|Table of Contents|

Response of Physiological Characteristics of Different Drought-tolerant Soybean Varieties to Different Rainfall Climatic Conditions(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2018年03期
Page:
359-365
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Response of Physiological Characteristics of Different Drought-tolerant Soybean Varieties to Different Rainfall Climatic Conditions
Author(s):
YAN Chun-juan WANG Wen-bin CAO Yong-qiang SUN Xu-gangSONG Shu-hong WANG Chang-ling ZHANG Li-jun
(Crop Institute of Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Science, Shenyang 110161, China)
Keywords:
Physiological characteristics Soybean Drought-tolerant variety Rainfall characteristics
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2018.03.0359
Abstract:
Field experiments were conducted to study the effects of different rainfall climatic conditions on the physiological characteristics of different soybean varieties. Compared the chlorophyll content, plant height, fresh and dry weight of soybean plant at V4, R2, R4 and R6 stages. Results indicated that, in general, the chlorophyll content of Shenyang located in humid and semi-humid area were higher than that of Fuxin located in semi-arid region. Generally, plant root water content, stem water content, leaf water content, petiole water content and bean pod moisture content had the similar change trends, the value of Shenyang in the same cultivar were higher than that of Fuxin, but the difference were not significant between some sampling periods, the effect of varieties on root water content was different at different sampling periods and locations. In general, stem water content, leaf water content, petiole water content and bean pod moisture content of soybean plants all showed that the value of Liaodou 14 was higher than that of Liaodou 21 in the same period and the same location, but in most cases it did not reach significant differences level between treatments. The changes of the biomass of different parts of the plant showed that, except for root biomass, stem biomass of R4 and bean pod biomass of R6, the value of Fuxin was higher than that in Liaodou 14 in Shenyang, and the difference was not significant. The biomass of other organs in all stages showed that the value of Shenyang were higher than the value of Fuxin with the same variety, but only a few significant differences were found among the treatments. The organs distributed proportion of soybean plants at mature stage showed the order of seed > pod > root or stem. Liaodou 14 had higher seed distribution ratio than Liaodou 21, while showed lower the distribution ratio of the pods, roots and stems. This tendency of pods per plant was consistent with yield. Drought stress reduced the pods per plant, seeds per pods, yield per plant and plot yield, but increased the 100-seed weight. Liaodou 14 showed higher pods per plant, seeds per pods, yield per plant and plot yield than Liaodou 21, but lower 100-seed weight than Liaodou 21. Therefore, the results could clarify the physiological advantages of drought-tolerant soybean in response to drought stress and further enrich the theoretical knowledge of soybean resistant cultivation in Liaoning province.

References:

