|Table of Contents|

Comparison of Salt Tolerance of Forage Soybean Varieties(Lines) Hybrided by Cultivated Soybean and Wild Soybean at Germination and Seedling Stages(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2022年04期
Page:
405-412
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Comparison of Salt Tolerance of Forage Soybean Varieties(Lines) Hybrided by Cultivated Soybean and Wild Soybean at Germination and Seedling Stages
Author(s):
DU Yu-qian1; 2;  WANG Ming-jiu1; 2;  SUO Rong-zhen1; 2;  LI Shu-ning1; 2;  LIU Jia-wei1; 2;  CAO Ke-fan1; 2;  AI Lin3
(1.College of Grassland and Resources and Environment， Inner Mongolia Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources， Ministry of Education， Hohhot 010021, China; 2.Key Laboratory of Forage Cultivation， Processing and Efficient Utilization， Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs， Inner Mongolia Agricultural University， Hohhot 010021, China; 3.China Animal Agriculture Association， Beijing 100044, China)
Keywords:
forage soybean;  germination period;  seedling stage;  salt tolerance;  membership function
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2022.04.0405
Abstract:
In order to compare the salt tolerance of different forage soybeans at germination stage and seedling stage， and find higher salt tolerance of forage soybean germplasm， the hybrid offspring of wild soybean and cultivated soybean were used as experimental materials， and the male parent was used as control material to explore the difference of salt tolerance between hybrid offspring and male parent. Hybrids numbered Line 500， 3-2-1 brown-black， 8-4-1 brown， 27-2-1 and 8-3 black-green. The variety material was forage soybean S001 (referred to as S001) and the control material was male wild soybean. The effects of different concentrations of NaCl (50，100，150 and 200 mmol?L-1) on seed germination and seedling growth of seven materials were observed. The results showed that with the increase of NaCl concentration， the germination rate， germination potential， germination index， germination vigor and germination length of seeds of different materials showed a downward trend， and there were differences among materials. With the increase of salt stress intensity， superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity， peroxidase (POD) activity， soluble sugar (SS) and malondialdehyde (MDA) content of feed soybean at seedling stage increased， and the fluctuation ranges of salt resistance physiological indexes of different materials were different. The comprehensive comparison of principal component analysis and membership function of all indexes measured under salt stress at germination stage and seedling stage of all materials showed that the order of salt tolerance of seven materials at germination stage and seedling stage was S001>wild soybean>8-3 black green>8-4-1 brown>Line 500>3-2-1 brown black>27-2-1.Under salt stress， the salt tolerance of S001 was higher than that of its parent wild soybean. S001 can be used for further study on the molecular genetic mechanism of salt tolerance of cultivated soybean improved by wild soybean and used as a excellent soybean germplasm material for breeding new varieties of salt-tolerant cultivated soybean.

References:

［1］董宽虎，沈益新.饲草生产学[M].北京:中国农业出版社，2003.(DONG K H， SHEN Y X. Forage production[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press， 2003.)[2]李建国，濮励杰，朱明，等.土壤盐渍化研究现状及未来研究热点[J].地理学报，2012，67(9): 1233-1245.(LI J G，PU L J，ZHU M，et al.Current status of soil salinization research and future research hotspots[J].Journal of Geography，2012，67(9): 1233-1245.)[3]杨劲松.中国盐渍土研究的发展历程与展望[J].土壤学报，2008(5): 837-845.(YANG J S. Development of saline soils in China and prospects[J]. Journal of Soil Science，2008 (5): 837-845.)[4]张威，廖锡良，喻德跃，等.大豆耐盐性研究进展[J].土壤与作物，2018，7(3): 284-292.(ZHANG W， LIAO X L， YU D Y， et al. Advances in research on salt tolerance of soybean[J]. Soil and Crops，2018，7(3): 284-292.)[5]张煜，李娜娜，丁汉凤，等.野生大豆种质资源及创新应用研究进展[J].山东农业科学，2012，44(4): 31-35.(ZHANG Y， LI N N， DING H F， et al. Research progress on wild soybean germplasm resources and innovative applications[J]. Shandong Agricultural Science，2012，44(4): 31-35.)[6]陈爱国，王岩.野生大豆资源保护及利用研究进展[J].农业开发与装备，2020(12): 58-59.(CHEN A G， WANG Y. Research progress on conservation and utilization of wild soybean resources[J]. Agricultural Development and Equipment，2020(12): 58-59.)[7]时丽冉.3种不同生境野大豆抗盐性比较[J].衡水学院学报，2020，22(4): 22-26.(SHI L R. Comparison of salt resistance of wild soybean in three different habitats[J]. Journal of Hengshui College，2020，22(4): 22-26.)[8]邵桂花，常汝镇，陈一舞.大豆耐盐性研究进展[J].大豆科学， 1993， 12(3): 5.(SHAO G H，CHANG R Z，CHEN Y W. Research progress on salt tolerance of soybean[J]. Soybean Science， 1993， 12(3): 5.)[9]李向楠.大豆耐盐性研究进展[J].安徽农学通报，2008，14(23): 122-123.(LI X N.Advances in salt tolerance of soybean[J]. Anhui Agronomy Bulletin，2008，14(23): 122-123.)[10]牛远，杨修艳，戴存凤，等.大豆芽期和苗期耐盐性评价指标筛选[J].大豆科学，2018，37(2): 215-223.(NIU Y， YANG X Y， DAI C F， et al. Screening of indicators for salt tolerance evaluation in soybean at sprouting and seedling stages[J]. Soybean Science，2018，37(2): 215-223.)[11]韩飞，诸葛玉平，娄燕宏，等. 63份谷子种质的耐盐综合评价及耐盐品种筛选[J]. 植物遗传资源学报， 2018， 19(4): 9.(HAN F， ZHUGE Y P， LOU Y H， et al. Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance of 63 cereal germplasm and screening of salt-tolerant varieties[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources， 2018， 19(4): 9.)[12]王学奎.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].2版.北京:高等教育出版社， 2006.(WANG X K.Principles and techniques of plant physiological and biochemical experiments[M]. 2nd edition. Beijing: Higher Education Press， 2006.)[13]张军起，赵霞，张豪，等.不同大豆种子萌发期耐盐性分析[J].山西农业科学，2019，47(5): 770-774，779.(ZHANG J Q， ZHAO X， ZHANG H， et al. Analysis of salt tolerance of different soybean seeds during germination[J]. Shanxi Agricultural Science，2019，47(5): 770-774，779.)[14]金杭霞， 郭丹丹， 杨清华，等. 利用模糊隶属函数法综合评价大豆萌发期耐盐性[J]. 分子植物育种， 2021， 19(24): 7.(JIN H X， GUO D D， YANG Q H， et al. Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance in soybean at germination stage using fuzzy affiliation function method[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding， 2021， 19(24): 7.)[15]张秀玲.盐胁迫下野大豆种子萌发特性研究[J].中国野生植物资源，2013，32(6): 21-24.(ZHANG X L. Study on seed germination characteristics of wild soybean under salt stress[J].China Wild Plant Resources，2013，32(6): 21-24.)[16]张金霞，董德坤，胡兴旺，等.三个大豆品种萌发期和苗期的耐盐性比较[J].浙江农业学报，2016，28(7): 1101-1107.(ZHANG J X，DONG D K，HU X W，et al. Comparison of salt tolerance of three soybean varieties at germination and seedling stages[J].Zhejiang Journal of Agriculture，2016，28(7): 1101-1107.)[17]贺莉，徐晓腾，刘菲，等.NaCl胁迫下野生大豆生理生态反应的研究[J].大豆科学，2011，30(2): 242-245.(HE L， XU X T， LIU F， et al. Physiological and ecological responses of wild soybean under NaCl stress[J]. Soybean Science，2011，30(2): 242-245.)[18]姜瑛，周萌，吴越，等.不同燕麦品种耐盐性差异及其生理机制[J].草业科学，2018，35(12): 2903-2914.(JIANG Y， ZHOU M， WU Y， et al. Differences in salt tolerance of different oat varieties and their physiological mechanisms[J]. Grassland Science，2018，35(12): 2903-2914.)[19]杨发荣，刘文瑜，黄杰，等.不同藜麦品种对盐胁迫的生理响应及耐盐性评价[J]. 草业学报， 2017， 26(12): 12.(YANG F R， LIU W Y， HUANG J， et al. Evaluation of physiological response and salt tolerance of different quinoa varieties to salt stress[J]. Journal of Grass Industry， 2017， 26(12): 12.)[20]杜莉莉. 栽培和滩涂野大豆及其杂交后代耐盐性、农艺性状与籽粒品质研究[D].南京：南京农业大学，2009.(DU L L. Research on salt tolerance， agronomic traits and seed quality of cultivated and beach wild soybean and its hybrid progeny[D]. Nanjing ：Nanjing Agricultural University， 2009.)[21]李发院，田芳，张晓可，等.栽培大豆和野生大豆及其回交后代苗期耐盐性分析[J].大豆科学，2012，31(4): 593-597.(LI F Y， TIAN F， ZHANG X K， et al. Salt tolerance analysis of cultivated soybean and wild soybean and their backcross progeny at seedling stage[J]. Soybean Science，2012，31(4): 593-597.)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-08-10