[1]谢甫绨,Steven K.St.Martin.大豆骨干品系在特定育种程序中的作用[J].大豆科学,2009,28(03):370-376.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.03.0370]
　XIE Fu-ti,Steven K.St.MARTIN.Effect of Elite Lines on A Specific Soybean Breeding Program[J].Soybean Science,2009,28(03):370-376.[doi:10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.03.0370]
点击复制

大豆骨干品系在特定育种程序中的作用

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S] 卷: 第28卷 期数: 2009年03期 页码: 370-376 栏目: 出版日期: 2009-06-25
Title:
Effect of Elite Lines on A Specific Soybean Breeding Program
文章编号:
1000-9841(2009)03-0370-07
作者:
谢甫绨1; Steven K.St.Martin2
1沈阳农业大学农学院，辽宁 沈阳 110161；
2Department of Horticulture and Crop Science，Ohio Agriculture Research and Development Centre，The Ohio State University，Columbus，OH 43210-1086,USA
Author(s):
XIE Fu-ti1; Steven K.St.MARTIN2
1Agricultural College of Shenyang Agricultural University，Shenyang 110161，Liaoning,China；
2Department of Horticulture and Crop Science，Ohio Agriculture Research and Development Centre,The Ohio State University，Columbus，OH 43210-1086,A
关键词:
大豆; 骨干品系; 育种
Keywords:
Soybean; Elite line; Breeding
分类号:
S565.1
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.03.0370
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
来源于遗传多样性的变异将有助于提高育种效率，通过血缘关系分析可以了解后代群体的遗传结构。研究的目的是评估美国俄亥俄州立大学大豆育种程序中对产量改良起过重大贡献的骨干品系的作用。在俄亥俄州立大学大豆育种程序中，通常采用自己创造的骨干育种材料或来自其他育种程序的优异品种（系）做亲本进行常年杂交组配，这样带来了骨干血缘年度间的差异性，骨干品种（系）做亲本的使用年限也是有限的，然而，由于本育种程序中缺乏做豆腐用的骨干亲本，使Ohio FG1品种用作亲本的年限延长。Kottman，A98-980047，U 97-3114，HS 98-3628，HS 94-4533，Athow和HS 93-4118等7个骨干品种（系）对俄亥俄州立大学大豆产量改良起主要作用。后代群体中含50%以上骨干血缘品系的平均产量和所有被鉴定品系的平均产量呈极显著正相关，相关系数为0.9146，含50%以上骨干血缘品系的平均产量越高，所有被鉴定品系的平均产量也越高。但后代群体中骨干品系的血缘百分率和所有被鉴定品系的平均产量间不存在线性关系，说明在选择骨干品系做亲本时，除了考虑骨干品系的数量外，还要考虑骨干品系的配合力。俄亥俄州立大学大豆育种程序中，26个骨干品系衍生的后代中有11个的衍生后代平均产量超过对照品种，而且，这11个骨干品系中又有7个来自俄亥俄州立大学大豆育种程序，说明育种中间材料在产量改良中起着关键性作用。血缘分析结果表明，7个骨干品系来源于Williams、Essex、Amsoy、Wayne、Corsoy 5个老品种 和一个现代品系A 86-301024。1998 至2008年俄亥俄州立大学育成的19个油用品种和8个豆腐用品种中分别有17和14个亲本来自育种程序本身，进一步说明骨干品系的创造在品种选育中起着重大作用。
Abstract:
Genetic variability that arises from genetic diversity benefits the successful soybean breeding program，breeders analyze the pedigree of breeding populations to examine the genetic structure of their populations.The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of elite entries which had an important role in the yield improvement of the OSU soybean breeding program.The OSU soybean breeding program，usually used the new elite lines from itself breeding program or from other programs as parents to make the new cross in each year，changed the pedigree percentage of elite lines in different years，and the years as the elite line used as parents was limited.However，as there was a lack of breeding materials for food grade soybean breeding，the Ohio FG1 used for a longer time.Kottman，A98-980047，U 97-3114，HS 98-3628，HS 94-4533，Athow，and HS 93-4118 these 7 parents were the best elite lines for the yield improvement of the OSU program.There was a linear relationship between the mean yield of entries with ≥50% pedigree of elite lines and the mean yield of all tested entries（ P=0.0002).The correlation of the mean yield of entries with ≥50% pedigree of elite lines and the mean yield of all tested entries was 0.9146，they had a similar trend.There was no linear relationship between the pedigree percentage of elite lines and the mean yield of all tested entries，which meant that making new cross for the yield improvement should consider the combinability of elite line，not just the quantity of elite lines as parents.The mean yield of entries derived from 11 of 26 elite lines was over check，7 of 11 was from the OSU breeding program，the breeding materials played a key role in the yield improvement.The 7 elite lines were related with five old cultivars（Williams，Essex，Amsoy，Wayne and Corsoy）and a current cultivar A 86-301024.From 1998 to 2008，17 of 38 parents of the oil-use cultivars，and 14 of 16 parents of the food-grade cultivars were from the OSU program.The elite lines had an important effect on the development of cultivars.

