|Table of Contents|

Salt and Alkaline Tolerance Screening and Comprehensive Identification of Eighteen Soybean Varieties(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2019年03期
Page:
344-352
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Salt and Alkaline Tolerance Screening and Comprehensive Identification of Eighteen Soybean Varieties
Author(s):
(1.Agricultural College of Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities,Tongliao 028000,China;2.College of Pharmaceutical and Food Engineering,Shanxi University of Chinese Medicine,Jinzhong 030619, China)
Keywords:
Soybean Saline-alkali stress Membership function Principal component analysis
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2019.03.0344
Abstract:
Under hydroponic conditions, the seedlings of eighteen soybean varieties were treated with water containing 60 mmol?L-1 mixed salt (NaHCO3 and Na2CO3 with the molar ratio of 9∶1).To evaluate the saline-alkali tolerance of different soybean varieties, conduct cluster analysis and provid theoretical basis for the utilization of soybean in saline-alkali land, the indexes of plant height, stem diameter, leaf area, main root length, dry weight above ground, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci), transpiration rate (Tr) and stomatal conductance (Gs)were measured after 7 d stress treatment, and the principal component analysis and membership function of fuzzy mathematics were conducted. The results showed that the factor loadings of plant height, main root length and net photosynthetic rate (Pn) indexes were the largest by principal component analysis, which could be used as the main identification indicators for the selection of salt and alkali tolerant soybean varieties. Varieties were sorted according to the membership function, Eighteen soybean varieties showed significant differences in salt and alkali tolerance, and they could be divided into three categories. Among them, four soybean materials including hybrid soybean 5 were salt-alkali tolerant varieties, eleven varieties materials including Jiyu 611 and Jiyu 299 were medium saline-alkali tolerant varieties, and two materials, Jiyu 256 and Dongnong 63, were saline-alkali sensitive tolerant varieties.

References:

[1]王志春, 杨福, 陈渊, 等. 苏打盐碱胁迫下水稻体内的Na+、K+响应[J].生态环境, 2008,17(3): 1198-1203.(Wang Z C, Yang F, Chen Y,et al. The response of soda saline stress of Na+ and K+on rice[J]. Ecology Environment, 2008, 17(3): 1198-1203. )
[2]Yang Z, Wan B. Progress in techniques of improvement and utilization of saline-alkali land in China and its future trend[J]. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 2014, 2: 1-11.
[3]刘玉兰, 陈殿元, 元明浩, 等. 盐胁迫对小粒大豆幼苗生长发育及光合特性的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2017, 36(6): 913-920.(Liu Y L, Chen D Y, Yuan M H, et al. Effects of salt stress on seedling growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Glycine gracilis [J].Soybean Science, 2017, 36 (6): 913-920.)
[4]Deng X X, Zhang X Q, Song X J, et al. Response of transgenic rice at germination traits under salt and alkali stress[J]. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2011, 6(18): 4335-4339.
[5]季平, 张鹏, 徐克章,等. 不同类型盐碱胁迫对大豆植株生长性状和产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2013, 32(4): 477-481.(Ji P,Zhang P,Xu K Z,et al. Effects of salt and alkaline stress on plant growth traits and yield of soybean[J].Soybean Science,2013,32(4): 477-481.)
[6]赵俊香, 任翠梅, 吴凤芝, 等. 16份菊芋种质苗期耐盐碱性筛选与综合鉴定[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(5): 620-627.(Zhao J X, Ren C M, Wu F Z, et al. Comprehensive identification of saline-alkaline tolerance of 16 Jerusalem artichoke accessions at seedling stage [J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2015, 23 (5): 620-627.)
[7]李丰先, 周宇飞, 王艺陶, 等. 高粱品种萌发期耐碱性筛选与综合鉴定[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(9): 1762-1771.(Li F X, Zhou Y F, Wang Y T, et al. Screening and identification of sorghum cultivars for alkali tolerance during germination[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(9): 1762-1771.)
[8]沈一, 刘永惠, 陈志德, 等. 花生幼苗期耐盐品种的筛选与评价[J]. 花生学报, 2012, 41(1): 10-15.(Shen Y, Liu Y H, Chen Z D, et al. Selection and evaluation of peanut varieties based on seedling salt tolerance[J]. Journal of Peanut Science, 2012, 41(1): 10-15.)
