Abstract

References:

［1］Yin X J, Sakata K, Komatsu S.Phosphoproteomics reveals the effect of ethylene in soybean root under flooding stress ［J］. Journal of Proteome Research, 2014, 13(12): 5618-5634.

［2］Mustafa G, Komatsu S.Quantitative proteomics reveals the effect of protein glycosylation in soybean root under flooding stress ［J］.Frontiers in Plant Science, 2014, 5: 627.

［3］Oh M W, Nanjo Y, Komatsu S. Gel-free proteomic analysis of soybean root proteins affected by calcium under flooding stress［J］. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2014, 5: 559.

［4］Oh M W, Nanjo Y, Komatsu S. Analysis of soybean root proteins affected by gibberellic acid treatment under flooding stress ［J］. Protein and Peptide Letters, 2014, 21(9): 911-947.

［5］Yin X J, Sakata K, Nanjo Y, et al. Analysis of initial changes in the proteins of soybean root tip under flooding stress using gel-free and gel-based proteomic techniques ［J］.Journal of Proteomics, 2014, 106: 1-16.

［6］Oh M W, Nanjo Y, Komatsu S. Identification of nuclear proteins in soybean under flooding stress using proteomic technique ［J］. Protein and Peptide Letters, 2014, 21(5): 458-467.

［7］Nanjo Y, Jang H Y, Kim H S, et al.Analyses of flooding tolerance of soybean varieties at emergence and varietal differences in their proteomes ［J］. Phytochemistry, 2014, 106: 25-36.

［8］Komatsu S, Nakamura T, Sugimoto Y, et al. Proteomic and metabolomic analyses of soybean root tips under flooding stress ［J］.Protein and Peptide Letters, 2014, 21(9): 865-884.

［9］Komatsu S, Han C, Nanjo Y, et al.Label-free quantitative proteomic analysis of abscisic acid effect in early-stage soybean under flooding［J］.Journal of Proteome Research, 2013, 12 (11): 4769-4784.

［10］Komatsu S, Nanjo Y, Nishimura M.Proteomic analysis of the flooding tolerance mechanism in mutant soybean［J］. Journal of Proteomics, 2013, 79: 231-250.

［11］Nanjo Y, Nakamura T, Komatsu S. Identification of indicator proteins associated with flooding injury in soybean seedlings using label-free quantitative proteomics［J］. Journal of Proteome Research, 2013, 12 (11): 4785-4798.

［12］Khatoon A, Rehman S, Oh W M, et al.Analysis of response mechanism in soybean under low oxygen and flooding stresses using gel-base proteomics technique［J］. Molecular Biology Reports, 2012, 39:10581-10594.

［13］Salavati A, Khatoon A, Nanjo Y, et al.Analysis of proteomic changes in roots of soybean seedlings during recovery after flooding［J］. Journal of Proteomics, 2012, 75: 878-893.

［14］Khatoon A, Rehman S, Hiraga S, et al. Organ-specific proteomics analysis for identification of response mechanism in soybean seedlings under flooding stress［J］. Journal of Proteomics, 2012, 75: 5706-5723.

［15］Komatsu S, Makino T, Yasue H. Proteomic and biochemical analyses of the cotyledon and root of flooding-stressed soybean plants［J］.PLoS One, 2013, 8(6): e65301.

［16］Nanjo Y, Skultety L, Uvácˇková L, et al.Mass spectrometry-based analysis of proteomic changes in the root tips of flooded soybean seedlings［J］. Journal of Proteome Research, 2012, 11(1): 372-385.

［17］Khatoon A, Rehman S, Salavati A, et al. A comparative proteomics analysis in roots of soybean to compatible symbiotic bacteria under flooding stress［J］.Amino Acids, 2012, 43:2513-2525.

［18］Alam I, Sharmin S A, Kim K H, et al. Comparative proteomic approach to identify proteins involved in flooding combined with salinity stress in soybean［J］. Plant Soil, 2011, 346:45-62.

［19］Komatsu S, Thibaut D, Hiraga S, et al. Characterization of a novel flooding stress-responsive alcohol dehydrogenase expressed in soybean roots［J］. Plant Molecular Biology, 2011, 77:309-322.

［20］Komatsu S, Kuji R, Nanjo Y, et al. Comprehensive analysis of endoplasmic reticulum-enriched fraction in root tips of soybean under flooding stress using proteomics techniques［J］.Journal of Proteomics, 2012, 77: 531-560.

［21］Komatsu S, Yamamoto A, Nakamura T, et al. Comprehensive analysis of mitochondria in roots and hypocotyls of soybean under flooding stress using proteomics and metabolomics techniques［J］. Journal of Proteome Research, 2011, 10: 3993-4004.

［22］Mohammadi P P, Moieni A, Hiraga S, et al. Organ-specific proteomic analysis of drought-stressed soybean seedlings［J］ Journal of Proteomics, 2012, 75: 1906-1923.

