|Table of Contents|

Research on the Regulation Effect of Ribosomal Gene GmRPL12 on Low Sulfur Tolerance in Soybean(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2020年04期
Page:
518-526
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Research on the Regulation Effect of Ribosomal Gene GmRPL12 on Low Sulfur Tolerance in Soybean
Author(s):
CHEN Yan-ning WU Zhi-yi YUAN Wen-jie KAN Gui-zhen HUANG Fang YU De-yue WANG Hui
(Soybean Research Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University/National Center for Soybean Improvement/Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Soybean (Ministry of Agriculture)/National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing 210095, China)
Keywords:
Soybean Ribosomal Gene Sulfur GmRPL12
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2020.04.0518
Abstract:
In order to investigate the regulation of ribosomal genes on soybean tolerance to low sulfur stress, this study cloned a soybean ribosomal gene GmRPL12 from the root of Kefeng 1. We analysised the gene structure and expression in different tissues under low sulfur stress.The gene overexpression vector and interference vector were transformed into hairy root of Kefeng 1 to obtain transgenic chimeras, and then we analysised the expression of the gene and the phenotype of the chimera plant.The results of sequence analysis showed that, the total length of the gene code region was 576 bp. There was a ribosomal protein L7/L12 C-terminal domain RPL12 in its predicted protein. The gene was highly expressed in roots and was induced by low sulfur, and showed different expression patterns in two materials. Soybean chimeras with gene overexpression (OE), RNA interference (Ri), and two empty vectors (OE-EV and Ri-EV) were obtained by genetic transformation of hairy roots. Compared with that under the +S condition, SPAD value, the plant height, the fresh weight and dry weight of aboveground, the fresh weight and dry weight of root increased significantly in the GmRPL12 gene-overexpressed soybean chimera under the -S condition, and these indicators decreased significantly in the soybean Ri chimera under the -S condition. Furthermore, the inorganic sulfur contents of soybean OE chimeras increased significantly in the above ground and under ground plant under -S, and in the above ground plant under +S. These results suggest that GmRPL12 gene may be involved in soybean tolerance to low sulfur and soybean sulfur metabolism.

References:

