on drought resistance and its response to drought stress of main peanut varieties in Liaoning ［D］．Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2016.）
［7］张海燕，郭忠军，姚正培，等．抗旱、敏旱棉花材料苗期根系特性研究［J］．新疆农业科学，2014, 51(10): 1772-1776.（Zhang H Y, Guo Z J, Yao Z P, et al. The growing situation of cotton under the simulate hydroponic drought condition ［J］. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 51(10): 1772-1776.）
［8］路之娟，张永清，张楚，等．不同基因型苦荞苗期抗旱性综合评价及指标筛选［J］．中国农业科学，2017, 50(17):3311-3322．(Lu Z J, Zhang Y Q, Zhang C, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and indicators of the drought resistance of different genotypes of Fagopyrum tataricum at deedling dtage［J］. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(17):3311-3322.）
［9］陈雅彬，李凤海．不同玉米品种及亲本苗期抗旱指标测定及抗旱性分析［J］．辽宁农业科学，2006（2）:32-34．(Chen Y B, Li F H. Identification of drought resistance indexes of different maize varieties and its parents during seedling period ［J］. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 2006（2）:32-34.)
［10］孙继颖，高聚林，薛春雷，等．不同品种大豆抗旱性能比较研究［J］．华北农学报，2007，22(6): 91-97．（Sun J Y, Gao J L, Xue C L, et al. Comparative experiment on drought resistant characters of different soybean varieties ［J］. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2007, 22(6): 91-97.）
［11］董守坤，赵坤，刘丽君，等．干旱胁迫对春大豆叶绿素含量和根系活力的影响［J］．大豆科学，2011, 30(6): 949-953.（Dong S K, Zhao K, Liu L J, et al. Effect of drought stress on chlorophyll content and root activity of spring soybean ［J］. Soybean Science, 2011, 30(6): 949-953.）
［12］寿惠霞，朱丹华，陈彩霞，等．8个春大豆品种对旱境的反应及抗旱指标初探［J］．浙江农业科学，1991（6）: 278-281. (Shou H X, Zhu D H, Chen C X, et al. Responses of 8 spring soybean varieties to dry upland and index of drought resistance ［J］. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 1991（6）: 278-281.)
［13］赵博生，衣艳君，刘家尧．外源甜菜碱对干旱/盐胁迫下的小麦幼苗生长和光合功能的改善［J］．植物学通报，2001, 18(3): 378-380.（Zhao B S, Yi Y J, Liu J Y. Exogenous betaine improves the growth and photosynthesis of wheat seedlings under drought/salt stress ［J］. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2001，18（3）: 378-380.）
［14］郑玉红，蔡庆生，刘建秀．水分胁迫对几种假俭草的影响［J］．草地学报，2005，13(2): 102-105.（Zheng Y H, Cai Q S, Liu J X.Response of centipedegrass ［Eremochloa ophiuroides (Munro.) Hack.］ accessions to water stress ［J］. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2005, 13(2):102-105.）
［15］王丽娜，克热木·伊力，侯江涛．水分胁迫对扁桃砧木叶片脯氨酸、可溶性蛋白质、 质膜透性、相对含水量的影响［J］．新疆农业大学学报，2006, 29(3): 175-186.（Wang L N, Karim A, Hou J T. Effects of water stress on proline, soluble protein, membrane permeability, relative water content of almond rootstock ［J］. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2006, 29(3): 175-186.）
［16］李冬琴，曾鹏程，陈桂葵，等．干旱胁迫对3种豆科灌木生物量分配和生理特性的影响［J］．中南林业科技大学学报，2016, 36(1): 33-39.（Li D Q, Zeng P C, Chen G K, et al. Effects of drought stress on biomass distribution and physiological characteristics in three kinds of leguminous shrubs ［J］. Journal of Central South Forestry University, 2016, 36(1): 33-39.）
［17］胡继超，曹卫星，姜东，等．小麦水分胁迫影响因子的定量研究．Ⅰ干旱和渍水胁迫对光合、蒸腾及干物质积累与分配的影响［J］．作物学报，2004, 30(4): 315-320.（Hu J C, Cao W X, Jiang D, et al. Quantification of water stress factor for crop growth simulation. I. Effects of drought and waterlogging stress on photosynthesis, transpiration and dry matter partitioning in winter wheat ［J］. Acta Agronmic Sinica, 2004, 30(4): 315-320.）
［18］董钻．大豆器官平衡与产量［J］．辽宁农业科学，1981（3）: 14-21.(Dong Z. Organ equilibrium and yield on soybean ［J］. Liaoning Acultural Sciences, 1981（3）: 14-21.)
［19］白伟，孙占祥，刘晓晨，等．苗期水分胁迫对大豆器官平衡和产量的影响［J］．大豆科学，2009, 28(1): 59-62.（Bai W, Sun Z X, Liu X C, et al. Effect of water stress at seedling on organ equilibrium and yield of soybean［J］. Soybean Science，2009, 28(1): 59-62.）
［20］关晓雪，宋书宏，董丽杰，等．不同结荚习性大豆的器官平衡与产量的关系［J］．大豆科学，2009, 28(2): 221-224. (Guan X X, Song S H, Dong L J, et al. Relation between organ balance and yield in soybean of different podding habits［J］. Soybean Science，2009, 28(2): 221-224.)
［21］闫春娟，宋书宏，王文斌，等．灌溉对不同基因型大豆生理特性及产量的影响［J］．大豆科学，2014, 33(6): 945-948. (Yan C J, Song S H, Wang W B, et al. Effect of irrigation on physiological characteristics and yield of different genotype soybean （Glycine max (L.) Merr．）［J］. Soybean Science，2014, 33(6): 945-948.)