参考文献/References:

[1]]Fehr W R.Soybean[M]//Fehr W.R.Principles of cultivar development：Volume II.Crop Species.Macmillan，Inc.，New York.1987:533-576.

［2］Wilcox J R.Sixty years of improvement in publicly developed elite soybean lines[J].Crop Science，2001，41:1711-1716.
［3］Cornelious B K，Sneller C H.Yield and molecular diversity of soybean lines derived from crosses of northern and southern elite parents[J].Crop Science，2002，42:642-647.
［4］Sneller C H.Pedigree analysis of elite soybean lines[J].Crop Science，1994，34:1515-1522.
［5］Gizlice Z，Carter T E Jr，Burton J W.Genetic base for North American public soybean cultivars released between 1947 and 1988[J].Crop Science，1994，34:1143-1151.
［6］Gizlice Z，Carter T E Jr，Burton J W.Genetic diversity in North American soybean：I.Multivariate analysis of founding stock and relation to coefficient of parentage[J].Crop Science，1993，33:614-620.
［7］Carter T E Jr，Gizlice Z，Burton J W.Coefficient of parentage and genetic similarity estimates for 258 North American soybean cultivars released by public agencies during 195488[G].USDA Tech.Bull.no.1814.U.S.Gov.Print.Office，Washington，DC，1993.
［8］Delannay X，Rodgers D M，Palmer R G.Relative contribution among ancestral lines to North American soybean cultivars[J].Crop Science，1983，23：944-949.
［9］Gizlice Z，Carter T E Jr，Gerig T M，et al.Genetic diversity patterns in north American public soybean cultivars based on coefficient of parentage[J].Crop Science，1996，36：753-65.
［10］Kisha T，Diers B W，Hoyt J M，et al.Genetic diversity among soybean plant introductions and north American germplasm[J].Crop Science，1998，38:1669-1680.
［11］St.Martin S K.Effective population size for the soybean improvement program in maturity groups 00 to IV[J].Crop Science，1982，22:151-152.
［12］Sneller C H.Impact of transgenic genotypes and subdivision on diversity within elite North American soybean germplasm[J].Crop Science，2003，43：409-414.
［13］Fioritto R J，St.Martin S K，Schmitthenner A F，et al.Registration of Flint’ soybean[J].Crop Science，1997，37:1980-1981.
［14］Fioritto R J，St.Martin S K，Dorrance A E，et al.Registration of Dilworth’ soybean[J].Crop Science，2004，44：691.
［15］McBlain B A，Fioritto R J，St.Martin S K，et al.Registration of Resnik’ soybean[J].Crop Science，1990，30：424-425.
［16］McBlain B A，Fioritto R J，St.Martin S K，et al.Registration of GR8936’ soybean[J].Crop Science，1990，30：426-427.
［17］McBlain B A，Fioritto R J，St.Martin S K，et al.Registration of Chapman’ soybean[J].Crop Science，1991，31：487-488.
［18］McBlain B A，Fioritto R J，St.Martin S K，et al.Registration of Edison’ soybean[J].Crop Science，1991，31：488-489.
［19］St.Martin S K，Calip-DuBois A J，Fioritto R J，et al.Registration of Ohio FG1’ soybean[J].Crop Science，1996，36：813.
［20］St.Martin S K，Calip-DuBois A J，Fioritto R J，et al.Registration of Ohio FG2’ soybean[J].Crop Science，1996，36：814.
［21］St.Martin S K，Calip-DuBois A J，Fioritto R J，et al.Registration of General’ soybean[J].Crop Science，1997，37:1979.
［22］St.Martin S K，Calip-DuBois A J，Fioritto R J，et al.Registration of Defiance’ soybean[J].Crop Science，1997，37:1981.
［23］St.Martin S K ，Mills G R，Fioritto R J，et al.Registration of Darby’ soybean[J].Crop Science，2001，41:590.
［24］St.Martin S K，Mills G R，Fioritto R J，et al.Registration of Kottman’ soybean[J].Crop Science，2001，41：590-591.
［25］St.Martin S K ，Mills G R，Fioritto R J，et al.Registration of HS93-4118 soybean[J].Crop Science，2001，41：591.
［26］St.Martin S K ，Mills G R，Fioritto R J，et al.Registration of Ohio FG3’ soybean[J].Crop Science，2004，44:687.
［27］St.Martin S K ，Feller M K，Fioritto R J，et al.Registration of HS0 3243’ soybean[J].Crop Science，2006，46：1811.
［28］St.Martin S K，Mills G R，Fioritto R J，et al.Registration of Ohio FG5’ soybean[J].Crop Science，2006，46：2709.
［29］St.Martin S K，Dye B W，McBlain B A.Use of hill and short-row plots for selection of soybean genotypes[J].Crop Science，1990，30：74-79.
［30］Allard R W.Genetic basis of the evolution of adaptedness in plants[J].Euphytica，1996，92:1-11.
［31］Ininda J，Fehr W R，Cianzio S，et al.Genetic gain in soybean populations with different percentages of plant introduction parentage[J].Crop Science，1996，36:1470-1472.
