[1]乔云发 　苗淑杰,韩晓增.氮素形态对大豆根系形态性状及释放 H+ 的影响*[J].大豆科学,2006,25(03):265-269.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2006.03.0265]
　Qiao Yunfa Miao Shujie Han Xiaozeng.EFFECTS OF NITROGEN FORMS ON THE ROOT MORPHOLOGY ANDPROTON EXTRUSION IN SOYBEAN[J].Soybean Science,2006,25(03):265-269.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2006.03.0265]
点击复制

氮素形态对大豆根系形态性状及释放 H+ 的影响*

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S] 卷: 第25卷 期数: 2006年03期 页码: 265-269 栏目: 出版日期: 2006-08-25
Title:
EFFECTS OF NITROGEN FORMS ON THE ROOT MORPHOLOGY ANDPROTON EXTRUSION IN SOYBEAN
作者:
乔云发 1 　苗淑杰 1;  2 　韩晓增 1
(1. 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所 ,哈尔滨 150081;2. 中国科学院研究生院 ,北京 100039)
Author(s):
Qiao Yunfa 1 　Miao Shujie 1; 2Han Xiaozeng 1
(1. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agro-ecology , Chinese Academy of Sciences Harbin , 150081;2. Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing , 150039)
关键词:
氮素形态; 大豆 ; 根系性状 ; H+
Keywords:
Nitrogen form ; Soybean; root morphology ; H+
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2006.03.0265
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
采用水培培养方法, 研究了不同形态氮素对大豆根系形态性状及释放 H+ 的影响。结果表明,不同形态氮素对根系形态特性的影响不同 ,表现为 ,NO 3-N 和 NH 4 NO 3-N 促进根表面积增加;NH 4+- N 对根系的生长表现出抑制作用;而生物固氮处理 ,除根尖数随生育期的延长而增加外,其他根系形状几乎没有变化。NH 4+- N 处理根系释放出大量 H+,且大豆根系受到 NH 4+-N 的毒害 ,阻碍了根系对其它元素的吸收;而 NO 3-N 处理, 根系释放出大量 OH-,对根系吸收其他元素的抑制作用较小, 因此 ,生物量增加较明显;NH 4 NO 3-N 处理根际 pH 变化较小, 促进大豆植株生长;而生物固氮处理,在生育前期, 根瘤固氮能力较弱, 不能及时为大豆生长提供充足的氮素,进而抑制大豆的生长 ,使生物量偏低 。
Abstract:
Solution culture experiment with soybean was made to study the effect of nitrogen forms on theroot morphology and proton extrusion from roots. The results showed that there were significant differ-ences between the effects of nitrogen forms and soybean root morphology. NO 3 -N and NH 4 NO 3 -N inducedroot surfacearea increased;NH?4+?-N inhibited root grow th , however, the root morphology of N 2 -fixationtreatment nearly did not have changes, except tips of root increased with time. The H+extrusion fromroot indicated that NH 4+ -N increased H +extrusion, but the poison symptom when NH 4+-N was an nitro-gen source and amount of H+extrusion from NH 4 NO 3 -N treatment was in the middle of NO 3 -N 、NH 4+ -Nand NH 4 NO 3 -N. At early stage , N 2 -fixation treatment had low nitrogenase activity so that inhibited plantgrow th and low biomass.

参考文献/References:

1　 Von Wiren N, Gagarrini S , Frommer W B. Regulation of mineralnitrogen uptake in plants[ J] . Plant and Soil, 1997, 96:191 - 199.

2　 Markus L , Alberto S, Peter S et al. Root development of maize(Zea may s L.) as observed with Minirhizotrons in Lysimeters[ J] . Crop Sci. , 2000, 40:1665- 1672.
3　 傅金民, 董钻. 大豆根系生长与产量的关系[ J] . 大豆科学, 1987, 6(4):261- 279.
4　 Gijsman A J. RhizospHere pH along different root zones ofDoug hlas-fir(Pseudotsuag menxiesiti), as affected by source ofnitrogen[ J] . Plant Soil, 1990, 124:161 - 167.
5　 Silber A , Ganmore-neumann R, Ben-Jaacov J. Effects of nutrientaddition on growth and rhizospHere pH of Leucadendron , vSafarisunset[ J] . Plant Soil, 1998, 199:205- 211.
6　 陈永亮. 不同氮源处理对红松苗木根际 pH 及养分有效性的影响[ J] . 南京林业大学学报, 2004, 28(1):42- 46.
7　 马新明, 王志强, 王小纯,等. 氮素形态对不同专用型小麦根系及氮素利用率影响的研究[ J] . 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(4):655-658.
8　 陆景陵主编. 植物营养学[ M] . 北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003, 2.
9　 张福锁. 环境胁迫与根际营养[ M] . 北京:农业出版社, 1998.
10 Gazzarrini S, Lejay L, Cojon A , et al. T hree functional trans-porters for constitutive, diurnally regulated, and starvation-in-duced uptake of ammonium into Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell ,1999, 11:937- 948.
11 Bhat K K S. Nutrient inflows into apple roots. Plant Soil , 1983,71:371- 380.
12 Costa C, Dwyer LM , Hamilton RI, et al. A sampling method formeasurement of large root sy stems with scanner-based image a-nalysis[ J] . Agron. J. 2000, 92:621 - 627.
13 金剑,刘晓冰, 王光华, 等. 大豆生殖生长期根系形态性状与产量关系研究[ J] . 大豆科学, 2004, 23(4):253- 257.
14 曹翠玲, 李生秀. 氮素表态对玉米幼苗碳水化合物及养分累积的影响[ J] . 华中农业大学学报, 2003, 22(5):457 - 461.
15 曹翠玲, 李生秀. 氮素表态对作物生理特性及生长的影响[ J] . 华中农业大学学报, 2004, 23(5):581 - 586.

相似文献/References:

[1]张银霞,宋晓华　 李英慧　 邱丽娟.农杆菌介导的大豆转基因研究进展＊[J].大豆科学,2006,25(03):309.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2006.03.0309]
　Zhang Yinxia Song Xiaohua Li Yinhui Qiu Lijuan.ADVANCES ON THE STUDY OF AGROBACTERIUM-MEDIATEDTRANSFORMATION OF SOYBEAN[J].Soybean Science,2006,25(03):309.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2006.03.0309]
[2]王 　伟 　曹敏建 　王晓光　李 　植.低钾胁迫对不同钾营养效应型大豆保护酶系统的影响*[J].大豆科学,2005,24(02):101.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2005.02.0101]
　Wang Wei Cao Minjian Wang Xiaoguang Li Zhi.EFFECTS OF LOW POTASSIUM STRESS ON PROTECTIVE SYSTEMS OF DIFFERENTK- NUTRIENT EFFECTIVE SOYBEAN VARIETIES[J].Soybean Science,2005,24(03):101.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2005.02.0101]
[3]苗 　 进,吴孔明 ＊ 　 李国勋.大豆蚜的研究进展＊[J].大豆科学,2005,24(02):135.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2005.02.0135]
　Miao Jin Wu Kongming,Li Guoxun.ADVANCES IN RESEARCH ON SOYBEAN APHID, APH IS GLYCINES[J].Soybean Science,2005,24(03):135.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2005.02.0135]

备注/Memo

项目来源:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973 计划)(2005CB121101), 黑龙江省攻关项目(GB05C201 - 01)资助

作者简介:乔云发(1976 -), 男, 主要从事植物营养方面研究。
通讯作者:韩晓增研究员, T el:0451 - 86602940, E- mail:xzhan@cern. ac. cn

更新日期/Last Update: 2016-12-15