[1]高越,刘辉,陶波.抗草甘膦野生大豆筛选及其抗性生理机制研究[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):76-83.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.018]
　GAO Yue,LIU Hui,TAO Bo.Screening and Physiological Mechanisms of Resistance to Glyphosate in Wild Soybeans(Glycine soja)[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(01):76-83.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.018]
点击复制

抗草甘膦野生大豆筛选及其抗性生理机制研究

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S] 卷: 第32卷 期数: 2013年01期 页码: 76-83 栏目: 出版日期: 2013-02-25
Title:
Screening and Physiological Mechanisms of Resistance to Glyphosate in Wild Soybeans(Glycine soja)
文章编号:
1000-9841(2013)01-0076-04
作者:
高越;刘辉;陶波
东北农业大学 农学院，黑龙江 哈尔滨 150030
Author(s):
GAO Yue; LIU Hui; TAO Bo
College of Agriculture,Northeast Agricultural University,Harbin 150030,Heilongjiang，China
关键词:
野生大豆; 草甘膦; 莽草酸; 叶绿素含量; 谷胱甘肽-S-转移酶
Keywords:
Wild soybean; Glyphosate; Shikimic; Chlorophyll; GSTs
分类号:
S565.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.018
摘要:
利用田间试验对67份野生大豆材料进行草甘膦抗性筛选,结果在草甘膦有效剂量为1.23 kg.hm-2条件下,不同野生大豆对草甘膦抗性存在明显差异,其中ZYD0685和ZYD2405的存活率最高,分别为87%和83%;7份材料的存活率为2.7%～38%;58份材料死亡。以抗性材料ZYD0685和敏感材料ZYD0790进行生理指标研究,结果在未经草甘膦处理时,二者的叶绿素含量、莽草酸含量及谷胱甘肽-S-转移酶(GSTs)活性基本相同。在草甘膦不同剂量处理下,抗性材料ZYD0685叶绿素和莽草酸含量没有明显变化,GSTs活性明显增加;而敏感材料ZYD0790莽草酸含量明显升高,叶绿素含量明显降低,GSTs活性变化幅度较小。因此,植物体内莽草酸积累量较少是抗草甘膦的主要生理反应。
Abstract:
Sixty-seven wild soybeans(Glycine soja )were field planted and their resistance to glyphosate were identified.The resistance to glyphoaste of tested materials varied greatly.At 1.23 kg a.i·hm-2 glyphosate,the survival rate of ZYD0685 and ZYD2405 were 87% and 83%,respectively,that of seven wild soybeans ranged from 2.7% to 38%,fifty-eight wild soybeans were died after glyphosate treatment.To elucidate the physiological mechanism of the resistance,chlorophyll content,shikimate accumulation and gultathione S transferases(GSTs)activity between glyphosate resistant and sensitive wild soybean,ZYD0685 and ZYD0790,were compared.The three index for ZYD0685 and ZYD0790 were basically identical before glyphosate treatment.Under varied glyphosate concentration treatment,chlorophyll content and shikimate accumulation remained stable and GSTs activity significantly enhanced for resistant soybean ZYD0685.While shikimate accumulation significantly increased and chlorophyll content significantly increased for sensetive soybean ZYD0790.Results suggest lower shikimate accumulation is the main physiological response for glyphosate resistance in wild soybean.

参考文献/References:

［1］李向华，王克晶，李福山，等.野生大豆(Glycine soja)研究现状与建议[J].大豆科学，2005，24(4):305-307.(Li X H,Wang K J,Li F S,et al.Research progress of wild soybean(Glycine soja)and suggestions for improving its effective utilization and protection[J].Soybean Science,2005,24(4):305-307.）

