PU Wei-feng,LI Gui-lan,ZHANG Min,et al.Effects of Drought Stress on Root Characteristics and Physiological Indexes of Glycine soja and Glycine max [J].Soybean Science,2010,29(04):615-622.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2010.04.0615]
干旱胁迫对野生和栽培大豆根系特征及生理指标的影响
- Title:
- Effects of Drought Stress on Root Characteristics and Physiological Indexes of Glycine soja and Glycine max
- 文章编号:
- 1000-9841（2010）04-0615-08
- Keywords:
- Drought stress; Glycine soja; Glycine max; Drought resistance
- 分类号:
- S565.1
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 以4份野生大豆（永5、永26、永46、永52）和4份栽培大豆（中黄13、冀豆12、秦皇10、秦皇29）为材料，用不同浓度（0%，10%，20%，30%）PEG6000模拟水分胁迫，探讨干旱胁迫对野生和栽培大豆幼苗根系特征和生理指标的影响。结果表明：随着干旱胁迫的增加，不同大豆材料的根系特性存在显著差异，大豆抗旱性与总根长、总根表面积、总根体积呈正相关，与平均根直径呈负相关；隶属函数综合评定结果表明4份野生大豆的抗旱性均强于栽培大豆，其中栽培大豆中黄13抗旱性最差。干旱胁迫下，野生大豆、栽培大豆的叶片相对含水量呈下降趋势，丙二醛含量均比0%PEG6000有所增加，但不同材料间叶绿素含量、超氧化物歧化酶（SOD）活性和过氧化物酶（POD）活性的表现趋势不同，说明野生大豆和栽培大豆的抗旱生理指标存在一定的差异。
- Abstract:
- Four wild soybeans (Yong5, Yong26, Yong46, Yong52) and 4 cultivated soybeans (Zhonghuang 13, Jidou12, Qinhuang 10, Qinhuang 29) were used as materials in this study to discuss the effects of drought stress on root characteristics and physiological indexes of wild soybeans and cultivate soybeans. Drought stress conditions was simulated by different concentrations of PEG6000.The results showed that, the root characteristics of different soybean materials were significantly different with the increase of drought stress. Besides, drought resistance of soybean was positively correlated with total root length, total root surface and total root volume of the root, while drought resistance of soybean was negatively correlated with average roots diameter. The results of membership functions and comprehensive evaluation showed that wild soybean materials had stronger drought stress resistance than cultivated soybean, and Zhonghuang 13 cultivated soybean had the weakest drought stress resistance in all cultivated soybeans, besides, relative water contents of wild soybeans and cultivate soybean leaves were decreased and MDA content was increased than 0%PEG6000 under drought stress. However, the chlorophyll content, the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POD) had different performances, which indicated that there were some differences between the drought resistance physiological indexes of wild and cultivated soybeans.
参考文献/References:
[1]王敏,张从宇,马同富,等.大豆品种苗期抗旱性研究[J].中国油料作物学报,2004,26(3):29-32.(Wang M,Zhang C Y,Ma T F,et al.Studies on the drought resistance of seeding in soybean[J].Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences,2004,26(3):29-32.) [2]孙彩霞,沈秀英.作物抗旱性鉴定指标及数量分析方法的研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2002,18(1):49-51.(Sun C X,Shen X Y.Advances in studies on identification indexes and methods of quantitative analyses for crop drought resistance[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2002,18(1):49-51.) [3]杨光宇.东北地区野生、半野生大豆资源在大豆育种中利用研究进展[J].大豆科学,1997,16(3):259-263.(Yang G Y.Advance of study on usage of wild and semi-wild soybean in soybean breeding in the nortneast of china[J].Soybean Science,1997,16(3):259-263.) [4]董钻,谢甫绨.