[1]张小芳,王冰冰,徐燕,等.PEG模拟干旱胁迫下野生大豆转录组分析 [J].大豆科学,2018,37(05):681-689.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.05.0681]
　ZHANG Xiao-fang,WANG Bing-bing,XU Yan,et al.The Transcriptome Analysis of Wild Soybean Under Drought Stress Simulated by PEG[J].Soybean Science,2018,37(05):681-689.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.05.0681]
点击复制

PEG模拟干旱胁迫下野生大豆转录组分析

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S] 卷: 第37卷 期数: 2018年05期 页码: 681-689 栏目: 出版日期: 2018-09-20
Title:
The Transcriptome Analysis of Wild Soybean Under Drought Stress Simulated by PEG
作者:
张小芳; 王冰冰; 徐燕; 张炜坤; 赵恢; 张锴; 乔亚科; 李桂兰
（河北科技师范学院 农学与生物科技学院，河北 昌黎 066600）
Author(s):
ZHANG Xiao-fang;  WANG Bing-bing;  XU Yan;  ZHANG Wei-kun;  ZHAO Hui;  ZHANG Kai;  QIAO Ya-ke;  LI Gui-lan
（College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology, Changli 066600, China）
关键词:
野生大豆; RNA-seq; 干旱胁迫; 转录组
Keywords:
Glycine soja;  RNA-seq;  Drought stress;  Transcriptome
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.05.0681
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为研究耐旱型野生大豆在干旱胁迫下基因表达谱的变化，从备选野生大豆材料中筛选抗旱性强的野生大豆品种，同时探讨最适PEG胁迫浓度，而后以野生大豆永46为试验材料，利用RNA-seq技术对20% PEG6000处理不同时间的叶片进行基因表达谱差异分析。结果显示：获得39 183个序列信息，其中各时期共有序列27 875个。随干旱胁迫时间延长，差异表达基因数量发生变化，胁迫12 h达到最多。根据GO功能分析可将序列大致分为分子功能、细胞成分和生物学过程三大类，其差异表达基因广泛涉及糖、脂类、蛋白质和核酸等生物大分子代谢、能量代谢以及次生代谢过程。在KEGG数据库中，依据代谢途径可将其定位在127个分支，包括植物-病原体互作、植物激素信号转导、RNA降解、ABC转运蛋白等，其中植物激素信号转导途径在不同时间处理下的变化都显著。转录因子分析发现在干旱胁迫下变化明显的转录因子家族包括MYB、bHLH、AP2\\EREBP、WRKY和NAC等。对4个不同功能基因干旱胁迫后不同时间的表达量进行荧光定量分析，其变化趋势与转录组数据相同。
Abstract:
In order to estimate the gene expression profiles affected by drought stress, a drought-resistant wild soybean accession Yong 46 was used to detect the differentially expressed genes under 20% PEG6000 by RNA-seq technology. A total of 39 183 unigenes were screened out, of which 27 875 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were coincident. All the assembled unigenes could be broadly divided into cellular component, molecular function and biological process by gene ontology, these DEGs were involved in metabolisms of carbohydrate, lipid, protein, nucleic acid and energy, and secondary metabolism. 127 classes according to their metabolic pathway were found by the analyze of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes(KEGG) pathway, including the plant-pathogen interaction, plant hormone signal transduction, RNA degradation and ABC transporters. The pathway of plant hormone signal transduction changed the most obviously under different times. The most evident change transcription factor families included MYB, bHLH, AP2-EREBP, WRKY and NAC under drought stress. The results of qRT-PCR were in conformity with the RNA-seq. These results provided a base for further study on drought stress functional genes screening in wild soybean．

参考文献/References:

［1］Yuan C P, Wang Y J, Zhao H K, et al. Genetic diversity of rhg1and rhg4loci in wild soybeans resistant to soybean cyst nematode race 3［J］. Genetics & Molecular Research, 2016, 15(2): gmr7386.

