|Table of Contents|

Occurrence Characteristics and Identification of Resistant Materials for Soybean Crinkle Leaf Disease(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2020年03期
Page:
431-441
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Occurrence Characteristics and Identification of Resistant Materials for Soybean Crinkle Leaf Disease
Author(s):
CHEN Wen-jie1;  CHEN Yuan1;  WEI Qing-yuan1;  GUO Xiao-hong1;  TANG Fu-yue1;  YANG Meng2;  YE Wan-dian3;  LIANG Jiang1
(1.Cash Crops Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, China; 2.Maize Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, China; 3.Scientific Research Division, Hezhou Academy of Agricltral Sciences, Hezhou 542800, China)
Keywords:
Soybean;  Crinkle leaf disease;  Crinkle leaf index;  Occurrence characteristics;  Identification
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2020.03.0431
Abstract:
A soybean crinkle leaf disease (SCLD) appeared in some places such as Guangxi and Guangdong. SCLD could occur in large areas on the same material, which could decrease soybean yield seriously. In order to research on the occurrence characteristics of the SCLD, this study carried out different sowing time, different growth stage and different environments into experiments of randomized block design. Two crinkle leaf materials performed stablely named Huachun 10 and Zhonghuang 320, and together with 50 soybean materials (tested in Guangxi soybean regional test and regional soybean test in south China in 2018-2019) were used in these experiments. Results showed that the occurrence of SCLD was influenced by sowing time slightly. SCLD did not appear in seeding stage, but occurred seriously in mid growth stage and tended slightly in late growth stage. The heritability of SCLD in different years were 98.37% and 99.51% in different places. High sensitive and immune materials appeared stably in different years. Middle types changed greatly and SCLD occurred regionally. The occurrence of SCLD were found in four of eight places during Guangxi soybean regional test in 2019. The crinkle leaf ratios (CLRs) were different in different places and it was the highest in Hezhou. Crinkle leaf degree of high sensitive materials changed more slightly. The average CLR of spring and summer soybean materials in Guangxi soybean regional test was 50.00% and 50.84% respectively,and it was 65.00% and 100.00% in regional soybean test in south China. Two high sensitive materials named Huachun 10 and Guixiadou 119, and seven immune materials such as Gui 1603 were identified, which could be used for further research on SCLD.

References:

［1］张明厚, 吕文清, 魏培文. 我国大豆病毒病发生, 危害情况发展趋势及其原因分析和防治建议［J］. 大豆科学, 1986, 5(11): 305-314. (Zhang M H, Lyu W Q, Wei P W. The occurrence and developing tendency of soybean virus disease in China and suggestion for the disease management［J］. Soybean Science, 1986, 5(11): 305-314.)［2］Campos R E,Bejerman N, Nome C, et al. Bean yellow mosaic virus in soybean from Argentina［J］. Journal of Phytopathology, 2013, 162: 322-325.［3］Yang X D,Niu L, Zhang W, et al. Increased multiple virus resistance in transgenic soybean overexpressing the double-strand RNA-specific ribonuclease gene PAC1［J］. Transgenic Research,2019,28:129-140.［4］Kelley K B, Wax L M, Hager A G, et al. Soybean response to plant growth regulator herbicides is affected by other post emergence herbicides［J］. Weed Science, 2005, 53: 101-112.［5］Andrew P R, David M S, William G J. Response of Glyphosate-tolerant soybean yield components to dicamba exposure［J］. Weed Science, 2013, 61(4): 526-536.［6］Alanna B S, Benjamin P S, Daniel B R, et al. Effect of soybean growth stage on sensitivity to sublethal rates of dicamba and 2,4-D［J］. Weed Technology, 2019, 33(4): 555-561.［7］Elcio F S, José M K S, Amanda P P, et al. Physiological highlights of manganese toxicity symptoms in soybean plants: Mntoxicityresponses［J］. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2017, 113: 6-19.［8］聂智星, 代金英, 吉家正, 等. 大豆叶突变体abl-CT的发掘与特性分析［J］. 江苏农业科学, 2013, 41(1): 86-88. (Nie Z X, Dai J Y, Ji J Z, et al. Excavation and characteristic analysis of soybean leaf mutant abl-CT［J］. Jiangsu Agricultural Science, 2013, 41(1): 86-88. )［9］Song X F, Wei H C, Cheng W, et al. Development of indel markers for genetic mapping based on whole genome resequencing in soybean［J］. Genes Genomes Genetics, 2015, 5(12): 2793-2799.［10］王大刚,李凯,智海剑.大豆抗大豆花叶病毒病基因研究进展［J］.中国农业科学, 2018, 51(16): 3040-3059. (Wang D G, Li K, Zhi H J. Progresses of resistance on soybean mosaic virus in soybean［J］. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(16): 3040-3059.)［11］唐向民, 杨守臻, 陈怀珠, 等. 160份广西春大豆种质对大豆花叶病毒株系SC15和SC18的抗性评价［J］.大豆科学, 2019, 38(2): 181-188,197. (Tang X M, Yang S Z, Chen H Z, et al. Resistance evaluation of 160 Guangxi spring-sowing soybean germplasms to soybean Mosaic Virus strains SC15 and SC18［J］.Soybean Science, 2019, 38(2): 181-188,197.)［12］邱丽娟, 常汝镇. 大豆种质资源描述规范和数据标准［M］. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006: 76-77. (Qiu L J, Chang R Z. Descriptors and data standard for soybean (Glycine spp.)［M］. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006: 76-77.)［13］盖钧镒. 试验统计方法［M］. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 248-252. (Gai J Y. Test statistical method［M］. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006: 76-77.)［14］张英虎,孟珊,贺建波,等.大豆重组自交系群体NJRSXG百粒重超亲分离的遗传解析［J］.中国农业科学, 2015, 48(22): 4408-4416. (Zhang Y H, Meng S, He J B, et al. The genetic constitution of transgressive segregation of the 100-seed weight in a recombinant inbred line population NJRSXG of soybean［J］. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(22): 4408-4416. )［15］Hanson C, Robinson H, Comstock R, et al. Biometrical studies of yield in segregating populations of Korean lespedeza［J］. Agronomy Journal, 1956, 48(6): 268-272.［16］Elcio F S, José M K S, Amanda P P, et al. Physiological highlights of manganese toxicity symptoms in soybean plants: Mn toxicity responses［J］. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2017, 113: 6-19.［17］申宏波, 文景芝, 苗兴芬, 等. 黑龙江省大豆新品系双抗大豆灰斑病、疫霉病鉴定［J］.大豆科学, 2007(1): 107-110. (Shen H B, Wen J Z, Miao X F, et al. Identification of resisting to both C.Sojia and Phytophthora rot of new soybean lines in Heilongjiang［J］. Soybean Science, 2007(1): 107-110.)［18］陈文杰,梁江,钟开珍,等.大豆抗花叶病毒材料初步筛选及评价［J］.大豆科学, 2012, 31(4): 617-620. (Chen W J, Liang J, Zhong K Z, et al. Preliminary selection and evaluation for Glycine max resistant to soybean mosaic virus［J］. Soybean Science, 2012, 31(4): 617-620.)［19］李穆, 刘念析, 岳岩磊, 等. 抗大豆白粉病南方栽培大豆种质资源的初步筛选［J］.大豆科学, 2016, 35(2): 209-212,221. (Li M, Liu N X, Yue Y L, et al. Preliminary screening for resistant soybean cultivars to powdery mildew in southern China［J］. Soybean Science, 2016, 35(2): 209-212,221.)［20］单志慧, 刘艳, 巴红平, 等. 一个大豆锈病新抗源的筛选与鉴定［J］.中国油料作物学报, 2012, 34(2): 188-192. (Shan Z H, Liu Y, Ba H P, et al. New soybean germplasm resistance to Phakopsora pachyrhizi Syd［J］. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2012, 34(2): 188-192.)［21］魏玮, 张艳娇, 李长育, 等. 大豆抗细菌性斑疹病抗性鉴定以及抗病相关QTL定位［J］.分子植物育种, 2018, 16(18): 5978-5986. ( Wei W, Zhang Y J, Li C Y, et al. Resistance identification of soybean to bacterial rashes and QTL mapping of disease resistance［J］. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2018, 16(18): 5978-5986.)［22］王大刚, 陈圣男, 黄志平, 等. 193份大豆品系对SMV抗性鉴定与分子标记检测［J］.分子植物育种, 2019,17(24):8138-8151. (Wang D G, Chen S N, Huang Z P, et al. Identification and molecular detection of soybean mosaic virus resistance of 193 soybean lines［J］. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2019,17(24):8138-8151.)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2020-07-14