|Table of Contents|

Genetic Relationship of Three Soybean Core Parents and Their Derived Breeding Lines Detected by Presence/Absence Variation Markers(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2016年01期
Page:
1-10
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Genetic Relationship of Three Soybean Core Parents and Their Derived Breeding Lines Detected by Presence/Absence Variation Markers
Author(s):
WANG Zi-li;  ZHANG Ji-shun;  GUO Cheng-yu;  SUN Feng-luan;  LI Zhong-yang;  KONG Jie-jie;  GAI Jun-yi;  ZHAO Tuan-jie
Soybean Research Institute/National Center for Soybean Improvement/Key Laboratory for Biology and Genetic Improvement of Soybean (General), Ministry of Agriculture/National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
Keywords:
Soybean;  PAV marker;  Breeding line;  Genetic diversity;  Core parent
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2016.01.0001
Abstract:
A new molecular marker system, presence/absence variation (PAV) of large fragment genomic sequences shows potential because of its convenient PCR-based technique and distinct band distribution on.However, its application in soybean breeding and genetic research remains to be carried. There are some core parents in soybean breeding program, which are the key to success in breeding, revealing their role is helpful for parent selection in hybrid breeding work. In this study, total 154 soybean materials including 28 parents and 126 breeding lines were used to reveal their genetic relationship.These lines were derived from the crosses between three core parents (Nannong 86.4, Nannong 88.48 and Youchu 4) and a set of domestic and exotic lines in a breeding program in National Center of Soybean Improvement. The average number of allele per PAV was 2.1.The average value of polymorphic information content (PIC) per PAV was 0.239. The average allele number of the gene-based and non-coding region PAV marker and the average values of polymorphic information content (PIC) of the two PAV types were almost the same. All 34 crosses were clustered into 6 groups based on PAV markers data, among them, three big groups correspond to the three core parents could be identified.All 154 materials were clustered into 9 groups. Most lines from the same core parent or same cross were classified as a group. According to the genetic contribution rate of PAV allele of the core parents, 22 crosses had higher average contribution rate than the expected ratio in the 29 crosses. The observed contribution values of core parent Nannong 86.4, Nannong 88.48 were higher than the expected values based on pedigree analysis, while Youchu 4 from other region had less contribution to the derived lines, indicating the rationalities of using local elite line as core parent in breeding program. In comparison with pedigree analysis, PAV marker can reveal detail genetic relationship among the parents and their derived lines.

References:

［1］Collard B C Y, Jahufer M Z Z, Brouwer J B,et al. An introduction to markers, quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping and marker-assisted selection for crop improvement: The basic concepts［J］.Euphytica, 2005, 142(1-2): 169-196.