［2］杨如萍,包振贤,陈光荣,等.大豆抗旱性研究进展［J］.作物杂志, 2012(5): 8-12. (Yang R P, Bao Z X, Chen G R, et al. The research progress in drought resistance of soybean［J］. Crops, 2012(5): 8-12. )
［3］Lam H M, Xu X, Liu X, et al. Resequencing of 31 wild and cultivated soybean genomes identifies patterns of genetic diversity and selection［J］. Nature Genetics, 2010, 42(12):1053-1059.
［4］Kim M Y, Lee S,van K, et al. Whole-genome sequencing and intensive analysis of the undomesticated soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. and Zucc.) genome［J］. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107: 22032-22037.
［5］王克晶, 李向华. 国家基因库野生大豆(Glycine soja)资源最近十年考察与研究［J］. 植物遗传资源学报,2012(4): 507-514.（Wang K J, Li X H. Exploration and studies of wild soybean germplasm resources in the China genebank during recent decade［J］. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources,2012(4):507-514.）
［6］Kosová K, Vítámvás P, Urban M O, et al.Plant abiotic stress proteomics: The major factors determining alterations in cellular proteome［J］. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 9:122.
［7］Teng Z Q, Hui-Qing F U, Jia S H, et al. Review of current progress in the metabolomics for plant response to abiotic stress［J］. Crop Research, 2011, 35(1):110-118.
［8］Fan X D, Wang J Q, Yang N, et al. Gene expression profiling of soybean leaves and roots under salt, saline-alkali and drought stress by high-throughput Illumina sequencing［J］. Gene, 2013, 512(2): 392-402.
［9］Wang X, Oh M, Sakata K, et al. Gel-free/label-free proteomic analysis of root tip of soybean over time under flooding and drought stresses［J］. Journal of Proteomics, 2016, 130:42.
［10］Berretta J, Morillon A. Pervasive transcription constitutes a new level of eukaryotic genome regulation［J］. Embo Reports, 2009, 10(9):973-982.
［11］Liu X, Lyu S, Liu R, et al. Transcriptomic analysis reveals the roles of gibberellin-regulated genes and tran-scription factors in regulating bolting in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)［J］. Plos One, 2018, 13(2): e0191518.
［12］Gao C, Wang Y, Liu G, et al. Expression profiling of salinity-alkali stress responses by large-scale expressed sequence tag analysis in Tamar & hispid［J］.Plant Molecular Biology, 2008, 66(3): 245-258.
［13］姚敏磊, 张璟曜, 周汐, 等. 大豆响应低磷胁迫的数字基因表达谱分析［J］. 大豆科学, 2016, 35(2): 213-221.（Yao M L, Zhang J Y, Zhou X, et al. The digital gene expression profiling analysis of genes in response to low phosphorus stress in soybean［J］. Soybean Science, 2016, 35(2): 213-221.）
［14］任梦露, 刘卫国, 刘婷, 等. 荫蔽胁迫下大豆茎秆形态建成的转录组分析［J］. 作物学报, 2016, 42(9): 1319-1331. （Ren M L, Liu W G, Liu T, et al. Transcriptome analysis of stem morphogenesis under shade stress in soybean［J］. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2016, 42(9): 1319-1331.）
［15］张晓娜, 朴春兰, 董友魁, 等. 大豆根系应答重金属Cd胁迫的转录组分析［J］. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(5): 1633-1641. (Zhang X N, Piao C L, Dong Y K, et al. Transcriptome analysis of response to heavy metal Cd stress in soybean root［J］. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2017, 28(5):1633-1641.)
［16］Liu A, Xiao Z, Li M W, et al.Transcriptomic reprogramming in soybean seedlings under salt stress［J］. Plant Cell & Environment, 2018, 12(12): e0189159.
［17］吴倩, 张磊, 黄志平, 等. 转录组测序及其在野生大豆基因资源发掘中的应用［J］. 大豆科学, 2013, 32(6): 845-851.（Wu Q, Zhang L, Huang Z P, et al. Transcription sequencing and its application on discovering the gene resources of wild soybean［J］. Soybean Science, 2013, 32(6): 845- 851.）
［18］Wei C, Yao Q, Patil G B, et al.Identification and comparative analysis of differential gene expression in soybean leaf tissue under drought and flooding stress revealed by RNA-Seq［J］. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: 1044.
［19］Carter T E Jr,de Souza P I, Purcell L C. Recent advances in breeding for drought and aluminum resistance in soybean［C］. Chicago: Proceedings of World Soybean Research Conference VI, 1999: 106-125.
