[1]昝凯,周青,张志民,等.灰色关联度和DTOPSIS法综合分析河南区域试验中大豆新品种(系)的农艺性状表现[J].大豆科学,2018,37(05):664-671.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.05.0664]
　ZAN Kai,ZHOU Qing,ZHANG Zhi-min,et al.Gray Correlation Analysis and DTOPSIS Method for Comprehensive Agronomic Performance Analysis of New Soybean Varieties(Lines) in Henan Regional Test[J].Soybean Science,2018,37(05):664-671.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.05.0664]
点击复制

灰色关联度和DTOPSIS法综合分析河南区域试验中大豆新品种(系)的农艺性状表现

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S] 卷: 第37卷 期数: 2018年05期 页码: 664-671 栏目: 出版日期: 2018-09-20
Title:
Gray Correlation Analysis and DTOPSIS Method for Comprehensive Agronomic Performance Analysis of New Soybean Varieties(Lines) in Henan Regional Test
作者:
昝凯; 周青; 张志民; 郑丽敏; 王凤菊; 陈亚光; 李明军; 徐淑霞
（安阳市农业科学院，河南 安阳 455000）
Author(s):
ZAN Kai;  ZHOU Qing;  ZHANG Zhi-min;  ZHENG Li-min;  WANG Feng-ju; CHEN Ya-guang;  LI Ming-jun;  XU Shu-xia
(Anyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, China)
关键词:
灰色关联度; DTOPSIS法; 大豆; 综合性状评价
Keywords:
Gray correlation analysis;  DTOPSIS analysis;  Soybean;  Comprehensive traits evaluation
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.05.0664
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了给鉴定和评价大豆新品种(系)提供依据和方法，本研究应用灰色关联度分析法和DTOPSIS法对参加2014年河南省夏大豆区域试验的14个品种(系)进行综合分析评价，将各参试品种的综合性状优劣进行排序，并分析了两种方法在综合评价方面的优劣。为确保综合评价结果的客观性和可靠性，本研究利用灰色关联度法确定各性状的权重值，并对这两种方法设置相同的标准品种，以便于对两种方法的分析结果进行比较，从而验证灰色关联度法和DTOPSIS法分析结果的准确性，结果表明：DTOPSIS法计算出的品种间Ci值差异明显，品种间综合性状的差异表现充分，而灰色关联度分析法计算出的品种间Gi值差异不大，综合评价效果较差；相关性分析表明各品种用灰色关联度分析法和DTOPSIS法计算出的品种优劣排名具有一致性，与仅依据品种产量的优劣排名不具有一致性。以上结果说明：灰色关联度法和DTOPSIS法都能对大豆品种(系)作出科学的综合评价，其中DTOPSIS法具有相对更好的评价效果。
Abstract:
In order to provide basis and method for identifying and estimating the new soybean varieties (lines), gray correlation analysis method and DTOPSIS method were used to comprehensively evaluate 14 soybean varieties (lines) which participated in the summer soybean regional test in Henan province in 2014. The advantages and disadvantages of each tested variety were evaluated to identify and appraise these new soybean varieties(lines), and the effects of the two methods on comprehensive evaluation were assessed as well. The traits weight were determined by the method of gray correlation to ensure the objectivity and reliability of the comprehensive evaluation results, at the same time, the same standard varieties were utilized in the method of gray correlation analysis and the DTOPSIS to verify the accuracy of the analysis results by comparing the analysis results of these two methods. Comparison results between these two methods showed that the differences of Ci values calculated by DTOPSIS method for different varieties were significant, meaning that the differences in comprehensive traits between varieties were fully expressed. While the Gi values of gray correlation analysis method were not significant, by which a conclusion was drawn that the comprehensive evaluation effects of gray correlation analysis method were poorer than the DTOPSIS method. The results of correlation analysis showed that the varieties had a consistent ranking in the calculation method of the gray correlation analysis and the DTOPSIS, and were not consistent with the rankings based simply on the yield of the varieties. All of the above illustrated that both of the gray correlation analysis and DTOPSIS method can make scientific comprehensive evaluation of soybean varieties (lines), among which the DTOPSIS method has a relatively better evaluation effect.