［32］Helms T，Orf J，Vallad G，et al.Genetic variance，coefficient of parentage，and genetic distance of six soybean populations[J].Theoretical and Applied Genetics，1997，94:20-26.
［33］Kisha T，Sneller C H，Diers B W.The relation of genetic distance and genetic variance in populations of soybean[J].Crop Science，1997，37：1317-1325.
［34］Nelson R L，Cregan P，Boerma H R，et al.DNA marker diversity among modern North American Chinese and Japanese soybean cultivars[G].In Agronomy Abstracts，ASA，Madison，WI.1998:164.
［35］Thompson J A，Nelson R L，Vodkin L O.Identification of diverse soybean germplams using RAPD markers[J].Crop Science，1998，38:1348-1355.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘章雄,李卫东,孙石,等.1983～2010年北京大豆育成品种的亲本地理来源及其遗传贡献[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.002]
　LIU Zhang-xiong,LI Wei-dong,SUN Shi,et al.Geographical Sources of Germplasm and Their Nuclear Contribution to Soybean Cultivars Released during 1983 to 2010 in Beijing[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):1.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.002]
[2]李彩云,余永亮,杨红旗,等.大豆脂质转运蛋白基因GmLTP3的特征分析[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.003]
　LI Cai-yun,YU Yong-liang,YANG Hong-qi,et al.Characteristics of a Lipid-transfer Protein Gene GmLTP3 in Glycine max[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.003]
[3]王明霞,崔晓霞,薛晨晨,等.大豆耐盐基因GmHAL3a的克隆及RNAi载体的构建[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.004]
　WANG Ming-xia,CUI Xiao-xia,XUE Chen-chen,et al.Cloning of Halotolerance 3 Gene and Construction of Its RNAi Vector in Soybean (Glycine max)[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):12.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.004]
[4]张春宝,李玉秋,彭宝,等.线粒体ISSR与SCAR标记鉴定大豆细胞质雄性不育系与保持系[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.005]
　ZHANG Chun-bao,LI Yu-qiu,PENG Bao,et al.Identification of Soybean Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Line and Maintainer Line with Mitochondrial ISSR and SCAR Markers[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.005]
[5]卢清瑶,赵琳,李冬梅,等.RAV基因对拟南芥和大豆不定芽再生的影响[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.006]
　LU Qing-yao,ZHAO Lin,LI Dong-mei,et al.Effects of RAV gene on Shoot Regeneration of Arabidopsis and Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.006]
[6]杜景红,刘丽君.大豆fad3c基因沉默载体的构建[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.007]
　DU Jing-hong,LIU Li-jun.Construction of fad3c Gene Silencing Vector in Soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):28.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.007]
[7]张力伟,樊颖伦,牛腾飞,等.大豆“冀黄13”突变体筛选及突变体库的建立[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.008]
　ZHANG Li-wei,FAN Ying-lun,NIU Teng-fei?,et al.Screening of Mutants and Construction of Mutant Population for Soybean Cultivar "Jihuang13”[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.008]
[8]盖江南,张彬彬,吴瑶,等.大豆不定胚悬浮培养基因型筛选及基因枪遗传转化的研究[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.009]
　GAI Jiang-nan,ZHANG Bin-bin,WU Yao,et al.Screening of Soybean Genotypes Suitable for Suspension Culture with Adventitious Embryos and Genetic Transformation by Particle Bombardment[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):38.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.009]
[9]王鹏飞,刘丽君,唐晓飞,等.适于体细胞胚发生的大豆基因型筛选[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.010]
　WANG Peng-fei,LIU Li-jun,TANG Xiao-fei,et al.Screening of Soybean Genotypes Suitable for Somatic Embryogenesis[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.010]
[10]刘德兴,年海,杨存义,等.耐酸铝大豆品种资源的筛选与鉴定[J].大豆科学,2013,32(01):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.011]
　LIU De-xing,NIAN Hai,YANG Cun-yi,et al.Screening and Identifying Soybean Germplasm Tolerant to Acid Aluminum[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(03):46.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.01.011]

备注/Memo

Corresponding author:S.K.St.Martin.E-mail:st-martin.1@osu.edu

更新日期/Last Update: 2014-09-25