|Table of Contents|

The Influence of Different Herbicides on Intercropping Soybean and Maize(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2017年02期
Page:
287-295
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
The Influence of Different Herbicides on Intercropping Soybean and Maize
Author(s):
DAI Wei;  YANG Jizhi;  WANG Xiaochun;  YONG Taiwen;  WANG Qingmei;  ZHOU Xian;  YANG Wenyu
（College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chendu 611130, China）
Keywords:
Herbicides;  Soybean;  Maize;  Weed;  Phytotoxicity;  Weeding effect
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2017.02.0287
Abstract:
In order to study the impact of different herbicides on corn and soybean growth and weed control effect, we simulated maize intercropping pattern of soybean cultivation in pot method Ten kinds of soil treatment with herbicide and 13 kinds of treating stems and leaves to the herbicide were chosen Results showed that: Five soil treatment and five stem leaf treatment could filt out drug victims light or the drug victims could recovery The five soil treatments include Pendimethalin, S metolachlor, Prometryn+Acetochlor+2,4 D butyl ester, Acetochlor+Metribuzin +2,4D butyl ester and Acetochlor+Metribuzin The five stemleaf treatments include Bentazone, Thifensulfuron methyl, Florasulam+Flumetsulam, Fomesafen+Bentazone and Imazethapyr In the soil treatment of Pendimethalin and Acetochlor+Metribuzin, plant height, stem diameter and dry matter weight of corn and soybean showed no significant difference compared with CK, the weed control of number was 60.58% and 60.58%, respectively, the weed control of weight was 67.12% and 55.35%, respectively S metolachlor was harmful to plant height and stem diameter of intercropping maize, but did not affect maize dry matter accumulation Its fresh weight of control effect is 7196% and 7883%, higher than other herbicides In the stem leaf treatment of Bentazone, plant height, stem diameter and dry matter weight of corn and soybean showed no significant difference compared with CK, the weed control of number was 52.7%, lower than other herbicides After the maize and soybean treated with Thifensulfuron methyl, plant height decreased and stem enlarged, but the phytotoxicity could resume after herbicides and the weed control effect was higher than other herbicides, the weed control of number and weed control of weight were 73.88% and 96.1%, respectively Soil treatment Pendimethalin and Stemleaf treatment Bentazone are safer for corn and soybean, soil treatment S metolachlor and Stem leaf treatment Thifensulfuron methyl are better for weeding

References:

［1］高同彬, 何付丽, 赵长山窄行平作密植大豆田杂草的危害特点［J］. 大豆科学, 2008, 27(3): 536-538, 542(Gao T B, He F L, Zhao C S Harm characteristics of weeds in flat planting narrow row solid seeded soybean ［J］. Soybean Science, 2008, 27(3): 536-538, 542)

