|Table of Contents|

Feasibility Study of Phytic Acid Content Reduction Rate in Seed as An Assistant Screening Index for Phosphorus Efficiency Soybean Varieties(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2019年04期
Page:
554-562
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Feasibility Study of Phytic Acid Content Reduction Rate in Seed as An Assistant Screening Index for Phosphorus Efficiency Soybean Varieties
Author(s):
YU Ren-jie1;  SU Qing-wang2;  FU Yu1;  HE Xu1;  JIANG Hao2;  WU Zhi-hai2;  YANG Xue1;  YANG Mei-ying1
（1.College of Life Sciences,Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China; 2.Faculty of Agronomy, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China)
Keywords:
Soybean;  Phosphorus efficient;  Phytic acid content reduction rate;  Yield;  Agronomic traits
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2019.04.0562
Abstract:
In order to clarify the reduction rate of phytic acid content of seed as a screening index for phosphorus efficient soybean varieties. The experiment used 26 soybean varieties as materials and adopted the cultivation method.The yield, agronomic traits, physiological indexes and phytic acid content of each variety under normal phosphorus and low phosphorus levels were determined, and the correlation between the indicators was analyzed. The 26 varieties were clustered into 7 types from A to G with yield loss rate. The loss rate of A type varieties was less than 10%, G type was more than 60%, and B-F types were between 10% and 60%. The yield and phytic acid content were positively correlated with plant height, stem diameter, chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate, and phosphorus content in above ground and underground parts, respectively, and there were significant positive correlations between yield and phytic acid content with stem diameter and net photosynthetic rate. Under normal phosphorus and low phosphorus conditions, there were no obvious changes in the phytic acid content of cultivars among 7 types, but the phytic acid content reduction rates of type A soybean cultivars were significantly less than 30%, and type G were greater than 80%. The field planting test further confirmed that the low phosphorus tolerance index of cultivars of A type with content of phytic acid less than 30% was greater than 1.0. The G varieties had a low phosphorus tolerance index of less than 0.6 and belonged to the type of weak tolerance to low phosphorus, B-F varieties were intermediate between A and G. In summary, the reduction rate of phytic acid content in different soybean varieties at normal phosphorus and low phosphorus levels could be used as another key indicator to screen phosphorus efficient soybean varieties in coordination with yield and some agronomic traits.

References:

［1］Dong-Ting W U, Zhang X X, Gong Z P, et al. Effects of phosphorus nutrition on P absorption and yields of soybean［J］. Plant Nutrition & Fertilizer Science, 2012, 18(3):670-677.