[9]张春宵, 刘晓鑫, 周波, 等. 吉林省26份主推玉米杂交种的苗期耐盐碱性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2010(1): 66-69.(Zhang C X, Liu X X, Zhou B, et al. The alkali analysis of Jilin 26 main maize hybrid on seedling stage. Crops,2010(1): 66-69.)
[10]宁丽华, 张大勇, 刘佳, 等. 盐胁迫下苗期栽培大豆生理响应及Na+动态平衡关键基因的表达[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(24): 4714-4725.(Ning L H, Zhang D Y, Liu J, et al. Effect of salt stress on physiological reponses and the expression of key genes involved in Na+ Homeostasis of soybean seedlings[J]. Agricultural Science of China, 2016, 49 (24): 4714-4725.)
[11]徐芬芬, 楚婕妤, 刘誉, 等.盐胁迫对大豆种子萌发过程中吸水和水解酶活性的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2017, 36(1): 74-77.(Xu F F, Chu J H, Liu Y, et al. Effects of salt stress on water uptake and hydrolytic enzyme activities during soybean seed germination[J].Soybean Science, 2017, 36 (1): 74-77.)
[12]胡卫静,何丽君,何劲莉, 等. NaCl胁迫对野生与栽培大豆杂交后代株系生理指标的影响[J].大豆科学,2013,32(3):349-354.(Hu W J, He L J, He J L, et al. Effects of NaCl stress on physiological characters of soybean hybrids from Glycine max×Glycine soja[J].Soybean Science, 2013, 32 (3): 349-354.)
[13]孟强,姜奇彦,牛风娟, 等.盐胁迫下不同抗性野生大豆(Glycine soja)生理生化性状比较分析[J].中国农业科技导报,2017,19(8):25-32.(Meng Q, Jiang Q Y, Niu F J, et al. Comparative analysis of physiological and biochemical characters of Glycine soja under NaCl stress [J].China Agricultural Science and Technology Report, 2017, 19 (8): 25-32.)
[14]牛远,杨修艳,戴存凤,等.大豆芽期和苗期耐盐性评价指标筛选[J].大豆科学,2018,37(2):215-223.(Niu Y, Yang X Y, Dai C F, et al. Related indices selection of soybean salt tolerance at germination and seedling stages [J]. Soybean Science, 2018, 37 (2): 215-223.)
[15]吴杨, 高慧纯, 张必弦, 等. 24-表油菜素内酯对盐碱胁迫下大豆生育、生理及细胞超微结构的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(5): 811-821.(Wu Y, Gao H C, Zhang B X, et al. Effects of 24-Brassinolide on the fertility, physiological characteristics and cell ultra-structure of soybean under saline-alkali stress[J]. Agricultural Science of China, 2017, 50 (5): 811-821.)
[16]牛陆. 盐、碱胁迫对大豆属植物的结构演化及生理特性的影响[D]. 长春:东北师范大学, 2013.(Nui L. Effects of salt and alkali stress on the structural evolution and physiological characteristics of soybean [D]. Changchun:Northeast Normal University, 2013.)
[17]范富, 张庆国, 邰继承, 等.通辽市盐碱地形成及类型划分[J]. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 24(4):409-413.(Fan F, Zhang Q G, T J C, et al. The formation and classification of saline-alkali soil in tongliao city[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities (Natural Science Edition), 2009, 24 (4): 409-413.)
[18]郝黎仁, 樊元, 郝哲欧. SPSS实用统计分析[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社,2003.(Hao L R, Fan Y, Hao Z O. Practical statistical analysis of SPSS[M]. Beijing: China Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power Press, 2003.)
[19]陈德明, 俞仁培, 杨劲松. 盐渍条件下小麦抗盐性的隶属函数值法评价[J]. 土壤学报, 2002(3): 368-374.(Chen D M, Yu R P, Yang J S. The membership function value evaluation method of under the salted stress on wheat[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2002, 39(3): 368-373.)
[20]宋江峰, 李大婧, 刘春泉, 等. 甜糯玉米软罐头主要挥发性物质主成分分析和聚类分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(10): 2122-2131.(Song J F, Li D J, Liu C Q, et al. Principal components analysis and cluster analysis of flavor compositions in waxy corn soft can[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(10): 2122-2131.)
