|Table of Contents|

Breeding and High-yield Cultivation Technology of A New Drought Tolerant Soybean Variety Fendou 93(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2022年06期
Page:
758-762
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Breeding and High-yield Cultivation Technology of A New Drought Tolerant Soybean Variety Fendou 93
Author(s):
LIU Xiao-rong; REN Xiao-jun; REN Hai-hong; ZHAO Jing-yun; LYU Xin-yun; MA Jun-kui
（Institute of Industrial Crops，Shanxi Agricultural University，Taiyuan 030009，China）
Keywords:
soybean;  Fendou 93;  drought tolerance;  breeding;  high-yield cultivation
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2022.06.0758
Abstract:
Fendou 93 is a new drought-tolerant soybean variety bred by Shanxi Agricultural University′s Industrial Crop Research through sexual hybridization and systematic selection， used Jinda 78 as the female parent and Jindou 39 as the male parent. This variety has the characteristics of high yield， stable traits， strong disease resistance， good commercial properties， and high drought tolerance. The average growth period is 139.5 days， suitable for planting in spring sowing areas such as central and southern Shanxi， central and northern Shaanxi， central and eastern Gansu. In 2018， Fendou 93 participated in the regional experiment of the Northwest group of the late-maturing group of northern spring soybeans. The average yield was 3 672.0 kg·ha-1， which was an increase of 1.0% over the control (Fendou 78)， and the proportion of the test sites for increasing production was 75%. In 2019， the average yield of this variety was 3 630.0 kg·ha-1， which was 10.0% higher than the control (Fendou 78)， and the proportion of the test sites for increasing production was 100%. In 2019， in the production test of the Northwest group of the late-maturing group of spring soybeans in the north， the average yield of Fendou 93 was 3 346.5 kg·ha-1， which was an increase of 5.2% compared with the control (Fendou 78)， and the proportion of the test sites for increasing production was 86%. Its crude protein content is 42.67%， and the crude fat content is 19.55%. In 2020， Fendou 93 was tested and approved by the National Crop Variety Approval Committee of the Ministry of Agriculture in 2020， and the authorized number was Guoshendou 20200027.

References:

［1］王曙明， 孟凡凡， 郑宇宏， 等. 大豆高产育种研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报， 2010， 26(9): 162-166.(WANG S M， MENG F F， ZHENG Y H， et al. Progress of soybean breeding for high yield[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin， 2010， 26(9): 162-166.)[2]王兴荣， 张彦军， 李玥， 等. 干旱胁迫对大豆生长的影响及抗旱性评价方法与指标筛选[J]. 植物遗传资源学报， 2018， 19(1): 49-56. (WANG X R， ZHANG Y J， LI Y， et al. Effects of drought stress on growth and screening methods and indexes for drought resistance in soybean[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources， 2018， 19(1): 49-56.)[3]刘小荣， 马俊奎， 刘学义. 大豆玉米“扩行增密”带状复种技术在山西应用初探[J]. 大豆科学， 2017， 36(5): 725-726. (LIU X R， MA J K， LIU X Y. Application of ‘entend row and higher density’ strip compound planting system of soybean-maize in Shanxi province[J]. Soybean Science， 2018， 19(1): 49-56.)[4]张海波. 浅析大豆的营养价值及其加工利用[J]. 山西农业科学， 2009， 37(5): 73-75. (ZHANG H B. Preliminary review on the nutritiona1va1ue of soybean and its processing and utilization[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricu1tural Science， 2009， 37(5): 73-75.)[5]FRIEDMAN M， BRANDON D L. Nutritional and health benefits of soyproteins[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry， 2001， 49: 1069-1086.[6]李贵全， 张海燕， 季兰， 等. 不同大豆品种抗旱性综合评价[J]. 应用生态学报， 2006， 17(12)： 2408-2412. (LI G Q， ZHANG H Y， JI L， et al. Comprehensive evaluation on drought-resistance of different soybean varieties[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology， 2006， 17(12): 2408-2412.)[7]蒲伟凤， 李桂兰， 张敏， 等. 干旱胁迫对野生大豆和栽培大豆根系特征及生理指标的影响[J]. 大豆科学， 2000， 29(4): 615-621. (PU W F， LI G L， ZHANG M， et al. Effects of drought stress on root characteristics and physiological indexes of Glycine soja and Glycine max[J]. Soybean Science， 2000， 29(4): 615-621.)[8]董守坤， 赵坤， 刘丽君， 等. 干旱胁迫对春大豆叶绿素含量和根系活力的影响[J]. 大豆科学， 2011， 30(6): 949-953. (DONG S K， ZHAO K， LIU L J， et al. Effect of drought stress on chlorophyll content and root activity of spring soybean[J]. Soybean Science， 2011， 30(6): 949-953.)[9]PMHAN MD〖KG(0.5mm S， LEE J D， SHANNON J G， et al. Recent advances inbreeding for drought and salt stress tolerance in soybean[C]. Springer: Advances in Molecular Breeding Toward Drought and Salt Tolerance Crops， 2007: 739-773.[10]许崇海， 罗勇， 徐影. IPCC AR4多模式对中国地区干旱变化的模拟及预估[J]. 冰川冻土， 2010， 32(5): 867-874. (XU C H， LUO Y， XU Y. Simulation and prediction of the drought variations in China by multi-model ensemble[J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology， 2010， 32(5): 867-874.)[11]祁旭升， 刘章雄， 关荣霞， 等. 大豆成株期抗旱性鉴定评价方法研究[J]. 作物学报， 2012,38(4): 665-674. (QI X S， LIU Z X， GUAN R X. Comparison of evaluation methods for drought-resistance at soybean adult stage[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica， 2012,38(4): 665-674.)[12]杨如萍， 包振贤， 陈光荣， 等. 大豆抗旱性研究进展[J]. 作物杂志， 2012(5): 8-12. (YANG Ｒ P， BAO Z X， CHEN G R， et al. The research progress in drought resistance of soybean[J]. Crops， 2012(5): 8-12.)[13]刘学义. 大豆抗旱性评定方法探讨[J]. 中国油料作物学报， 1986(4): 23-26. (LIU X Y. Evaluation method of drought resistance of soybean[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences， 1986(4): 23-26.)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-11-29