［20］蒲伟凤. 不同类型大豆种质资源抗旱性比较及野生大豆抗旱性筛选［D］. 秦皇岛: 河北科技师范学院, 2010.（Pu W F. Comparison of drought resistance in different soybean types and screening of drought resistance in Glycine soja［D］. Qinhuangdao: Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology, 2010.）
［21］乔亚科, 李桂兰, 高书国, 等. 昌黎沿海野生大豆分布及其耐盐性［J］. 河北职业技术师范学院学报, 2001(2): 9-13.（Qiao Y K , Li G L, Gao S G, et al. Geographical distribution and salt-tolerance of wild soybean（Glycine soja）in inshore regions in Changli Hebei province［J］. Journal of Hebei Vocation-Technical Teachers College, 2001(2): 9- 13.）
［22］王丹，乔亚科，韩粉霞，等. 河北东部沿海地区野生大豆SSR多样性分析［J］. 大豆科学, 2010, 29(4): 555-558. （Wang D, Qiao Y K, Han F X, et al. Diversity of Glycine soja in eastern coastal area of Hebei province［J］. Soybean Science, 2010, 29(4): 555-558.）
［23］Zhang X, Jiang H, Wang H, et al.Transcriptome analysis of rice seedling roots in response to potassium deficiency［J］. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1): 5523.
［24］Prince S J, Joshi T, Mutava R N, et al.Comparative analysis of the drought-responsive transcriptome in soybean lines contrasting for canopy wilting［J］. Plant Science, 2015, 240:65-78.
［25］刘洪博, 刘新龙, 苏火生, 等. 干旱胁迫下割手密根系转录组差异表达分析［J］.中国农业科学, 2017, 50(6): 1167- 1178.（Liu H B, Liu X L, Su H S, et al. Transcriptome difference analysis of saccharum spontaneum roots in response to drought stress［J］. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(6): 1167-1178.）
［26］刘振山. 小麦苗期干旱、高温和旱热共胁迫转录表达谱及ABD部分同源基因表达分化分析［D］. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2015.（Liu Z S. Transcriptome profiling and differential homeologous genes expression analysis of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings during drought stress, heat stress and their［D］. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2015.）
［27］Fujita Y, Fujita M, Satoh R, et al. AREB1 is a transcription activator of novel ABRE-dependent ABA signal-ing that enhances drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis［J］. Plant Cell, 2005, 17(12): 3470-3488.
［28］周宏. 桑树抗旱相关4个转录因子家族鉴定与表达分析［D］. 镇江: 江苏科技大学, 2017. (Zhou H. Identification and expression analysis of drought-resistant related 4 transcription factor families in mulberry (Morus L.)［D］. Zhenjiang: Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, 2017.）
［29］Jiang J J, Ma S H, Ye N H, et al. WRKY transcription factors in plant responses to stresses［J］. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2017, 59(2): 86-101.
［30］Zhou Q Y, Tian A G, Zou H F, et al.Soybean WRKY-type transcription factor genes, GmWRKY13, GmWRKY21, and GmWRKY54, confer differential tolerance to abiotic stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis plants［J］. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2008, 6(5): 486-503.
［31］刘鑫, 邹郁陶, 牟巍, 等. 玉米乙烯应答元件结合蛋白基因启动子克隆与功能验证［J］. 核农学报, 2016, 30(4):629- 637.（Liu X, Zou Y T, Mu W, et al. Cloning and functional validation of promoter of ethylene-responsive element-binding protein gene in maize［J］. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences,2016, 30(4): 629-637.）
［32］Hu W, Hou X, Huang C, et al.Genome-wide identification and expression analyses of aquaporin gene family during development and abiotic stress in banana［J］. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2015, 16(8): 19728-19751.
［33］Guerrero F D, Jones J T, Mullet J E. Turgor-responsive gene transcription and RNA levels increase rapidly when pea shoots are wilted. Sequence and expression of three inducible genes［J］. Plant Molecular Biology, 1990, 15(1):11.
［34］叶国良, 宋娟娟, 叶清. 两种不同抗旱能力的豇豆根系水通道蛋白基因的克隆与分析［J］. 分子植物育种, 2016, 14(8): 1977-1985. (Ye G L, Song J J, Ye Q. Cloning and analysis of aquaporins in roots of two cow pea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) cultivars with contrasting drought tolerance［J］. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2016,14(8): 1977-1985.)