［23］Gil-Quintana E, Larrainzar E, Seminario A, et al. Local inhibition of nitrogen fixation and nodule metabolism in drought-stressed soybean［J］. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2013, 64(8): 2171-2182,?

［24］Hakeem K R, Khan F, Chandna R, et al. Genotypic variability among soybean genotypes under NaCl stress and proteome analysis of salt-tolerant genotype［J］.Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2012, 168: 2309-2329.

［25］Ma H Y, Song L R, Shu Y J, et al.Comparative proteomic analysis of seedling leaves of different salt tolerant soybean genotypes［J］. Journal of Proteomics, 2012, 75: 1529-1546.

［26］Ma H Y, Song L R, Huang Z G, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis reveals molecular mechanism of seedling roots of different salt tolerant soybean genotypes in responses to salinity stress ［J］. EuPA Open Proteomics, 2014, 4: 40-57.［27］Ahsan N, Donnart T, Nouri M Z, et al. Tissue-specific defense and thermo-adaptive mechanisms of soybean seedlings under heat stress revealed by proteomic approach［J］. Journal of Proteome Research, 2010, 9(8): 4189-4204.［28］Wang L Q, Ma H, Song L R, et al. Comparative proteomics analysis reveals the mechanism of pre-harvest seed deterioration of soybean under high temperature and humidity stress［J］. Journal of Proteomics, 2012, 75: 2109-2127.［29］Tian X, Liu Y, Huang Z G, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of seedling leaves of cold-tolerant and sensitive spring soybean cultivars［J］. Molecular Biology Reports, 2014, 42(3): 581-601.

［30］Swigonska S, Weidner S.Proteomic analysis of response to long-term continuous stress in roots of germinating soybean seeds［J］. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2013, 170: 470-479.

［31］Hossain Z, Hajika M, Komatsu S.Comparative proteome analysis of high and low cadmium accumulating soybeans under cadmium stress［J］.Amino Acids, 2012, 43: 2393-2416.

［32］Hossain Z, Makino T, Komatsu S. Proteomic study of β-aminobutyric acid-mediated cadmium stress alleviation in soybean［J］.Journal of Proteomics, 2012, 75(13): 4151-4164.

［33］Duressa D, Soliman K, Taylor R, et al. Proteomic analysis of soybean roots under aluminum stress［J］. International Journal of Plant Genomics, 2011, 282531.

［34］Chen Z J, Cui Q Q, Liang C Y, et al. Identification of differentially expressed proteins in soybean nodules under phosphorus deficiency through proteomic analysis［J］.Proteomics, 2011, 11: 4648-4659.

［35］Galant A, Koester R P, Ainsworth E A, et al. From climate change to molecular response: Redox proteomics of ozoneinduced responses in soybean［J］. New Phytologist, 2012, 194: 220-229.

［36］Yang H, Huang Y P, Zhi H J, et al. Proteomicsbased analysis of novel genes involved in response toward soybean mosaic virus infection［J］. Molecular Biology Reports, 2011, 38:511-521.

［37］Wang Y, Yuan X Z, Hu H, et al. Proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins in resistant soybean leaves after Phakopsora pachyrhizi infection［J］. Journal of Phytopathol, 2012, 160:554-560.

［38］Zhang Y M, Zhao J M, Xiang Y, et al. Proteomics study of changes in soybean lines resistant and sensitive to Phytophthora sojae［J］.Proteome Science, 2011, 9:52

［39］Timbo R V, Hermes-Lima M, Silva L P, et al. Biochemical aspects of the soybean response to herbivory injury by the brown stink bug Euschistus heros (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) ［J］. PLoS One, 2014, 9(10): e109735.

［40］Liu D W, Chen L J, Duan Y X.Differential proteomic analysis of the resistant soybean infected by soybean cyst nematode, Heterodera glycines Race 3［J］. Journal of Agricultural Science, 2011, 3(4): 160-167.

［41］Fan R, Wang H, Wang Y L, et al. Proteomic analysis of soybean defense response induced by cotton worm (prodenia litura, fabricius) feeding［J］.Proteome Science, 2012, 10:16.

［42］Schmutz J, Cannon S B，Schlueter J，et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean［J］. Nature, 2010, 463: 178-183.［43］Yu S, Zhang X, Guan Q, et al.Expression of a carbonic anhydrase gene is induced by environmental stresses in rice (Oryza sativa L)［J］.Biotechnology Letters, 2007, 29: 89-94.

［44］Feng L L, Han Y J, Liu G, et al. Overexpression of sedoheptulose1,7-bisphosphatase enhances photosynthesis and growth under salt stress in transgenic rice plants［J］.Functional Plant Biology, 2007, 34: 822-834.

［45］Gupta A S, Webb R P, Holaday A S, et al.Overexpression of superoxide sismutase protects plants from oxidative stress (induction of ascorbate peroxidase in superoxide dismutaseoverexpressing plants)［J］. Plant Physiology, 1993, 103: 1067-1073.

Advances on Proteomics of Soybean under Stress(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Info

References:

Memo

Common functions

Navigate

Tools

Statistics