[1]Sánchez F J, Andrés E F, Tenorio J L, et al. Growth of epicotyls, turgor maintenance and osmotic adjustment in pea plants (Pisum sativum L.) subjected to water stress [J]. Field Crops Research, 2004, 86: 81-90.
[2]阎勇,罗兴录,张兴思,等.不同供水条件下玉米耐旱生理特性比较[J].中国农学通报,2007, 23(9):323-326.(Yan Y, Luo X L, Zhang X S, et al. Comparison of maize physiological characters under different treatment of irrigation [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 23(9):323-326.)
[3]Rolando O T, Kenneth L M, Casiana V C, et al. Screening of rice genebank germplasm for yield and selection of new drought tolerance donors [J]. Field Crops Research, 2013, 147: 12-22.
[4]Serraj J K, Kumar J, Chandra S, et al. Variation in root traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) grown under terminal drought [J]. Field Crops Research, 2004, 88: 115-127.
[5]Chu G, Chen T, Wang Z, et al.Morphological and physiological traits of roots and their relationships with water productivity in water-saving and drought-resistant rice [J]. Field Crops Research, 2014, 162(6):108-119.
[6]赵跃.辽宁主栽花生品种耐旱性差异及其对干旱胁迫的响应机制研究[D].沈阳: 沈阳农业大学,2016.(Zhao Y. Studies on drought resistance and its response to drought stress of main peanut varieties in Liaoning [D].Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2016.)
[7]张海燕,郭忠军,姚正培,等.抗旱、敏旱棉花材料苗期根系特性研究[J].新疆农业科学,2014, 51(10): 1772-1776.(Zhang H Y, Guo Z J, Yao Z P, et al. The growing situation of cotton under the simulate hydroponic drought condition [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 51(10): 1772-1776.)
[8]路之娟,张永清,张楚,等.不同基因型苦荞苗期抗旱性综合评价及指标筛选[J].中国农业科学,2017, 50(17):3311-3322.(Lu Z J, Zhang Y Q, Zhang C, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and indicators of the drought resistance of different genotypes of Fagopyrum tataricum at deedling dtage[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(17):3311-3322.)
[9]陈雅彬,李凤海.不同玉米品种及亲本苗期抗旱指标测定及抗旱性分析[J].辽宁农业科学,2006(2):32-34.(Chen Y B, Li F H. Identification of drought resistance indexes of different maize varieties and its parents during seedling period [J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 2006(2):32-34.)
[10]孙继颖,高聚林,薛春雷,等.不同品种大豆抗旱性能比较研究[J].华北农学报,2007,22(6): 91-97.(Sun J Y, Gao J L, Xue C L, et al. Comparative experiment on drought resistant characters of different soybean varieties [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2007, 22(6): 91-97.)
[11]董守坤,赵坤,刘丽君,等.干旱胁迫对春大豆叶绿素含量和根系活力的影响[J].大豆科学,2011, 30(6): 949-953.(Dong S K, Zhao K, Liu L J, et al. Effect of drought stress on chlorophyll content and root activity of spring soybean [J]. Soybean Science, 2011, 30(6): 949-953.)
[12]寿惠霞,朱丹华,陈彩霞,等.8个春大豆品种对旱境的反应及抗旱指标初探[J].浙江农业科学,1991(6): 278-281. (Shou H X, Zhu D H, Chen C X, et al. Responses of 8 spring soybean varieties to dry upland and index of drought resistance [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 1991(6): 278-281.)
[13]赵博生,衣艳君,刘家尧.外源甜菜碱对干旱/盐胁迫下的小麦幼苗生长和光合功能的改善[J].植物学通报,2001, 18(3): 378-380.(Zhao B S, Yi Y J, Liu J Y. Exogenous betaine improves the growth and photosynthesis of wheat seedlings under drought/salt stress [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2001,18(3): 378-380.)
[14]郑玉红,蔡庆生,刘建秀.水分胁迫对几种假俭草的影响[J].草地学报,2005,13(2): 102-105.(Zheng Y H, Cai Q S, Liu J X.Response of centipedegrass [Eremochloa ophiuroides (Munro.) Hack.] accessions to water stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2005, 13(2):102-105.)
[15]王丽娜,克热木·伊力,侯江涛.水分胁迫对扁桃砧木叶片脯氨酸、可溶性蛋白质、 质膜透性、相对含水量的影响[J].新疆农业大学学报,2006, 29(3): 175-186.(Wang L N, Karim A, Hou J T. Effects of water stress on proline, soluble protein, membrane permeability, relative water content of almond rootstock [J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2006, 29(3): 175-186.)
[16]李冬琴,曾鹏程,陈桂葵,等.干旱胁迫对3种豆科灌木生物量分配和生理特性的影响[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2016, 36(1): 33-39.(Li D Q, Zeng P C, Chen G K, et al. Effects of drought stress on biomass distribution and physiological characteristics in three kinds of leguminous shrubs [J]. Journal of Central South Forestry University, 2016, 36(1): 33-39.)
[17]胡继超,曹卫星,姜东,等.小麦水分胁迫影响因子的定量研究.Ⅰ干旱和渍水胁迫对光合、蒸腾及干物质积累与分配的影响[J].作物学报,2004, 30(4): 315-320.(Hu J C, Cao W X, Jiang D, et al. Quantification of water stress factor for crop growth simulation. I. Effects of drought and waterlogging stress on photosynthesis, transpiration and dry matter partitioning in winter wheat [J]. Acta Agronmic Sinica, 2004, 30(4): 315-320.)
[18]董钻.大豆器官平衡与产量[J].辽宁农业科学,1981(3): 14-21.(Dong Z. Organ equilibrium and yield on soybean [J]. Liaoning Acultural Sciences, 1981(3): 14-21.)
[19]白伟,孙占祥,刘晓晨,等.苗期水分胁迫对大豆器官平衡和产量的影响[J].大豆科学,2009, 28(1): 59-62.(Bai W, Sun Z X, Liu X C, et al. Effect of water stress at seedling on organ equilibrium and yield of soybean[J]. Soybean Science,2009, 28(1): 59-62.)
[20]关晓雪,宋书宏,董丽杰,等.不同结荚习性大豆的器官平衡与产量的关系[J].大豆科学,2009, 28(2): 221-224. (Guan X X, Song S H, Dong L J, et al. Relation between organ balance and yield in soybean of different podding habits[J]. Soybean Science,2009, 28(2): 221-224.)
[21]闫春娟,宋书宏,王文斌,等.灌溉对不同基因型大豆生理特性及产量的影响[J].大豆科学,2014, 33(6): 945-948. (Yan C J, Song S H, Wang W B, et al. Effect of irrigation on physiological characteristics and yield of different genotype soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.)[J]. Soybean Science,2014, 33(6): 945-948.)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2018-06-08