PDF下载 +分享

微信公众号：大豆科学

[1]马星竹,周宝库,郝小雨.长期不同施肥条件下大豆田黑土酶活性研究[J].大豆科学,2016,35(01):96-99.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.01.0096]
　MA Xing-zhu,ZHOU Bao-ku,HAO Xiao-yu.Study of Black Soil Enzyme Activity in Soybean Field Under Long-Term Different Fertilizations[J].Soybean Science,2016,35(01):96-99.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.01.0096]

点击复制

长期不同施肥条件下大豆田黑土酶活性研究

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S] 卷: 第35卷期数: 2016年01期页码: 96-99 栏目: 出版日期: 2016-01-20

Title:: Study of Black Soil Enzyme Activity in Soybean Field Under Long-Term Different Fertilizations

作者:: 马星竹; 周宝库; 郝小雨; 黑龙江省农业科学院土壤肥料与环境资源研究所，黑龙江哈尔滨 150086

Author(s):: MA Xing-zhu; ZHOU Bao-ku; HAO Xiao-yu; Institute of Soil Fertilizer and Environment Resource, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150086, China

关键词:: 黑土; 长期施肥; 土壤酶; 土壤养分

Keywords:: Black soil; Longterm fertilization; Soil enzyme; Soil nutrient

DOI:: 10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.01.0096

文献标志码:: A

摘要:: 以农业部黑龙江耕地保育与农业环境科学观测实验站（始建于1979年）为研究平台，选取4个典型施肥处理（不施肥处理、有机肥处理、单施化肥、有机-化肥配合处理）为供试土样，于2011年大豆收获后采集土壤样品，研究长期不同施肥处理对黑土主要酶类（葡糖苷酶、脲酶和磷酸单酯酶）活性的影响。结果表明：长期不施肥处理大豆田土壤酶活性较低，施肥处理可以增加黑土酶活性，脲酶与磷酸单酯酶对施肥响应程度大于β-葡糖苷酶；单施有机肥处理与化肥处理对土壤酶活性影响程度之间差异不显著，而有机肥配施化肥处理则能够显著增强黑土β-葡糖苷酶、脲酶和磷酸单酯酶活性。同时，土壤β-葡糖苷酶、脲酶和磷酸单酯酶活性与土壤有机碳、全氮、全磷以及速效磷含量之间具有极显著的正相关关系，与土壤pH之间具有极显著的负相关关系。长期有机肥配施化肥处理可以显著增强大豆田土壤酶活性，土壤酶活性与土壤主要养分含量之间关系密切。

Abstract:: Based on scientific observation station of arable land conservation and agriculture environment of Heilongjiang, Ministry of Agriculture (built in 1979), selected four typical fertilization treatments (no fertilizer, organic fertilizer, chemical fertilizer and organic fertilizer combined with chemical fertilizer)，collected soil sample after soybean harvest in 2011 to study effect of long-term different fertilizations on main kinds of enzymes activities (βglucosidase, urease and phosphatase) of black soil. The results showed that the no fertilizer treatment had lower enzyme activities, fertilization treatment could increase black soil enzyme activities, urease and phosphatase had bigger response degree than βglucosidase; there was no significant difference between effects of organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer on soil enzyme activities; however, treatment of organic fertilizer combined with chemical fertilizer could increase soil βglucosidase, urease and phosphatase activities significantly Meanwhile, there were significant and positive correlationships among soil enzyme activities and contents of soil organic, soil total nitrogen, soil total phosphate and soil available phosphate, significant and negative correlationships among soil enzyme activities and soil Ph. Long-term treatment of organic fertilizer combined with chemical fertilizer could increase soil enzyme activity in soybean field, which had close relationships with soil nutrients

参考文献/References:

［1］Manjaiah K，Dhyan S. Soil organic matter and biological properties after 26 years of maize-wheat-cowpea cropping as affected by manure and fertilization in a Cambisol in semiarid region of India［J］. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2001, 86: 155-162

［2］Elfstrand S, Hedlund K, Martensson A.Soil enzyme activities, microbial community composition and function after 47 years of continuous green manuring［J］.Applied Soil Ecology, 2007, 35(6): 610-621

［3］Mandal A, Patra A K, Singh D, et al. Effect of long-term application of manure and fertilizer on biological and biochemical activities in soil during crop development stages［J］. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98: 3585-3592

［4］Katsalirou E, Deng S, Nofziger D L, et al.Long-term management effects on organic C and N pools and activities of C.transforming enzymes in prairie soils［J］. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2010, 46: 335-341.

