[1]陈光荣,王立明,杨如萍,等.薯-豆套作模式下作物对种间竞争与补偿作用的响应[J].大豆科学,2019,38(02):217-228.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2019.02.0217]
CHEN Guang-rong,WANG Li-ming,YANG Ru-ping,et al.Interspecies Competition and Compensation Response in Potato-Soybean Relay-Cropping System Under Different Soybean Varieties[J].Soybean Science,2019,38(02):217-228.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2019.02.0217]
点击复制
CHEN Guang-rong,WANG Li-ming,YANG Ru-ping,et al.Interspecies Competition and Compensation Response in Potato-Soybean Relay-Cropping System Under Different Soybean Varieties[J].Soybean Science,2019,38(02):217-228.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2019.02.0217]
薯-豆套作模式下作物对种间竞争与补偿作用的响应
《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]
卷:
第38卷
期数:
2019年02期
页码:
217-228
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-03-20
- Title:
- Interspecies Competition and Compensation Response in Potato-Soybean Relay-Cropping System Under Different Soybean Varieties
- Keywords:
- Potato-Soybean relay-cropping; Interspecies competition; Compensation effect; Northwest irrigation districts
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 以马铃薯-大豆套作模式为研究对象，通过2年的大田试验，分析不同熟期大豆品种与马铃薯组合后系统内作物干物质和养分积累的特性与种间竞争补偿的相互关系，阐明间套作系统种间竞争力弱化和恢复补偿能力提高的作用机理，为实现间套作可持续发展提供科学依据。结果表明：套作马铃薯干物质及养分积累无显著变化，而套作大豆变化显著。出苗60 d内套作大豆干物质积累量是同期单作的43.74%，出苗后80～100 d，晚熟品种干物质积累量相对于中熟和早熟提高的幅度分别为35.54%～59.22%和65.56%～70.81%，大豆收获时，晚熟品种干物质积累接近单作，两者间差异不显著。共生期，套作大豆N、P、K积累量较同期单作降低的幅度分别为31.43%～41.44%、21.17%～25.36%和23.23%～35.6%，晚熟品种与中熟、早熟品种间差异达到显著水平。共生期结束后，套作大豆养分吸收量较单作显著增加，收获时，晚熟品种N、P、K养分积累量接近单作，两者间差异不显著。综上，在该群体中，马铃薯是核心作物，共生期处于竞争优势（APS>0、CRPS>0），而大豆处于竞争弱势(APS<0、CRPS<0)，选择晚熟大豆品种与马铃薯组合可弱化种间竞争力和营养竞争比率，还有利于马铃薯收获后恢复补偿能力的发挥。
- Abstract:
- Taking the potato and soybean relay-cropping system as study object, two years experiment was carried out in Gansu irrigation districts. The study was aiming at investigating the characteristics of crop growth and nutrient absorption, determining dry matter accumulation, nutrient accumulation characteristics, interspecific competition dynamics and niche differentiation characteristics, clarifying the resources saving mechanism of intercropping. The results showed that there was no significant difference of dry matter and nutrient accumulation between intercropped potato and sole potato, but there was significant difference between intercropped soybean and sole soybean. Dry matter accumulation of inter-soybean relative to sole soybean was decreased by 43.74% at 60 d after soybean sowing, but there was no significant difference between different soybean varieties. Dry matter accumulation of late maturing variety was 35.54%-59.22% and 65.56%-70.81% higher than those under medium maturing and early maturing varieties at 80-100 d after soybean sowing, respectively. When the potato had been harvested, the dry matter accumulation of soybean in all intercropping systems increased, especially late maturing varieties, which became much closer to sole cropping, and there was significant difference between different soybean varieties. During the co-growth period, there was significant difference of Nutrient N, P and K accumulation between late maturing variety and medium and early maturing variety. Nutrient N, P and K accumulation of inter-soybean relative to sole soybean was decreased by 31.43%-41.44%,21.17%-25.36% and 23.23%-35.6%, respectively. After potato harvest, Nutrient N, P and K accumulation of soybean in all intercropping systems increased, especially late maturing varieties, which became much closer to sole cropping, and there was significant difference between different soybean varieties. Therefore, in potato-soybean relay-cropping system, the values of A and CR indicated that the potato was more competitive than soybean, late maturing variety was better than early maturing and medium maturing varieties to intercrop with potato, the interspecific competition in using resources was been weaken during the co-growth period, and it was beneficial to the compensation effect of soybean during the period after potato harvest.
