|Table of Contents|

Potassium Efficiency of Different Low K Tolerant Soybean Varieties(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2014年03期
Page:
385-388
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Potassium Efficiency of Different Low K Tolerant Soybean Varieties
Author(s):
LI Xing-tao12TONG Xiao-nan1YU Hai-qiu2WANG Ning3WANG Xiao-Guang2CAO Min-jian2
1.College of Life and Environment,Gannan Normal University,Ganzhou 341000,China;2.Agronomy College,Shenyang Agricultural University,Shenyang 110866,China;3.Agricultural Information Institute,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Beijing 100081,China
Keywords:
Soybean cultivarsLow K toleranceK uptake efficiencyK utilization efficiency
PACS:
S565.1
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2014.03.0385
Abstract:
In order to study K efficiency of different low K tolerant soybean varieties under low K stress,we carried out pot culture,with low Ktolerant soybean varieties Shennong 6 and Jiunong 15,low K sensitive soybean varieties Tiefeng 31 and GD8521 under low K stress and K applied treatment.Significant difference of K utilization efficiency was found in low K tolerant soybean between low K stress and K applied treatment,while the K utilization efficiency of low K sensitive soybean between low K stress and K applied treatment was no significant difference.The K uptake efficiency of low K tolerant and low K sensitive soybean cultivars declined under the low K stress.The grain yield K utilization efficiency and K harvest index of low K tolerant soybean cultivars under low K stress were significant higher than that under K applied treatment.However,no significant differences of low K sensitive soybean cultivars were found between low K stress and K applied treatment.These results implied that the higher K utilization efficiency caused the higher tolerance coefficient for the low K sensitive soybean cultivars.

References:

[1] 姜存仓 . 不同基因型棉花对钾的反应差异及其机理研究 [D]. 武汉 : 华中农业大学 ,2006:101-108.(Jiang C C.Different effects and mechanisms of potassium on varied cotton genotypes[D].Wuhan:Huazhong Agricultural University,2006:101-108.)
[2]王利,陈防,万开元.植物钾效率及其评价的研究进展与展望[J].土壤,2010,42(2):164-170.(Wang L,Cheng F,Wang K Y.Progress and expectation of the research on plant K efficiency and its evaluation[J].Soils,2010,42(2):164-170.)
[3]姜存仓,王运华,鲁剑巍,等.植物钾效率基因型差异机理的研究进展[J].华中农业大学学报,2004,23(4):483-487.(Jiang C C,Wang Y H,Lu J W,et al.Advances of study on the Kefficiency in different plant genotypes[J].Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University,2004,23(4):483-487.)
[4]Rmheld V,Kirkby E A.Research on potassium in agriculture:Needs and prospects[J].Plant and Soil,2010,335(1-2):155-180.
[5]唐劲驰,曹敏建,刘限.大豆品种(系)耐低钾性的筛选与评价[J].大豆科学,2003,22(1):18-21.(Tang J C,Cao M J,Liu X.Resistance mechanism and screening of soybean genotype resistance to low potassium[J].Soybean Science,2003,22(1):18-21.)
[6]王伟,曹敏建,周春喜,等.大豆耐低钾胁迫品种(系)的筛选[J].大豆通报,2005(4):7-8.(Wang W,Cao M J,Zhou C X,et al.Screening of tolerance low potassium soybean cultivars[J].Soybean Bulletin,2006(4):7-8.)
[7]Lu G,George M S,Zhou W.Genotypic variation of sweet potatoes grown under low potassium stress[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition,2003,26(4):745-756.
[8]Damon P M,Osborne L D,Rengel Z.Canola genotypes differ in potassium efficiency during vegetative growth[J].Euphytica,2007,156(3):387-397.
[9]Rengel Z,Damon P M.Crops and genotypes differ in efficiency of potassium uptake and use[J].Physiologia Plantarum,2008,133(4):624-636.
[10]Sas L,Rengel Z,Tang C.The effect of nitrogen nutrition on cluster root formation and proton extrusion by Lupinusalbus[J].Annals of Botany,2002,89(4):435-442.
[11]Fernández F G,Brouder S M,Volenec J J,et al.Root and shoot growth,seed composition,and yield components of notill rainfed soybean under variable potassium[J].Plant and Soil,2009,322(1-2):125-138.
[12]George M S,Lu G,Zhou W.Genotypic variation for potassium uptake and utilization efficiency in sweet potato(Ipomoea batatas L.)[J].Field Crops Research,2002,77(1):7-15.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-08-01