|Table of Contents|

Transcriptome Analysis of Soybean Root System in the Early Stage of Rhizobium Infection(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2021年03期
Page:
289-298
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Transcriptome Analysis of Soybean Root System in the Early Stage of Rhizobium Infection
Author(s):
QI Ping1 ZHENG Kai-jie2 ZHAO Xiao-yu3 SONG Jian1 WANG Jun1 QIU Li-juan4 YAN Zhe4
(1.College of Agriculture, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, China; 2.Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, CAS, Changchun 130102, China; 3.Institute of Microbiology, Heilongjiang Academy of Sciences, Harbin 150010,China; 4.Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Key Facility for Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement/Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing 100081, China)
Keywords:
Soybean RNA-seq Symbiotic nitrogen fixation WIP gene
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2021.03.0289
Abstract:
To analyze signal regulation between rhizobia and host plant in symbiosis, understand gene regulation network of the root system in the early stage of rhizobial infection, and explore the molecular mechanism of evolution of legume symbiosis, the transcriptomic profiles were performed from soybean root tissues infected by rhizobia for 12 h. The significantly regulated genes were analyzed by gene ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis, the expression of candidate genes in the pathway were verified by qRT-PCR, and evolutionary and functional features of candidate genes were analyzed by phylogenetic tree and correlation cluster analysis. In this research, a total of 488 genes were identified which were significantly regulated by rhizobial infection in the early stage of symbiosis. GO enrichment analysis showed that the up-regulated genes were enriched in wounding response, while the down-regulated genes were enriched in regulation of cell wall biosynthesis. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis showed that the genes involved in plant-pathogen interaction, plant hormone transduction and MAPK signaling pathway were enriched in up-regulated genes, while the genes encoding ABC transporter and circadian rhythm were enriched in down-regulated genes. The analysis of genes enriched in wounding response identified the WIP (Wound-Induced Peptide) family that may be involved in regulation of rhizobia infection in soybeans. RNA-seq and qRT-PCR results showed that 16 WIP genes were induced after rhizobial infection. Molecular evolutionary analysis and gene expression cluster analysis showed that the sequence and expression feature of WIP subfamilies which induced by rhizobia were different from WIP subfamily homologous to Arabidopsis thaliana.

References:

[1]Fowler D, Coyle M, Skiba U, et al. The global nitrogen cycle in the twenty-first century[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2013, 368(1621): 20130164.[2]Schmutz J, Cannon S B, Schlueter J, et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean[J]. Nature, 2010, 463(7278): 178-183.[3]Graham P H. Legumes: Importance and constraints to greater use[J]. Plant Physiology, 2003, 131(3): 872-877.[4]Iqbal A, Khalil I A, Ateeq N, et al. Nutritional quality of important food legumes[J]. Food Chemistry, 2006, 97(2): 331-335.[5]Tharanathan R N, Mahadevamma S. Grain legumes—A boon to human nutrition[J]. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2003, 14(12): 507-518.[6]Bohra A, Mir R R, Jha R, et al. Advances in genomics and molecular breeding for legume improvement[M]∥Tuteja N, Tuteja R, Passricha N, et al. Advancement in crop improvement techniques, Elsevier: Woodhead Publishing, 2020: 129-139.[7]Fowler D, Steadman C E, Stevenson D, et al. Effects of global change during the 21st century on the nitrogen cycle[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2015, 15(24): 13849-13893.[8]Franssen H J, Vijn I, Yang W C, et al. Developmental aspects of the rhizobium-legume symbiosis[J]. Plant Molecular Biology, 1992, 19(1): 89-107. [9]Barnett M J, Fisher R F. Review article: Global gene expression in the rhizobial-legume symbiosis[J]. Symbiosis, 2006, 42(1): 1-24.[10]Oldroyd G E D, Downie J A. Coordinating nodule morphogenesis with rhizobial infection in legumes[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2008, 59: 519-546. [11]Geurts R, Fedorova E, Bisseling T. Nod factor signaling genes and their function in the early stages of rhizobium infection[J]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2005, 8(4): 346-352.[12]Zipfel C, Oldroyd G E D. Plant signalling in symbiosis and immunity[J]. Nature, 2017, 543(7645): 328-336.[13]Geurts R, Bisseling T. Rhizobium nod factor perception and signalling[J]. The Plant Cell, 2002, 14(S1): S239-S249.[14]Long S R. Genes and signals in the rhizobium-legume symbiosis[J]. Plant Physiology, 2001, 125(1): 69-72.[15]Saito K, Yoshikawa M, Yano K, et al. NUCLEOPORIN85 is required for calcium spiking, fungal and bacterial symbioses, and seed production in Lotus japonicus[J]. The Plant Cell, 2007, 19(2): 610-624. [16]Stacey G, Libault M, Brechenmacher L, et al. Genetics and functional genomics of legume nodulation[J]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2006, 9(2): 110-121. [17]Limpens E, Bisseling T. Nod factor signal transduction in the rhizobium-legume symbiosis[M]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009: 249-276.[18]Hayashi T, Shimoda Y, Sato S, et al. Rhizobial infection does not require cortical expression of upstream common symbiosis genes responsible for the induction of Ca2+ spiking[J]. The Plant Journal, 2014, 77(1): 146-159. [19]Wong J E M M, Nadzieja M, Madsen L H, et al. A Lotus japonicus cytoplasmic kinase connects Nod factor perception by the NFR5 LysM receptor to nodulation[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2019, 116(28): 14339-14348.[20]Antolín-Llovera M, Ried M K, Parniske M. Cleavage of the SYMBIOSIS RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE ectodomain promotes complex formation with Nod Factor Receptor 5[J]. Current Biology, 2014, 24(4): 422-427. [21]Kanamori N, Madsen L H, Radutoiu S, et al. A nucleoporin is required for induction of Ca2+ spiking in legume nodule development and essential for rhizobial and fungal symbiosis[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006, 103(2): 359-364.[22]Tirichine L, Sandal N, Madsen L, et al. A gain-of-function mutation in a cytokinin receptor triggers spontaneous root nodule organogenesis[J]. Science, 2007, 315(5808): 104-107.[23]Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: A revolutionary tool for transcriptomics[J]. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2009, 10(1): 57-63.[24]Yuan S L, Li R, Chen H F, et al. RNA-Seq analysis of nodule development at five different developmental stages of soybean (Glycine max) inoculated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum strain 113-2[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1): 1-14.[25]Niyikiza D, Piya S, Routray P, et al. Interactions of gene expression, alternative splicing, and DNA methylation in determining nodule identity[J]. The Plant Journal, 2020, 103(5): 1744-1766.[26]Hayashi S, Reid D E, Lorenc M T, et al. Transient Nod factor‐dependent gene expression in the nodulation‐competent zone of soybean (Glycine max[L.] Merr.) roots[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2012, 10(8): 995-1010.[27]Carvalho G A, Batista J S, Marcelino-Guimares F C, et al. Transcriptional analysis of genes involved in nodulation in soybean roots inoculated with Bradyrhizobium japonicum strain CPAC 15[J]. BMC Genomics, 2013, 14(1): 1-11.[28]Huerta-Cepas J, Serra F, Bork P. ETE 3: Reconstruction, analysis, and visualization of phylogenomic data[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2016, 33(6):1635-1638.[29]Libault M, Farmer A, Joshi T, et al. An integrated transcriptome atlas of the crop model Glycine max, and its use in comparative analyses in plants[J]. The Plant Journal, 2010, 63(1): 86-99.[30]Karim S, Lundh D, Holmstrm K O, et al. Structural and functional characterization of AtPTR3, a stress-induced peptide transporter of Arabidopsis[J]. Journal of Molecular Modeling, 2005, 11(3): 226-236.[31]Karim S, Holmstrm K O, Mandal A, et al. AtPTR3, a wound-induced peptide transporter needed for defence against virulent bacterial pathogens in Arabidopsis[J]. Planta, 2007, 225(6): 1431-1445.[32]Yamada M, Hsiao Y C. The roles of peptide hormones and their receptors during plant root development[J]. Genes, 2021, 12(1): 22.[33]Kereszt A, Mergaert P, Montiel J, et al. Impact of plant peptides on symbiotic nodule development and functioning[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 9: 1026.[34]Batut J, Mergaert P, Masson-Boivin C. Peptide signalling in the rhizobium–legume symbiosis[J]. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 2011, 14(2): 181-187. [35]Djordjevic M A, Mohd-Radzman N A, Imin N. Small-peptide signals that control root nodule number, development, and symbiosis[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2015, 66(17): 5171-5181.[36]Kumagai H, Kinoshita E, Ridge R W, et al. RNAi Knock-down of ENOD40s leads to significant suppression of nodule formation in Lotus japonicus[J]. Plant and Cell Physiology, 2006, 47(8): 1102-1111.[37]Reid D E, Ferguson B J, Hayashi S, et al. Molecular mechanisms controlling legume autoregulation of nodulation[J]. Annals of Botany, 2011, 108(5): 789-795.[38]Ferguson B J, Indrasumunar A, Hayashi S, et al. Molecular analysis of legume nodule development and autoregulation[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2010, 52(1): 61-76.[39]Kinkema M, Gresshoff P M. Investigation of downstream signals of the soybean autoregulation of nodulation receptor kinase GmNARK[J]. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions, 2008, 21(10): 1337-1348.[40]Tsikou D, Yan Z, Holt D B, et al. Systemic control of legume susceptibility to rhizobial infection by a mobile microRNA[J]. Science, 2018, 362(6411): 233-236.[41]Zhang C, Qi M, Zhang X, et al. Rhizobial infection triggers systemic transport of endogenous RNAs between shoots and roots in soybean[J]. Science China Life Sciences, 2020, 63(8): 1213-1226.[42]Yu L L, Wang Y W, Liu Y, et al. Wound-induced polypeptides improve resistance against Pseudomonas syringae pv. Tomato DC3000 in Arabidopsis[J]. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2018, 504(1): 149-156.[43]Chen Y L, Lee C Y, Cheng K T, et al. Quantitative peptidomics study reveals that a wound-induced peptide from PR-1 regulates immune signaling in tomato[J]. The Plant Cell, 2014, 26(10): 4135-4148.[44]Conrath U. Priming of induced plant defense responses[J]. Advances in Botanical Research, 2009, 51: 361-395.[45]Conrath U. Molecular aspects of defence priming[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2011, 16(10): 524-531.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-07-20