［2］杜晓军, 崔锡花, 姜成, 等玉米、大豆地两用除草剂的筛选［J］. 延边大学农学学报, 2001, 23(4): 282-286(Du X J, Cui X H, Jiang C, et al Corn and soybean fields of dual use herbicide screening［J］. Journal of Agricultural Science Yanbian University, 2001, 23(4): 282-286)
［3］张亚辉, 王国忠, 姚丽影, 等米豆通用除草剂的田间药效试验［J］. 吉林农业科学, 2005, 30(6): 37-39(Zhang Y H, Wang G Z, Yao L Y, et al Corn and soybean field efficacy test of common herbicides［J］. Journal of Jilin Agricultural Sciences, 2005, 30(6): 37-39
［4］赵银月, 耿智德, 詹和明, 等玉米大豆间作条件下不同剂量除草剂的效果研究［J］.大豆科技, 2014(5):17-20(Zhao Y Y, Geng Z D, Zhan H M, et al Corn Soybean intercropping system study on effect of different doses of herbicides［J］. Soybean Science & Technology, 2014(5): 17-20)
［5］刘波, 关成宏, 王险峰, 等我国东北地区常见除草剂药害原因分析与解决方法［J］. 农药, 2006, 45(6): 368-373(Liu B, Guan C H, Wang X F, et al Analyzing the causes of and solutions for crop injury by herbicides commonly used in northeast China［J］. Agrocheincals, 2006, 45(6): 368-373)
［6］王险峰, 范志伟, 胡荣娟, 等除草剂药害新进展与解决方法［J］. 农药, 2009, 48(5): 384-388(Wang X F, Fan Z W, Hu R J, et al Progress and solution of herbicide phytotoxicity［J］. Agrocheincals, 2009, 48(5): 384-388)
［7］谢娜, 王金信, 侯珍, 等氯吡嘧磺隆除草活性及对不同玉米品种的安全性［J］. 植物保护学报, 2012, 39(5): 461-466(Xie N, Wang J X, Hou Z, et al Herbicidal activity and security of halosulfuron methyl to different maize varieties［J］. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica, 2012, 39(5): 461-466)
［8］马永林,覃建林,马跃峰,等14种磺酰脲类除草剂对蔗田香附子的防效及安全性评价［J］. 西南农业学报, 2014, 27(9): 2419-2422(Ma Y L, Tan J L, Ma Y F, et al Cyperus rotundus L control effect and sugarcane evaluation on safety of 14 sulfonylurea herbicide in sugarcane field［J］. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 27(9): 2419-2422)
［9］Masoumeh Y, Das T K, Rakesh P Effect of herbicide tank mixes on weed control, yield and physiological parameters of soybean (Glycine max) under tilled and no tilled conditions［J］. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2013, 18(3): 290-294
［10］刘毅, 王承星, 张卫书, 等几种除草剂防除玉米田杂草的田间药效对比［J］. 贵州农业科学, 2012, 40(1): 82-85 (Liu Y, Wang C X, Zhang W S, et al Control effect of five herbicides on weeds in maize field［J］. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 40(1): 82-85
［11］李秉华, 张永信, 边全乐, 等免耕夏玉米田杂草防治关键期研究［J］. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(8): 998-1003(Li B H, Zhang Y X, Bian Q L, et al Critical period of weed control in no tillage summer maize fields ［J］. Chinese Journal of Eco Agriculture, 2013,21(8): 998-1003
［12］王玉芬, 路战远, 张向前, 等化学除草剂对保护性耕作大豆田杂草防除的影响［J］. 大豆科学, 2013, 32(4): 521-525 (Wang Y F, Lu Z Y, Zhang X Q, et al Effect on weeds control in the conservation tillage soybean field using chemical herbicide［J］. Soybean Science, 2013, 32(4): 521-525)
［13］马永林, 郭成林, 马跃峰, 等11种除草剂对穿心莲安全性评价及田间杂草防除效果［J］. 南方农业学报, 2015, 46(3): 433-436 (Ma Y L, Guo C L, Ma Y F, et al Safety evaluation of 11 kinds of pre emergence herbicides on Andrographis paniculata (Burm f ) Nees and their control effects in field［J］. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2015, 46(3): 433-436)
［14］陈洁, 石洁 辛硫磷与3种除草剂共同处理对玉米生长的影响［J］. 河北农业科学, 2010, 14(8): 114-116 (Chen J, Shi J Effects of co utilization of Phoxim and herbicides on maize growth［J］. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 14(8): 114-116)
［15］李鹤鹏, 付亚书, 姜士波, 等几种常用除草剂在大豆田的防效评价［J］. 黑龙江农业科学, 2013(1): 43-49 (Li H P, Fu Y S, Jiang S B, et al Evaluation of the efficacy of several herbicides in soybean field［J］. Heilongjiang Agricultural Science, 2013(1): 43-49)
［16］林绍森, 唐永金玉米密度、行距和穴距对间作大豆叶片叶绿素a含量的影响［J］. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(9): 43-49(Lin S S, Tang Y J Effect of density row spacing and hole spacing of maize on leafs chlorophyll a content of intercropped soybean［J］. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(9): 43-49)
［17］高阳, 段爱旺, 刘祖贵, 等间作种植模式对玉米和大豆干物质积累与产量组成的影响［J］. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(2): 214-221(Gao Y, Duan A W, Liu Z G, et al Effect of Intercropping patterns on dry matter accumulation and yield components of maize and soybean［J］. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2009, 25(2): 214-221)
［18］王险峰, 关成宏, 范志伟磺酰脲类除草剂安全性评价［J］. 农药, 2010, 49(8): 547-551, 564(Wang X F, Guan C H, Fan Z W Evaluation on safety of sulfonylurea herbicides［J］. Agrocheincals, 2010, 49(8): 547-551, 564)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-05-14