|Table of Contents|

Effects of Different Intertillage Methods on Soil Moisture and Soybean Yield(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2020年01期
Page:
68-75
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Different Intertillage Methods on Soil Moisture and Soybean Yield
Author(s):
HUANG Bing-lin WANG Meng-xue JIN Xi-jun ZHANG Chun-yu ZHANG Yu-xian HU Guo-hua
(College of Agronomy, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, China)
Keywords:
Intertillage Ridge Subsoiling Soil moisture content Yield
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2020.01.0068
Abstract:
In order to reveal the effects of different intertillage measures on soil moisture and soybean yield. Considering the depth of subsoiling, time and frequency of subsoiling and ridge, we set four tillage methods, including advance ridge, advance subsoiling, conventional subsoiling and conventional ridge in this study. Measures to study the effects of different intertillage measures on soil condition, moisture content, growth and soybean yield. The results showed that subsoiling of the bulk density of soil decreased by 3.1%-6.4% compared with that of the ridge. The moisture content of advance subsoiling and conventional subsoiling in each soil layer was significantly higher than that of conventional ridge at each stage. Advance subsoiling and conventional subsoiling were significantly higher than that of conventional ridge by 10.8% and 19.1% respectively in 0-5 cm soil layer at seedling stage. The soil water storage amount of advance subsoiling and conventional subsoiling was significantly higher than that of conventional ridge, with the largest difference in pod bearing stage, which was 21.5% and 16.3% higher than that of conventional ridge, respectively. Advanced subsoiling or ridge increased LAI, among which PT1, advance subsoiling and conventional subsoiling at pod stage significantly increased by 28.5%, 32.2% and 22.7% respectively compared with conventional ridge. Plant height in the early and middle stages of soybean was significantly increased in advance subsoiling compared with conventional ridge, while there was little difference in the later stages. By reducing soil bulk density and increasing soil moisture content and water storage advance subsoiling promoted the increase of soybean LAI and soybean height, resulting in higher dry matter accumulation in various organs, and finally increased the yield of soybean. Finally, the yield of advance subsoiling increased by 8.7% compared with that of conventional ridge. This research indicated that advanced subsoiling was helpful to the increase of soybean yield in this region.

References:

[1]Ren D L, Liu X Y, Wang R. Benefit of yield increasing of spring soybean by film mulching[J]. Journal of Shani Agricultural Sciences, 2006, 34(1): 35-37.[2] 李丽君, 高聚林, 武向良, 等. 不同覆膜方式对大豆田水分动态及利用效率的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2008, 27(2): 262-266. (Li L J, Gao J L, Wu X L L, et al. Effects of different film mulching methods on water dynamics and utilization efficiency of soybean fields[J]. Soybean Science, 2008, 27(2): 262-266.)[3] 闫春娟, 宋书宏, 王文斌, 等. 不同降雨条件对不同耐旱型大豆根系的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2018, 37(2): 209-214. (Yan C J, Song S H, Wang W B, et al. Effects of different rainfall conditions on the root system of different drought-tolerant soybean[J]. Soybean Science, 2018, 37(2): 209-214.)[4] 闫春娟, 王文斌, 孙旭刚, 等. 干旱胁迫对大豆根系发育影响初报[J]. 大豆科学, 2012, 31(6): 924-926, 931. (Yan C J, Wang W B, Sun X G, et al. Effect of drought stress on soybean root development[J]. Soybean Science, 2012, 31(6): 924-926, 931.)[5] 庞绪, 何文清, 严昌荣, 等. 耕作措施对土壤水热特性和微生物生物量碳的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(4): 1308-1316. (Pang X, He W Q, Yan C R, et al. Effects of tillage measures on soil hydrothermal characteristics and microbial biomass carbon [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(4): 1308-1316.)[6] 邱野, 王瑄. 耕作模式对坡耕地土壤水分和大豆产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(22): 128-137. (Qiu Y, Wang X. Effects of tillage patterns on soil moisture and soybean yield in sloping land[J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(22): 128-137.)[7] Sarkar S, Paramanick M, Goswam S B. Soil temperature, water use and yield of yellow sarson (Brassica napus L. var. glauca) in relation to tillage intensity and mulch management under rainfed lowland ecosystem in eastern India[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2007, 93(1): 94-101.[8] Jorge L, Daniel P B, Jorge á F, et al. Long-term analysis of soil water conservation and crop yield under different tillage systems in Mediterranean rainfed conditions[J]. Field Crops Research, 2016, 189(15): 59-67.[9] Haytham M S, Constantino V, Miguel á M, et al. Short-term effects of four tillage practices on soil physical properties, soil waterpotential, and maize yield[J]. Geoderma, 2015,237-238:60-70.[10]Dan T, Lynne C B, Christian T, et al. Crop production and soil water management in conservation agriculture, no-till, and conventional tillage systems in Malawi[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2015, 212(20): 285-296. [11]苏丽丽, 李亚杰, 徐文修. 耕作方式对土壤理化性状及夏大豆产量的影响分析[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017, 35(3): 43-48, 58. (Su L L, Li Y J, Xu W X. Analysis of effects of tillage methods on soil physical and chemical properties and summer soybean yield [J]. Agricultural research in Arid Regions, 2017, 35(3): 43-48, 58.)[12]曾芳荣, 殷文, 张小红. 不同覆膜方式对旱地大豆农田土壤水热特征及产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2017, 26(7): 1090-1098. (Zeng F R, Yin W, Zhang X H. Effects of different film mulching methods on soil hydrothermal characteristics and yield of upland soybean fields [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2017, 26(7): 1090-1098.)[13]李娟, 葛磊, 曹婷婷, 等. 有机肥施用量和耕作方式对旱地土壤水分利用效率及作物生产力的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(2): 121-127. (Li J, Ge L, Cao T T, et al. Effects of organic fertilizer application and tillage methods on soil water use efficiency and crop productivity in dry land[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 33(2): 121-127.)[14]郭兆元, 黄自立, 冯立孝. 陕西土壤[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1992:56-57. (Guo Z Y, Huang Z Z, Feng L X. Shaanxi soil[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1992: 56-57.)[15]Alan R, Konstantin Y V, Govindarajalu S, et al. The global soil moisture data bank[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2000, 81(6): 1281-1299.[16]Haghighi F F, Gorji M, Sharifi F. Temporal variability of soil water content and penetration resistance under different soil management practices[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 74 (2): 188-198. [17]Andreas S, Gernot B, Peter S, et al. Temporal dynamics of soil hydraulic properties and the water-conducting porosity under different tillage[J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2011, 113: 89-98.[18]刘立晶, 高焕文, 李洪文. 玉米-小麦一年两熟保护性耕作体系试验研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2004(3): 70-73. (Liu L J, Gao H W, Li H W. Experimental study on conservation tillage system of maize and wheat two crops a year[J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2004(3): 70-73.)[19]Ramakrishna A, Hoang M T, Suhas P W, et al. Effect of mulch on soil temperature, moisture, weed infestation and yield of groundnut in northern Vietnam[J]. Field Crops Research,2005,95(2-3): 115-125. [20]张博文, 杨彦明, 李金龙, 等. 连续深松对黑土水热酶特性及细菌群落的影响[J].生态学杂志, 2018, 37(11): 3323-3332. (Zhang B W, Yang Y M, Li J L, et al. Effects of continuous subsoiling on temperature, water content, enzyme activity and bacterial community in black soil[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2018, 37(11): 3323-3332.)[21]Verhulst N, Govaerts B, Verachtert E, et al. Conservation agriculture, improving soil quality for sustainable production systems?[M]// Advances in Soil Science: Food Security and Soil Quality. America:CRC Press, 2001:137-208.[22]秦红灵, 高旺盛, 马月存, 等. 两年免耕后深松对土壤水分的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 10(1): 78-85. (Qin H L, Gao W S, Ma Y C, et al. Effects of subsoiling on soil moisture under no-tillage 2 years later[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 10(1): 78-85.)[23]尹斌, 高聚林, 王志刚, 等. 高产春玉米灌浆期碳氮积累、转运及叶片衰老特性对深松深度的响应[J]. 玉米科学, 2014, 22(2): 98-103.(Yin B, Gao J L, Wang Z G, et al. Response on carbon-nitrogen accumulation and transportation and leaf senescence characters of high yield spring maize by subsoiling depth in filling stage[J]. Maize Science, 2014, 22(2): 98-103.)[24]Raji I Y, John C S, Donald G B, et al. Growth analysis of soybean under no-tillage and conventional tillage systems[J]. Growth Analysis of Soybean under No-Tillage and Conventional Tillage Systems, 1999, 91(6): 928-933.[25]朱倩. 不同耕作措施对夏大豆籽粒产量和生理特性的影响[D]. 洛阳: 河南科技大学, 2014. (Zhu Q. Effects of different tillage measures on grain yield and physiological characteristics of summer soybean[D]. Luoyang: Henan University of Science and Technology, 2014.)[26]陈传信, 唐江华, 罗家祥, 等. 复播大豆光合特性、干物质积累分配及产量对土壤耕作方式的响应[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2016, 39(2): 94-99. (Chen C X, Tang J H, Luo J X, et al. Response of photosynthetic characteristics, dry matter accumulation and distribution and yield to soil tillage methods in multi-seeded soybean[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2016, 39(2): 94-99.)[27]唐江华, 苏丽丽, 李亚杰, 等. 不同耕作方式对复播大豆光合特性、干物质生产及经济效益的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(1): 182-190. (Tang J H, Su L L, Li Y J, et al. Effects of different tillage methods on photosynthetic characteristics, dry matter production and economic benefits of replanted soybean[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(1): 182-190.)[28]张玉先, 罗奥, 祁倩倩, 等. 不同耕作措施对大豆光合特性和产量影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2010, 41(3): 672-677. (Zhang Y X, Luo A, Qi Q Q, et al. Effects of different tillage measures on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of soybean[J]. Chinese Soil Bulletin, 2010, 41(3): 672-677.)[29]Pereira J O, Melo D de, Richard G, et al. Yield of soybean crop in function of soil compaction affected by tillage system on oxisol of subtropical region[J]. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2018,12(2): 227-234. [30]金喜军, 曲春媛, 张玉先, 等. 中耕措施对土壤温度和水分含量及大豆产量的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2015(6): 18-22. (Jin X J, Qu C Y, Zhang Y X, et al. Effects of intertillage measures on soil temperature, moisture content and soybean yield[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Science, 2015(6): 18-22.)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2020-03-17