|Table of Contents|

Establishment of a Grafting Process at Seedling Stage of Soybean
(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2018年06期
Page:
891-895
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Establishment of a Grafting Process at Seedling Stage of Soybean
Author(s):
FU Xing;  GAO Zhi;  LI Xin-xin;  LIAO Hong
(College of Resources and Environment/Root Biology Center, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
Keywords:
Soybean;  Grafting;  Process;  Survival rate
PACS:
-
DOI:
1011861/jissn1000-98412018060891
Abstract:
In order to establish the grafting system of soybean seedling stage with high survival rate of self-grafting, the soybean variety Williams 82 was used as the material for grafting experiment at different growth stages, and the survival rate of grafting was compared as affected by different darkness treatments for recovering The results showed that seedlings at 4,7 and 10 d after germination all can be utilized for grafting And the survival rate was as high as 83% when the plant grown at 4 d combined with 3 d of darkness Due to no cotyledons in the rootstock, the grafting process could contribute to study the relationship between roots and shoots in soybean When the rootstocks with cotyledons, 7 and 10 d seedlings after germination were used for grafting and separately grown under the conditions of 3 and 1 d in darkness for recovering, all grafting plants could be 100% survived, suggesed that it was a better system for soybean grafting This study could not only enrich and optimize soybean grafting technique, but also provide technical support for the research on the physiological and molecular mechanism of the relationship between roots and shoots in soybean

References:

［1］Moreno B, Jacob C, Rosales M, et al. Yield and quality of grafted watermelon grown in a field naturally infested with fusarium wilt［J］. Hort Technology, 2016, 26 (4): 453-459
［2］Xu Y, Guo S R, Li H, et al. Resistance of cucumber grafting rootstock pumpkin cultivars to chilling and salinity stresses［J］. Korean Journal of Horticultural Science & Technology, 2017, 35 (2): 220-231
［3］Chen X, Yao Q, Gao X, et al. Shoot-to-root mobile transcription factor HY5 coordinates plant carbon and nitrogen acquisition［J］. Current Biology, 2016, 26 (5): 640-646
［4］Ham B K, Lucas W J Phloem-mobile RNAs as systemic signaling agents［J］. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2017, 68 (1): 173-195
［5］Jin S, Jung H S, Chung K S, et al. FLOWERING LOCUS T has higher protein mobility than TWIN SISTER of FT［J］. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2015, 66 (20): 6109-6117
［6］Cober E R, Curtis D F Both promoters and inhibitors affected flowering time in grafted soybean flowering time isolines［J］. Crop Science, 2003, 43 (3): 886-891
［7］Heinze P H, Parker M W, Borthwick H A Floral initiation in Biloxi soybean as influenced by grafting［J］. Botanical Gazette, 1942, 103 (3): 518-530
［8］姚贵滨, 李文龙, 赵永山, 等 嫁接技术在大豆花叶病毒长距离运输机制研究上的应用［J］. 河北农业大学学报, 2010, 33 (6): 74-77 (Yao G B, Li W L, Zhao Y S, et al. The application of graft technique in the soybean for investigation of soybean mosaic virus transporting mechanism［J］. Journal of Agricultural University of Hebei, 2010, 33 (6): 74-77)
［9］Sheng C, Harper J E Shoot versus root signal involvement in nodulation and vegetative growth in wild-type and hypernodulation soybean genotypes［J］ Plant Physiology, 1997, 113: 825-831
［10］许鑫 早熟大豆子叶的开花促进效应研究［D］. 北京：中国农业科学院,2017(Xu X Study of flowering promoting effect of early-maturing soybean’s cotyledons［D］.Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,2017)
［11］Lim C W, Lee Y W, Hwang C H Soybean nodule-enhanced CLE peptides in roots act as signals in GmNARK-mediated nodulation suppression［J］. Plant & Cell Physiology, 2011, 52 (9): 1613-1627
［12］Reid D E, Ferguson B J, Gresshoff P M Inoculation-and nitrate-induced CLE peptides of soybean control NARK-dependent nodule formation［J］. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 2011, 24 (5): 606-618
［13］贾贞, 韩天富．嫁接技术在大豆生理和育种研究中的应用．大豆科学, 2010, 29 (1): 136-143．(Jia Z, Han T F Uses of grafting techniques in the studies of physiology and breeding of soybean［J］. Soybean Science, 2010, 29 (1): 136-143 )
［14］曹晓宁, 孙石, 吴存祥, 等 用于大豆根冠关系研究的嫁接方法［J］ 中国油料作物学报,2013, 35 (5): 579-583 (Cao X N, Sun S, Wu C X, et al. Grafting techniques for root-shoot relationship study in soybean［J］. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2013, 35 (5): 579-583)
［15］Borthwick H A, Parker M W Photoperiodic perception in Biloxi soybeans［J］. Botanical Gazette, 1938, 100: 374-387
［16］Shanmugasundaram S, Wang C C, Toung T S Photoperiodic response of flowering in two-branched soybean plants［J］. Botanical Gazette, 1979, 140 (4): 4141-4147
［17］Przepiorkowski T, Martin S K S The effect of grafting on the flowering of near-isogenic lines of soybean［J］. Crop Science, 2003, 43 (5): 1760-1763
［18］Sun H, Jia Z, Cao D, et al. GmFT2a, a soybean homolog of FLOWERING LOCUS T, is involved in flowering transition and maintenance［J］. PLos One, 2011, 6(12): e29238
［19］贾贞, 吴存祥, 王妙, 等 大豆嫁接体系中砧木或接穗保留叶片数对接穗生长发育的影响［J］作物学报, 2011, 37 (4): 650-660 (Jia Z, Wu C X, Wang M, et al. Effects of leaf number of stock or scion in graft union on scion growth and development of soybean［J］. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011, 37 (4): 650-660)
［20］Pantalone V R, Rebetzke G J, Burton J W, et al. Soybean PI416937 root system contributes to biomass accumulation in reciprocal grafts［J］. Agronomy Journal, 1999, 91: 840-844
［21］Cho M J, Harper J E Root isoflavonoid response to grafting between wild-type and nodulation mutant soybean plants［J］. Plant Physiology, 1991, 96(4): 1277-1782
［22］Balatti P A, Pueppke S G Cultivar-specific interactions of soybean with rhizobium fredii are regulated by the genotype of the root［J］. Plant Physiology, 1990, 94(4): 1907-1909
［23］Matsuoka K, Sugawara E, Aoki R, et al. Differential cellular control by cotyledon-derived phytohormones involved in graft reunion of Arabidopsis hypocotyls［J］. Plant & Cell Physiology, 2016, 57 (12): 2620-2631
［24］Yoo S J, Hong S M, Jung H S, et al. The cotyledons produce sufficient FT protein to induce flowering: Evidence from cotyledon micrografting in Arabidopsis［J］. Plant & Cell Physiology, 2013, 54 (1): 119-128

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2018-12-04