[1]李兴涛,佟晓楠,于海秋,等.不同低钾耐性大豆品种钾素效率的差异[J].大豆科学,2014,33(03):385-388.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2014.03.0385]
　LI Xing-tao,TONG Xiao-nan,YU Hai-qiu,et al.Potassium Efficiency of Different Low K Tolerant Soybean Varieties[J].Soybean Science,2014,33(03):385-388.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2014.03.0385]
点击复制

不同低钾耐性大豆品种钾素效率的差异

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S] 卷: 第33卷 期数: 2014年03期 页码: 385-388 栏目: 出版日期: 2014-06-25
Title:
Potassium Efficiency of Different Low K Tolerant Soybean Varieties
作者:
李兴涛1; 佟晓楠1; 于海秋2; 王 宁3; 王晓光2; 曹敏建2
1.赣南师范学院 生命和环境科学学院，江西 赣州 341000； 2.沈阳农业大学 农学院，辽宁 沈阳 110161； 3.中国农业科学院 农业信息研究所，北京 100081
Author(s):
LI Xing-tao1; 2; TONG Xiao-nan1; YU Hai-qiu2; WANG Ning3; WANG Xiao-Guang2; CAO Min-jian2
1.College of Life and Environment,Gannan Normal University,Ganzhou 341000,China;2.Agronomy College,Shenyang Agricultural University,Shenyang 110866,China;3.Agricultural Information Institute,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Beijing 100081,China
关键词:
大豆品种; 低钾耐性; 钾吸收效率; 钾利用效率
Keywords:
Soybean cultivars; Low K tolerance; K uptake efficiency; K utilization efficiency
分类号:
S565.1
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2014.03.0385
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以低钾耐性品种沈农6号和九农15，低钾敏感性品种铁丰31和GD8521为材料，通过盆栽试验研究了不同低钾耐性大豆品种的钾利用效率和吸收效率。结果表明：低钾胁迫下耐性品种的钾利用效率都显著提高，敏感性品种提高不显著；低钾胁迫下耐性和敏感品种钾吸收效率都呈下降趋势；此外，耐性品种低钾胁迫的籽粒钾利用效率、钾收获指数都显著高于施钾条件，敏感性品种两处理间无显著差别。综上所述，耐性品种与敏感性品种相比在低钾胁迫下依然能获得较高产量主要原因是具备更高的钾利用效率。
Abstract:
In order to study K efficiency of different low K tolerant soybean varieties under low K stress,we carried out pot culture,with low Ktolerant soybean varieties Shennong 6 and Jiunong 15,low K sensitive soybean varieties Tiefeng 31 and GD8521 under low K stress and K applied treatment.Significant difference of K utilization efficiency was found in low K tolerant soybean between low K stress and K applied treatment,while the K utilization efficiency of low K sensitive soybean between low K stress and K applied treatment was no significant difference.The K uptake efficiency of low K tolerant and low K sensitive soybean cultivars declined under the low K stress.The grain yield K utilization efficiency and K harvest index of low K tolerant soybean cultivars under low K stress were significant higher than that under K applied treatment.However,no significant differences of low K sensitive soybean cultivars were found between low K stress and K applied treatment.These results implied that the higher K utilization efficiency caused the higher tolerance coefficient for the low K sensitive soybean cultivars.

参考文献/References:

[1] 姜存仓 . 不同基因型棉花对钾的反应差异及其机理研究 [D]. 武汉 : 华中农业大学 ,2006:101-108.(Jiang C C.Different effects and mechanisms of potassium on varied cotton genotypes[D].Wuhan:Huazhong Agricultural University,2006:101-108.)
[2]王利，陈防，万开元.植物钾效率及其评价的研究进展与展望[J].土壤,2010，42(2):164-170.（Wang L,Cheng F,Wang K Y.Progress and expectation of the research on plant K efficiency and its evaluation[J].Soils,2010,42(2):164-170.）
[3]姜存仓,王运华,鲁剑巍,等.植物钾效率基因型差异机理的研究进展[J].华中农业大学学报,2004,23(4):483-487.(Jiang C C,Wang Y H,Lu J W,et al.Advances of study on the Kefficiency in different plant genotypes[J].Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University,2004,23(4):483-487.)
[4]Rmheld V,Kirkby E A.Research on potassium in agriculture:Needs and prospects[J].Plant and Soil,2010,335(1-2):155-180.
[5]唐劲驰，曹敏建，刘限.大豆品种(系)耐低钾性的筛选与评价[J].大豆科学,2003,22(1):18-21.(Tang J C,Cao M J,Liu X.Resistance mechanism and screening of soybean genotype resistance to low potassium[J].Soybean Science,2003,22(1):18-21.)
[6]王伟，曹敏建，周春喜，等.大豆耐低钾胁迫品种(系)的筛选[J].大豆通报,2005(4):7-8.(Wang W,Cao M J,Zhou C X,et al.Screening of tolerance low potassium soybean cultivars[J].Soybean Bulletin,2006(4):7-8.)
[7]Lu G,George M S,Zhou W.Genotypic variation of sweet potatoes grown under low potassium stress[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition,2003,26(4):745-756.
[8]Damon P M,Osborne L D,Rengel Z.Canola genotypes differ in potassium efficiency during vegetative growth[J].Euphytica,2007,156(3):387-397.
[9]Rengel Z,Damon P M.Crops and genotypes differ in efficiency of potassium uptake and use[J].Physiologia Plantarum,2008,133(4):624-636.
[10]Sas L,Rengel Z,Tang C.The effect of nitrogen nutrition on cluster root formation and proton extrusion by Lupinusalbus[J].Annals of Botany,2002,89(4):435-442.
[11]Fernández F G,Brouder S M,Volenec J J,et al.Root and shoot growth,seed composition,and yield components of notill rainfed soybean under variable potassium[J].Plant and Soil,2009,322(1-2):125-138.
[12]George M S,Lu G,Zhou W.Genotypic variation for potassium uptake and utilization efficiency in sweet potato(Ipomoea batatas L.)[J].Field Crops Research,2002,77(1):7-15.