相似文献/References:

[1]刘章雄,李卫东,孙石,等.1983～2010年北京大豆育成品种的亲本地理来源及其遗传贡献[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.002]
　LIU Zhang-xiong,LI Wei-dong,SUN Shi,et al.Geographical Sources of Germplasm and Their Nuclear Contribution to Soybean Cultivars Released during 1983 to 2010 in Beijing[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.002]
[2]李彩云,余永亮,杨红旗,等.大豆脂质转运蛋白基因GmLTP3的特征分析[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.003]
　LI Cai-yun,YU Yong-liang,YANG Hong-qi,et al.Characteristics of a Lipid-transfer Protein Gene GmLTP3 in Glycine max[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.003]
[3]王明霞,崔晓霞,薛晨晨,等.大豆耐盐基因GmHAL3a的克隆及RNAi载体的构建[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.004]
　WANG Ming-xia,CUI Xiao-xia,XUE Chen-chen,et al.Cloning of Halotolerance 3 Gene and Construction of Its RNAi Vector in Soybean (Glycine max)[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.004]
[4]张春宝,李玉秋,彭宝,等.线粒体ISSR与SCAR标记鉴定大豆细胞质雄性不育系与保持系[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.005]
　ZHANG Chun-bao,LI Yu-qiu,PENG Bao,et al.Identification of Soybean Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Line and Maintainer Line with Mitochondrial ISSR and SCAR Markers[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.005]
[5]卢清瑶,赵琳,李冬梅,等.RAV基因对拟南芥和大豆不定芽再生的影响[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.006]
　LU Qing-yao,ZHAO Lin,LI Dong-mei,et al.Effects of RAV gene on Shoot Regeneration of Arabidopsis and Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.006]
[6]杜景红,刘丽君.大豆fad3c基因沉默载体的构建[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.007]
　DU Jing-hong,LIU Li-jun.Construction of fad3c Gene Silencing Vector in Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.007]
[7]张力伟,樊颖伦,牛腾飞,等.大豆“冀黄13”突变体筛选及突变体库的建立[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.008]
　ZHANG Li-wei,FAN Ying-lun,NIU Teng-fei?,et al.Screening of Mutants and Construction of Mutant Population for Soybean Cultivar "Jihuang13”[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.008]
[8]盖江南,张彬彬,吴瑶,等.大豆不定胚悬浮培养基因型筛选及基因枪遗传转化的研究[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.009]
　GAI Jiang-nan,ZHANG Bin-bin,WU Yao,et al.Screening of Soybean Genotypes Suitable for Suspension Culture with Adventitious Embryos and Genetic Transformation by Particle Bombardment[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.009]
[9]王鹏飞,刘丽君,唐晓飞,等.适于体细胞胚发生的大豆基因型筛选[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.010]
　WANG Peng-fei,LIU Li-jun,TANG Xiao-fei,et al.Screening of Soybean Genotypes Suitable for Somatic Embryogenesis[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.010]
[10]刘德兴,年海,杨存义,等.耐酸铝大豆品种资源的筛选与鉴定[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.011]
　LIU De-xing,NIAN Hai,YANG Cun-yi,et al.Screening and Identifying Soybean Germplasm Tolerant to Acid Aluminum[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.011]
[11]李大勇,徐克章,董雅致,等.氮水平对不同大豆品种生理特性及产量的影响[J].大豆科学,2013,32(03):365.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.03.0365]
　LI Da-yong,XU Ke-zhang,DONG Ya-zhi,et al.Effect of Nitrogen Levels on Physiological Characteristics and Yield of Different Soybean Varieties[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):365.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.03.0365]
