|Table of Contents|

Effects of Exogenous Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria on Growth Characteristics of Soybean Under Different Soil Condition(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2017年01期
Page:
78-86
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Effects of Exogenous Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria on Growth Characteristics of Soybean Under Different Soil Condition
Author(s):
WU Zhi-hai1;  LIU Jing-jing2;  YANG Mei-ying2;  LU Dong-xue2;  YUE Sheng-tian2;  FU Li2
1.College of Agronomy, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China; 2.College of Life Science, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China
Keywords:
Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria(PSB);  Soybean;  Salt-alkaline soil;  Growth promoting effect
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2017.01.0078
Abstract:
In order to determine the application effect of phosphatesolubilizing bacteria(PSB) in different soils, the growth promoting effects of two PSB on soybean in the black soil and saline alkali soil were studied. The photosynthesis, osmotic adjustment substances, biomass, N and P uptake and yield of soybean were investigated with a pot experiment. By the addition of PSB, Pn was increased, the content of leaf soluble protein, soluble sugar and free amino acid were significantly reduced at R6 and R8, plant height and root dry weight of soybean were increased from R2 to R8. The plant dry weight treated with wj1 and mixed bacteria was better than that of wj3. The WUE of R2 was significantly improved, the content of total N and P of shoot, root and plant were increased at the stage of V3, R2 and R8 by adding the mixed PSB into black soil. The total of N and P of shoot and plant growing in the mixed soil were also increased after inoculation with PSB. The pod number, total grain number, grain weight per plant and 100seed weight per plant of black soil with wj1 and mixed soil with PSB were higher than that without bacteria. As a result, adding exogenous PSB could improve photosynthesis and enhance adaptability of soybean in the mixed salt alkaline soil, thereby increase plant biomass, nitrogen and phosphorus uptake and crop yield. The growth promoting effect of mixed PSB was better than single strain of wj1 or wj3.

References:

［1］王光华, 周可琴, 金剑, 等. 不同碳源对三种溶磷真菌溶解磷矿粉能力的影响［J］. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23(2): 32-36.(Wang G H, Zhou K Q, Jin J, et al. Effect of different C sources on the solubilization of rock phosphate by three phosphate solubilizing fungi［J］. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2004, 23(2): 32-36.