相似文献/References:

[1]唐文义,赵恩龙,宋秋来,等.大豆品种与豆浆特性关系的研究[J].大豆科学,2014,33(02):0.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2014.02.0203]
　TANG Wenyi,ZHAO Enlong,SONG Qiulai,et al.Relationship Between Soybean Cultivars and Soymilk Characteristics[J].Soybean Science,2014,33(03):0.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2014.02.0203]
[2]张新艳,王曙明,王谦玉,等.不同大豆品种豆乳的凝聚特性研究[J].大豆科学,2011,30(04):657.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2011.04.0657]
　ZHANG Xin-yan,WANG Shu-ming,WANG Qian-yu,et al.Coacervation Property of Soymilk Made by Different Soybean Varieties[J].Soybean Science,2011,30(03):657.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2011.04.0657]
[3]刘太林,杨静慧,穆俊丽,等.不同大豆品种种子萌芽期的耐盐性[J].大豆科学,2009,28(05):837.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.05.0837]
　LIU Tai-lin,YANG Jing-hui,MU Jun-li,et al.Salt Tolerance Selection of Ten Soybeans in Germination Period[J].Soybean Science,2009,28(03):837.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.05.0837]
[4]赵军,商磊,王毅博,等.田间不同施肥处理大豆生长过程模拟验证研究[J].大豆科学,2008,27(01):86.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2008.01.0086]
　ZHAO Jun,SHANG Lei,WANG Yi-bo,et al.Simulation of Soybean Growth with Different Fertilizer Treatments in Northeast China[J].Soybean Science,2008,27(03):86.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2008.01.0086]
[5]许海涛,许波,王友华.河南省大豆品种状况分析与研发对策[J].大豆科学,2007,26(04):623.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2007.04.033]
　XU Hai-tao,XU Bo,WANGYou- hua.CONDITIONS OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES AND ITS EXPLOITATION TAETICS IN HENAN PROVINCE[J].Soybean Science,2007,26(03):623.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2007.04.033]
[6]王伟威,王兴宇,魏崃,等.中俄大豆品种氨基酸组成特性分析[J].大豆科学,2015,34(04):635.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2015.04.0635]
　WANG Wei-wei,WANG Xing-yu,WEI Lai,et al.Analysis of Amino Acid Composition Characters in Chinese and Russian Soybean Cultivars[J].Soybean Science,2015,34(03):635.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2015.04.0635]
[7]陈光荣,杨国,张国宏,等.西北灌区西瓜套作大豆高产高效模式群体配置技术研究[J].大豆科学,2016,35(02):245.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.02.0245]
　CHEN Guang-rong,YANG Guo,ZHANG Guo-hong,et al.Optimal Allocation Technology for Compound Population of Relayintercropping Watermelon with Soybean in Northwest Irrigation Districts[J].Soybean Science,2016,35(03):245.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.02.0245]
[8]李凯,盖钧镒,孙长美,等.国审大豆新品种南农41[J].大豆科学,2016,35(04):699.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.04.0699]
　LI Kai,GAI Jun-yi,SUN Chang-mei,et al.Breeding of New Soybean Cultivar Nannong 41[J].Soybean Science,2016,35(03):699.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.04.0699]
[9]于国宜,王大刚,吴倩,等.2009-2015年安徽省大豆试验新品系对SMV和SCN的抗性评价[J].大豆科学,2016,35(05):782.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.05.0782]
　YU Guo-yi,WANG Da-gang,WU Qian,et al.Evaluation of Resistance of Soybean New Lines to Soybean Mosaic Virus and Soybean Cyst Nematode in Anhui Province in 2009-2015[J].Soybean Science,2016,35(03):782.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.05.0782]
[10]南喜平,刘香英,田志刚,等.大豆籽粒品质对干豆腐加工特性的影响及适用性评价[J].大豆科学,2016,35(06):947.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.06.0947]
　NAN Xi-ping,LIU Xiang-ying,TIAN Zhi-gang,et al.The Effect of Soybean Quality Characteristics on Dried Tofu Processing Quality and Adaptability Evaluation[J].Soybean Science,2016,35(03):947.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.06.0947]

备注/Memo

收稿日期：2013-11-25

基金项目：国家自然科学基金(31271644)。
第一作者简介：李兴涛(1977-)，男，博士，讲师，主要从事植物营养逆境相关研究。E-mail:lisailor@163.com。
通讯作者：王宁（1981-），女，讲师，博士，主要从事作物逆境生理和文献计量学研究。E-mail:wangning01@caas.cn。

更新日期/Last Update: 2014-08-01