［2］Jones N, Ougham H, Thomas H, et al.Markers and mapping revisited: finding your gene［J］. New Phytologist, 2009, 183(4): 935-966.
［3］Xu Y, Lu Y, Xie C, et al. Whole-genome strategies for marker-assisted plant breeding［J］. Molecular Breeding, 2012, 29(4): 833-854.
［4］Springer N M, Ying K, Fu Y, et al. Maize inbreds exhibit high levels of copy number variation (CNV)and presence/absence variation (PAV) in genome content［J］. PLoS Genetics, 2009, 5(11): e1000734.
［5］Gao Q, Yue G, Li W, et al. Recent progress using high-throughput sequencing technologies in plant molecular breeding［J］. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2012, 54(4): 215-227.
［6］Iafrate A J, Feuk L, Rivera M N, et al.Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome［J］.Nature Genetics, 2004, 36(9): 949-951.
［7］Kern A D, Begun D J.Recurrent deletion and gene presence/absence polymorphism: telomere dynamics dominate evolution at the tip of 3L in Drosophila melanogaster and D.simulans［J］. Genetics, 2008, 179(2): 1021-1027.
［8］Arrach N, Porwollik S, Cheng P, et al. Salmonella serovar identification using PCR-based detection of gene presence and absence［J］.Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2008, 46(8): 2581-2589.
［9］Batley J, Barker G, O’Sullivan H, et al.Mining for single nucleotide polymorphisms and insertions/deletions in maize expressed sequence tag data［J］. Plant Physiology, 2003, 132(1): 84-91
［10］García-Lor A, Luro F, Navarro L, et al. Comparative use of InDel and SSR markers in deciphering the interspecific structure of cultivated citrus genetic diversity: A perspective for genetic association studies［J］. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 2012, 287(1): 77-94.
［11］Ollitrault F, Terol J, Martin A A, et al.Development of InDel markers from Citrus clementina (Rutaceae) BAC-end sequences and interspecific transferability in Citrus［J］. American Journal of Botany, 2012, 99(7): e268-e273
［12］Liu B, Wang Y, Zhai W, et al. Development of In Del markers for Brassica rapa-based on whole-genome re-sequencing［J］. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2013, 126(1): 231-239
［13］Zhang L M, Luo H, Liu Z Q, et al.Genome-wide patterns of large-size presence/absence variants in sorghum［J］. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2014, 56(1): 24-37
［14］Wang Y, Lu J, Chen S, et al.Exploration of presence/absence variation and corresponding polymorphic markers in soybean genome［J］. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2014, 56(10): 1009-1019.
［15］庄巧生. 中国小麦品种改良及系谱分析［M］.北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003. (Zhuang Q S. Chinese wheat improvement and pedigree analysis［M］. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2003)
［16］Carter T E Jr, Nelson R L, Sneller C H,et al.Genetic diversity in soybean［M］// Boerma H R, Specht J E. Soybean: Improvement, production and uses-3rd ed-Agronomy Monograph Madison:ASA and CSSA, 2004: 303-416.
［17］熊冬金, 赵团结, 盖钧镒.中国大豆育成品种亲本分析［J］. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(9): 2589-2598. (Xiong D J, Zhao T J, Gai J Y.Parental analysis of soybean cultivars released in China［J］. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(9): 2589-2598.)
［18］关荣霞, 张磊, 刘章雄, 等.DNA导入和系选大豆品种及其亲本遗传关系的SSR标记分析［J］.植物学报, 2010, 45(1): 36-43. (Guan R X, Zhang L, Liu Z X, et al. Relationship analysis of soybean cultivars breeded by intracultivar selection or pollen tube pathway and parents by simple sequence repeat markers［J］. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2010, 45(1): 36-43.)
［19］崔章林, 盖钧镒, Carter T E J, 等. 中国大豆育成品种及其系谱分析(1923-1995)［M］.北京: 中国农业出版社, 1998.(Cui Z L, Gai J Y, Carter T E Jr, et al.The released Chinese soybean cultivars and their pedigree analysis (1923-1995)［M］. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1998)
［20］刘佑斌, 盖钧镒, 游明安. 高产早熟夏大豆新品种南农88-48的选育研究［J］. 南京农业大学学报, 1995, 18(3):1-6.(Liu Y B, Gai J Y, You M A. Development of soybean cultivar with high yield and early maturity: Nannong 88-48［J］.Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 1995, 18(3): 1-6.)
［21］张性坦, 赵存, 柏惠侠, 等. 夏大豆诱处4号公顷产4500 kg生理指标研究［J］. 中国农业科学, 1996, 29(6): 46-54. (Zhang X T, Zhao C, Bai H X, et al.Study on physiological indexes of summer soybean variety Youchu 4 yielding 4500 kg?ha-1［J］. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1996, 29(6): 46-54.)
［22］Doyle J J. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue［J］. Focus, 1990, 12: 13-15.［23］Liu K J, Muse S V. PowerMarker: An integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis［J］.Bioinformatics, 2005, 21(9): 2128-2129.［24］Botstein D, White R L, Skolnick M, et al. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms［J］. American Journal of Human Genetics, 1980, 32(3): 314
［25］Nei M, Tajima F, Tateno Y. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data［J］.Journal of Molecular Evolution, 1983, 19(2): 153-170.
［26］Rohlf F J.NTSYS-PC: Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system［G］. New York:Exeter Software, 1992
［27］Saxena R K, Edwards D, Varshney R K. Structural variations in plant genomes［J］. Briefings in Functional Genomics, 2014, 13(4): 296-307
［28］Lam H M, Xu X, Liu X, et al. Resequencing of 31 wild and cultivated soybean genomes identifies patterns of genetic diversity and selection［J］.Nature Genetics, 2010, 42(12): 1053-1059
［29］Li Y H, Li W, Zhang C, et al. Genetic diversity in domesticated soybean (Glycine max) and its wild progenitor (Glycine soja) for simple sequence repeat and single-nucleotide polymorphism loci［J］. New Phytologist, 2010, 188(1): 242-253.
［30］冯芳君, 罗利军, 李荧, 等. 水稻InDel和SSR标记多态性的比较研究［J］.分子植物育种, 2005, 3(5): 725-730. (Feng F J, Luo L J, Li Y, et al. Comparative analysis of polymorphism of InDel and SSR markers in rice［J］. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2005, 3(5): 725-730.)
［31］Bernard R L, Juvik G A, Hartwig E E, et al.Origins and pedigrees of public soybean varieties in the United States and Canada［R］.US Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin 1988, No. 1764.
［32］Carter T E J, Gizlice Z, Burton J W. Coefficient-of-parentage and genetic similarity estimates for 258 north America soybean cultivars by public agencies during 1945-1988［R］. US Department of Agriculture， Technical Bulletin, 1993, No. 1814
［33］赵战胜, 喻树迅, 范术丽, 等.北疆早熟陆地棉品种的遗传多样性分析［J］.棉花学报, 2012, 24(6): 473-480. (Zhao Z S, Yu S X, Fan S L, et al.Analysis of genetic diversity of early maturing upland cotton varieties in northern Xinjiang［J］.Cotton Science, 2012, 24(6): 473-480.)
［34］Shoemaker R C, Guffy R D, Lorenzen L L, et al. Molecular genetic mapping of soybean: Map utilization［J］.Crop Science, 1992, 32(5): 1091-1098.
［35］Christopher M, Mace E, Jordan D, et al. Applications of pedigree-based genome mapping in wheat and barley breeding programs［J］. Euphytica, 2007, 154(3): 307-316.
［36］李小军, 徐鑫, 刘伟华, 等.利用SSR标记探讨骨干亲本欧柔在衍生品种的遗传［J］ 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(10): 3397-3404. (Li X J, Xu X, Liu W H, et al. Genetic diversity of the founder parent Orofen and its progenies revealed by SSR markers［J］.Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2009, 42(10): 3397-3404.)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2016-01-28