|Table of Contents|

Gray Correlation Analysis and DTOPSIS Method for Comprehensive Agronomic Performance Analysis of New Soybean Varieties(Lines) in Henan Regional Test(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2018年05期
Page:
664-671
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Gray Correlation Analysis and DTOPSIS Method for Comprehensive Agronomic Performance Analysis of New Soybean Varieties(Lines) in Henan Regional Test
Author(s):
ZAN Kai;  ZHOU Qing;  ZHANG Zhi-min;  ZHENG Li-min;  WANG Feng-ju; CHEN Ya-guang;  LI Ming-jun;  XU Shu-xia
(Anyang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, China)
Keywords:
Gray correlation analysis;  DTOPSIS analysis;  Soybean;  Comprehensive traits evaluation
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.05.0664
Abstract:
In order to provide basis and method for identifying and estimating the new soybean varieties (lines), gray correlation analysis method and DTOPSIS method were used to comprehensively evaluate 14 soybean varieties (lines) which participated in the summer soybean regional test in Henan province in 2014. The advantages and disadvantages of each tested variety were evaluated to identify and appraise these new soybean varieties(lines), and the effects of the two methods on comprehensive evaluation were assessed as well. The traits weight were determined by the method of gray correlation to ensure the objectivity and reliability of the comprehensive evaluation results, at the same time, the same standard varieties were utilized in the method of gray correlation analysis and the DTOPSIS to verify the accuracy of the analysis results by comparing the analysis results of these two methods. Comparison results between these two methods showed that the differences of Ci values calculated by DTOPSIS method for different varieties were significant, meaning that the differences in comprehensive traits between varieties were fully expressed. While the Gi values of gray correlation analysis method were not significant, by which a conclusion was drawn that the comprehensive evaluation effects of gray correlation analysis method were poorer than the DTOPSIS method. The results of correlation analysis showed that the varieties had a consistent ranking in the calculation method of the gray correlation analysis and the DTOPSIS, and were not consistent with the rankings based simply on the yield of the varieties. All of the above illustrated that both of the gray correlation analysis and DTOPSIS method can make scientific comprehensive evaluation of soybean varieties (lines), among which the DTOPSIS method has a relatively better evaluation effect.

References:

［1］刘录祥，孙其信，王士芸. 灰色系统理论应用于作物新品种综合评估初探［J］. 中国农业科学, 1989, 22(3): 22-27. (Liu L X, Sun Q X, Wang S Y. A preliminary study on multifactorial evaluation of new crop varieties with the application of the gray system theory［J］. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1989, 22(3): 22-27.)

