PDF下载 +分享

微信公众号：大豆科学

[1]苏黎　张仁双　宋书宏董钻　谢甫绨　王晓光.不同结荚习性大豆开花结荚鼓粒进程的比较研究[J].大豆科学,1997,16(03):237-244.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.1997.03.0237]
　Su LiZhang RenshuangSong Shuhong ?Dong ZuanXie FutiWang Xiao guang.COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON FLOWERING POD SETTING ANDSEED FILLING OF SOYBEANS WITH DIFFERENT PODDING HABITS[J].Soybean Science,1997,16(03):237-244.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.1997.03.0237]

点击复制

不同结荚习性大豆开花结荚鼓粒进程的比较研究

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S] 卷: 第16卷期数: 1997年03 页码: 237-244 栏目: 出版日期: 1997-08-20

Title:: COMPARATIVE STUDIES ON FLOWERING POD SETTING ANDSEED FILLING OF SOYBEANS WITH DIFFERENT PODDING HABITS

作者:: 苏黎　张仁双　宋书宏董钻　谢甫绨　王晓光; (辽宁省农业科学院　沈阳　110161)
(沈阳农业大学　沈阳　110161)

Author(s):: Su Li　Zhang Renshuang　Song Shuhong ?Dong Zuan　Xie Futi　Wang Xiao guang; (Liaoning Academy of Agricul tural Sciences, Shenyang　110161)
( Shenyang Agricul tural University , Shenyang　110161)

关键词:: 大豆; 结荚习性; 开花; 结荚; 鼓粒; 比较

Keywords:: So ybean; Podding habit s; Blo om; Pod set; Pod fi lling; Pod filling; Comparison

DOI:: 10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.1997.03.0237

文献标志码:: A

摘要:: 通过3年田间观测,比较研究了3种结荚习性不同的大豆品种(有限性铁丰24号、亚有限性辽豆10号、无限性沈豆H- 5064)开花、结荚、鼓粒进程。铁丰24号出苗后第69. 5天始花,花期18. 5天,植株中部先开花,渐次向上向下开放; 辽豆10号出苗后第52. 5天始花,花期34天,植株下部先开花,渐次向上开放; 沈豆H- 5064出苗后第54. 0天始花,花期40. 5天,开花次序与辽豆10号相同。铁丰2 4号全株结荚率为33. 53% 、主花序、副花序、分枝的结荚率分别为36. 84%、48. 94% 、20. 29% ,主要结荚部位在植株的中上部; 相应地,辽豆10号为35. 71% 、55. 81% 、25. 00% 和0, 中部结荚居多; 沈豆H5064为24. 00% 、35. 92% 、12. 12% 和6. 67% ,豆荚分布均匀。铁丰24号、辽豆10号、沈豆H-5064分别在开花后第10- 19天、12- 22天、15- 26天豆荚伸长较快,基本接近品种的固有长度和宽度; 豆荚厚度增长因品种籽粒灌浆进程而异。3个品种自幼荚出现至豆荚长成所需时间基本相同(约63天)。3个品种单粒的增重过程符合Logi stic方程,前期增重缓慢,中期加快,后期又减慢,分别在开花后第49. 4天、53. 5天、56. 6天籽粒积累速率最快。

Abstract:: Through field test s and observ ation in 3 years, comparativ e studies w ere made onf low ering , pod set ting a nd seed filling of three so ybean va rieties w ith dif ferent poddinghabi ts ( Tiefeng No. 24, determina te; Liaodou No. 10, semi- determina te; Shendou H- 5064, indetermina te) .The time of ini tial flow ering o f Tiefeng No. 24 cocurred at 69 day s af ter emergency ,and it flow ered fo r 18. 5 day s, ini tial f low ers a ppeared o n the middle part of the mainstem, then o ther f low ers bloomed g radually up and dow n along the stom. The time ofini tial f low ering of Liaodou No. 10 o ccured a t 54 days af ter emerg ency, i t w as 34 days off low ering season, the f low ering o rder w as basically from the low er to the upper. Thetime of initial f low ering of Shendou H- 5064 occured at 55 days af ter emergency , i t had40. 5 days of f low ering seaso n, the f low ering order was just the same as that of LiaodouNo. 10. The rate o f pod set of Tiefeng No. 24 was 33. 53% , the ra te o f pod set of mainraceme w as 36. 84% , those o f subraceme and branch w ere 48. 94% , 20. 29% respectiv ely, the main posi tio n at w hichpo ts set was on the upper par t of the main stem; w hilethose o f Liaodou No. 10 w ere 35. 75% , 55. 81% , 25. 00% a nd 0, the main position atw hich po ts set wa s on the middle pa rt o f the main stem; tho se of Shendo u H-5064 were 24. 00% , 35. 92% , 12. 12% and 6. 67% , the pods w ere dist ributed ba la ncelyalo ng the plant. The pod set ting Tiefeng No. 24, Liaodou No. 10 a nd Shendou H- 5064increased faster f rom 10 days to 16 days, 12- 21 days and 15- 26 da ys af ter f low eringrespectiv ely , and reached the giv en leng th a nd width w ere approximately the same. Thethree v arieties have a simi lar period o f pod g row th ( 63 da ys approx imately ) . The seedw eight accumlations of the three v arieties co uld be model led by Logi stic equa tion. Thehighest ra tes o f seed w eight accumula tio n occo ured a t 49. 4, 53. 3 and 56. 6 da ys af terf low ering.