［2］Chen Y P, Rekha P D, Arun A B, et al. Phosphate solubilizingbacteria from subtropical soil and their tricalcium phosphate solubilizing abilities［J］. Applied Soil Ecology, 2006, 34: 33- 41.
［3］冯月红, 姚拓, 龙瑞军. 土壤解磷菌研究进展［J］. 草原与草坪, 2003(1):3-7. (Feng Y H, Yao T, Long R J. Research progress of soil phosphate solubilizing abilities［J］. Grassland and Turf, 2003(1):3-7.)
［4］林钰栅, 范缙, 蔡邦平, 等. 解磷微生物在重金属污染原位修复中的作用及其机理研究进展［J］. 厦门大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 55(5): 697-706. (Lin Y Z, Fan J, Cai B P, et al. Reaserch progress on the mechanisms and effects of in-situ remediation of heavy metal pollution with phosphate solubilizing abilities［J］. Journal of Xiamen University(Natural Science Edition), 2016, 55(5): 697-706.)
［5］Gontia-Mishra I, Sasidharan S, Tiwari S. Recent developments in use of 1-aminocyclopropane1carboxylate(ACC) deaminase for conferring tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress［J］. Biotechnology Letters, 2014, 36(5): 889-898.
［6］Rajkumar M, Ae N, Prasad M N V, et al. Potential of siderophore-producing bacteria for improving heavy metal phytoextraction［J］. Trends in Biotechnology, 2010, 28(3):142-149.
［7］刘佩印. 黑龙江省大豆重迎茬问题的研究概况［J］. 黑龙江农业科学, 2001(3): 31-35. (Liu P Y. A survey of continuous and every other cropping of soybean in Heilongjiang province［J］. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2001(3): 31-35.)
［8］吕晓, 徐慧, 李丽, 等. 盐碱地农业可持续利用及其评价［J］. 土壤, 2012, 44(2): 203- 207. (Lyu X, Xu H, Li L, et al. Sustainable utilization of saline alkali soil and evaluation［J］. Soils, 2012, 44(2): 203-207.)
［9］赵国杰, 牛世全, 达文燕, 等. 四株无机解磷菌处理碱化土壤的理化性质及质量评价［J］. 土壤通报, 2014, 45(4):157-163.(Zhao G J, Niu S Q, Da W Y, et al. Assessment of soil quality and physicochemical properties of the alkaline soil amended with four inorganic phosphate-dissolving microbial inoculants［J］. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2014, 45(4): 157-163.)
［10］宋家清, 郑秀社, 张庆国, 等. 活性微生物菌肥对滨海盐碱土改良的影响［J］. 北方园艺, 2010(18):53-55. (Song J Q, Zheng X S, Zhang Q G, et al. Improving effect of microbial organic fertilizer on coastal saline-alkali soil［J］. Northern Horticulture, 2010(18):53-55.)
［11］刘微, 朱小平, 高书国, 等. 解磷微生物浸种对大豆生长发育及其根瘤形成的影响研究［J］. 中国生态农业学报, 2004, 3(12): 153-155. (Liu W, Zhu X P, Gao S G, et al. Effects of soaked seeds with phosphate-dissolving microorganisms on the growth and development and its nodule of soybean plant［J］. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2004, 3(12): 153-155.)
［12］王芳, 谢庭生. 酸性紫色土施用溶磷菌对大豆的增产效应［J］. 湖南农业科学, 2012(17): 61-63. (Wang F, Xie T S. Effect of applying phosphate-solubilizing bacteria to acid purple soil on yield-increasing of soybean［J］. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2004, 3(12): 153-155.
［13］雒鹏飞, 高勇, 宋凤斌, 等. 吉林省西部盐碱土资源开发利用中的若干问题［J］. 吉林农业大学学报, 2004, 26(6): 659-663. (Luo P F, Gao Y, Song F B, et al. Some issues in exploitation and utillzation of saline-alkaline soil resources in the west of jilin province［J］. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2004, 26(6): 659-663.
［14］汤洁, 汪雪格, 李昭阳, 等. 基于CA-Markov模型的吉林省西部土地利用景观格局变化趋势预测［J］. 吉林大学学报, 2010, 40(2): 405-410.(Tang J, Wang X G, Li Z Y, et al. The tendency forecast on land use landscape pattern change in western Jilin province based on ca-markov model［J］. Journal of Jilin University, 2010, 40(2): 405-410.)
［15］王春红. 大豆根际土壤溶无机磷细菌的溶磷特性研究［D］. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2015: 25. (Wang C H. Solubilizing properties of the inorganic phosphate-solubilizing bacteria isolated from soybean rhizosphere soil［D］. Changchun：Jilin Agricultural University, 2015: 25.)
［16］张志安, 张美善, 魏荣海, 等. 植物生理学实验指导［M］. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2004. (Zhang Z A, Zhang M S, Wei R H, et al. Experimental instruction of plant physiology［M］. Beijing: China Agriculture Scientech Press, 2004.)
［17］Hameeda B, Reddy Y, Harish K R. Effect of carbon substrates on rock phosphate solubilization by bacteria from composts and macrofauna［J］. Current Microbiology, 2006, 53(4): 298-302.?
［18］Freitas J R, Banerjee M R, Germida J J. Phosphate-solubilizing rhizobacteria enhance the growth and yield but notphosphorus uptake of canola (Brassica napus L.) ［J］. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 1997, 24(4): 358-364.
［19］毕静静, 郭宪峰, 郭建党. 微生物菌肥对番茄光合效能、产量及品质的影响［J］. 山东农业科学, 2012, 44 (7): 61-62, 66. (Bi J J, Guo X F, Guo J D. The effect of microbial fertilizer on photosynthetic ffficiency, yield and quality of tomato［J］. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 44(7): 61-62, 66.)
［20］冯瑞章, 姚拓, 周万海, 等. 溶磷菌对燕麦生物量及植株氮、磷含量的影响［J］. 水土保持学报, 2009, 23(2): 189-193. (Feng R Z, Yao T, Zhou W H, et al. Effects of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria on the vegetation biomass, nitrogen and phosphorus concentration of Avena sativa［J］. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 23(2): 189-193.)
［21］Samina M, George L. Inoculation effects of Pseudomonas putida, Gluconacetobacter azotocaptans and Azospirillum lipoferum on cornplant growth under greenhouse conditions［J］. Microbial Ecology, 2006, 51(3): 326-335.
［22］毛桂莲, 许兴.枸杞耐盐突变体的筛选及生理生化分析［J］.西北植物学报, 2005, 25(2): 275-280. (Mao G L, Xu X. Studies on in vivo selection of salt-tolerant mutant of Lycium barbarum L. and its physiological and biochemical characteristics［J］. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2005, 25(2): 275-280.)
［23］沈黎明, 王舰. 水分胁迫、盐胁迫和热激对林生山黧豆体内游离氨基酸含量的影响［J］. 中国农业大学学报, 1996, 1(1): 23-27. (Shen L M, Wang J. Influences of water stress, salt stress and heat shock on amino acids contents of-Lathyrus sylvestris L.［J］. Journal of China Agricultural University, 1996, 1(1): 23-27.)
［24］Hallleeda B, Harish K, Reddy Y, et al.Effeet of carbon substrates on rock phosphate solubilization by baeteria from composts and macrohuna［J］. Cunrrent Microbiology, 2006, 53(4): 298-302.
［25］Bossuyt H, Denef K, Six J, et al. Influence of microbial populations and residue quality on aggregate stability［J］. Applied Soil Ecology, 2001, 16: 195-208．

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-03-14