土壤水分胁迫对大豆体内酶活性的影响[J].大豆科学,1995,14(4):290-298.(Dong Z, Xie F T. Effects of drought treatments at different stages on the enzymeactivites and membrane permabilities in soybean[J].Soybean Science,1995,14(4):290-298.) [5]刘学义.大豆抗旱性评定方法探讨[J].中国油料,1986(4):23-26.(Liu X Y.Discuss of identical method in soybean drought resistance[J].Chinese Oil Crops,1986(4):23-26.) [6]谢甫绨,王文和,王海英,等.大豆品种耐旱性的评价[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2000,31(3):238-241.(Xie F T,Wang W H,Wang H Y,et al. Drought tolerance evaluation of soybeans[J].Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University,2000,31(3):238-241.) [7]孔照胜,武云帅,岳爱琴,等.不同大豆品种抗旱性生理指标综合分析[J].华北农学报,2001,16(3):40-45.(Kong Z S,Wu Y S,Yue A Q,et al. Comprehensive analysis of physiological indexes for drought resistance in different soybean varieties[J].Acta Agriculturae Boreali Sinica,2001,16(3):40-45.) [8]谢甫绨,董钻,刘宛,等.渗透胁迫下大豆抗旱机理的初步研究[J].沈阳农业大学学报,1995,26(3): 8-12.(Xie F T，Dong Z，Liu W，et al.Preliminary study on the mechanism of soybean drought resistance under osmotic stress[J].Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University,1995,26(3):8-12.) [9]钟鹏,朱占林,李志刚,等.PEG处理对大豆幼苗活力及膜系统修复的影响[J].中国农学通报,2004,20(4):260-263.(Zhong P,Zhu Z L,Li Z G,et al.Effect of PEG on vigour index and membrane systems repair in different genetypical soybean seedlings[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2004,20(3):260-263.) [10]高中超，周宝库，张喜林.大豆对干旱胁迫生理生化的响应[J].大豆通报，2007(6):27-30.(Gao Z C，Zhou B K，Zhang X L.The physiology and biochemistry reaction of soybean to drought stress[J]. Soybean Bulletin，2007(6):27-30.) [11]刘莹,盖钧镒,吕慧能.黄淮海地区大豆耐旱根系性状的遗传分析[J].华北农学报,2007,22(5)：31-35.(Liu Y,Gai J Y,Lu H N.Inheritance of root traits related to drought tolerance in soybean(Glycine max(L)Merr)[J].Acta Agriculturae Boreali Sinica,2007,22(5):31-35.) [12]陈杨,李隆,张福锁.大豆和蚕豆苗期根系生长特征的比较[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(11):2112-2116.(Chen Y,Li L,Zhang F S.Root growth characteristics of soybean and fababean at their seedling stage[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2005,16(11):2112-2116.) [13]朱鹏,韩 阳,阮亚男.不同大豆品种苗期抗旱性比较[J].大豆科学,2008,27(4):711-714.(Zhu P,Han Y,Ruan Y N.Comparsion on drought resistance of different soybean varieties at seedling stage[J].Soybean Science,2008,27(4):711-714.) [14]杨剑平,陈学珍,王文平,等.大豆实验室PEG6000模拟干旱体系的建立[J].中国农学通报,2003,19(3):65-68.(Yang J P,Chen X Z,Wang W P,et al.The establishment of the simulated system of drought for soybean in laboratory [J]. Chinese AgriculturalScience Bulletin,2003,19(3):65-68.) [15]王翠花,孙志刚,杨晓松.PEG处理对大豆叶片抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版),2005,20(5):523-526.(Wang C H，Sun Z G，Yang X S.Influence in activation of the antioxidase in the blade of soybeans with PEG[J].Journal of Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities，2005，20(5):523-526）. [16]龚明.作物抗旱性鉴定方法与指标评价[J].云南农业大学学报,1989(1):37-81.(Gong M.Screening methods and indexes of drought resistance in crops and comprehensive evaluation[J].Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University,1989(1):37-81.) [17]张志良.植物生理学实验指导(第二版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1990.