相似文献/References:

[1]高越,刘辉,陶波.抗草甘膦野生大豆筛选及其抗性生理机制研究[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):76.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.018]
　GAO Yue,LIU Hui,TAO Bo.Screening and Physiological Mechanisms of Resistance to Glyphosate in Wild Soybeans(Glycine soja)[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(05):76.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.018]
[2]王军卫,侯立江,李? 登,等.野生大豆紫色酸性磷酸酶PAP1基因的克隆及分析[J].大豆科学,2013,32(05):596.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.05.0596]
　WANG Jun-wei,HOU Li-jiang,LI Deng,et al.Cloning and Sequence Analysis of Purple Acid Phosphotase PAP1 Gene in Wild Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(05):596.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.05.0596]
[3]王军卫,侯立江,李 登,等. 野生大豆紫色酸性磷酸酶PAP1基因的克隆及分析[J].大豆科学,2013,32(05):596.
　WANG Jun-wei,HOU Li-jiang,LI Deng,et al. Cloning and Sequence Analysis of Purple Acid Phosphotase PAP1 Gene in Wild Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(05):596.
[4]王丽燕.硅对野生大豆幼苗耐盐性的影响及其机制研究[J].大豆科学,2013,32(05):659.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.05.0659]
　WANG Li-yan.Effects of Silicon on Salt Tolerance of Glycine soja Seedlings and Its Mechanism[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(05):659.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.05.0659]
[5]陈丽丽,王明玖,何丽君,等.野生大豆ISSR体系的优化及其在远缘杂交后代鉴定中的利用[J].大豆科学,2013,32(04):459.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.04.0459]
　CHEN Li-li,WANG Ming-jiu,HE Li-jun,et al.Optimization for ISSR Reaction System of Wild Soybean and Its Utilization in Distant Hybrid Identification[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(05):459.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.04.0459]
[6]郑世英,萧蓓蕾,金桂芳.NaCl胁迫对野生大豆和栽培大豆叶绿素及光合特性的影响[J].大豆科学,2013,32(04):486.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.04.0486]
　ZHENG Shi-ying,XIAO Bei-lei,JIN Gui-fang.Effect of NaCl Stress on Chlorophyll Content and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Glycine soja and Glycine max[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(05):486.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.04.0486]
[7]徐艳平,胡翠美,张文会,等.干旱胁迫对野生大豆幼苗光合作用相关指标的影响[J].大豆科学,2013,32(03):341.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.03.0341]
　XU Yan-ping,HU Cui-mei,ZHANG Wen-hui,et al.Effect of Simulated Drought Stress on Photosynthesis Related Indexes at Seedling Stage of Wild Soybeans[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(05):341.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.03.0341]
[8]胡卫静,何丽君,何劲莉,等.NaCl胁迫对野生与栽培大豆杂交后代株系生理指标的影响[J].大豆科学,2013,32(03):349.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.03.0349]
　HU Wei-jing,HE Li-jun,HE Jin-li,et al.Effects of NaCl Stress on Physiological Characters of Soybean Hybrids from Glycine max × Glycine soja[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(05):349.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.03.0349]
[9]王 旻,梁 玉,王欣欣,等.即墨野生大豆主要成分及其营养价值分析[J].大豆科学,2013,32(03):355.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.03.0355]
　WANG Min,LIANG Yu,WANG Xin-xin,et al.Assessment on Nutritional Compositions and Value of Jimo Wild Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(05):355.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.03.0355]
[10]程鹏,徐鹏飞,范素杰,等.野生大豆接种大豆疫霉根腐病菌后过氧化物酶（POD）活性变化[J].大豆科学,2013,32(02):197.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.02.013]
　CHENG Peng,XU Peng-fei,FAN Su-jie,et al.Response of POD Activity in Glycine soja ?Inoculated by Phytophthora sojae[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(05):197.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.02.013]

备注/Memo

收稿日期：2018-04-23

基金项目：转基因生物新品种培育科技重大专项（2014ZX0800404B）；河北省自然科学基金（C2016407100，C2014407051）；河北省研究生创新资助项目（CXZZSS2018148）。
第一作者简介：张小芳（1993-），女，硕士，主要从事植物遗传资源研究及植物分子生物学研究。E-mail：zxf13214@163.com。
通讯作者： 李桂兰（1963-），女，博士，教授，主要从事作物遗传资源及作物基因工程研究。E-mail：lgl63@126.com。

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-10-08