参考文献/References:

[1 ]　孙醒东, 1956, 大豆,科学出版社

[2 ]　赖先齐, 1963, 中国农业科学, ( 3) 47- 49

[3 ]　曹大铭, 1982, 作物学报, 8( 2) 81- 86

[4 ]　祝其昌, 1984, 大豆科学, 3( 4) 318- 326

[5 ]　盖钧镒, 1984, 南京农学院学报, ( 4) 6- 18

[6 ]　孙卓韬,董钻, 1986,大豆科学, ( 2) 91- 101

[7 ]　张秋荣, 1984, 大豆科学, ( 4) 332- 338

[8 ]　汪炳良, 1994, 园艺学进展, 548- 553

[9 ]　昆野昭晨, 1979, 苗以农译自《农业およじ园艺》,第54卷,第3- 4号

[10 ]　EgLi. D. B. 1975, Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 55 ( 1): 215- 219

[11 ]　Hanw ay. J. J. , and C. R. Weber, 1971, Agron. J. 63: 263- 266

相似文献/References:

[1]刘章雄,李卫东,孙石,等.1983～2010年北京大豆育成品种的亲本地理来源及其遗传贡献[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.002]
　LIU Zhang-xiong,LI Wei-dong,SUN Shi,et al.Geographical Sources of Germplasm and Their Nuclear Contribution to Soybean Cultivars Released during 1983 to 2010 in Beijing[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.002]
[2]李彩云,余永亮,杨红旗,等.大豆脂质转运蛋白基因GmLTP3的特征分析[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.003]
　LI Cai-yun,YU Yong-liang,YANG Hong-qi,et al.Characteristics of a Lipid-transfer Protein Gene GmLTP3 in Glycine max[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.003]
[3]王明霞,崔晓霞,薛晨晨,等.大豆耐盐基因GmHAL3a的克隆及RNAi载体的构建[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.004]
　WANG Ming-xia,CUI Xiao-xia,XUE Chen-chen,et al.Cloning of Halotolerance 3 Gene and Construction of Its RNAi Vector in Soybean (Glycine max)[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.004]
[4]张春宝,李玉秋,彭宝,等.线粒体ISSR与SCAR标记鉴定大豆细胞质雄性不育系与保持系[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.005]
　ZHANG Chun-bao,LI Yu-qiu,PENG Bao,et al.Identification of Soybean Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Line and Maintainer Line with Mitochondrial ISSR and SCAR Markers[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.005]
[5]卢清瑶,赵琳,李冬梅,等.RAV基因对拟南芥和大豆不定芽再生的影响[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.006]
　LU Qing-yao,ZHAO Lin,LI Dong-mei,et al.Effects of RAV gene on Shoot Regeneration of Arabidopsis and Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.006]
[6]杜景红,刘丽君.大豆fad3c基因沉默载体的构建[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.007]
　DU Jing-hong,LIU Li-jun.Construction of fad3c Gene Silencing Vector in Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.007]
[7]张力伟,樊颖伦,牛腾飞,等.大豆“冀黄13”突变体筛选及突变体库的建立[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.008]
　ZHANG Li-wei,FAN Ying-lun,NIU Teng-fei?,et al.Screening of Mutants and Construction of Mutant Population for Soybean Cultivar "Jihuang13”[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.008]
[8]盖江南,张彬彬,吴瑶,等.大豆不定胚悬浮培养基因型筛选及基因枪遗传转化的研究[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.009]
　GAI Jiang-nan,ZHANG Bin-bin,WU Yao,et al.Screening of Soybean Genotypes Suitable for Suspension Culture with Adventitious Embryos and Genetic Transformation by Particle Bombardment[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.009]
[9]王鹏飞,刘丽君,唐晓飞,等.适于体细胞胚发生的大豆基因型筛选[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.010]
　WANG Peng-fei,LIU Li-jun,TANG Xiao-fei,et al.Screening of Soybean Genotypes Suitable for Somatic Embryogenesis[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.010]
[10]刘德兴,年海,杨存义,等.耐酸铝大豆品种资源的筛选与鉴定[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.011]
　LIU De-xing,NIAN Hai,YANG Cun-yi,et al.Screening and Identifying Soybean Germplasm Tolerant to Acid Aluminum[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.011]

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-01-13