|Table of Contents|

Farmers′ Planting Preferences for Soybean Germplasm based on Choice Experiment(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2019年01期
Page:
124-133
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Farmers′ Planting Preferences for Soybean Germplasm based on Choice Experiment
Author(s):
LIU Ya-mei1LIU Li2LAN Jing1
(1.College of Public Administration,Nanjing Agricultural University,Nanjing 210095,China; 2.Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences,Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People′s Republic of China,Nanjing 210042,China)
Keywords:
Soybean germplasm attributes Farmers′ planting preference Choice experiment Economic value
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2019.01.0124
Abstract:
In 2016, the Ministry of Agriculture proposed the supply-side structure reform program in agricultural sector named‘replacing corn with soybeans’, however, due to farmers were reluctant to plant soybeans, the yield and benefit of domestic soybean planting were low. Based on survey data from 381 farmers′ selection of different soybean germplasm attributes in Shandong province, this study examines farmers′ planting preference for different soybean attributes by adopting the choice experiment and multiple logit model, and then calculates the economic value for each attribute respectively. By taking soybeans with low yields, early maturity, lodging and low resistance to disease as the reference group, our results showed that: (1) Farmers′ planting preferences (with respect to soybean germplasm attributes selection) as following, lodging resistance>lodging, high production>middle production≥low production, medium maturity>early maturing>late maturing, middle resistance>high resistance≥low resistance to pests. (2)Though the purposes for soybeans planting were different, farmers′ planting preferences were consistent for different soybean uses. (3)The market prices of soybeans were lower than the total value of attributes for the targeted soybean varieties, and so the economic value of the soybean germplasm was underestimated by the market. The above evidences provide certain scientific supports for improving farmers′ willingness to plant soybeans, design appropriate market price system of soybeans, guide research and development in soybean breeding industry and effectively promote the supply-side structure reform in soybean industry.

References:

[1]Lancaster K. A new approach to consumer theory [J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1966, 74(2):132-157.
[2]Luce R.Individual choice behavior [M]. New York: Wiley, 1959.
[3]樊辉,赵敏娟. 自然资源非市场价值评估的选择实验法:原理及应用分析[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(7):1347-1354. (Fan H, Zhao M J. Choice experiments for natural resource non-market evaluation[J].Resources Science, 2013, 35(7):1347-1354.)
[4]Adamowicz W, Louviere J, Williams M. Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities [J]. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 1994, 26(3):271-292.
[5]李艳军, 李崇光, 杨光圣. 基于农户角度的商品种子价值要素效用评价——以油菜种子为例[J]. 中国农村经济, 2009(1):58-69. (Li Y J, Li C G, Yang G S. Evaluation of utility value of commodity seed based on peasant households: Taking rapeseed seeds as an example[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2009(1):58-69.)
[6]Rambonilaza M, Dachary-Bernard J. Land-use planning and public preferences: What can we learn from choice experiment method [J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2007, 83(4):318-326.
[7]Andreopoulos D, Damigos D, Comiti F, et al. Estimating the nonmarket benefits of climate change adaptation of river ecosystem services:A choice experiment application in the Aoosbasin, Greece [J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2015, 45:92-103.
[8]常向阳, 赵璐瑶. 江苏省小麦种植农户化肥与农药选择行为分析——基于选择实验法的实证[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(11):551-555. (Chang X Y, Zhao L Y. Analysis on fertilizer and pesticide selection behavior of wheat farmers in Jiangsu province based on selective experiment method[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 43(11):551-555.)
[9]马爱慧, 张安录. 选择实验法视角的耕地生态补偿意愿实证研究——基于湖北武汉市问卷调查[J]. 资源科学, 2013, 35(10):2061-2066. (Ma A H, Zhang A L. Cultivated land ecological compensation willingness based on choice experiments[J].Resources Science, 2013, 35(10):2061-2066.)
[10]陈琦,都基隆,韩立民,等.消费者对水产品质量安全属性的偏好研究——基于选择实验法的分析[J].资源开发与市场, 2015, 31(9):1040-1044. (Chen Q, Du J L, Han L M, et al. Study on consumers′ preference for the quality and safety attributes of aquatic product——Based on analysis of choice experiment[J]. Resource Development & Market, 2015, 31(9):1040-1044.)
[11]蓝菁, 夏伟峰, 刘立,等. 基于选择实验法的生物资源公众保护偏好研究[J]. 资源科学, 2017,39(3):577-584. (Lan J, Xia W F, Liu L, et al. Public preferences for biological resource conservation based on choice experiment methods[J]. Resources Science, 2017,39(3):577-584.)
[12]尹世久, 徐迎军, 陈雨生. 食品质量信息标签如何影响消费者偏好——基于山东省843个样本的选择实验[J]. 中国农村观察, 2015(1):39-49. (Yin S J, Xu Y J, Chen Y S. How do food quality information label affect consumers preferences:Based on the choice experiment of 843 samples in Shandong province[J]. China Rural Survey, 2015(1):39-49.)
[13]杨树果, 何秀荣. 中国大豆产业状况和观点思考[J]. 中国农村经济, 2014(4):32-41. (Yang S G, He X R. Soybean industry status and viewpoints in China[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2014(4):32-41.)
[14]潘文华, 许世卫. 黑龙江省大豆产业困境与差异化发展战略[J]. 农业经济问题, 2014, 35(2):26-33. (Pan W H, Xu S W. The dilemma and different development strategy of soybean industry in Heilongjiang province [J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2014, 35(2):26-33.)
[15]陆光米, 朱再清. 我国棉花与玉米、大豆生产效益的比较分析[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2017(9):115-120. (Lu G M, Zhu Z Q. Comparative analysis of cotton,corn and soybean production efficiency in China[J]. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2017(9):115-120.)
[16]刘爱民, 于格, 于萧萌. 大豆主产区主要竞争农作物生产成本与收益分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2005, 26(2):35-39. (Liu A M, Yu G, Yu X M. Analysis of production cost and gain of major competing crops at main soybean production regions[J]. Chinese Journal of China Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2005, 26(2):35-39.)
[17]杨胜先, 牛远, 李梦,等. 栽培大豆农艺性状的关联分析及优异等位变异挖掘[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(20):3941-3952. (Yang S X, Niu Y, Li M, et al. Association mapping of agronomic traits in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) and mining of novel alleles[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(20):3941-3952.)
[18]梁慧珍, 余永亮, 杨红旗,等. 大豆产量及主要农艺性状QTL的上位性互作和环境互作分析[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(1):37-44. (Liang H Z, Yu Y L, Yang H Q, et al. Epistatic effects and QTL × environment interaction effects of QTLs for yield and agronomic traits in soybean[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(1):37-44.)
[19]慈敦伟, 张礼凤, 汪宝卿,等. 大豆种质资源农艺性状和产量的年份间差异及其关系[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2011, 12(6):872-880. (Ci D W, Zhang L F, Wang B Q, et al. Variation of agronomic traits and production of germplasm resources of soybean in different years and the relationship between them[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2011, 12(6):872-880.)
[20]张淑荣, 李广, 刘稳. 我国大豆产业的国际竞争力实证研究与影响因素分析[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2007, 293(5):10-15. (Zhang S R, Li G, Liu W. Experimental study and factors analysis on the international competition power of Chinese soybean industry[J]. Journal of International Trade, 2007, 293(5):10-15.)
[21]石春娜, 姚顺波, 陈晓楠, 等. 基于选择实验法的城市生态系统服务价值评估——以四川温江为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2016(5): 767-778. (Shi C N, Yao S B, Chen X N, et al. Economic valuation of ecosystem services based on choice experiments: A case study of Wenjiang in Sichuan province[J]. Journal Natural Resources, 2016(5): 767-778.)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-01-22