[1]尚静,肖任果,汤忠琴,等.两种防治大豆高隆象药剂防效及其对大豆的氧化胁迫效应[J].大豆科学,2017,36(05):761-767.[doi:DOI：10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2017.05.0761]
　SHANG Jing,XIAO Ren-guo,TANG Zhong-qin,et al.The Control of Two Kinds of Insecticideson to Erganiadoriae yunnannus and Their Oxidative Stress on Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2017,36(05):761-767.[doi:DOI：10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2017.05.0761]
点击复制

两种防治大豆高隆象药剂防效及其对大豆的氧化胁迫效应

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S] 卷: 第36卷 期数: 2017年05期 页码: 761-767 栏目: 出版日期: 2017-09-20
Title:
The Control of Two Kinds of Insecticideson to Erganiadoriae yunnannus and Their Oxidative Stress on Soybean
作者:
尚静; 肖任果; 汤忠琴; 常小丽; 杨文钰
（四川农业大学 农学院/带状复合种植工程技术研究中心/四川省作物重大病害重点实验室，四川 成都 611130）
Author(s):
SHANG Jing;  XIAO Ren-guo;  TANG Zhong-qin;  CHANG Xiao-li;  YANG Wen-yu
（College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University/Sichuan Engineering Research Center for Crop Strip Intercropping System/Sichuan Key Laboratory for Major Crop Diseases, Chengdu 611130, China）
关键词:
高隆象; 三唑磷; 氯虫苯甲酰胺; 氧化胁迫损伤; 相对防效
Keywords:
Ergania doriae yunnanus;  Triazophos;  Chlorantraniliprole;  Oxidative stress;  Relative control effect
DOI:
DOI：10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2017.05.0761
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在复合种植模式下大豆高隆象的发生率远高于其它害虫，成为造成大豆产量损失的重要因素。本研究用防治大豆高隆象的两种药剂处理大豆，检测大豆氧化胁迫损伤，并调查了间作和净作模式下的虫害发生率和药剂防效。结果表明：药剂处理组中，大豆的生长发育受阻，活性氧(ROS)累积量上升，膜脂通透性增加，抗氧化酶活力增强；药剂处理对大豆叶片均造成了氧化胁迫损伤。喷施三唑磷氧化胁迫损伤效应显著低于喷施氯虫苯甲酰胺和复配；间作模式下大豆高隆象的发生率远低于净作，两种模式下，三唑磷对大豆高隆象的防效均比氯虫苯甲酰胺以及两种药剂复配的效果更好。优选三唑磷作为大豆高隆象成虫的防治药剂。
Abstract:
In intercropping, incidence of Ergania doriae yunnanus is much higher than other pests which become an important factor resulted in the loss of soybean.Two kinds of insecticides on the control of Ergania doriae yunnanus were used in present study. The oxidative stress damage on soybean was detected and the incidence of pests and control effect were investigated in the monocropping and intercropping. The results showed that the growth and development of soybean treated by insecticide was inhibited. The accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and permeability of plasmalemma were increased Antioxidant enzyme activity was enhanced Oxidative stress of soybean leaves was caused by chemical treatment Oxidative stress damage effect was significantly lower by spraying triazophos than spraying chlorantraniliprole and co-spraying. The incidence of Ergania doriae yunnanus was far lower in intercropping than monocropping. In the two types of cropping patterns, spraying triazophos was more effective than spraying chlorantraniliprole and co-spraying on the control of Ergania doriae yunnanus . Triazophos was priority selected as a pesticide on the control of Ergania doriae yunnanus.

参考文献/References:

［1］李福贵.大豆田高隆象发生为害与防治初探［J］.基层农技推广, 2015(10): 21-22.(Li F G. The harm and control of Ergania doriae yunnanus in soybean fields ［J］. Basic-level Agro-technique Extension, 2015, 10: 21-22)

