|Table of Contents|

Comparative Histological Structure of Different Resistant Soybean Roots to Soybean Cyst Nematode(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2016年05期
Page:
795-799
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Comparative Histological Structure of Different Resistant Soybean Roots to Soybean Cyst Nematode
Author(s):
LIU HeWANG Yuan-yuan ZHU Xiao-feng LIU Xiao-yuCHEN Li-jie DUAN Yu-xi
Plant protection college/Nematode Institute of Northern China, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China)
Keywords:
Soybean Synctium Cyst nematode
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.05.0795
Abstract:
Paraffin sections technique were used to compare the histological structure of different resistant soybean roots, aiming to determine the resistance mechanism of different small black soybean cultivars.The result showed that in the early days of infection there was no significant difference in the number of second stage juveniles inside soybean roots between different resistant cultivars. The formation of synctium in the resistant cultivars was earlier than susceptible cultivars. Harbin small black soybean early formed the syncytial in stele and hardly resistant the invasion.With the nematode infection,resistant cultivars evolved hypersensitive reaction to prevent nematode development forming a very small number of female in roots where almost no females formed in Huipizhi Heidou root, the strongest anti-development.Susceptible cultivar Liaodou 15 had no hypersensitive response occurred within the root formation of a large females. In the host’s vascular bundles, the xylem of susceptible cultivar Liaodou 15 moved outward and the xylem vessel would be reduced in the late infection that was not conducive to the safety of water transportation.However,the structure of xylem didn’t change in the three resistant cultivars and was good for the growth of soybean.

References:

[1]刘维志.植物病原线虫学[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2000:281-294.(Liu W Z .Plant pathogenic nematodes[M].China Agriculture Press,2000:281-294.)

[2]Wrather J A, Koenning S R. Estimates of disease effects on soybean yields in the United States 2003 to 2005[J]. Journal of Nematology, 2006, 38(2): 173.
[3]Ross J P. Host-parasite relationship of the soybean cyst nematode in resistant soybean roots[J]. Phytopathology, 1958, 48(10): 578-579.
[4]吴海燕,远方,陈立杰,等.大豆胞囊线虫病与大豆抗胞囊线虫机制的研究[J].大豆科学,2001,30(4):285-289.(Wu H Y,Yuan F, Chen L J,et al.Advance in soybean cyst nematodes and mechanism of soybean resistance to Heterodera glycines[J].Soybean Science,2001,20(4):285-289.)
[5]刘维志.植物线虫学研究技术[M]. 沈阳: 辽宁科学技术出版社,1995.(Liu W W. Plant nematode and technology studies[M].Shenyang: Liaoning Science and Technology Press,1995.)
[6]毛晓霞. 石蜡切片制作方法的改良[J]. 安徽农学通报,2013(8):15-16,39.(Mao X X. The improved methods of paraffin sections-production[J].Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin,2013(8):15-16,39.)
[7]王宝荣,金延明.植物切片混合染液染色方法[J].中国中药杂志,1995,20(4):20(Wang B R, Jin Y M. Slice mixing plant dye staining method[J].Traditional Chinese Medicine,1995,20(4):20.)
[8]Aditya J, Lewis J, Shirley N J, et al.The dynamics of cereal cyst nematode infection differ between susceptible and resistant barley cultivars and lead to changes in (1, 3; 1, 4)β-glucan levels and HvCslF gene transcript abundance[J]. New Phytologist, 2015, 207: 135-147.
[9]Endo B Y. Feeding plug formation in soybean roots infected with the soybean cyst nematode[J]. Phytopathology, 1978, 68: 1022-1031.
[10]刘大伟,陈立杰,段玉玺. 灰皮支黑豆对大豆胞囊线虫3号生理小种侵染和发育的影响[J].作物杂志,2014(1):145-147.(Liu D W, Chen L J, Duan Y X. Huipizhiheidou on the penetration and development of race 3 of Heterodera glycines[J]. Corps,2014(1):145-147.)
[11]陈树思. 洋蒲桃次生木质部中导管分子的解剖学[J]. 植物学通报,2006(6):677-683.(Chen S S.Anatomy of vessel elements in the secondary xylemof syzygium samarangense [J].Chinese Bulletin of Botany,2006(6):677-683)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2016-09-25