［2］宋智美, 刘乃雁, 王元英, 等. 灰色关联度法在烤烟品种重要性状综合评价中的运用［J］. 中国烟草科学, 2011, 32(2): 17-19, 23.(Song Z M, Liu N Y, Wang Y Y, et al. Application of gray relational analysis in evaluating major attributes in national variety trial of flu-cured tobacco［J］. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2011, 32(2): 17-19, 23.)
［3］魏云山, 刘迎春, 丁素荣, 等. 大豆品种资源性状稳定性的灰色关联度分析与评价［J］. 大豆科学, 2012, 31(3): 406-410. (Wei Y S, Liu Y C, Ding S R, et al. Evaluation on characters stability of soybean germplasms through gray correlation degree analysis［J］. Soybean Science, 2012, 31(3): 406-410.)
［4］刘翔宇, 刘祖昕, 加帕尔, 等. 基于主成分与灰色关联分析的甜高粱品种综合评价［J］. 新疆农业科学, 2016, 53(1): 99-107. (Liu X Y, Liu Z X, Jia P E, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of sweet sorghum varieties based on principal component silabi analysis and gray relational grade analysis［J］. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 53(1): 99-107.)
［5］刘瑞显, 张国伟, 扬长琴. 基于熵权理论的灰色关联度法在棉花耐盐性评价中的应用［J］. 核农学报, 2017, 31(2): 402-409. (Liu R X, Zhang G W, Yang C Q, et al. Using gray related degree method based on entropy weight theory to evaluate salt tolerance of cotton［J］. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 31(2): 402-409.)
［6］丁明亮, 赵红, 蒲秋红, 等. 应用灰色关联度分析法对远缘杂交选育的小麦品系评价［J］. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(2): 217-222. (Ding M L, Zhao H, Pu Q H, et al. Multi-factorial evaluation of new wheat lines from distant hybridization by gray relational analysis method［J］. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 31(2): 217-222.)
［7］姚兴涛, 朱永达, 张永贞, 等. 区域国民经济协调发展的动态多目标决策［J］. 农业工程学报, 1991, 7(4): 1-6. (Yao X T, Zhu Y D, Zhang Y Z, et al. Dynamic multiobjective decision making of coordination development of region national economy［J］. Transactions of CSAE, 1991, 7(4): 1-6.)
［8］吴志会, 白玉龙, 董玉武, 等. DTOPSIS法综合评价冀中北冬小麦新品种的初步研究［J］. 麦类作物学报, 2005, 25(6): 108-111. (Wu Z H, Bai Y L, Dong Y W, et al. A preliminary evaluation of new winter wheat varieties of middle-north Hebei with DTOPSIS method［J］. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2005, 25(6): 108-111.)
［9］胡其明, 邓伟, 党筱兰. 用DTOPSIS法综合评价杂交水稻新品种在黔西南州的适应性［J］. 种子, 2013, 32(12): 95-97. (Hu Q M, Deng W, Dang X L. Comprehensive evaluation of adaptability of new hybrid rice varieties in Qianxinan autonomous prefecture by DTOPSIS［J］. Seed, 2013, 32(12): 95-97.)
［10］邵美红, 程楚, 程思明, 等. 运用DTOPSIS法对鲜食玉米新品种在浙西北地区适应性的综合评价［J］. 江西农业学报, 2017, 29(6): 25-28. (Shao M H, Cheng C, Cheng S M, et al. Using DTOPSIS method to comprehensively evaluate adaptability of sweet corn varieties in northwest of Zhejiang province［J］. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2017, 29(6): 25-28. )
［11］胡守林, 万素梅, 王汉全. 南疆棉区应用DTOPSIS法综合评价棉花新品种的初步探索［J］. 棉花学报, 2002, 14(1): 41-43. (Hu S L, Wan S M, Wang H Q. Preliminary study report in the south of Xinjiang by using the DTOPSIS to evaluate the new cotton varieties［J］. Cotton Science, 2002, 14(1): 41-43.)
［12］徐淑霞, 杨慧凤, 周青, 等. DTOPSIS法对安豆1号大豆新品种的综合评价［J］. 大豆科技, 2011(2): 17-20. (Xu S X, Yang H F, Zhou Q, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of new soybean variety Andou 1 based on DTOPSIS method［J］. Soybean Science & Technology, 2011(2): 17-20.)
［13］郭瑞林. 作物灰色育种学［M］. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1995: 154-160. (Guo R L. Crop grey breeding［M］. Beijing: China′s Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 1995: 154-160.)
［14］孙治安, 王建立, 杨丙中. 农作物新品种灰色关联度与DTOPSIS分析比较［J］. 耕作与栽培, 2006(1): 15-20. (Sun Z A, Wang J L, Yang B Z. Analysis of new crop varieties with gray correlation analysis and DTOPSIS analysis［J］. Tillage and Cultivation, 2006(1): 15-20.)
［15］姜永平, 刘水东, 薛晨霞, 等. DTOPSIS法和灰色关联度法在番茄品种综合评价中的应用比较［J］. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(22): 259-263. (Jiang Y P, Liu S D, Xue C X, et al. Results comparison of comprehensive evaluation tomato varieties with DTOPSIS and gray related degree［J］. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(22): 259-263.)
［16］李彦平, 李淑君, 吴娟霞, 等. DTOPSIS法和灰色关联度法在新引烤烟新品种综合评价中的应用比较［J］. 中国烟草学报, 2012, 18(4): 35-40. (Li Y P, Li S J, Wu J X, et al. Application of comparison of comprehensive evaluation newly introduced flu-cured tobacco varieties by analysis methods of DTOPSIS and gray correlation［J］. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2012, 18(4): 35-40.)
［17］杨昆, 吴才文, 覃伟, 等. DTOPSIS法和灰色关联度法在甘蔗新品种综合评价中的应用比较［J］. 西南农业学报, 2015, 28(4): 1542-1547. (Yang K, Wu C W, Tan W, et al. Comparison of comprehensive evaluation sugarcane new varieties with DTOPSIS and gray related degree［J］. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 28(4): 1542-1547.)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2018-10-08