参考文献/References:

［1］刘录祥，孙其信，王士芸. 灰色系统理论应用于作物新品种综合评估初探［J］. 中国农业科学, 1989, 22(3): 22-27. (Liu L X, Sun Q X, Wang S Y. A preliminary study on multifactorial evaluation of new crop varieties with the application of the gray system theory［J］. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1989, 22(3): 22-27.)

［2］宋智美, 刘乃雁, 王元英, 等. 灰色关联度法在烤烟品种重要性状综合评价中的运用［J］. 中国烟草科学, 2011, 32(2): 17-19, 23.(Song Z M, Liu N Y, Wang Y Y, et al. Application of gray relational analysis in evaluating major attributes in national variety trial of flu-cured tobacco［J］. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2011, 32(2): 17-19, 23.)
［3］魏云山, 刘迎春, 丁素荣, 等. 大豆品种资源性状稳定性的灰色关联度分析与评价［J］. 大豆科学, 2012, 31(3): 406-410. (Wei Y S, Liu Y C, Ding S R, et al. Evaluation on characters stability of soybean germplasms through gray correlation degree analysis［J］. Soybean Science, 2012, 31(3): 406-410.)
［4］刘翔宇, 刘祖昕, 加帕尔, 等. 基于主成分与灰色关联分析的甜高粱品种综合评价［J］. 新疆农业科学, 2016, 53(1): 99-107. (Liu X Y, Liu Z X, Jia P E, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of sweet sorghum varieties based on principal component silabi analysis and gray relational grade analysis［J］. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 53(1): 99-107.)
［5］刘瑞显, 张国伟, 扬长琴. 基于熵权理论的灰色关联度法在棉花耐盐性评价中的应用［J］. 核农学报, 2017, 31(2): 402-409. (Liu R X, Zhang G W, Yang C Q, et al. Using gray related degree method based on entropy weight theory to evaluate salt tolerance of cotton［J］. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 31(2): 402-409.)
［6］丁明亮, 赵红, 蒲秋红, 等. 应用灰色关联度分析法对远缘杂交选育的小麦品系评价［J］. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(2): 217-222. (Ding M L, Zhao H, Pu Q H, et al. Multi-factorial evaluation of new wheat lines from distant hybridization by gray relational analysis method［J］. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 31(2): 217-222.)
［7］姚兴涛, 朱永达, 张永贞, 等. 区域国民经济协调发展的动态多目标决策［J］. 农业工程学报, 1991, 7(4): 1-6. (Yao X T, Zhu Y D, Zhang Y Z, et al. Dynamic multiobjective decision making of coordination development of region national economy［J］. Transactions of CSAE, 1991, 7(4): 1-6.)
［8］吴志会, 白玉龙, 董玉武, 等. DTOPSIS法综合评价冀中北冬小麦新品种的初步研究［J］. 麦类作物学报, 2005, 25(6): 108-111. (Wu Z H, Bai Y L, Dong Y W, et al. A preliminary evaluation of new winter wheat varieties of middle-north Hebei with DTOPSIS method［J］. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2005, 25(6): 108-111.)
［9］胡其明, 邓伟, 党筱兰. 用DTOPSIS法综合评价杂交水稻新品种在黔西南州的适应性［J］. 种子, 2013, 32(12): 95-97. (Hu Q M, Deng W, Dang X L. Comprehensive evaluation of adaptability of new hybrid rice varieties in Qianxinan autonomous prefecture by DTOPSIS［J］. Seed, 2013, 32(12): 95-97.)
［10］邵美红, 程楚, 程思明, 等. 运用DTOPSIS法对鲜食玉米新品种在浙西北地区适应性的综合评价［J］. 江西农业学报, 2017, 29(6): 25-28. (Shao M H, Cheng C, Cheng S M, et al. Using DTOPSIS method to comprehensively evaluate adaptability of sweet corn varieties in northwest of Zhejiang province［J］. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2017, 29(6): 25-28. )
［11］胡守林, 万素梅, 王汉全. 南疆棉区应用DTOPSIS法综合评价棉花新品种的初步探索［J］. 棉花学报, 2002, 14(1): 41-43. (Hu S L, Wan S M, Wang H Q. Preliminary study report in the south of Xinjiang by using the DTOPSIS to evaluate the new cotton varieties［J］. Cotton Science, 2002, 14(1): 41-43.)
［12］徐淑霞, 杨慧凤, 周青, 等. DTOPSIS法对安豆1号大豆新品种的综合评价［J］. 大豆科技, 2011(2): 17-20. (Xu S X, Yang H F, Zhou Q, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of new soybean variety Andou 1 based on DTOPSIS method［J］. Soybean Science & Technology, 2011(2): 17-20.)
［13］郭瑞林. 作物灰色育种学［M］. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1995: 154-160. (Guo R L. Crop grey breeding［M］. Beijing: China′s Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 1995: 154-160.)
［14］孙治安, 王建立, 杨丙中. 农作物新品种灰色关联度与DTOPSIS分析比较［J］. 耕作与栽培, 2006(1): 15-20. (Sun Z A, Wang J L, Yang B Z. Analysis of new crop varieties with gray correlation analysis and DTOPSIS analysis［J］. Tillage and Cultivation, 2006(1): 15-20.)
［15］姜永平, 刘水东, 薛晨霞, 等. DTOPSIS法和灰色关联度法在番茄品种综合评价中的应用比较［J］. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(22): 259-263. (Jiang Y P, Liu S D, Xue C X, et al. Results comparison of comprehensive evaluation tomato varieties with DTOPSIS and gray related degree［J］. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(22): 259-263.)
［16］李彦平, 李淑君, 吴娟霞, 等. DTOPSIS法和灰色关联度法在新引烤烟新品种综合评价中的应用比较［J］. 中国烟草学报, 2012, 18(4): 35-40. (Li Y P, Li S J, Wu J X, et al. Application of comparison of comprehensive evaluation newly introduced flu-cured tobacco varieties by analysis methods of DTOPSIS and gray correlation［J］. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2012, 18(4): 35-40.)
［17］杨昆, 吴才文, 覃伟, 等. DTOPSIS法和灰色关联度法在甘蔗新品种综合评价中的应用比较［J］. 西南农业学报, 2015, 28(4): 1542-1547. (Yang K, Wu C W, Tan W, et al. Comparison of comprehensive evaluation sugarcane new varieties with DTOPSIS and gray related degree［J］. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 28(4): 1542-1547.)