[21]李广鲁, 王文果, 陈志新, 等. 钙对盐胁迫下冰叶日中花不同器官离子含量和根部K+、Na+吸收的影响[J]. 植物科学学报, 2018,36(2):282-290.(Li G L, Wang W G, Chen Z X, et al. Effect of calcium on ion contents in different organs and absorption of K+ and Na+in the root tips of Mesemberyanthemum crystallinum L.under NaCl stress[J].Journal of Plant Science, 2018,36(2):282-290.)
[22]王聪,刘艳华,董永义, 等. NaCl胁迫对菜用大豆光合作用及叶绿体抗氧化系统的影响[J].西南农业学报,2016,29(12):2824-2829.(Wang C, Liu Y H, Dong Y Y, et al. Effects of NaCl stress on photosynthesis and chloroplast antioxidant system of vegetable soybean[J]. Southwest Agricultural Journal, 2016, 29 (12): 2824-2829.)
[23]刘志萍,李琲琲,薛海楠, 等. NaCl胁迫对大麦籽粒抗坏血酸-谷胱甘肽循环的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2016,36(6):736-741.(Liu Z P, Li B B, Xue H N, et al. Effect of NaCl stress on antioxidant system and ascorbate-glutathione cycle in barley seeds[J]. Journal of Wheat Crops, 2016, 36 (6): 736-741.)
[24]姜梦婷, 王秋岭, 周鑫, 等. 不同油料作物油脂体氧化稳定性差异的研究[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2018, 33(10): 63-70.(Jiang M T, Wang Q L, Zhou X, et al. Differences in oxidation stability of oil bodies from diverse oilseed crops[J]. Chinese Journal of Cereals and Oils, 2018, 33 (10): 63-70.)
[25]张威, 廖锡良, 喻德跃, 等. 大豆耐盐性研究进展[J]. 土壤与作物, 2018, 7(3): 284-292.(Zhang W, Liao X L, Yu D Y, et al. A review of salt tolerance in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merill][J]. Soil and Crops, 2018, 7 (3): 284-292.)
[26]韩飞,诸葛玉平,娄燕宏,等. 63份谷子种质的耐盐综合评价及耐盐品种筛选[J].植物遗传资源学报,2018,19(4):685-693.(Han F, Zhu-Ge Y P, Lou Y H, et al. Evaluation of salt tolerance and screening for salt tolerant accessions of 63 foxtail millet germplasm[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2018, 19 (4): 685-693.)
[27]孙东雷,卞能飞,陈志德, 等.花生萌发期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选[J].植物遗传资源学报,2017,18(6):1079-1087.(Sun D L, Bian N F, Chen Z D, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance and screening for salt tolerant accessions of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) at germination stage[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2017, 18 (6): 1079-1087.)
[28]薛忠财,高辉远,柳洁.野生大豆和栽培大豆光合机构对NaCl胁迫的不同响应[J].生态学报,2011,31(11):3101-3109.(Xue Z C, Gao H Y, Liu J. Different response of photosynthetic apparatus between wild soybean (Glycine soja) and cultivated soybean (Glycine max) to NaCl stress [J]. Journal of Ecology, 2011, 31 (11): 3101-3109.)
[29]郑世英, 萧蓓蕾, 金桂芳. NaCl胁迫对野生大豆和栽培大豆叶绿素及光合特性的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2013, 32(4): 486-489.(Zheng S Y, Xiao B L, Jin G F. Effect of NaCl stress on chlorophyll content and photosynthetic characteristics of Glycine soja and Glycine max[J].Soybean Science, 2013, 32 (4): 486-489.)
[30]Yang J Y, Zheng W, Tian Y, et al. Effects of various mixed salt-alkaline stresses on growth, photosynthesis and photosynthetic pigment concentrations of Medicago ruthenica seedlings[J]. Photosynthetica, 2011, 49(2): 275-284.
[31]吴泽龙,谭晓风,袁军, 等.油茶不同叶龄叶片形态与光合参数的测定[J].经济林研究,2016,34(2):24-29.(Wu Z L, Tan X F, Yuan J, et al. Morphology and photosynthetic parameters of Camellia oleifera leaves at different ages[J]. Economic Forest Research, 2016, 34 (2): 24-29.)
[32]张树文,杨久春,李颖, 等.1950s中期以来东北地区盐碱地时空变化及成因分析[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(3):435-442.(Zhang S W, Yang J C, Li Y, et al. Changes of saline-alkali land in northeast China and its causes since the Mid-1950s [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2010, 25 (3): 435-442.)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-05-30