|Table of Contents|

Growth and Decomposition of China′s Soybean Total Factor Productivity Under Carbon Emissions
(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2019年03期
Page:
460-468
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Growth and Decomposition of China′s Soybean Total Factor Productivity Under Carbon Emissions
Author(s):
YANG Xue HE Yu-chengYAN Gui-quan
(College of Economics and Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)
Keywords:
Soybean Carbon emissions Total factor productivity Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2019.03.0460
Abstract:
In the paper, incorporating carbon emissions into the soybean total factor producticity analysis framework to provide reference for low carbon production in soybeans. The spatial and temporal characteristics of carbon emissions and density in China′s major soybean producing areas from 2006 to 2016 are measured and analyzed, and then the Malmquist- Luenberger productivity index based on directional distance function was used. The law estimated the total factor productivity of 11 provinces and cities in China′s major soybean producing areas in 2006-2016 under carbon emission constraints. The results showed that in 2016, China′s soybean carbon emissions decreased by 11.70% compared with 2006, with an average annual negative growth of 1.24%, while carbon emission density increased by 14.02% compared with 2006, with an average annual growth of 1.32%, both of which showed a trend of rising firstly and then decreasing. From a regional perspective, Heilongjiang and Inner Mongolia had the largest carbon emissions, while Jilin and Shanxi had the highest carbon emission density. Under the carbon emission constraints of 2006-2016, China′s soybean total factor productivity grew at an average annual rate of 2.32%, of which technical efficiency improved by 0.6% annually, and cutting-edge technological progress increased by 1.66% annually. It showed that the growth of China′s soybean total factor productivity mainly depends on the contribution of cutting-edge technological progress, and the improvement of technical efficiency was not obvious. From the perspective of geographical distribution, there was a regional imbalance in China′s soybean total factor productivity under carbon emission constraints. The western region had the fastest growth, while the eastern region had the slowest growth, and there were differences in the total factor productivity growth patterns of various provinces and cities. The main soybean producing areas in China are lacking of ‘Environmental Technology Innovators’. According to the research conclusions, some policy recommendations were proposed to improve the total factor productivity of soybean in China.

References:

[1]侯彩霞,赵雪雁,文岩,等.不同生计方式农户的碳足迹研究——以黑河流域中游张掖市为例[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(4):587-597.(Hou C X, Zhao X Y, Wen Y, et al. Different subsistence farmers, carbon footprint research: A case study of city of Zhangye in midstream of Heihe river basin[J].Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 29(4):587-597.)

