|Table of Contents|

Dynamic Evolution of Microbial Community in the Rhizosphere of Continuous Cropping of Soybean in Black Soil(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2018年05期
Page:
748-755
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Dynamic Evolution of Microbial Community in the Rhizosphere of Continuous Cropping of Soybean in Black Soil
Author(s):
CHEN Xue-li12WANG Yu-feng1LI Wei-qun1WANG Shuang1WANG Xiao-jun1ZHANG Lei1WANG Ying1
(1.Institute of Soil Fertilizer and Environment Resources, Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Plant Nutrition of Heilongjiang Province, Fertilizer Engineering Technology Research Centre of Heilongjiang Province, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150086, China; 2.Postdoc station of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150086, China)
Keywords:
Black soil Soybean continuous cropping Rhizosphere Microbial community Diversity of soil microbial
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.05.0748
Abstract:
In order to explore the effects of long-term continuous cropping on the microbial community structures of soybean rhizosphere soil. Polymerase Chain Reaction-Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) method was used to analysis the dynamic process of soil microbial community based on long-term soybean continuous cropping experiment with the same environment factors. The results showed that soil bacteria community composition changed with continuous cropping years, where the diversity of bacteria community in soybean continuous cropping over seven years treatments were lower than that of rotation and continuous cropping less than four years, indicating that soil bacteria community was changed with soybean continuous cropping, but it is a slowly process. The results of fungi community structure analysis showed that the community composition of SC2 and SC4 trend to more abundant and diverse. Then the diversities of fungi community for more than 7 years and the rotation treatment were from 3.067 7 to 3.071 5, lower than that of SC2 and SC4, while the community composition of SC7 showed similar to rotation, which was the typical property of suppressive soil.

References:

[1]Berg G, Smalla K. Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere[J]. Fems Microbiology Ecology, 2010, 68(1):1-13.
[2]Garbeva P, van Veen J A, van Elsas J D. Microbial diversity in soil: Selection of microbial populations by plant and soil type and implications for disease suppressiveness[J]. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2004, 42: 243-270.
[3]Rasche F, Velvis H, Zachow C, et al. Impact of transgenic potatoes expressing antibacterial agents on bacterial endophytes is comparable to effects of soil, wildtype potatoes, vegetation stage and pathogen exposure[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2006, 43 (3): 555-566.
[4]Jangid K, Williams M A, Franzluebbers A J, et al. Relative impacts of land-use, management intensity and fertilization upon soil microbial community structure in agricultural systems[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008, 40 (11): 2843-2853.
[5]Caesar T, Lenssen A W, Caesar A J, et al. Effects of tillage on microbial populations associated to soil aggregation in dryland spring wheat system[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2010, 46 (2): 119-127.
[6]Guan X, Wang J, Zhao H, et al. Soil bacterial communities shaped by geochemical factors and land use in a less-explored area, Tibetan Plateau[J]. BMC Genomics, 2013, 14 (1): 820.
[7]Sudini H, Liles M R, Arias C R, et al. Exploring soil bacterial communities in different peanut-cropping sequences using multiple molecular approaches[J]. Phytopathology, 2011, 101 (7): 819-827.
[8]Wieland G, Neumann R, Backhaus H. Variation of microbial communities in soil, rhizosphere, and rhizoplane in response to crop species, soil type, and crop development[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2001, 67(12): 5849-5854.
[9]Avidano L, Gamalero E, Cossa G P, et al. Characterization of soil health in an Italian polluted site by using microorganisms as bioindicators[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2005, 30 (1): 21-33.
[10]Nannipieri P, Ascher J, Ceccherini M T, et al. Microbial diversity and soil functions[J]. European Journal of Soil Sciences, 2010, 54(4): 655-670.
[11]Welbaum G E, Sturz A V, Dong Z, et al. Managing soil microorganisms to improve productivity of agro-ecosystems[J]. Critical Review in Plant Sciences, 2004, 23 (2): 175-193.
[12]Glick B R. Using soil bacteria to facilitate phytoremediation[J]. Biotechnology Advance, 2010, 28 (3): 367-374.
[13]Hayat R, Ali S, Amara U, et al. Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: A review[J]. Annual Microbiology, 2010, 60 (4): 579-598.
[14]Liu X, Zhang J, Gu T, et al. Microbial community diversities and taxa abundances in soils along a seven-year gradient of potato monoculture using high throughput pyrosequencing approach[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(1):e86610.