［2］曹敏建,佟占昌,韩明祺,等.磷高效利用的大豆遗传资源的筛选与评价［J］. 作物杂志, 2001(4):22-24.（Cao M J, Tong Z C, Hang M Q.Screening and evaluation of soybean genetic resources for efficient phosphorus utilization［J］. Crops , 2001(4):22-24.）
［3］李莉.磷高效基因型水稻筛选及其吸收利用磷素特性研究［D］.四川: 四川农业大学, 2014: 35-42.（Li L.Study on screening for genotypes with high phosphorus efficient and its phosphorus uptake and utilization of phosphorus in rice［D］.Sichuan: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2014: 35-42.)
［4］Nielsen N E, Barber S A.Differences among genotypes of corn in the kinetics of P uptake［J］. Agronomy Journal, 1978(5):695-698.
［5］Barber S A,Mackay A D.Root growth and phosphorus and potassium uptake by two corn genotypes in the field［J］. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 1986, 10(3):217-230.
［6］Fhse D, Claassen N, Jungk A. Phosphorus efficiency of plants: II. Significance of root radius, root hairs and cation-onion balance for phosphorus influx in seven plant species［J］. Plant & Soil, 1991, 132(2):261-272.
［7］廖红,严小龙.低磷胁迫下菜豆根构型性状的QTL定位［J］. 农业生物技术学报, 2000, 8(1):67-70.（Liao H, Yan X L. Molecular mapping of QLTs confering root architeeture of common beanin response to phosphorus deifeiency［J］. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 2000, 8(1):67-70.）
［8］Svistoonoff S, Creff A, Reymond M, et al. Root tip contact with low-phosphate media reprograms plant root architecture［J］. Nature Genetics, 2007, 39(6):792-796.
［9］Majumder N D, Borthakur D N, Rakshit S C. Heterosis in rice under phosphorus stress［J］. Indian Journal of Genetics & Plant Breeding, 1989, 49(2):231-235.
［10］Reiter R S, Coors J G, Sussman M R, et al. Genetic analysis of tolerance to low-phosphorus stress in maize using restriction fragment length polymorphisms［J］. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1991, 82(5):561-568.
［11］郭玉春,林文雄,石秋梅,等.水稻苗期磷高效基因型筛选研究［J］. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(12):1587-1591.（Guo Y C, Lin W X, Shi Q M, et al. Correlations between characteristics of roots and those of aerial parts of soybean varieties［J］. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 13(12):1587-1591.）
［12］刘鸿雁,黄建国,魏成熙,等.磷高效基因型玉米的筛选研究［J］. 中国土壤与肥料, 2004(5):25-29.（Liu H Y, Huang J G, Wei C X, et al. Study on screening maize genotypes of high phosphorus efficiency［J］. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2004(5):25-29.）
［13］王秀荣,严小龙,卢仁骏.菜豆叶片特征与磷效率关系初探［J］. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1999, 5(1):89-92.（Wang X R,Yan X L,Lu R J. Preliminary study on the relation between leaf features and pi efficiency of common bean［J］. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 1999, 5(1):89-92.）
［14］曹黎明,潘晓华.水稻不同耐低磷基因型的评价指标分析［J］. 上海农业学报, 2000, 16(4):31-34.（Cao L M, Pan X H. Analysis of some indexes used for evaluating tolerance of different rice genotypes to low phosphorus treatment in sand culture［J］. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 2000, 16(4):31-34.）
［15］Chaubey C N, Senadhira D, Gregorio G B. Genetic analysis of tolerance for phosphorous deficiency in rice (Oryza sativaL.)［J］. Theoretische and Angewandte Genetik, 1994, 89(2-3):313-317.
［16］Ni J J,Wu P, Senadhira D, et al. Mapping QTLs for phosphorus deficiency tolerance in rice (Oryza sativaL.)［J］. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1998, 97(5-6):777-783.
［17］李银银,许更文,李俊峰,等.水稻品种的耐低磷性及其农艺生理性状［J］.中国水稻科学,2018,32(1):51-66.（Li Y Y, Xu G W, Li J F, et al.Tolerance to low phosphorus and its agronomic and physiological characteristics of rice cultivars［J］.Chinese Journal of Rice Science,2018,32(1):51-66.）
［18］高姝,王治红,陆兰姣,等.低磷胁迫下玉米苗期根系特征及优良材料筛选［J］.广西农学报,2017,32(6):6-9.（Gao Z, Wang Z H, Lu L J, et al. Root characteristics of maize seedlings and selection of good inbred lines under low-phosphorus stress［J］.Journal of Guangxi Agriculture,2017,32(6):6-9.）
