|Table of Contents|

Application of Similarity-difference Evaluation in Hybrid Combination of SoybeanBreeding of High Yield and Good Quality(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2016年03期
Page:
360-366
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Application of Similarity-difference Evaluation in Hybrid Combination of SoybeanBreeding of High Yield and Good Quality
Author(s):
ZHANG Kai-xinWANG DuoWU HanYAO DanWANG Pi-wuMU Jin-mingCHEN Chang-qingZHANG Jun
College of Agronomy,Jilin Agricultural University,Changchun 130118,China
Keywords:
Soybean Hybrid combination Similarity-difference evaluation
PACS:
S565. 1
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.03.0360
Abstract:
By the method of similarity-difference evaluation,20 hybrid combinations of soybean were analyzed with yield,fatand protein as breeding objectives. These hybrid combinations were planted in field at Jilin Agricultural University from 2013to 2014,expecting to obtain the excellent hybrid combinations and improve the efficiency of breeding. The results showedthat,when yield as the breeding target,the first-class combinations were ARIRA × Jilin 38, Jilin 38 × ARIRA,ARIRA × Yi 3,EXP × ARIRA, Jilin 38 × Jilin 47,Yi 3 × Jilin 47, the second-class combinations were Yi 3 × ARIRA,ARIRA × EXP,Jilin 47× EXP,ARIRA × Jilin 47,Yi 3 × EXP,Jilin 38 × Yi 3, the remaining 8 combinations were in general and rated as the thirdclasscombinations. When fat as the breeding target,the first-class combinations included ARIRA × Jilin 38,Jilin 38 × ARIRA,ARIRA × Yi 3,EXP × ARIRA,Yi 3 × ARIRA,ARIRA × EXP, the second-class combinations included Jilin 38 × Jilin47,Yi 3 × Jilin 47,Jilin 47 × EXP,ARIRA × Jilin 47,Yi 3 × EXP,Jilin 38 × Yi 3,the remaining 8 combinations were ratedas the third-class combinations. When protein as the breeding target,the first-class included ARIRA × Jilin 38,Jilin 38 ×ARIRA,ARIRA × Yi 3,EXP × ARIRA,Yi 3 × ARIRA,ARIRA × EXP, the second-class combinations included Jilin 38 × Jilin47,Yi 3 × Jilin 47,Jilin 47 × EXP,ARIRA × Jilin 47,Yi 3 × EXP,Jilin 38 × Yi 3,the remaining 8 combinations wererated as the third-class combinations. When yield as the breeding target,the four pairs of reciprocal cross combinations whichwere Jilin 47 × EXP and EXP × Jilin 47,Yi 3 × Jilin 47 and Jilin 4 × Yi 3,Jilin 38 × Yi 3 and Yi 3 × Jilin 38,ARIRA × Jilin38 and Jilin 38 × ARIRA showed bigger difference on integrated identic degree. When fat and protein as the breeding target,only ARIRA × Jilin 38 and Jilin 38 × ARIRA,the one pair of reciprocal cross combination showed bigger difference on integratedidentic degree. Based on the different breeding target,first-class combinations should be expanded to the scale of cultivationin next year,the second-class combinations should be moved aiming to choose the quality plants in next year,for thethird-class combinations,if there were no special advantages,should be eliminated.

References:

[1] 郭瑞林. 作物灰色育种学[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社,1995: 136-168. ( Guo R L. Crop grey breeding science [M]. Bei366大豆科学3 期jing: China’s Agricultural Science and Technology Press,1995:136-138. )