参考文献/References:
［1］Brooker R W, Bennett A E, Conf W F, et al. Improving intercropping: A synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology［J］. New Phytologist, 2015（206）: 107-117.
［2］王志刚. 灌漠土上连续间作对作物生产力和土壤肥力的影响［D］. 北京：中国农业大学, 2014.(Whang Z G. Crop productivity and soil fertility as affected by continuous intercropping in an orthic anthrosol［D］. Beijing: Chinese Agricultural University, 2014.)
［3］Schoener T W. Field experiments on interspecific competition［J］. American Naturalist, 1983: 240-285.
［4］Tilman D. The importance of the mechanisms of interspecific competition［J］. American Naturalist, 1987: 769-774.
［5］吴刚, 李静. 农林生态系统界面生态学初探［J］.应生态学报, 2000(3): 459-460. (Wu G, Li J. Primary research on interface ecology in agroforestrial ecosystems ［J］.Journal of Applied Ecology, 2000(3): 459-460.)
［6］Casper B B, Jackson R B. Plant competition underground ［J］. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1997: 545-570.
［7］Aggarwal P, Garrity D P, Liboon S, et al. Resource use and plant interactions in a rice-mungbean intercrop［J］. Agronomy Journal 1992, 84: 71-78.
［8］Chen X, Cui Z, Fan M, et al. Producing more grain with lower environmental costs［J］. Nature, 2014, 514(7523): 486.
［9］陈光荣, 杨文钰, 张国宏,等. 薯豆套作模式下不同熟期大豆品种的生长补偿效应［J］. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(3): 455-467.(Chen G R, Yang W Y, Zhang G H, et al. Compensation effect of different soybean varieties in potato/soybean intercropping systems［J］. Scientia Agricultural Sinica, 2016, 49(3): 455-467.)
［10］Li L, Sun J H, Zhang F S, et al. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping:Ⅱ. Recovery or compensation of maize and soybean after wheat harvesting［J］. Field Crops Research, 2001, 71(3):173-181.
［11］Li L, Sun J H, Zhang F S. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping:Ⅰ. Yield advantage and interspecific interactions on nutrients［J］. Field Crops Re-search, 2001, 71(2):123-137.
［12］陈光荣, 杨文钰, 张国宏,等. 马铃薯/大豆套作对3个大豆品种光合指标与产量的影响［J］. 应用生态学报, 2015,26(11): 3345-3352.(Chen G R, Yang W Y, Zhang G H, et al. Effects of potato/soybean intercropping on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of three soybean varieties［J］. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecololy, 2015,26(11): 3345-3352.)
［13］鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析［M］. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005. (Bao S D. Analysis of soil agricultural chemistry［M］. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2005.)
［14］Al-Dalain S A. Effect of intercropping of zea maize with potato Solanum tuberosum L. on potato growth and on the productivity and land equivalent ratio of potato and zea maize［J］. Agriculture Journal, 2009,4: 164-170.
［15］Connolly J, Goma H C, Rahim K. The information content of indicators in intercropping research［J］. Agriculture Ecosystem and Environment, 2001,87: 191-207.
［16］Willy R W, Rao M R. A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops［J］. Experimental Agriculture, 1980,16: 117-125.
［17］Morris R A, Garrity D P. Resource capture and utilization in intercropping: Non-nitrogen nutrients［J］. Field Crops Research, 1993, 34: 319-334.
［18］Mushagalush G N, Ledent J F, Draye X. Shoot and root com-petition in potato/maize intercropping: Effects on growth and yield［J］. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2008, 64: 180-188.
［19］Ruiz R A, Bertero H D. Light interception and radiation use efficiency in temperate quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars［J］. European Journal of Agronomy, 2008, 29: 144-152.
