LYU De-dong,XU Wei,SHI Shu-sen.The Structure of Soybean Pod of 45 Spring Soybean Varieties and Evaluation of Resistance to Leguminivora glycinivorella[J].Soybean Science,2018,37(02):275-283.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.02.0275]
45个春大豆品种豆荚结构特征及其对食心虫抗性评价
- Title:
- The Structure of Soybean Pod of 45 Spring Soybean Varieties and Evaluation of Resistance to Leguminivora glycinivorella
- Keywords:
- Soybean variety; Pod structure; Leguminivora glycinivorella; Resistance coefficient; Correlation analysis
- 分类号:
- S565.1;S433.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为解析豆荚结构特征及其与大豆品种对食心虫抗性的关系,对45份东北春大豆品种的荚毛密度、长度、颜色、形状及荚皮各层组织厚度等结构特征进行观测分析,提出相对抗性系数法对大豆品种抗虫性进行评价,结果表明:45个品种荚毛密度的频次分布符合韦布尔方程Y荚毛密度=9.21(1-EXP(-((X-2.77)/2.90)^-6.37)),荚毛长度的频次分布符合双曲线方程Y荚毛长度=-151.28+138.39X-29.46X2;荚皮表皮角质层、皮下厚壁细胞层、中果皮细胞层、内壁细胞组织层厚度的频次分布均符合二次曲线方程,分别为Y角质层=-42.23+2.30X-0.02X2、Y厚壁=-103.14+3.12X-0.021X2、Y中果皮=-72.32+0.23X-0.000 1X2、Y内壁=-109.17+1.44X-0.004X2。品种抗选择系数k1、抗钻入系数k2、综合抗性系数k综合与虫食率的相关系数分别为R1=-0.649(P=0.004 0)、R2=-0.723(P=0.025 8)、R综合=-0.717(P=0.000 1),均呈极显著负相关,表明可以将相对抗性系数作为评价当地品种抗性的指标。
- Abstract:
- To analysis the relation between characteristics of pods structure and resistance to Leguminivora glycinivorella, pod hair density, length, color and thickness of different layers of 45 northeast spring soybean were observed analysis. The soybean varieties resistance was evaluated by resistance coefficient method. The results showed that the frequency distribution of pod hair density in 45 varieties accorded with Weibull equation ydensity=9.21(1-exp(-((x-2.77)/2.90)^-6.37)),the frequency distribution of pod hair length conformed to the Hyperbolic equation,ylength=-151.28+138.39x-29.46x2.The frequency distribution of thickness of epidermal cuticle, subcutaneous thick-walled cell layer, mesocarp cell layer and endothecium cell layer of the pod shell were in accordance with the Hyperbolic equation yCuticle=-42.23+2.30x-0.02x2、yThick-walled cells=-103.14+3.12x-0.021x2、yMedium peel=-72.32+0.23x-0.000 1x2、yInner wall=-109.17+1.44x-0.004x2. The correlation coefficients of varieties resistant to selectivity coefficient, anti-penetration coefficient and total resistance coefficient were R1= -0.649(P=0.004 0), R2=-0.723(P=0.025 8) and Rsynthesis =-0.717(P=0.000 1) all showed a very significant negative correlation. It showed that the relative resistance coefficient could be used as a standard to evaluate the resistance of varieties.
参考文献/References:
相似文献/References:
[1]李兴涛,佟晓楠,于海秋,等.不同低钾耐性大豆品种钾素效率的差异[J].大豆科学,2014,33(03):385.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2014.03.0385]
LI Xing-tao,TONG Xiao-nan,YU Hai-qiu,et al.Potassium Efficiency of Different Low K Tolerant Soybean Varieties[J].Soybean Science,2014,33(02):385.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2014.03.0385]
[2]唐文义,赵恩龙,宋秋来,等.大豆品种与豆浆特性关系的研究[J].大豆科学,2014,33(02):0.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2014.02.0203]
TANG Wenyi,ZHAO Enlong,SONG Qiulai,et al.Relationship Between Soybean Cultivars and Soymilk Characteristics[J].Soybean Science,2014,33(02):0.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2014.02.0203]
[3]张新艳,王曙明,王谦玉,等.不同大豆品种豆乳的凝聚特性研究[J].大豆科学,2011,30(04):657.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2011.04.0657]
ZHANG Xin-yan,WANG Shu-ming,WANG Qian-yu,et al.Coacervation Property of Soymilk Made by Different Soybean Varieties[J].Soybean Science,2011,30(02):657.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2011.04.0657]
[4]刘太林,杨静慧,穆俊丽,等.不同大豆品种种子萌芽期的耐盐性[J].大豆科学,2009,28(05):837.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.05.0837]
LIU Tai-lin,YANG Jing-hui,MU Jun-li,et al.Salt Tolerance Selection of Ten Soybeans in Germination Period[J].Soybean Science,2009,28(02):837.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.05.0837]
[5]赵军,商磊,王毅博,等.田间不同施肥处理大豆生长过程模拟验证研究[J].大豆科学,2008,27(01):86.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2008.01.0086]
ZHAO Jun,SHANG Lei,WANG Yi-bo,et al.Simulation of Soybean Growth with Different Fertilizer Treatments in Northeast China[J].Soybean Science,2008,27(02):86.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2008.01.0086]
[6]许海涛,许波,王友华.河南省大豆品种状况分析与研发对策[J].大豆科学,2007,26(04):623.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2007.04.033]
XU Hai-tao,XU Bo,WANGYou- hua.CONDITIONS OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES AND ITS EXPLOITATION TAETICS IN HENAN PROVINCE[J].Soybean Science,2007,26(02):623.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2007.04.033]
[7]王伟威,王兴宇,魏崃,等.中俄大豆品种氨基酸组成特性分析[J].大豆科学,2015,34(04):635.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2015.04.0635]
WANG Wei-wei,WANG Xing-yu,WEI Lai,et al.Analysis of Amino Acid Composition Characters in Chinese and Russian Soybean Cultivars[J].Soybean Science,2015,34(02):635.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2015.04.0635]
[8]陈光荣,杨国,张国宏,等.西北灌区西瓜套作大豆高产高效模式群体配置技术研究[J].大豆科学,2016,35(02):245.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.02.0245]
CHEN Guang-rong,YANG Guo,ZHANG Guo-hong,et al.Optimal Allocation Technology for Compound Population of Relayintercropping Watermelon with Soybean in Northwest Irrigation Districts[J].Soybean Science,2016,35(02):245.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.02.0245]
[9]李凯,盖钧镒,孙长美,等.国审大豆新品种南农41[J].大豆科学,2016,35(04):699.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.04.0699]
LI Kai,GAI Jun-yi,SUN Chang-mei,et al.Breeding of New Soybean Cultivar Nannong 41[J].Soybean Science,2016,35(02):699.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.04.0699]
[10]于国宜,王大刚,吴倩,等.2009-2015年安徽省大豆试验新品系对SMV和SCN的抗性评价[J].大豆科学,2016,35(05):782.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.05.0782]
YU Guo-yi,WANG Da-gang,WU Qian,et al.Evaluation of Resistance of Soybean New Lines to Soybean Mosaic Virus and Soybean Cyst Nematode in Anhui Province in 2009-2015[J].Soybean Science,2016,35(02):782.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.05.0782]
备注/Memo
收稿日期:2018-01-05