(Zhang Z L.A guide in plantphysiology experiment(2nded)[M].Beijing: Higher Education Press,1990.) [18]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2001.(Li H S. Plant physiology and biochemistry experiment:principle and technology[M].Beijing: Higher EducationPress,2001.) [19]张宪政,陈凤玉,王荣富.植物生理学实验技术[M].沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1994.(Zhang X Z,Chen F Y,Wang R F. Plant physiology experimental technology[M].Shenyang:Liaoning Science and Technology Press,1994.) [20]吴慎杰,李贵全,李捷,等.大豆抗旱育种中选择指标和标记的研究现状[J].干旱地区农业研究，2003,21(1):139-142.(Wu S J,Li G Q, Li J. Selecting targets and markers in drought-resistant breeding of soybean[J].Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas,2003,21(1):139-142.) [21]Bouslama M, Schapaugh W T. Stress tolerance in soybean.I.Evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance[J].Crop Science, 1984,24:933-937. [22]Garcia A, Gonzalez M C. Morphological markers for the early selection of drought-tolerant rice varieties[J].Cultivate Tropicales,1997,18(2):47-50. [23]孙祖东,陈怀珠,杨守嗪,等.大豆抗早性研究进展[J].大豆科学,2001,20(3）:221-226.(Sun Z D,Chen H Z,Yang S Z,et al.Advances in drought tolerance in soybean[J].Soybean Science,2001,20(3）:221-226.) [24]段光明.黄福贞.蚕豆根际水分胁迫与膜脂过氧化的关系[J].山西大学学报(自然科学版), 1992,15(2):176-181.(Duan G M,Huang F Z. Relationship between water stress and peroxidation ofmembrane lipids aboutmaize or brood bean rootsystem[J].Journal of Shanxi University(National Science Edition),1992,15(2):176-181.) [25]黎裕.作物抗旱鉴定方法与指标[J].干旱地区农业研究,1993,11(1):91-99.(Yu L.The identification method and index for crop drought resistance[J].Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas,1993,11(1)：91-99）. [26]李贵全,张海燕,季兰，等.不同大豆品种抗旱性综合评价[J].应用生态学报,2006,17(12):2408-2412.(Li G Q，Zhang H Y，Ji L，et al. Comprehensive evaluation on drought-resistance of differen t soybean varieties[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2006,17(12):2408-2412.） [27]龚吉蕊,赵爱芬,张立新.干旱胁迫下几种荒漠植物抗氧化能力的比较研究[J].西北植物学报,2004,24(9):1570-1577.(Gong J R,Zhao A F,Zhang L X.A comparative study on anti-oxidative ability of severaldesert plants under drought stress[J].Acta Botanica Boreal-Occidentalia Sinica,2004,24(9):1570-1577.)
相似文献/References:
[1]高越,刘辉,陶波.抗草甘膦野生大豆筛选及其抗性生理机制研究[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):76.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.018]
GAO Yue,LIU Hui,TAO Bo.Screening and Physiological Mechanisms of Resistance to Glyphosate in Wild Soybeans(Glycine soja)[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(04):76.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.018]
[2]王军卫,侯立江,李? 登,等.野生大豆紫色酸性磷酸酶PAP1基因的克隆及分析[J].大豆科学,2013,32(05):596.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.05.0596]
WANG Jun-wei,HOU Li-jiang,LI Deng,et al.Cloning and Sequence Analysis of Purple Acid Phosphotase PAP1 Gene in Wild Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(04):596.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.05.0596]
[3]王军卫,侯立江,李 登,等. 野生大豆紫色酸性磷酸酶PAP1基因的克隆及分析[J].大豆科学,2013,32(05):596.
WANG Jun-wei,HOU Li-jiang,LI Deng,et al. Cloning and Sequence Analysis of Purple Acid Phosphotase PAP1 Gene in Wild Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(04):596.
