|Table of Contents|

Chosen of Soybean Rhizobia Carrier and Screening of the Best Concentration(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2014年02期
Page:
207-210
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Chosen of Soybean Rhizobia Carrier and Screening of the Best Concentration
Author(s):
LIU Qingli1WANG Jinsheng1LIU Lijun1LIN Weigang1WANG Honglei2ZHANG Lili3WU Junjiang1
1.Soybean Research Institute,Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Harbin 150086,China; 2.Information Center of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Harbin 150086,China; 3.Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Harbin 150086,China
Keywords:
Soybean rhizobiaNodulationCarrier
PACS:
S565.1
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2014.02.0207
Abstract:
In order to screen the carrier that was more appropriate for the absorption of rhizobia,improving yield and quality of inoculated soybean,and screen the best soybean rhizobia bacterial concentration at levels of quality carrier,three carriers absorbed different soybean rhizobia bacterial concentration with seed dressing were performed according to the biomass,nodular rate and yields of soybean plant by soil pot experiments.The results showed that different carriers and inoculating soybean rhizobia could improve the biomass and nodular rate of soybean plant.Peat and vermiculite were used as carriers of rhizobia could remarkably promote the growth of soybean plant and enhance dry matter accumulation;thus the lasting effect of nodular was the longest,followed by vermiculite and liquid.Low level bacterial concentration could remarkably increased soybean yield and quality with peat and vermiculite as carriers,however the opposite when used liquid as carriers.In conclusion,in view of the cost,peat was more appropriate for soybean rhizobia,and the best bacterial concentration was 1.4×108cells·mL-1

References:

[1]Li J F , Huo P H , Shi S L ,et al.Effect of bacteriostats on cells growth and contamination-resistant capability of Rhizo bium inoculants[J].Advanced Materials Research , 2011 , 291-294:2460-2465.

[2]Zahran H H.Rhizobium-legume symbiosis and nitrogen fixation under sever condition an dinan arid climate[J].Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews,1999,63:968-989.
[3]Peoles M B,Herridge D F,Ladha J K.Biological nitrogen fixation:an efficient source of nitrogen for sustainable agricultural production[J].Plant and Soil,1995,174:3-28.
[4]李永兴,匡柏健,李久蒂.不同载体对微生物菌剂质量的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,1999(6):30-32.(Li Y X,Kuang B J,Li J D.Influence of different carriers on qualities of microbial manure[J].Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China,1999(6):30-32. )
[5]刘雯雯,姚拓,孙丽娜,等.菌糠作为微生物肥料载体的研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2008,27(2):787-791.(Liu W W,Yao T,Sun L N,et al.The Feasibility of spent mushroom substrate as a kind of microbial fertilizer carrier[J].Journal of AgroEnvironment Science,2008,27(2):787-791.)
[6]葛诚.微生物肥料生产应用基础[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000.(Ge C.Application of microbial fertilizer production base[M].Beijing:China Agricultural Science and Technology Press,2000.)
[7]熊春林,黄隆广,丁磊.根瘤菌新载体及其接种效果的研究[J].微生物通报,1989(2):66-69.(Xiong C L,Huang L G,Ding L.Study on root lame bacteria new carrier and its effect of inoculation[J].Microbiology China,1989(2):66-69.)
[8]牛彦波,吴皓琼,李智.载体,灭菌方式及pH对生物肥料产品活菌数及保存期的影响[J].黑龙江八一农垦大学学报,2003,15(3):36-39.(Niu Y B,Wu H Q,Li Z.Effect of absorbent,disinfection and pH on the living cell quantity and the preservative time of microbial fertilizer[J].Heilongjiang August First Land Reclamation University,2003,15(3):36-39.)
[9]吴皓琼,沙长青,牛彦波,等.保护剂与抑菌剂对生物肥料保存期的影响[J].生物技术,2004,14(6):55.(Wu H Q,Sha C Q,Niu Y B,et al.Effects of nutritious substance and bacteriostatic agent on the shelf-life of biofertilizer[J].Biotechnology,2004,14(6):55.)
[10]王庆胜.中国大豆品种资源保存与更新状况分析[J].黑龙江农业科学,2010,3(9):138.(Wang Q S.Analysis of conservation and regeneration statues for Chinese soybean germplasm[J].Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences,2010,3(9):138.)
[11]杨旭生.不同吸附载体对大豆根瘤菌剂质量影响研究[J].内蒙古科技与经济,2012,7(13):121.(Yang X S.Study on the effect of different adsorption carrier on the quality of Soybean rhizobium[J].lnner Mongolia Science Technology & Economy,2012,7(13):121.)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-08-04