［5］Guenet B, Lenhart K, Leloup J, et al. The impact of long-term CO₂? enrichment and moisture levels on soil microbial community structure and enzyme activities［J］.Geoderma, 2012, 170: 331-336

［6］Bowles T M, AcostaMartínez V, Calderón F, et al.Soil enzyme activities, microbial communities, and carbon and nitrogen availability in organic agroecosystems across an intensively-managed agricultural landscape［J］. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2014, 68: 252-262

［7］Nayak D R, Babu Y J, Adhya T K.Long-term application of compost influences microbial biomass and enzyme activities in a tropical Aeric Endoaquept planted to rice under flooded condition［J］.Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2007, 39(8): 1897-1906

［8］Roldán A, Caravaca F, Hernández M T, et al. No.tillage, crop residue additions, and legume cover cropping effects on soil quality characteristics under maize in Patzcuaro watershed(Mexico)［J］. Soil & Tillage Research, 2003, 72: 65-73

［9］Livia B, Frank B.Soil microbiological and biochemical properties affected by plant growth and different long-term fertilization［J］. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2006, 42(1): 1-12

［10］Mijangos I, Perez R, Albizu I, et al. Effects of fertilization and tillage on soil biological parameters［J］.Enzyme & Microbial Technology, 2006, 40: 100-106.

［11］Eivazi F, Tabatabai M A.Factors affecting glucosidases and galactosidases in soils［J］. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 1990, 22(7): 891-897.

［12］Tabatabai M A. Soil enzymes［M］//Weaver R W, Augle J S, Bottomley P S Methods of soil analysis. Wishton: Madison, 1994:775-883.［13］Ekenler M, Tabatabai M A. Effects of liming and tillage systems on microbial biomass and glycosidases in soils［J］. Biology & Fertility of Soils, 2003, 39: 51-61

［14］鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法［M］. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1999:146-185.(Lu R K. Soil agrochemical analysis［M］.Beijing: China Agriculture Science and Technology Press, 1999, 146-185.)

［15］Deng S P, Tabatabai M A. Effect of tillage and residue management on enzyme activities in soils:Ⅲ Phosphatases and arylsulfatase［J］. Biology & Fertility of Soils, 1997, 24: 141-146.

［16］Goyal S, Mishra M M, Dankar S S, et al. Microbial biomass turnover and enzyme activities following the application of farmyard manure to field soils with and without previous long-term applications［J］.Biology & Fertility of Soils, 1993, 15: 60-64.

［17］Tabatabai M A, Dick W A.Enzymes in soil［M］//Burns R G, Dick R P. Enzymes in the environment: activity, ecology and applications. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc 2002:567-596.

［18］Sarkar J M, Leonowicz A, Bollag J M.Immobilization of enzymes on clays and soils［J］.Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 1989, 21: 223-230.

［19］Nannipieri P, Greco S, Ceccanti B.Ecological significance of the biological activity in soil［M］//Bollag J M, Stotzky G. Soil Biochemistry. New York:1990: 293-355.

［20］周礼恺. 土壤酶学［M］.北京: 科学出版社, 1987.(Zhou L K. Soil enzymology［M］.Beijing: Science Press, 1987.)

［21］金继运, 刘荣乐, 译.土壤肥力与肥料［M］. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1998:95-155.(Jin J Y, Liu R L.Soil fertility and fertilizer［M］. Beijing: China Agriculture Science and Technology Press, 1998:95-155.)

［22］Nsabimana D, Haynes R J, Wallis F M.Size, activity and catabolic diversity of the soil microbial biomass as affected by land use［J］.Applied Soil Ecology, 2004, 26: 81-92

［23］Mungai N W, Motavalli P P, Kremer R J, et al. Spatial variation of soil enzyme activities and microbial functional diversity in temperate alley cropping systems［J］.Biology & Fertility of Soils, 2005, 42: 129-136.

［24］陆琴.太湖地区典型水稻土的酶学特征及水肥管理的酶学效应［D］.南京: 中国科学院南京土壤研究所, 2002.(Lu Q. Enzymatic characteristic and enzymatic effect of water and fertilizer management of typical Paddy soil in Taihu lake region［D］. Nanjing: Institute of Soil Science of CAS, 2002.)

［25］Wang X C, Lu Q. Beta-glucosidase activity in paddy soils of the Taihu lake region, China［J］. Pedosphere, 2006, 16(1): 118-124

［26］周礼恺, 张志明, 曹承绵.土壤酶活性的总体在评价土壤肥力水平中的作用［J］.土壤学报, 1983, 20(4): 413-416.(Zhou L K, Zhang Z M, Cao C J. On the role of totality of soil enzyme activities in the evaluation of the level of soil fertility［J］. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 1983, 20(4): 413-416.)