[4]雍太文,刘小明,肖秀喜,等.不同种子处理对苗期干旱胁迫条件下大豆农艺性状、产量及品质的影响[J].大豆科学,2013,32(05):620.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.05.0620]
YONG Tai-wen,LIU Xiao-ming,XIAO Xiu-xi,et al.Effects of Different Seed Treatments on Agronomic Properties,Yield and Quality of Soybean under Drought Stress at Seedling Stage[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(04):620.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.05.0620]
[5]芮海英,王丽娜,金 铃,等.苗期干旱胁迫对不同大豆品种叶片保护酶活性及丙二醛含量的影响[J].大豆科学,2013,32(05):647.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.05.0647]
RUI Hai-ying,WANG Li-na,JIN Ling,et al.Effect of Drought Stress at Seedling on Protective Enzyme Activity and MDA Content of Different Soybeans[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(04):647.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.05.0647]
[6]王丽燕.硅对野生大豆幼苗耐盐性的影响及其机制研究[J].大豆科学,2013,32(05):659.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.05.0659]
WANG Li-yan.Effects of Silicon on Salt Tolerance of Glycine soja Seedlings and Its Mechanism[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(04):659.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.05.0659]
[7]张立军,陈艳秋,宋书宏.豆科作物调控共生固氮响应干旱胁迫机制研究进展[J].大豆科学,2013,32(05):694.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.05.0694]
ZHANG Li-jun,CHEN Yan-qiu,SONG Shu-hong.Research Progress on Regulation Mechanism of Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation of Legumes in Response to Drought Stress[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(04):694.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.05.0694]
[8]陈丽丽,王明玖,何丽君,等.野生大豆ISSR体系的优化及其在远缘杂交后代鉴定中的利用[J].大豆科学,2013,32(04):459.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.04.0459]
CHEN Li-li,WANG Ming-jiu,HE Li-jun,et al.Optimization for ISSR Reaction System of Wild Soybean and Its Utilization in Distant Hybrid Identification[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(04):459.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.04.0459]
[9]郑世英,萧蓓蕾,金桂芳.NaCl胁迫对野生大豆和栽培大豆叶绿素及光合特性的影响[J].大豆科学,2013,32(04):486.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.04.0486]
ZHENG Shi-ying,XIAO Bei-lei,JIN Gui-fang.Effect of NaCl Stress on Chlorophyll Content and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Glycine soja and Glycine max[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(04):486.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.04.0486]
[10]徐艳平,胡翠美,张文会,等.干旱胁迫对野生大豆幼苗光合作用相关指标的影响[J].大豆科学,2013,32(03):341.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.03.0341]
XU Yan-ping,HU Cui-mei,ZHANG Wen-hui,et al.Effect of Simulated Drought Stress on Photosynthesis Related Indexes at Seedling Stage of Wild Soybeans[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(04):341.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.03.0341]
[11]马光,郭继平,魏淑珍,等.干旱胁迫下野生大豆和栽培大豆生理特性比较[J].大豆科学,2011,30(06):1057.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2011.06.1057]
MA Guang,GUO Ji-ping,WEI Shu-zhen,et al.Comparison on Physiological Characteristics of Glycine soja and Glycine max under Drought Stress[J].Soybean Science,2011,30(04):1057.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2011.06.1057]
[12]纪展波,蒲伟凤,李桂兰,等.野生大豆、半野生大豆和栽培大豆对苗期干旱胁迫的生理反应[J].大豆科学,2012,31(04):598.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2012.04.017]
JI Zhan-bo,PU Wei-feng,LI Gui-lan,et al.Physiological Reaction of Glycine soja,Glycine gracilisand Glycine max to Drought Stress in Seedling Stage[J].Soybean Science,2012,31(04):598.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2012.04.017]
[13]郑世英,郑晓彤,耿建芬,等.硅对干旱胁迫下野生大豆幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J].大豆科学,2018,37(02):263.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.02.0263]
ZHENG Shi-ying,ZHENG Xiao-tong,GENG Jian-fen,et al.Effects of Silicon on Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Wild Soybean Seedlings Under Drought Stress[J].Soybean Science,2018,37(04):263.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.02.0263]
[14]张小芳,王冰冰,徐燕,等.PEG模拟干旱胁迫下野生大豆转录组分析 [J].大豆科学,2018,37(05):681.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.05.0681]
ZHANG Xiao-fang,WANG Bing-bing,XU Yan,et al.The Transcriptome Analysis of Wild Soybean Under Drought Stress Simulated by PEG[J].Soybean Science,2018,37(04):681.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.05.0681]
备注/Memo
基金项目：转基因生物新品种培育重大专项资助项目（2009ZX08004-004B，2009ZX08004-001B）；国家自然科学基金资助项目（30940050)；河北省自然科学基金资助项目（C2009000868）；河北省科技厅支撑计划资助项目（09220103D；06547005D-3）。?