[1]杜青,王青梅,陈平,等.玉米-大豆带状间作下除草剂的筛选[J].大豆科学,2017,36(01):98-103.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2017.01.0098]
　DU Qing,WANG Qing-mei,CHEN Ping,et al.Screening of Herbicides in Maize-Soybean Relay Strip Intercropping System[J].Soybean Science,2017,36(01):98-103.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2017.01.0098]
点击复制

玉米-大豆带状间作下除草剂的筛选

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S] 卷: 第36卷 期数: 2017年01期 页码: 98-103 栏目: 出版日期: 2017-01-20
Title:
Screening of Herbicides in Maize-Soybean Relay Strip Intercropping System
作者:
杜青; 王青梅; 陈平; 戴炜; 杨文钰; 雍太文
四川农业大学 农学院/农业部西南作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室，四川 成都 611130
Author(s):
DU Qing; WANG Qing-mei; CHEN Ping;  DAI Wei; YANG Wen-yu; YONG Tai-wen
（College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University / Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Cultivation in Southwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Chengdu 611130, China）
关键词:
玉米-大豆带状复合种植;  除草剂;  防效;  产量
Keywords:
Maize-soybean relay strip intercropping;  Herbicide;  Control effect;  Yield
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2017.01.0098
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
采用单因素随机区组设计，研究了3种药剂（A1：60%乙·嗪·滴丁酯、A2：60%乙·嗪·滴丁酯+48%灭草松、A3：48%灭草松）与清水对照组（A4）在玉米-大豆间作条件下，玉米、大豆苗期农艺性状、株防效及药害等级和成熟期作物产量，考察了玉米-大豆带状复合种植模式下除草剂除草效果及安全性。结果表明：3种除草剂对反枝苋、马唐防效好，对刺儿菜防效较差。药后15 d，A1与A2对杂草的防除效果最好，均在75%以上，其中A2对马唐的株防效达到了100%。药后30 d，各处理下的鲜重防效均在80%以上，A1对反枝苋的株防除效果最好为88.89%。玉米、大豆产量在A2处理下最高，分别较清水对照组高33.7%、39.4%。3种除草剂对玉米、大豆幼苗都有一定的药害症状，但药害等级均小于1，从株防效和对作物产量的影响分析，A2更适用于玉米-大豆带状复合种植模式。
Abstract:
In this study, we mainly determined the effects and safety of different herbicides, and screened out suitable herbicides used in maize-soybean relay strip intercropping system. Three herbicides included A1:60% acetochlor·metribuzin·butylate, A2:60% acetochlor·metribuzin·butylate+48%bentazone, A3: 48% bentazone were adopted by single factor randomized block design. The agronomic characters, control effect per plant and phytotoxicity level of crops were determined in maize and soybean seedling stage, and the yield was determined in maturing stage. The results showed that three herbicides had a great control effect on Amaranthus retroflexus L. and Digitaria sanguinalis ( L. ) Scop，but the control effect of Cirsium setosum was poor. After 15 d used herbicide, the weed control was more effective in A1 and A2, both were above 75%, especially, the per plant effect of Digitaria sanguinalis( L. ) Scop was 100% in A2. After 30 d used herbicide, the fresh weight control effect of each treatment was above 80%, in A1 the control effect per plant to Amaranthus retroflexus L.was 88.89%. Maize and soybean yield were 33.7% and 39.4% higher than clear water control in A2 respectively. Three herbicides phytotoxicity symptoms had an negative effect to maize and soybean seedlings, but the phytotoxicity level was less than 1. Analysis from the weed effect of per plant and yield, A2 was more suitable for maize-soybean relay strip intercropping system.

参考文献/References:

［1］赵玉信,杨惠敏.作物格局、土壤耕作和水肥管理对农田杂草发生的影响及其调控机制［J］. 草业学报,2015,24(8): 199-210. ( Zhao Y X, Yang H M. Effects of crop pattern, tillage practice and water and fertilizer management on weeds and their control mechanisms［J］. Acta Pratacultura Sinica,2015,24(8):199-210.)