[12]阮英慧,董守坤,刘丽君,等.干旱胁迫下外源脱落酸对大豆花期生理特性的影响[J].大豆科学,2012,31(03):385.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2012.03.010]
　RUAN Ying-hui,DONG Shou-kun,LIU Li-jun,et al.Effects of Exogenous Abscisic Acid on Physiological Characteristics in Soybean Flowering under Drought Stress[J].Soybean Science,2012,31(03):385.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2012.03.010]
[13]赵洪梅,郑洪兵.改变源库关系对大豆产量生理的影响[J].大豆科学,2009,28(04):736.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.04.0736]
　ZHAO Hong-mei,ZHENG Hong-bing.Research Advance on Physiological Changes Respond to Alteration of Source-sink Relationship in Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2009,28(03):736.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.04.0736]
[14]孙继颖,高聚林,王志刚,等.不同覆膜方式对旱作大豆生理特性及水分利用效率的影响[J].大豆科学,2008,27(02):251.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2008.02.0251]
　SUN Ji-ying,GAO Ju-lin,WANG Zhi-gang,et al.Effects of Covering Film on Physiological Indexes and Water Use Efficiency(WUE) of Soybean in Dryland[J].Soybean Science,2008,27(03):251.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2008.02.0251]
[15]闫春娟,宋书宏,王文斌,等.灌溉对不同基因型大豆生理特性及产量的影响[J].大豆科学,2014,33(06):945.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2014.06.0945]
　YAN Chun-juan,SONG Shu-hong,WANG Wen-bin,et al.Effect of Irrigation on Physiological Characteristics and Yield of Different Genotype Soybean[Glycine max(L.)Merr.][J].Soybean Science,2014,33(03):945.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2014.06.0945]
[16]张红,郑世英,刘贵忠,等.N+注入对大豆种子发芽率及幼苗生理特性的影响[J].大豆科学,2015,34(04):630.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2015.04.0630]
　ZHANG Hong,ZHENG Shi-ying,LIU Gui-zhong,et al.Effects of N+Implantation on Germination Percentage of Seeds and Physiological Property of Seedlings in Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2015,34(03):630.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2015.04.0630]
[17]金剑,刘晓冰王光华潘相文周克琴.美国大豆品种改良过程中生理特性变化的研究进展[J].大豆科学,2003,22(02):137.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2003.02.0137]
　Jin Jian,Wang Guang huaLiu XiaobingPan XiangwenZhou Keqin.RESRARCH ADVANCEON PHYSIOLOGICAL CHANGES FROM GENETICIMPROVEMENTOF AMERICAN SOYBEAN CULTIVARS[J].Soybean Science,2003,22(03):137.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2003.02.0137]
[18]黄深富,郑殿峰,项洪涛.花期和鼓粒期低温胁迫对大豆叶片生理特性及产量的影响[J].大豆科学,2024,43(01):64.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.10009841.2024.01.0064]
[19]闫春娟,王文斌,王昌陵,等.不同时期水分胁迫对御旱基因型大豆生理特性和产量的影响[J].大豆科学,2024,43(04):450.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.10009841.2024.04.0450]

备注/Memo

收稿日期：2018-01-02

基金项目：辽宁省创新人才培养计划(2014027，2015029)；国家大豆产业技术体系（CARS-004-CES11）；国家重点研发计划（2016YFD0100201-01，2017YFD0101304-2）；辽宁省中央引导地方科技发展专项（2017108006）。
第一作者简介：闫春娟（1983-），女，硕士，助理研究员，主要从事大豆育种与栽培研究。E-mail：yanchunjuan1983@163.com。
通讯作者：宋书宏（1964-），男，博士，研究员，主要从事大豆育种与栽培研究。E-mail：sshun@163.com；
曹永强（1977-），男，硕士，研究员，主要从事大豆遗传育种与栽培生理研究。E-mail：yongqiangcao@hotmail.com。

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-06-08