[2]张广胜,王珊珊.中国农业碳排放的结构、效率及其决定机制[J].农业经济问题,2014,35(7):18-26.(Zhang G S, Wang S S. The structure, efficiency and decision mechanism of China′s agricultural carbon emissions[J].Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2014, 35(7):18-26.)
[3]赵文晋,李都峰,王宪恩.低碳农业的发展思路[J].环境保护,2010(12):38-39.(Zhao W J, Li D F, Wang X E. Development ideas of low carbon agriculture[J].Environmental Protection, 2010(12):38-39.)
[4]Chung Y H, Fre R, Grosskopf S. Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach[J].Microeconomics, 1995, 51(3):229-240.
[5]闵锐,李谷成.环境约束条件下的中国粮食全要素生产率增长与分解——基于省域面板数据与序列Malmquist-Luenberger指数的观察[J].经济评论,2012(5):34-42.(Min R, Li G C.A study on growth and decomposition of China′s grain TFP under environmental constraints: Empirical analysis based on provincial panel data and sequence Malmquist-Luenberger index[J].Economic Review, 2012(5):34-42.)
[6]韩海彬,赵丽芬.环境约束下中国农业全要素生产率增长及收敛分析[J].中国人口?资源与环境,2013,23(3):70-76.(Han H B, Zhao L F. Growth and convergence of agricultural TFP in China under environmental regulations[J].China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013,23(3):70-76.)
[7]田伟,杨璐嘉,姜静.低碳视角下中国农业环境效率的测算与分析——基于非期望产出的SBM模型[J].中国农村观察,2014(5):59-71.(Tian W, Yang L J, Jiang J. Measurement and analysis of China′s agricultural environmental efficiency from low carbon perspective——SBM model based on unexpected output [J].China Rural Survey, 2014(5):59-71.)
[8]张林,冉光和,蓝震森.碳排放约束与农业全要素生产率增长及分解[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2015(3):22-32.(Zhang L, Ran G H, Lan Z S. Growth and decomposition of agricultural total factor productivity in China under carbon emission constraints [J].Journal of South China Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2015(3):22-32.)
[9]田云,张俊飚,吴贤荣,等.碳排放约束下的中国农业生产率增长与分解研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(11):7-12.(Tian Y, Zhang J B, Wu X R, et al. Growth and sources of agricultural productivity in China under carbon emissions constraint[J].Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2015, 29(11):7-12.)
[10]高鸣,宋洪远.中国农业碳排放绩效的空间收敛与分异——基于Malmquist-luenberger指数与空间计量的实证分析[J].经济地理,2015,35(4):142-148.(Gao M, Song H Y. Dynamic changes and spatial agglomeration analysis of the Chinese agricultural carbon emissions performance [J].Economic Geography, 2015, 35(4):142-148.)
[11]吴丽丽,郑炎成,李谷成.碳排放约束下我国油菜全要素生产率增长与分解——来自13个主产区的实证[J].农业现代化研究,2013,34(1):77-80.(Wu L L, Zheng Y C, Li G C. Growth and source of rape total factor productivity in China under carbon emissions constraint——An empirical study from 13 main producing areas [J].Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2013, 34(1):77-80.)
〖HJ1.8mm〗[12]冯晓龙,刘明月,霍学喜.碳排放约束下中国苹果全要素生产率研究[J].中国农业大学学报,2017,22(2):157-168.(Feng X L, Liu M Y, Huo X X. Study on total factor productivity of apple in China under carbon emissions [J].Journal of China Agricultural University, 2017, 22(2):157-168.)
[13]司伟,王济民.中国大豆生产全要素生产率及其变化[J].中国农村经济,2011(10):16-25.(Si W, Wang J M.Total factor productivity of China′s soybean production and its changes [J].Chinese Rural Economy, 2011(10):16-25.)
[14]夏佳佳,郭萍,余康.我国大豆全要素生产率增长的变动与分解——基于Hicks-Moorsteen TFP指数的研究[J].南方农业学报,2015,46(5):917-921.(Xia J J, Guo P, Yu K. Change and decomposition of soybean′s total factor productivity growth in China——Based on Hicks-Moorsteen TFP index [J].Journal of Southern Agriculture,2015,46(5):917-921.)
[15]厄尔?O?黑迪,约翰?L?狄龙.农业生产函数[M].沈达尊,朱希刚,厉为民,译.北京:农业出版社,1991:220-228.(Earl O H, John L D.Agricultural production function[M].Shen D Z, Zhu X G, Li W M, translation. Beijing: Agricultural publishing house, 1991: 220- 228.)
[16]Shephard R W.A dynamic formulation of index functions for the theory of cost and production[M]// Eichihorn W, Henn R, Opitz O,et al.Theory and Applications of Economic Indices. Physica-Verlag Heidelberg, 1978:417-448.
[17]苏杨.中国农村环境污染调查[EB/OL].http://theory.people.com.cn/GB/49154/49369/4027248.html.2006[2012- 11- 21](Su Y. Rural environmental pollution survey in China. [EB/OL]. http://theory. people.com.cn /GB/49154/49369 /40 27248.html. 2006[2012- 11- 21])
[18]West T O, Marland G. A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture: comparing tillage practices in the United States[J].Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2002, 91(1):217-232.
[19]杨璐嘉.低碳视角下粮食主产区农业全要素生产率比较——基于中国13省2002-2011年数据的分析[J].湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2013(6):27-32.(Yang L J. Comparison of agricultural TFP of the main grain production area in China from low-carbon angle of view: Based on the data of 13 provinces from 2002 to 2011[J].Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Social Sciences) , 2013(6):27-32.)
[20]潘丹,孔凡斌.我国农业全要素生产率差异与收敛分析—基于环境污染视角[J].江西社会科学,2013(9):43-47.(Pan D, Kong F B. Analysis of the difference and convergence of total factor productivity in China′s agriculture——Based on the perspective of environmental pollution[J].Jiangxi Social Sciences, 2013(9):43-47.)
[21]潘丹,应瑞瑶.资源环境约束下的中国农业全要素生产率增长研究[J].资源科学,2013,35(7):1329-1338.(Pan D, Ying R Y. Agricultural total factor productivity growth in China under the binding of resource and environment [J].Resources Science,2013, 35(7):1329-1338.)
[22]Fare R, Grosskopf S, Margaritis D.APEC and the Asian economic crisis:Early signals from productivity trends [J]. Asian Economic Journal, 2001, 15 (3): 325-342.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-05-31