［2］丁建清, 农田杂草的生物防治［J］. 中国生物防治学报,1995,11(3):129-133. (Ding J Q. Biological control of crop weeds［J］. Chinese Journal of Biologically Control,1995,11(3):129-133.)
［3］丁祖军,张洪进,张夕林,等. 玉米田杂草发生规律、经济防除阈值及竞争临界期研究［J］. 杂草科学,2003(2):15-17.(Ding Z J, Zhang H J, Zhang X L, et al. Occurrence, economic threshold of weeds in maize field and the critical period of competition research ［J］. Weed Science,2003(2):15-17.)
［4］胡冀宁,孙备,李建东,等.植物竞争及在杂草科学中的应用［J］. 作物杂志,2007(2):12-15. ( Hu J N, Sun B, Li J D, et al. Plant competition and its applications in weed science［J］. Crops,2007(2):12-15.)
［5］杨友琼,吴伯志.作物间套作种植方式间作效应研究［J］. 中国农学通报,2007,23(11):192-196.(Yang Y Q, Wu B Z. Research of intercropping benefit of crop intercropping systems［J］. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007,23(11):192-196.)
［6］Corre-Hellou G, Dibet A, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, et al. The competitive ability of pea-barley intercrops against weeds and the interactions with crop productivity and soil N availability［J］. Field Crops Research,2011,122(3):264-272.
［7］Iqbal J, Cheema Z A, An M. Intercropping of field crops in cotton for the management of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.)［J］. Plant & Soil,2007,300(1): 163-171.
［8］Abraham C T, Singh S P. Weed management in sorghum-legume intercropping systems［J］. Journal of Agricultural Science,1984,103(11):103-115.
［9］张群,王小春,杨峰,等.玉米品种和大豆播期对冬油菜收获后玉.豆带状复合体系产量和效益的影响［J］. 大豆科学,2014,33(3):334-339. ( Zhan Q, Wang X C, Yang F, et al. Effects of maize varieties and soybean seeding time on yield and benefit of maize-soybean relay-planting system after winter rape harvest［J］. Soybean Science,2014,33(3):334-339.)
［10］王小春,杨文钰.玉米—大豆带状间套作全程机械化迈上新台阶［J］.大豆科技,2012(6):48-50. ( Wang X C, Yang W Y. Maize-soybean relay strip intercropping system mechanization to a new level［J］. Soybean Science & Technology,2012(6):48-50.)
［11］Carruthers K, Fe Q, Cloutier Q, et al. Intercropping corn with soybean, lupin and forages: Weed control by intercrops combined with interrow cultivation［J］. European Journal of Agronomy, 1998,8(3):225-238.
［12］黄高宝,柴强.植物化感作用表现形式及其开发应用研究［J］. 中国生态农业学报,2003,11(3):172-174. (Huang G B, Cai Q. Acting formation and applying development of allelopathy［J］. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2003,11(3):172-174.)
［13］曾任森,骆世明.香茅、胜红蓟和三叶鬼针草植物他感作用研究［J］. 华南农业大学学报,1993(4):8-14. ( Zeng R S, Luo S M. Study on allelopathic potentials of Cymbopogon citratus［J］. Journal of South China Agricultural University,1993(4): 8-14.)
［14］黄顶成,尤民生,侯有明,等. 化学除草剂对农田生物群落的影响［J］. 生态学报,2005,25(6):1451-1458. ( Huang D C, You M S, Hou Y M, et al. Effects of chemical herbicides on bio-communities in agroecosystem［J］. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2005,25(6):1451-1458.)
［15］徐淑芬,苏少泉,翟琦,等.大豆苗前除草剂多元混用的研究［J］. 植物保护学报,1987(1):65-70. ( Xu S F, Su S Q, Zhai Q, et al. A study on the multicomponent application of preemergence herbicides in soybean fields［J］. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica,1987(1):65-70.)
［16］卢向阳,方矩生,徐筠,等.乙草胺和嗪草酮水基性制剂的研制及其应用［J］. 华北农学报,1999,14(4):128-133.( Lu X Y, Fang J S, Xu J, et al. Formulation and application of a water-based mixtruewith acetochlor and metribuzin［J］. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica,1999,14(4):128-133.)
［17］林郁.农药应用大全［M］.北京:农业出版社,1989.( Yu L. Pesticide applications［M］. Beijing:Agriculture Press,1989.)
［18］魏福香.除草剂药害试验方法［J］. 杂草科学,1992(3):18-21.( Wei F X. Test method for herbicide phytotoxicity［J］. Weed Science,1992(3):18-21.)
［19］冯巨忠,刘泰安.灭草松玉米田除草试验［J］. 农药,1990(5):59.(Feng J Z, Liu T A. Bentazone weed control test in corn field［J］. Agrochemicals,1990(5):59.)
［20］Norsworthy J K, Bangarwa S K, Scott R C, et al. Use of propanil and quinclorac tank mixtures for broadleaf weed control on rice (Oryza sativa) levees［J］. Crop Protection,2010,29(3):255-259.
［21］王仁杰. 81.3%2,4-滴丁酯·嗪草酮·乙草胺乳油防除玉米田杂草效果［J］. 现代化农业,2011(9):7.( Wang R J. Effect of 81.3% Butyl 2,4D metribuzin · acetochlor EC on controlling weeds in maize field［J］. Modernizing Agriculture,2011(9):7.)
［22］武叶叶,何红波,冯慧敏,等.农田黑土中不同浓度乙草胺对玉米苗期生长的影响［J］. 土壤通报,2008,39(4):953-956. (Wu Y Y, He H B, Feng H M, et al. Effect of different concentration of acetochlor on the maize seedling growth in the agricultural mollisol［J］. Chisnese Journal of Soil Science,2008,39(4):953-956.)

相似文献/References:

[1]曹德银.农威豆田防除杂草的安全性试验研究[J].大豆科学,2000,19(01):85.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2000.01.0085]
　Cao Deyin.STUDY ON SECURITY OF USE OF AGRICULTURAL DETERMENT TO SOYBEAN[J].Soybean Science,2000,19(01):85.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2000.01.0085]
[2]孙明明,王萍,吕世翔,等.大豆间套作种植技术研究进展[J].大豆科学,2017,36(05):818.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2017.05.0818]
　SUN Ming-ming,WANG Ping,LYU Shi-xiang,et al.Advances in Planting Techniques for Soybean Intercropping[J].Soybean Science,2017,36(01):818.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2017.05.0818]

备注/Memo

基金项目：国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项（CARS-04-PS19）。

第一作者简介：杜青(1992-),女,硕士,主要从事作物栽培生理生态研究。E-mail:duqing92066@163.com。
通讯作者：雍太文(1976-), 男,博士，教授,主要从事作物栽培生理生态研究。E-mail: yongtaiwen@sicau.edu.cn。

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-03-14