[2] 郭瑞林. 作物育种同异理论与方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社,2011: 135-168. ( Guo R L. Crop breeding similaritydifferencetheory and method[M]. Beijing: China’s AgriculturalScience and Technology Press,2011: 135-168. )
[3] Guo R L,Diao S S,Wang J S, et al. The Method and its applicationof 2007 IEEE international conference on grey systems and intelligentservices[C]. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers,2007: 257-261.
[4] 郭瑞林,杨春玲,关立,等. 小麦品种区域试验的同异分析方法研究[J]. 麦类作物学报,2001,21( 3) : 60-63. ( Guo R L,Yang CL,Guan L,et al. Study on identical and different analysis methodof wheat variety regional test[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops ,2001,21( 3) : 60-63. )
[5] 关立,韩勇,齐光荣,等. 杂交组合同异评估方法在小麦育种中的应用[J]. 湖南农业科学,2014( 7) : 18-21. ( Guan L,Han Y,Qi G R,et al. Application of similarity-difference evaluation methodfor hybrid combinations in wheat breeding[J]. Hunan AgriculturalSciences,2014( 7) : 18-21. )
[6] 王士梅,朴钟泽,朱启升,等. 水稻新品种( 系) 农艺性状及品质的综合评价分析[J]. 安徽农业科学,2008,36 ( 11) : 4467-4469. ( Wang S M,Pu Z Z,Zhu Q S,et al. Analysis of comprehensiveevaluation on the agronomic characters and quality of newrice varieties ( line) [J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences,2008,36( 11) : 4467-4469. )
[7] 张徽,肖俐. 同异分析方法在抗虫棉品种综合评价中的应用[J]. 山东农业科学,2006 ( 2) : 44-45,53. ( Zhang H,Xiao L.Application of similarity-difference analysis in comprehensive evaluationof cotton cultivars with insect pest-resistance[J]. ShandongAgricultural Sciences,2006( 2) : 44-45,53. )
[8] 王友华,刘志强. 同异分析法对夏玉米区试品种的综合评价分析研究[J]. 湖南农业科学,2007( 4) : 52-54. ( Wang Y H,Liu ZQ. Evaluation of identical and different analysis on variety regionaltest of summer maize[J]. Hunan Agricultural Sciences,2007( 4) :52-54. )
[9] 袁爱梅,张富厚,袁建国,等. 用同异分析法评价不同栽培条件下的大豆新品种( 系) [J]. 河南农业科学,2003 ( 11) : 20-22.( Yuan A M,Zhang F H,Yuan J G,et al. Use similarity-differentanalysis method to evaluate new soybean varieties ( line) on differentcultivation conditions[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences,2003( 11) : 20-22. )
[10] 闫宏山,刘金荣,王素英,等. 四元联系数多因素态势排序分析法在谷子品种区试的应用研究[J]. 杂粮作物,2007,27 ( 4) :286-289. ( Yan H S,Liu J R,Wang S Y,et al. Application of analysismethod of multifactor situation sequent for four element connectionnumber on valley variety regional test[J]. Rain Fed Crops,2007,27( 4) : 286-289. )
[11] 王阔,郭瑞林. 同异分析方法在绿豆品种区域试验中的应用研究[J]. 杂粮作物,2004,24( 1) : 15-18. ( Wang K,Guo R L. Applicationof identical and different analysis in mung bean variety regionaltest[J]. Rain Fed Crops,2004,24( 1) : 15-18. )
[12] 华劲松,王华强. 同异分析在芸豆区域试验中的应用[J]. 西昌学院学报( 自然科学版) ,2008,28( 1) : 8-10. ( Hua J S,WangH Q. Application of identical and different analysis on variety regionaltest of kidney bean[J]. Journal of Xichang College ( NaturalScience Edition) ,2008,28( 1) : 8-10. )
[13] 张绍荣,龙国. 应用同异分析法对马铃薯品种( 系) 综合评估[J]. 贵州农业科学,2005,33( 3) : 34-35. ( Zhang S R,Long G.Comprehensive evaluation on potato varieties by means of identicaland different method[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences,2005,33( 3) : 34-35. )
[14] 刘家勇,陈学宽,吴才文,等. 同异分析法及其联系势测验在甘蔗品种区域化试验中的应用[J]. 西南农业学报,2008,21( 3) :613-617. ( Liu J Y,Chen X K,Wu C W, et al. The application ofsimilarity-difference analysis and connection trend test for the sugarcanevariety regional trial[J]. Southwest China Journal of AgriculturalSciences,2008,21( 3) : 613-617. )
[15] 于平福,黄凤珠,鹏宏祥. 四元联系数多因素态势排序法在葡萄新品种评价中的应用[J]. 西南农业学报,2005,18( 6) : 806-809. ( Yu P F,Huang F Z,Peng H X. Application on the evaluationof southern China grape new varieties with a four-element connectionnumber coefficient posture arrangement[J]. Southwest ChinaJournal of Agricultural Sciences,2005,18( 16) : 806-809. )
[16] 郭瑞林,路志芳,吴秋芳,等. 育种目标性状五种权重确定方法的比较研究[C]. 北京: 中国高等科学技术中心,2014: 278-281. ( Guo R L,Lu Z F,Wu Q F,et al. Comparative study of fivekinds of weight determination methods for breeding target traits[C]. Beijing: The Center of Advanced Science and Technology ofChina,2014: 278-281. )

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2016-06-23