[1]Panthee D R, Pantalone V R, Sams C E, et al. Quantitative trait loci controlling sulfur containing amino acids, methionine and cysteine, in soybean seeds[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2006, 112: 546-553.[2]Kopriva S, Malagoli M, Takahashi H. Sulfur nutrition: Impacts on plant development, metabolism, and stress responses[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2019, 70(16): 4069-4073.[3]刘崇群,曹淑卿,陈国安,等. 中国南方农业中的硫[J]. 土壤学报, 1990, 27(4): 398-404. (Liu C Q, Cao S Q, Chen G A, et al. Sulphur in the agriculture of China[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 1990, 27:398-404.)[4]金继运. 硫、镁和微量元素在作物营养平衡中的作用[C]. 成都:成都科技大学出版社, 1993: 249-254. (Jin J Y. The role of S, Mg and microelement of crops nutrition balance[C]. Chengdu: Chengdu Science and Technology University Press, 1993: 249-254.)[5]钱晓华, 杨平, 周学军,等. 安徽省土壤有效硫现状及时空分布[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(5): 1357-1364. (Qian X H, Yang P, Zhou X J, et al. Current situation and spatial-temporal distribution of soil available sulfur in Anhui province[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(5): 1357-1364.)[6]Zheng Z L, Leustek T. Advances in understanding sulfur utilization efficiency in plants[M]// Hossain M A, Kamiya T, Burritt D Y, et al. In plant macronutrient use efficiency molecular and genomic perspectives in crop plants. USA:Cambridge Academic Press, 2017: 215-232.[7]Ding Y, Zhou X,Zuo L, et al. Identification and functional characterization of the sulfate transporter gene GmSULTR1;2b in soybean[J]. BMC Genomics, 2016, 17: 373.[8]Krishnana H B, Jez J M. Review: The promise and limits for enhancing sulfur-containing amino acid content of soybean seed[J]. Plant Science, 2018, 272: 14-21.[9]Phartiyal P, Kim W S, Cahoon R E, et al. Soybean ATP sulfurylase, a homodimeric enzyme involved in sulfur assimilation, is abundantly expressed in roots and induced by cold treatment[J]. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 2006, 450: 20-29.[10]Phartiyal P, Kim W S, Cahoon R E, et al. The role of 5′-adenylylsulfate reductase in the sulfur assimilation pathway of soybean: Molecular cloning, kinetic characterization, and gene expression[J]. Phytochemistry, 2008, 69: 356-364.[11]Chronis D, Krishnan H B. Sulfur assimilation in soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.): Molecular cloning and characterization of a cytosolic isoform of serine acetyltransferase[J]. Planta, 2004, 218: 417-426.[12]Yi H,Jez J M. Assessing functional diversity in the soybean β-substituted alanine synthase enzyme family[J]. Phytochemistry, 2012, 83:15-24.[13]Zhang C,Meng Q, Zhang M, et al. Characterization of Oacetylserine (thiol) lyase-encoding genes reveals their distinct but cooperative expression in cysteine synthesis of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] [J]. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 2008, 26: 277-291.[14]Chronis D, Krishnan H B. Sulfur assimilation in soybean: Molecular cloning and characterization of O-acetylserine (thiol) lyase (cysteine synthase)[J]. Crop Science, 2003, 43: 1819-1827.[15]Kim W S, Chronis D,Juergens M, et al. Transgenic soybean plants overexpressing O-acetylserine sulfhydrylase accumulate enhanced levels of cysteine and Bowman-Birk protease inhibitor in seeds[J]. Planta, 2012, 235: 13-23.[16]Tarnowski L, Rodriguez M C, Brzywczy J, et al. Overexpression of the selective autophagy cargo receptor NBR1 modifies plant response to sulfur deficit[J]. Cells, 2020, 9: 669.[17]Hu B, Jin J,Guo A Y, et al. GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server[J]. Bioinformatics, 2015, 31(8): 1296-1297.[18]Livak K J, Schmittgen T D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔ CTmethod[J]. Methods, 2001, 25(4): 402-408.[19]Holsters M, deWaele D, Depicker A, et al. Transfection and transformation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens[J]. Molecular and General Genetics, 1978, 163(2): 181-187. [20]Kereszt A, Li D X, Indrasumunar A, et al. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of soybean to study root biology[J]. Nature Protocols, 2007, 2(4): 948-952.[21]Barakat A, Szick-Miranda K, Chang I F, et al. The organization of cytoplasmic ribosomal protein genes in the Arabidopsis genome[J]. Plant Physiology, 2001, 127: 398-415.[22]Luo A, Zhan H, Zhang X, et al. Cytoplasmic ribosomal protein L14B is essential for fertilization in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Science, 2020, 292: 110394. [23]Sha A H, Chen Y H, Shan Z H, et al. Identification of photoperiod-regulated gene in soybean and functional analysis in Nicotiana benthamiana[J]. Journal of Genetics, 2014, 93(1): 43-51.[24]Zhang J, Yuan H, Yang Y, et al. Plastid ribosomal protein S5 is involved in photosynthesis, plant development, and cold stress tolerance in Arabidopsis[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2016, 67(9): 2731-2744. [25]Lin D, Jiang Q,Zheng K, et al. Mutation of the rice ASL2 gene encoding plastid ribosomal protein L21 causes chloroplast developmental defects and seedling death[J]. Plant Biology, 2015, 17(3): 599-607.[26]Ludwig A,Tenhaken R. Suppression of the ribosomal L2 gene reveals a novel mechanism for stress adaptation in soybean[J]. Planta, 2001, 212(5-6): 792-798.[27]Kim K Y, Park S W, Chung Y S, et al. Molecular cloning of low-temperature-inducible ribosomal proteins from soybean[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2004, 55(399): 1153-1155.[28]Yao Y Y, Ni Z F, Du J K, et al.Isolation and characterization of 15 genes encoding ribosomal proteins in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. Plant Science, 2006, 170(3): 579-586.[29]Dong X,Duan S, Wang H B, et al. Plastid ribosomal protein LPE2 is involved in photosynthesis and the response to C/N balance in Arabidopsis thaliana[J/OL]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2020. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12907.[30]Chu S, Wang J, Zhu, Y, et al. An R2R3-type MYB transcription factor,GmMYB29, regulates isoflavone biosynthesis in soybean[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2017, 13(5):e1006770.[31]Zhang W, Liao X, Cui Y, et al. Acation diffusion facilitator, GmCDF1, negatively regulates salt tolerance in soybean[J]. PLoS Genetics, 2019, 15(1): e1007798.[32]Xue Y, Xiao B, Zhu S, et al. GmPHR25, a GmPHR member up-regulated by phosphate starvation, controls phosphate homeostasis in soybean[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2017, 68(17): 4951-4967.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2020-09-02