[15]She S, Niu J, Zhang C,et al. Significant relationship between soil bacterial community structure and incidence of bacterial wilt disease under continuous cropping system[J]. Archives of Microbiology, 2017, 199 (2):1-9.
[16]陈宗泽, 殷勤艳, 王旭明, 等. 土壤病原菌对连作大豆的致病性初探[J].吉林农业大学学报, 1999, 21(1): 29-32. (Chen Z Z, Yin Q Y, Wang X M, et al. Preliminary research on the pathogenicity of soil pathogens to continuous cropping soybean[J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 1999, 21(1): 29-32.)
[17]Baker K F, Cook R J. Biological control of plant pathogens[M].San Fransisco: American phytopathological society, 1974, 71(4): 1632.
[18]蔡柏岩,王丽阳,胡维,等. 连作大豆苗期根际土壤根腐病病原真菌菌群秸秆分析[J].中国农学通报,2015,31(32):92-98. (Cai B Y, Wang L Y, Hu W, et al. Analysis of community structure of root rot pathogenic fungi in seeding stage of soybean continuous cropping[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015,31(32):92-98.)
[19]韩晓增, 许艳丽. 大豆连作减产主要障碍因素的研究.Ⅰ.连作大豆根系腐解物的障碍效应[J]. 大豆科学, 1998, 17(3): 207-211. (Han X Z, Xu Y L. A study of main factors causing yield decrease of continuous cropping soybean [J]. Soybean Science, 1998, 17(3): 207-211.)
[20]郭荣君, 刘杏忠, 杨怀文. 大豆根际细菌Ⅰ拮抗大豆根腐病菌研究[J].大豆科学, 1998, 17(1): 53-58. (Guo R J, Liu X Z, Yang H W. Antagonistic effect of soybean rhizosphere bacteria I against soybean root rot [J].Soybean Science, 1998, 17(1): 53-58.)
[21]Chen M N, Li X, Yang Q L, et al.Dynamic succession of soil bacterial community during continuous cropping of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(7): e101355.
[22]朱琳,曾椿淋,李雨青,等. 基于高通量测序的大豆连作土壤细菌群落多样性分析[J].大豆科学,2017,36(3):419-424. (Zhu L, Zeneg C L, Li Y Q, et al. The characteristic of bacterial community diversity in soybean field with continuous cropping based on the high-throughout sequencing[J]. Soybean Science, 2017,36(3):419-424.)
[23]殷继忠,李亮,接伟光,等. 连作对大豆根际土壤细菌菌群结构的影响[J].生物技术通报,2018, 34(1):230-238. (Yin J Z, Li L, Jie W G, et al. Effects of continuous cropping on bacterial flora structure in soybean rhizosphere soil [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2018, 34(1):230-238.)
[24]高圣超,关大伟,马鸣超,等. 大豆连作条件下施肥对东北黑土细菌群落的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(7):1271-1281. (Gao S C, Guan D W, Ma M C, et al. Effects of fertilization on bacterial community under the condition of continuous soybean monoculture in black soil in northeast China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(7):1271-1281.)
[25]谷岩, 邱强, 王振民, 等. 连作大豆根际微生物群落结构及土壤酶活性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(19):3955-3964. (Gu Y, Qin Q, Wang Z M, et al. Effects of soybean continuous cropping on microbial and soil enzymes in soybean rhizosphere [J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(19):3955-3964.)
[26]李春格, 李晓鸣, 王敬国. 大豆连作对土体和根际微生物群落功能的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(4):1144-1150. (Li C G, Li X M, Wang J G. Effect of soybean continuous cropping on bulk and rhizosphere soil microbial community function [J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(4):1144-1150.)
[27]邹莉, 袁晓颖, 李玲, 等. 连作对大豆根部土壤微生物的影响研究[J]. 微生物学杂志, 2005, 25(2): 27-30. (Zou L, Yuan X Y, Li L, et al. Effects continuous cropping on soil microbes on soybean roots[J].Journal of Microbiology, 2005, 25(2): 27-30.)
[28]Liu J J, Yu Z H, Yao Q, et al. Distinct soil bacterial communities in response to the cropping system in a mollisol of Northeast China [J].Applied Soil Ecology, 2017, 119: 407-416.
[29]Muyzer G, de Waal E D, Uitterlinden A G. Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1993, 59 (3): 695-700.