相似文献/References:

[1]谢甫绨,曹海潮,张惠君,等.大豆远缘杂交后代植株倒伏与农艺性状的关系[J].大豆科学,2009,28(05):795.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.05.0795]
　XIE Fu-ti,CAO Hai-chao,ZHANG Hui-jun,et al.Relationship Between Lodging and Agronomic Traits of Soybean Progenies from Distant Pedigree[J].Soybean Science,2009,28(05):795.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.05.0795]
[2]单彩云,魏玉光,张延军,等.黑龙江省大豆主栽品种主要性状灰色关联度分析[J].大豆科学,2009,28(05):945.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.05.0945]
　SHAN Cai-yun,WEI Yu-guang,ZHANG Yan-jun,et al.Grey Correlation Degree Analysis on Main Traits of Soybean Varieties in Heilongjiang Province[J].Soybean Science,2009,28(05):945.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.05.0945]
[3]成雪峰,张凤云.灰色关联分析法在夏大豆育种上的应用[J].大豆科学,2009,28(01):31.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.01.0031]
　CHENG Xue-feng,ZHANG Feng-yun.Application of Grey Correlation Analysis in Summer Soybean Breeding[J].Soybean Science,2009,28(05):31.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.01.0031]
[4]保丽萍　王铁军　蔡淑平　耿智德　赵银月.云南省菜用大豆产量限制因子的研究＊[J].大豆科学,2006,25(02):181.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2006.02.0181]
　Bao LipingWang Tiejun Cai Shuping Geng Zhide Zhao Yinyue.ANALYSIS OF LIMITED FACTORS FOR VEGETABLE SOYBEAN PRODUCTION IN YUNNAN[J].Soybean Science,2006,25(05):181.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2006.02.0181]

备注/Memo

收稿日期：2018-05-21

基金项目：河南省科技攻关计划项目(092102110005)。
第一作者简介：昝凯（1988-），男，硕士，研究实习员，主要从事大豆遗传育种研究。E-mail: zankai163@163.com。
通讯作者：徐淑霞（1963-），女，研究员，主要从事大豆遗传育种研究。E-mail: aysx698@163.com。

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-10-08