[2]陈新，严继勇，高兵.野生大豆抗草甘膦基因漂移的初步研究[J].中国油料作物学报，2004，26(2):91-92 .（Chen X,Yan J Y,Gao B.Preliminary study on roundup ready soybean’s round-up ready gene move to wild soybean[J].Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2004,26(2):90-91.）
[3]Amrhein N,Deus B,Gehrke P,et al.The site of inhibition of the shikimate pathway by glyphosate II.Interference of glyphosate with ehofisme formation in vivo and vitro[J].Plant Physiology，1980，66：830-834.
[4]Dinelli G,Marotti I,Bonetti A,et al.Physiological and molecular insight on the mechanisms of resistance to glyphosate in Conyza canadensis(L.)Cronq.biotypes[J].Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology,2006,86：30-41.
[5]Marcos Y,Carolina I,Daniel O,et al.Glyphosate resistance in perennial ryegrass(Lolium perenne L.)from Argentina[J].Crop Protection,2012,32:12-16.
[6]Dinelli G,Marotti I,Bonetti A,et al.Physiological and molecular bases of glyphosate resistance in Conyza bonariensis biotypes from Spain[J] .Weed Research,2008,48:257-265.
[7]Tong X H,Daud M K,Sun Y Q,et al.Physiological and molecular mechanisms of glyphosate tolerance in an in vitro selected cotton mutant[J].Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology,2009,94:100-106.
[8]陶波，秦智伟，曲贵芹.菜豆抗草甘膦基因筛选的研究[J].中国农学通报,1993，9(5):31-33.（Tao B,Qin Z W,Qu G Q.Study on selection for resistance gene glyphosate of bean[J].Acta Agriculturae Nucleatae Sinica,1993,9(5):31-3.）
[9]邓渊钰.草甘膦药害的检测及其应用[J].杂草科学，2002(2):37-8.（Deng Y Y.Detection of glyphosate residues and its utilization[J].Weed Science,2002(2):37-8.）
[10] Pamela J H,David D.Glutathione transferase activities and herbicide selection in maize and associated weed species[J].Pesticide Science,1996,46:267-75.
[11]Widholm J M,Chinnala A R,Ryu J H.Glyphosate selection of gene amplification in suspension cultures of 3 plant species[J].Physiologia Plantarum,2001,112(4):540-45.
[12]Papanikou E,Brotherton J E,Widholm J M.Length of time in tissue culture can affect the selected glyphosate resistance mechanism[J].Planta,2004,218(4):589-98.
[13]Dyer W E,Weller S C,Bressan R A.Glyphosate tolerance in tobacco(Nicotiana tabacum L)[J].Plant Physiology,1988,88:661-66.
[14]ones J D,Goldsbrough P B,Weller S C.Stability and expression of amplified EPSPS genes in glyphosate resistant tobacco cells and plantlets[J].Plant Cell Reports,1996,15:431-36.
[15] Buehring N W,Massey J H,Reynolds D B.Shikimic acid accumulation in field grown corn(Zea mays)following simulated glyphosate drift[J].Agricultural Food Chemistry,2007,55:819-24.
[16]Pline W A,Wilcut J W,Duke S O,et al.Tolerance and Accumulation of shikimic acid in response to glyphosate applications inglyphosate-resistant and non-resistant cotton(Gossypium hirsutum L)[J].Agricultural Food Chemistry,2002,50:506-512.
[17] Shaner D L,Hassar-Nadler T,Henry W B.A rapid in vivo shikimate accumulation assay with excised leaf discs[J].Weed Science, 2005,53 :769-774.
[18] Moldes C A,Medici L O,Azevedo R A,et al.Biochemical responses of glyphosate resistant and susceptible soybean plants exposed to glyphosate[J].Acta Physiologiae Plantarum,2008,30:469-479.
[19]丁伟，马凤鸣，程茁，等.甜菜耐氯嘧磺隆生化机理的研究[J].中国农业科学，2009,42(3):906-911.（Ding W,Mang F M,Cheng Z,et al.Effect of chlorimuron-ethyl on biochemical mechanism in tolerant sugar beet[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2009,42(3):906-911.）

相似文献/References:

[1]王军卫,侯立江,李? 登,等.野生大豆紫色酸性磷酸酶PAP1基因的克隆及分析[J].大豆科学,2013,32(05):596.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.05.0596]
　WANG Jun-wei,HOU Li-jiang,LI Deng,et al.Cloning and Sequence Analysis of Purple Acid Phosphotase PAP1 Gene in Wild Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(01):596.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.05.0596]
[2]王军卫,侯立江,李 登,等. 野生大豆紫色酸性磷酸酶PAP1基因的克隆及分析[J].大豆科学,2013,32(05):596.
　WANG Jun-wei,HOU Li-jiang,LI Deng,et al. Cloning and Sequence Analysis of Purple Acid Phosphotase PAP1 Gene in Wild Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(01):596.
[3]王丽燕.硅对野生大豆幼苗耐盐性的影响及其机制研究[J].大豆科学,2013,32(05):659.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.05.0659]
　WANG Li-yan.Effects of Silicon on Salt Tolerance of Glycine soja Seedlings and Its Mechanism[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(01):659.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.05.0659]
[4]陈丽丽,王明玖,何丽君,等.野生大豆ISSR体系的优化及其在远缘杂交后代鉴定中的利用[J].大豆科学,2013,32(04):459.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.04.0459]
　CHEN Li-li,WANG Ming-jiu,HE Li-jun,et al.Optimization for ISSR Reaction System of Wild Soybean and Its Utilization in Distant Hybrid Identification[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(01):459.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.04.0459]
[5]郑世英,萧蓓蕾,金桂芳.NaCl胁迫对野生大豆和栽培大豆叶绿素及光合特性的影响[J].大豆科学,2013,32(04):486.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.04.0486]
　ZHENG Shi-ying,XIAO Bei-lei,JIN Gui-fang.Effect of NaCl Stress on Chlorophyll Content and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Glycine soja and Glycine max[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(01):486.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.04.0486]
[6]徐艳平,胡翠美,张文会,等.干旱胁迫对野生大豆幼苗光合作用相关指标的影响[J].大豆科学,2013,32(03):341.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.03.0341]
　XU Yan-ping,HU Cui-mei,ZHANG Wen-hui,et al.Effect of Simulated Drought Stress on Photosynthesis Related Indexes at Seedling Stage of Wild Soybeans[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(01):341.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.03.0341]
[7]胡卫静,何丽君,何劲莉,等.NaCl胁迫对野生与栽培大豆杂交后代株系生理指标的影响[J].大豆科学,2013,32(03):349.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.03.0349]
　HU Wei-jing,HE Li-jun,HE Jin-li,et al.Effects of NaCl Stress on Physiological Characters of Soybean Hybrids from Glycine max × Glycine soja[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(01):349.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.03.0349]
[8]王 旻,梁 玉,王欣欣,等.即墨野生大豆主要成分及其营养价值分析[J].大豆科学,2013,32(03):355.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.03.0355]
　WANG Min,LIANG Yu,WANG Xin-xin,et al.Assessment on Nutritional Compositions and Value of Jimo Wild Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(01):355.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.03.0355]
[9]程鹏,徐鹏飞,范素杰,等.野生大豆接种大豆疫霉根腐病菌后过氧化物酶（POD）活性变化[J].大豆科学,2013,32(02):197.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.02.013]
　CHENG Peng,XU Peng-fei,FAN Su-jie,et al.Response of POD Activity in Glycine soja ?Inoculated by Phytophthora sojae[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(01):197.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.02.013]
[10]吴 倩,张 磊,黄志平,等.转录组测序及其在野生大豆基因资源发掘中的应用[J].大豆科学,2013,32(06):845.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.06.0845]
　WU Qian,ZHANG Lei,HUANG Zhi-ping,et al.Transcription Sequencing and Its Application on Discovering the Gene Resources of Wild Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(01):845.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.06.0845]
[11]刘琪,相世刚,胡玉琪,等.野生大豆对草甘膦的耐性筛选及施用草甘膦后叶绿素荧光参数的变化[J].大豆科学,2018,37(03):399.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.03.0399]
　LIU Qi,XIANG Shi-gang,HU Yu-qi,et al.Tolerance Screening of Wild Soybean to Glyphosate and the Changes of Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters after Glyphosate Application[J].Soybean Science,2018,37(01):399.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.03.0399]

备注/Memo

基金项目：国家自然科学基金（30971834）。

第一作者简介：高越（1987-），男，在读硕士，研究方向为抗草甘膦野生大豆基因筛选及抗性基因定位。E-mail:gaoyue515@163.com 。
通讯作者：陶波（1963-），男，博士，教授，研究方向为抗除草剂作物基因的挖掘。E-mail:botaol@163.com。

更新日期/Last Update: 2013-02-20