［19］张运红,姚健,杨占平,等.不同基因型优质小麦对磷素响应的差异［J］.江苏农业科学,2018,46(14):75-79.（Zhang Y H, Yao J, Yang Z P, et al. Differences in response of phosphorus to different genotypes of high quality wheat［J］.Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2018,46(14):75-79.）
［20］李忠,江立庚,唐荣华,等.施磷量对花生光合特性及干物质积累的影响［J］.广东农业科学, 2017,44(7):48-52.（Li Z, Jiang L G, Tang R H, et al. Effects of phosphorus application rate on photosynthetic characteristics and dry matter accumulation of peanut［J］. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2017,44(7):48-52.）
［21］丁玉川,陈明昌,程滨,等.北方春大豆磷高效基因型的筛选［J］. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006, 12(4):597-600.（Ding Y C, Chen M C, Cheng B, et al. The selection of spring soybean genotypes with high phosphorus efficiency in Northern China［J］. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2006, 12(4):597-600.）
［22］张倩雯,丁广大,王效华,等.植物种子植酸研究进展［J］. 植物科学学报, 2016, 34(5):814-820.（Zhang Q W, Ding G D, Wang X H, et al. Research progress on plant seed phytic acid［J］. Plant Science Journal, 2016, 34(5):814-820.）
［23］Varun K,Tiratha R,Singh A H,et al.Probing phosphorus efficient low phytic acid content soybean genotypes with phosphorus starvation in hydroponics growth system［J］. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2015, 177(3):689-699.
［24］Krishnapriya V, Pandey R.Root exudation index: Screening organic acid exudation and phosphorus acquisition efficiency in soybean genotypes［J］. Crop & Pasture Science, 2016, 67(10):1096-1109.
［25］李志刚,谢甫绨,宋书宏.大豆高效利用磷素基因型的筛选［J］. 中国农学通报, 2004, 20(5):126-129.（Li Z G, Xie F D, Song S H. The selection of high phosphorus using efficient soybean genotype［J］. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2004, 20(5):126-129.）
［26］郭玉春,林文雄,石秋梅,等.水稻苗期磷高效基因型筛选研究［J］.应用生态学报,2002(12):1587-1591.（Guo Y C,Lin W X,Shi Q M,et al. Screening methodology for rice(Oryza sativa)genotypes with high phosphorus use efficiency at their seedlingstage［J］. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology［J］. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2002(12):1587-1591.）
［27］李永夫,罗安程,王为木,等.耐低磷水稻基因型筛选指标的研究［J］.应用生态学报,2005(1):119-124.（Li Y F,Luo A C,Wang W M,et al. An approach to the screening index f or low phosphorous tolerant rice genotype［J］. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2005(1):119-124.）
［28］夏龙飞,易科,张木清,等.甘蔗磷效率基因型差异及磷高效基因型筛选研究［J］.热带作物学报,2017,38(5):873-880.（Xia L F,Yi K,Zhang M Q,et al. Genotypic differences of phosphorus efficiency and screening of phosphorus efficient cultivars in sugarcane［J］. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops,2017,38(5):873-880.）
［29］王兰珍.冬小麦磷高效种质鉴定及其生理遗传分析［D］.北京:中国农业大学, 2003: 36-43.（Wang L Z. Characterzation and physiological and genetic analysis of phosphorus efficiency in winter wheat germplasys［D］.Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2003: 36-43.)
［30］袁园园,常芳,董贝,等.黄淮麦区小麦成株期磷高效基因型的鉴定和筛选［J］.麦类作物学报,2017,37(1):56-65.（Yuan Y Y, Chang F, Dong B, et al.Identification and selection of wheat genotypes with high phosphorus use efficiency at adult stage in huang-huai wheat area［J］. Journal of Triticeae Crops,2017,37(1):56-65.）
［31］卞芬茹.玉米籽粒植酸磷积累规律及影响因素研究［D］.保定: 河北农业大学, 2008: 29-43.（Bian F R.Study on the accumulation regularity of phytic acid p in maize seeds and its influence factors［D］.Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2008: 29-43.）
［32］毕俊国.粳稻植酸磷和矿质元素积累的氮磷肥调控效应研究［D］.南京:南京农业大学,2012:80-100.（Bi J G.The effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer on phosphorus of phytic acid and mineral nutrients accumulation in Japanica rice grains［D］.Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2012: 80-100.）
［33］王苏影,潘晓华,吴建富,等.施磷量对双季早、晚稻产量及稻米品质的影响［J］.中国土壤与肥料,2011(2):39-43.（Wang S Y, Pan X H, Wu J F,et al. Effects of amount P-applied on yield and rice quality of double-cropping rice［J］. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China,2011(2):39-43.）

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-07-25