［2］石育松.大豆在生长过程中常见的病虫害及综合防治技术［J］. 中国科技投资, 2013(A28): 366.(Shi Y S. Comprehensive control technology of common diseases and insect pests in the process of soybeans growth ［J］. China Venture Capital, 2013(A28): 366.)?
［3］吴雨珊,龚万灼,杨文钰,等.带状套作复光后不同大豆品种干物质积累模型与特征分析［J］.中国生态农业学报, 2017,25(4): 572-580. (Wu Y S, Gong W Z, Yang W Y, et al. Dynamic model and characteristics analysis of dry matter production after light recovery of different soybean varieties in relay strip intercropping systems ［J］. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(4): 572-580.)
［4］徐淑敏,刘新茹.大豆害虫的研究概况［J］.北华大学学报, 2003, 4(6): 478-483. (Xu S M, Liu X R.Survey of soybean pests ［J］. Journal of Beihua University, 2003, 4(6): 478-483.)
［5］季宏平.几种新药剂防治大豆害虫效果及其评价［J］. 大豆科学, 2002, 21(1): 78-80. (Ji H P. Prevention effect and evaluation on soybean pests of several new medicament ［J］. Soybean Science, 2002, 21(1): 78-80.)
［6］廖世纯,黄凤宽,韦桥现,等.三唑磷及其与益舒宝混用对稻瘿蚊的田间防效［J］. 中国稻米,2007(4): 63-64. (Liao S C, Huang F K, Wei Q X, et al. The control effect on-rice gall midge by triazophos mixed with good comfortable treasure ［J］. China Rice, 2007(4): 63-64.)
［7］任知良,王明刚.一种含有氯虫苯甲酰胺、氯吡硫磷、三唑磷和螺虫乙酯的高效杀虫剂:中国, 104365652 A.［P］.2015-02-25. (Ren Z L, Wang M G. A efficient insecticide containing chlorine worm benzamide sulfur, chlorine pyrazole phosphate, ethyl triazophos and worm screw: China, 104365652-A ［P］.2015-02-25.)
［8］余海明.三唑磷与氟虫腈复配对粘虫的增效机理研究［D］.杭州: 浙江大学, 2010(Yu H M. Mechanism research on synergistic of triazophos and Fluorine worm nitrile on the control of armyworm［D］. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2010.)?
［9］郭显伟,黄海.35%氯虫苯甲酰胺WG对稻纵卷叶螟防治效果的研究［J］. 生物灾害科学,2014,37(1):38-40. (Guo X W, Huang H. 35% Chlorantraniliprole WG in control against rice leaf rollers ［J］. Biological Disaster Science, 2014,37(1): 38-40.)
［10］齐国康.20%氯虫苯甲酰胺等杀虫剂对玉米螟的防治效果［J］.安徽农学通报,2010,16(12):124. (Qi G K. Effect of pesticides such like 20% chlorantraniliprole on the control of the corn borer［J］. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 16(12):124.)
［11］李小丹. Excel软件中的函数在大豆病虫害统计中的应用［J］.科技·经济·市场,2014(12):164-165. (Li X D. The application of the function in the Excel software in soybean plant diseases and insect pests of statistics ［J］. Science and Technology, Economy and Market, 2014(12):164-165.)
［12］Shang J, Xi D H, Yuan S, et al. Difference of physiological characters in dark green islands and yellow leaf tissue of CMV-infected Nicotianata bacum-leaves［J］. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 2010, 65c: 73-78.
［13］Shi Q H, Bao Z Y, Zhu Z J, et al. Effects of different treatments of salicylic acid on heat tolerance, chlorophyll fluorescence, and antioxidant enzyme activity in seedlings of Cucumis sativa L［J］. Plant Growth Regulation, 2006,48:127-135.
［14］van Rossum M W P C, Alberda M, van der Plas L H W. Role of oxidative damage in tulip bulb scale micropropagation［J］. Plant Science,1997,130:207-216.
［15］Qi J, Wang J, Gong Z, et al. Apoplastic ROS signaling in plant immunity［J］. Current Opinion in Plant Biology,2017,38:92-100.
［16］Suzuki N, Koussevitzky S, Mittler R, et al. ROS and redox signaling in the responseof plants to abiotic stress［J］. Plant Cell & Environment,2012,35(2):259-270.
［17］Chan Z, Yokawa K, Kim W Y, et al. Editorial: ROS regulation during plant abiotic stress responses［J］. Frontiers in Plant Science,2016,7:1536-1341.
［18］刘芳,奚本贵,包善微,等.氯虫苯甲酰胺对稻纵卷叶螟的防效及对稻田有益节肢动物的安全性评价［J］.植物保护,2009,35(5):139-144. (Liu F, Xi B G, Bao S W, et al. Control effectiveness of chlorantraniliprole on Cnaphalocrocis medinalis and evaluation of its safety to beneficial arthropods in the rice fields ［J］. Plant Protection, 2009, 35(5):139-144.)
［19］李瑞娟,于建垒,宋国春,等.氯虫苯甲酰胺在甘蓝和土壤中的残留及消解动态［J］.生态环境学报, 2011, 20(4):663-667. (Li R J, Yu J L, Song G C, et al. Residue and dynamic of chlorantraniliprole in cabbage and soil ［J］. Journal of Ecological Environment, 2011, 20(4):663-667.)

备注/Memo

基金项目：国家重点研发计划（SQ2017YFNC050029）；四川省科技厅科技支撑项目（2015NZ0040）；四川省教育厅科学技术一般项目（035Z1038）。

第一作者简介：尚静（1983-），女，博士，副教授，主要从事植物保护研究。E-mail: shangjing_edu@163.com。
通讯作者：杨文钰（1958-），男，教授，博导，主要从事作物生理生态与栽培研究。E-mail: mssiyangwy@sicau.edu.cn。

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-11-01