[30]Zhang C L, Huang Z Y, Cantu J, et al. Lipid biomarkers and carbon isotope signatures of a microbial (beggiatoa) mat associated with gas hydrates in the gulf of mexico[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2005, 71 (4): 2106-2112.
[31]Gardes M, Bruns T D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes: Application to the identification of mycorrhiza and rusts [J]. Molecular Ecology, 1993, 2 (2): 113-118.
[32]White T J, Buns T D, Lee S, et al. Analysis of phylogenetic relationships by amplification and direct sequencing of ribosomal RNA genes[J].Pcr Protocols A Guide to Methods & Applicati,1990: 315-322.
[33]Yang C, Crowley D E. Rhizosphere microbial community structure in relation to root location and plant iron nutritional status [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2000,66(1):345-351.
[34]Tscherko D, Hammesfahr U, Marx M C, et al.Shifts in rhizosphere microbial communities and enzyme activity of Poa alpina across an alpine chronosequence [J]. Soil Biological and Biochemistry, 2004, 36(10): 1685-1698.
[35]陈雪丽,李伟群,王英,等. 黑土区连作大豆根际土壤氨氧化古菌群落结构特征及其驱动因子分析[J].大豆科学,2016,35(4):622-627. (Chen X L, Li W Q, Wang Y, et al. Characterizion of ammonia oxidizing archaea community structure in the rhizosphere of continuous cropping soybean in black soil [J]. Soybean Science, 2016,35(4):622-627.)
[36]朱英波, 史凤玉, 张瑞敬, 等. 黑龙江大豆轮作和连作土壤细菌群落多样性比较[J].植物保护学报, 2014, 41(4):403-409. (Zhu Y B, Shi F Y, Zhang R J, et al. Comparision of bacterial diversity in rotational and continuous soybean cropping soils in Heilongjiang[J]. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica, 2014, 41(4):403-409.)
[37]Zhou X G, Gao D M, Liu J, et al. Changes inrhizosphere soil microbial communities in a continuously monocropped cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) system[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2014, 60 (1):1-8.
[38]Liu X B, Li Y S, Han B J, et al. Yield response of continuous soybean to one-season crop disturbance in a previous continuous soybean field in Northeast China [J]. Field Crops Research, 2012, 138 (138): 52-54.
[39]王光华, 金剑, 潘相文, 等. 不同茬口大豆根圈土壤pH值和氮营养分布的变化[J].中国油料作物学报, 2004, 26(1): 55-59. (Wang G H, Jin J, Pan X W, et al. Effect of different rotation systems on soil pH and N nutrition distribution across soybean rhizosphere [J]. Chinese journal of oil crop sciences [J]. 2004, 26(1): 55-59.)
[40]马汇泉, 郑桂萍, 赵九洲, 等. 大豆连作障碍及产生机理[J]. 土壤, 1997, 1:46-48. (Ma H Q, Zheng G P, Zhao J Z, et al. Soybean continuous cropping obstacles and production mechanism [J]. Soil, 1997, 1:46-48.)
[41]乔云发, 苗淑杰, 韩晓增, 等. 不同土地利用方式对黑土农田酸化的影响[J]. 农业系统科学与综合研究, 2007, 23(4):468-470, 476. (Qiao Y F, Miao S J, Han X Z, et al. The effects of different land-use types on farm black soil acidification [J]. System Sciences and Comprehensive Studies in Agriculture, 2007, 23(4):468-470, 476.)
[42]马汇泉, 靳学慧, 孙伟萍, 等. 大豆根腐病生态学研究Ⅱ .不同土壤条件对大豆根腐病的影响[J].中国油料, 1995, 17(1):47-48. (Ma H Q, Jin X H, Sun W P, et al. Soybean root rot ecology research II: Effects of different soil conditions on soybean root rot [J]. Chinese oil, 1995, 17(1):47-48.)
[43]王进闯. 大豆连作对根际土壤微生物群落的影响[D].北京:中国农业大学,2014. (Wang J C. The impact of continuous soybean monoculture on soil communities in the rhizosphere [D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University,2014.)
[44]Schreiner K, Hagn A, Kyselkova M,et al. Comparison of barley succession and take-all disease as environmental factors shaping the rhizobacterial community during take-all decline[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2010, 76 (14): 4703-4712.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2018-10-08