|Table of Contents|

Path Analysis on Black Soil Fertility via Soybean Yield and Quality(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2021年01期
Page:
89-97
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Path Analysis on Black Soil Fertility via Soybean Yield and Quality
Author(s):
WEI Dan CAI Shan-shan WANG Wei DING Jian-li JIN Liang LI Yu-mei LI Yan HU Yu
(1.Institute of Plant Nutrition and Resources, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China; 2.College of Resources and Environment, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China; 3.College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China; 4.Institute of Soil Fertilizer and Environmental Resources, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150086, China)
Keywords:
Soil fertility Soybean yield Soybean quality Multiple stepwise regression Path analysis
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2021.01.0089
Abstract:
This paper analyzed the effect of black soil fertility on soybean yield and quality in order to adjust the yield and quality of soybean. Black soil sloping farmland was used as the research basis, single fertilizer application (no organic materials) was used as the control, and the soil was fertilized with organic fertilizer, straw and biochar. Correlation analysis, multiple stepwise regression and path analysis were used to study the change of fertility of black soil and its effect on soybean yield and quality. The results showed that the organic carbon content of soil increased by 8.23%-15.01%, the yield increased by 10.89%-19.00% on average, and the protein content of soybean increased by 1.24%-2.05% under three treatments of organic fertilizer. The direct and indirect effects of organic carbon on soybean yield were strong. Soil fertility influenced soybean quality through direct and indirect effects, which could jointly explain 78.0%-99.2% of the variation of soybean quality and yield characters, but the action mechanism and influence intensity of each fertility factor were different. Soil total nitrogen showed a directly positive effect (0.366) in soybean protein content, but a directly negative effect(-0.892, -0.270) in soybean fat and ash content. The available potassium showed a strong directly positive effect (1.605, 1.406) in protein and fat content of soybean, and a directly negative effect (-1.465) in ash content of soybean. Soil fertility, soybean yield and quality were improved under three fertilization measures. Soil total nitrogen and available potassium all played a strong leading role in the changes of soybean yield and protein, fat, and ash content of soybean. The direct and indirect effects of soil available phosphorus, organic carbon and total potassium are also the main factors of soybean yield and quality variation.

References:

[1] 王连铮.大豆研究50年[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2010. (Wang L Z. 50 years of soybean research [M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2010.)
[2]姚俊英,于宏敏,阙粼婧,等.大豆气候品质评价技术模型[J].中国农学通报,2019,35(31):134-138. (Yao J Y, Yu H M, Que L J, et al. Soybean climatic quality assessment: Technical models [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019,35 (31): 134-138.)
[3]齐放,孙靖非.对黑龙江省大豆出口及生产的几点思考[J].大豆通报,2000(3):28. (Qi F, Sun J F. Some thoughts on soybean export and production in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Soybean Bulletin, 2000 (3): 28.)
[4]Kishimoto S, Sugiura G. Charcoal as a soil conditioner[J]. International Achievements for the Future, 1985, 5:12-23.
[5]Iswaran V, Jauhri K S, Sen A. Effect of charcoal, coal and peat on the yield of moong, soybean and pea[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1980,12(2):191-192.
[6]田艺心,高凤菊,曹鹏鹏.饱和D-最优设计在高蛋白大豆施肥优化中的应用[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(2):343-350.(Tian Y X, Gao F J, Cao P P. Application of saturatedD-optimal design for optimum fertilization in the production of high protein soybean [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019,25 (2): 343-350.)
[7]李鸣雷,谷洁,高华,等.不同有机肥对大豆植株性状、品质和产量的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2007,35(9):67-72. (Li M L, Gu J, Gao H, et al. Effects of different organic fertilizer on plant character, quality and yield of soybean [J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University,2007,35 (9): 67-72.)
[8]王开勇,郭岩彬,孟凡乔, 等.有机耕作对大豆土壤-植株氮磷吸收及品质的影响[J].中国农学通报, 2013,29(33):248-252. (Wang K Y, Guo Y B, Meng F Q, et al. Effect of organic cultivation on soil nitrogen and phosphor uptake and quality of soybean [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29 (33): 248-252.)
[9]朱洪德,冯丽娟,于洪久,等.种植密度和施肥水平对高油大豆品质性状的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(1):232-236. (Zhu H D, Feng L J, Yu H J, et al. Effects of different planting densities and fertilizer levels on quality traits of high-oil soybean [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2010,16 (1): 232-236.)
[10]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2005. (Bao S D. Soil agricultural chemistry analysis[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2005.)
[11]中华人民共和国卫生部.GB5009.4—2010 食品安全国家标准—食品中灰分的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2010. (Ministry of Health of the PRC. GB5009.4—2010 National food safety standard-Determination of ash in foods[S]. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2010.)
[12]中华人民共和国卫生部. GB 50095—2010 食品安全国家标准—食品中蛋白质的测定[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2010. (Ministry of Health of the PRC.GB 50095—2010 National standard for food safety-Determination of protein in foods[S]. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2010.)
[13]中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB T 5512—2008 粮油检验—粮食中粗脂肪含量测定[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2008. (General Administration of Quality Suprevision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People′s Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People′s Republic of China. GB T 5512—2008 Inspect of grain and oil seeds-determination of crude fat content in grain[S]. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2008.)
[14]邓小华,黄杰,杨丽丽,等.石灰、绿肥和生物有机肥协同改良酸性土壤并提高烟草生产效益[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(9):1577-1587. (Deng X H, Huang J, Yang L L, et al.The synergistic effect of lime, green manure and bio-organic fertilizer on restoration of acid field and improvement of tobacco production efficiency [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019,25 (9): 1577-1587.)
[15]Lal R, Follett R, Stewart B, et al. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change and advance food security[J]. Soil Science,2007, 172(12): 943-956.
[16]李艳,李玉梅,刘峥宇,等.秸秆还田对连作玉米黑土团聚体稳定性及有机碳含量的影响[J].土壤与作物,2019,8(2):129 -138. (Li Y, Li Y M, Liu Z Y, et al. Effects of straw incorporation on aggregate stability and organic carbon content of black soil in continuous cropping maize [J]. Soil and Crops, 2019,8 (2): 129-138.)
[17]Deluca T H, Gundale M J, Mackenzie M D, et al. Biochar effects on soil nutrient transformations[C]// Lehmann J, Joseph S. Biochar for environmental management: Science and technology. London: Routledge, 2015:421-454.
[18]Schmidt M W I, Noack A G. Black carbon in soils and sediments: Analysis, distribution, implications, and current challenges[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2000, 14(3): 777-793.
[19]姜佰文,胡燕燕,邓宏志,等.商品有机肥与无机肥配施对大豆品质和产量的影响[J].东北农业大学学报,2013,44(11):29-33. (Jiang B W, Hu Y Y, Deng H Z, et al. Effect of mixture commercial organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer on soybean yield and quality [J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2013,44 (11): 29-33.)
[20]朱宝国,于忠和,王囡囡,等.有机肥和化肥不同比例配施对大豆产量和品质的影响[J].大豆科学,2010,129(1):97-100. (Zhu B G, Yu Z H, Wang N N, et al. Effect of different proportion combined application of organic and chemical fertilizer on soybean yield and quality [J]. Soybean Science, 2010,129 (1): 97-100.)
[21]辛大伟,陈庆山,单继勋,等.不同大豆品种品质性状的动态积累[J].东北农业大学学报, 2006, 37(5): 592-595. (Xin D W, Chen Q S, Shan J X, et al. Dynamic accumulation of quality traits in different soybean varieties [J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2006, 37 (5): 592-595.)
[22]闰春娟,王文斌, 董钻, 等.大豆种质资源蛋白质及脂肪含量的聚类及相关性分析[J].大豆科技,2011(1):11-16. (Yun C J, Wang W B, Dong Z, et al. Clustering and correlation analysis of egg quality and fat content of soybean germplasm resources [J]. Soybean Science & Technology, 2011 (1): 11-16.)
[23]张玉凤,董亮,李彦,等.沼肥对大豆产量、品质、养分和土壤化学性质的影响[J].水土保持学报,2011,25 (4): 135-138,143. (Zhang Y F, Dong L, Li Y, et al. Effects of biogas slurry on soybean yield, quality and nutrient absorption and soil chemical property [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2011,25 (4): 135-138,143.)
[24]王志新.环境因素对大豆化学品质及产量影响研究Ⅳ常规肥料对大豆化学品质及产量的影响[J].中国农学通报,2006,22(1):169-174. (Wang Z X. The influence of fertilizer on the yield and quality of soybean IV. Effect of conventional fertilizers on chemical quality and yield of soybean [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2006,22 (1): 169-174.)
[25]薛红.增施氮、磷、钾和有机肥对大豆产量、品质的影响及经济效益分析[J].安徽农学通报,2009,15(7):109-110. (Xue H. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and organic fertilizer on soybean yield and quality and economic benefit analysis [J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2009,15 (7): 109-110.)
[26]尹元萍,董文汉,王明君,等.2种磷水平下大豆种质资源品质性状的遗传差异分析[J].西南农业学报,2017,30(10):2185-2190. (Yin Y P, Dong W H, Wang M J, et al. Analysis of genetic variation of soybean germplasm resources under two phosphorus levels [J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017,30 (10): 2185-2190.)
[27]于洋.不同磷素水平土壤对大豆磷素积累和产量的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2013. (Yu Y. Effect of different phosphorus level soil on phosphorus accumulation and yield of soybean [D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2013.)
[28]宋喜清,王美玲,孙凤荣,等.磷肥对黑农43和黑农41大豆产量及品质的影响试验研究[J]. 科技信息,2011(21):798. (Song X Q, Wang M L, Sun F R, et al. Experimental study on the effect of phosphate fertilizer on yield and quality of Heinong 43 and Heinong 41 [J]. Science & Technology Information, 2011(21):798.)
[29]宇万太,姜子绍,马强,等.不同施肥制度对作物产量及土壤磷素肥力的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2009,17(5):885-889. (Yu W T, Jiang Z S, Ma Q, et al. Effect of different fertilization systems on soil phosphorus fertility and crop yield [J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2009, 17 (5): 885-889.)
[30]Andraski T W, Bundy L G .Relationships between phosphorus levels in soil and in runoff from corn production systems [J] . Journal of Environmental Quality, 2003, 32(1):310-316.
[31]程凤娴,涂攀峰,严小龙,等.酸性红壤中磷高效大豆新种质的磷营养特性[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2010, 16(1):71-81.(Cheng F X, Tu P F, Yan X L, et al. Phosphorus nutrition characters for new soybean germplasms with high phosphorus efficiency in acid red soils [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2010, 16 (1): 71-81.)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2021-02-09