相似文献/References:

[1]匡恩俊,刘峰,高中超.黑土层厚度及心土培肥对大豆产量的影响[J].大豆科学,2012,31(02):266.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2012.02.021]
　KUANG En-jun,LIU Feng,GAO Zhong-chao.Effect of Black Soil Depth and Subsoil Fertilizing on Soybean Yield[J].Soybean Science,2012,31(01):266.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2012.02.021]
[2]丁娇,韩晓增,邹文秀,等.长期施肥对大豆生长状况及产量的影响[J].大豆科学,2012,31(05):778.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2012.05.019]
　DING Jiao,HAN Xiao-zeng,ZOU Wen-xiu,et al.Effect of Long-term Fertilization on Growth and Yield of Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2012,31(01):778.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2012.05.019]
[3]乔云发,韩晓增.长期定量施肥对大豆根系形态和根瘤性状的影响[J].大豆科学,2011,30(01):119.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2011.01.0119]
　QIAO Yun-fa,HAN Xiao-zeng.Effects of Long-term Fertilization on Root Phenotype and Nodulation of Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2011,30(01):119.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2011.01.0119]
[4]王树起,韩晓增,乔云发,等.寒地黑土大豆轮作与连作不同年限土壤酶活性及相关肥力因子的变化[J].大豆科学,2009,28(04):611.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.04.0611]
　WANG Shu-qi,HAN Xiao-zeng,QIAO Yun-fa,et al.Variation of Soil Enzymes Activity and Relevant Nutrients at Different Years of Soybean (Glycine max L.)Rotation，Alternate and Continuous Cropping[J].Soybean Science,2009,28(01):611.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.04.0611]
[5]刘俊杰,王光华,金剑,等.磷浓度处理对大豆根际土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J].大豆科学,2008,27(05):801.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2008.05.0801]
　LIU Jun-jie,WANG Guang-hua,JIN Jian,et al.Effect of Different Phosphorus Concentrations on Microbial Communities in Soybean Rhizosphere[J].Soybean Science,2008,27(01):801.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2008.05.0801]
[6]孟庆杰,许艳丽,李春杰,等.不同施肥/土地利用方式对黑土细菌多样性的影响[J].大豆科学,2008,27(03):480.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2008.03.0480]
　MENG Qing-jie,XU Yan-li,LI Chun-jie,et al.Effects of Different Fertilization and Land Use History on the Bacterial Diversity in Black Soils[J].Soybean Science,2008,27(01):480.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2008.03.0480]
[7]金剑,王光华,陈雪丽,等.Biolog-ECO解析不同大豆基因型R1期根际微生物群落功能多样性特征[J].大豆科学,2007,26(04):565.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2007.04.022]
　JIN Jian,WANG Guang-hua,CHEN Xue-li,et al.ANALYSIS OF MICROBIAL COMMUNITY FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY IN RHIZOSPHERE OF DIFFERENT SOYBEAN GENOTYPES AT R1 STAGE USING BIOLOG-ECO METHOD[J].Soybean Science,2007,26(01):565.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2007.04.022]
[8]李婧,迟凤琴,魏丹,等.不同有机物料还田对黑土活性有机碳组分含量的影响[J].大豆科学,2016,35(06):975.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.06.0975]
　LI Jing,CHI Feng-qin,WEI Dan,et al.Effects of Different Organic Materials Returning to Field on the Content of Active Organic Carbon in Black Soil[J].Soybean Science,2016,35(01):975.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.06.0975]
[9]王秋菊,米刚,张劲松,等.不同磷物料培肥心土对大豆产量和品质的影响[J].大豆科学,2016,35(06):981.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.06.0981]
　WANG Qiu-ju,MI Gang,ZHANG Jin-song,et al.Different Phosphorus Fertilizer Material Subsoil Effect on Yield and Quality of Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2016,35(01):981.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.06.0981]
[10]张兴义刘晓冰隋跃宇张少良　张久明刘焕军　 Stephen J. Herbert.人为剥离黑土层对大豆干物质积累及产量的影响*[J].大豆科学,2006,25(02):123.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2006.02.0123]
　Zhang Xingyi Liu Xiaobing Sui Yueyu Zhang Shaoliang Zhang JiumingLiu Huanjun Stephen J. Herbert.EFFECTS OF ARTIFICIAL TOPSOIL REMOVAL ON SOYBEAN DRY MATTERACCUMULATION AND YIELD IN CHINESE MOLLISOLS[J].Soybean Science,2006,25(01):123.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2006.02.0123]

备注/Memo

基金项目：农业部公益性行业专项(201303126); 国家“十二五”科技支撑计划(2013BAD07B01, 2013BAD11B03)；黑龙江省留学回归人员择优资助。第一作者简介：马星竹(1980-), 女, 博士, 副研究员, 主要从事土壤肥力与土壤生物活性研究。E-mail: maxingzhu@163.com。

更新日期/Last Update: 2016-01-29