［20］宋艳霞, 杨文钰, 李卓玺, 等. 不同大豆品种幼苗叶片光合及叶绿素荧光特性对套作遮荫的响应［J］. 中国油料作物学报, 2009, 31(4): 474-479. (Song Y X, Yang W Y, Li Z X, et al. The effects of shading on photosynthetic and fluorescent characteristics of soybean seedlings under mazie-soybean relay cropping［J］. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2009, 31(4): 474-479.)
［21］王树起, 沈其荣, 褚贵新, 等. 种间竞争对旱作水稻与花生间作系统根系分布和氮素吸收积累的影响［J］. 土壤学报,2006, 43(5): 860-863. (Wang S Q, Shen Q R, Chu G X, et al. Effect of interspecies competition on root distribution and nitrogen uptake of peanut and rice in intercropping in aerobic soil［J］. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2006, 43(5): 860-863.)
［22］金绍龄, 张丽慧, 李隆. 小麦玉米带田一种作物施用氮肥对配对作物氮营养的影响［J］. 西北农业学报,1993, 2(3): 1-6.(Jin S L, Zhang L H, Li L. Effect of N application in maize-wheat intercropping system［J］. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 1993, 2(3): 1-6.)
［23］叶优良. 间作对氮素和水分利用的影响［D］. 北京：中国农业大学, 2003. (Ye Y L. Effect of intercropping on nitrogen and water use ［D］. Beijin: Chinese Agricultural University, 2003.)
［24］李文学.小麦玉米蚕豆间作系统中氮、磷吸收利用特点及其环境效应［D］. 北京：中国农业大学, 2001. (Li W X. Nitrate accumulation in soil and nutrient acquisition by intercropped wheat, maize and faba bean［D］. Beijin: Chinese Agricultural University, 2001.)
［25］Mao L L, Zhang L Z, Li W Q, et al. Yield advantage and water saving in maize/pea intercrop［J］. Field Crops Research, 2012, 138: 11-20.
［26］Li R, Hou X Q, Ji Z K, et al. Effects on soil temperature, moisture, and maize yield of cultivation with ridge and full mulching in the rainfed area of the Loess Plateau, China［J］. Agricultural Water Management, 2013, 116: 101-109.
［27］NicholsI J D, Rosemeyer M E, Carpenter F L, et al. Intercropping legume trees with nativetimber trees rapidly restores cover to eroded tropical pasture without fertilization［J］. Forest Ecology and Management, 2001, 152: 195-209.
［28］Li Q Z, Sun J H, Wei X J, et al. Overyielding and interspecific interactions mediated by nitrogen fertilization in strip intercropping of maize with faba bean, wheat and barley［J］. Plant and Soil, 2011, 339(1/2): 147-161.
［29］Zuo Y M, Zhang F S. Effect of peanut mixed cropping with gramineous species on micronutrient concentrations and iron chlorosis of peanut plants grown in a calcareous soil［J］. Plant and Soil, 2008, 306(1/2): 23-36.
［30］Zhang F S, Li L. Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency［J］. Plant and Soil, 2003, 248(1): 305-312.
［31］雍太文, 杨文钰, 向达兵, 等. 小麦/玉米/大豆套作的产量、氮营养表现及其种间竞争力的评定［J］. 草业学报, 2012, 21(1): 50-58. (Yong T W, Yang W Y, Xiang D B, et al. Production and N nutrient performance of wheat-maize-soybean relay strip intercropping system and evaluation of interspecies competition［J］. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(1): 50-58.)
［32］Madhavan M, Shanmugasundaram V S. Effect of population on nutrient uptake of pigeonpea genotypes in sole and intercropped situation with sorghum CO2［J］. Acta Agronomica Hungarica, 1990, 39: 389-392.
［33］刘广才.不同间套作体系种间营养竞争的差异性及机理研究［D］. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2005. (Liu G C. Difference and its mechanism of interspecific nutrition competition in different intercropping system［D］. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2005.)
备注/Memo
收稿日期：2018-12-04
基金项目：甘肃省农业科学院科技支撑计划（2017GAAS47）；国家自然科学基金（31660134）；国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项（CARS-04-CES17）。
第一作者简介：陈光荣(1980-)，男，博士，副研究员，主要从事大豆新品种选育及作物高产高效栽培理论与技术研究。E-mail:chengr516@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update:
2019-04-01