|Table of Contents|

Influence of Drought Stress on Soybean Physiological Indexes(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2011年01期
Page:
83-88
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Influence of Drought Stress on Soybean Physiological Indexes
Author(s):
DONG Xing-yue12LIN Hao2LIU Li-jun1TANG Xiao-fei1WEI Lai2
1.Soybean Research Institute,Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Harbin 150086,Heilongjiang;
2. Graduate School of Northeast Agricultural University,Harbin 150086,Heilongjiang, China
Keywords:
Soybean (Glycine max)Drought stressPhysiological indexes
PACS:
S565.1
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2011.01.0083
Abstract:
To investigate the drought resistance of soybean varieties, stress coefficient analysis and grey related correlation analysis were introduced into this experiment, which can identify the drought resistance of all the test varieties and provide the basis for the drought screening. Results showed that under drought stress, with the time of drought stress exterding the relative water content of leaves(RWC) decreased in 12 varieties, while the content of soluble sugar(WSS), free proline (Pro) and malondialdehyde (MDA) content increasd gradually, especially the peroxidase (POD) activity in most soybean cultivars exhibited up trends. Divided all tested varieties into 3 groups, Heinong56, Ha5489, Heinong59 exhibited high drought resistance and the grey correlation grade (ri)>0.7737; Suinong28, Hefeng55, M3, Heinong46, Heinong50, Heinong44 were moderately resistant (0.7720 <ri?<0.7488); Fengshou24, M2, M1 were lowly resistant (0.7453< ri< 0.7359).

References:

[1]Bray E A. Responses to abiotic stresses in biochemistry and molecular biology of plants[J]. American Society of Plant Physiologists, 2000, 1158-1249.

[2]王晶英,敖红,张杰,.植物生理生化实验技术与原理[M].哈尔滨:东北林业大学出版社,2003133-136.(Wang J Y, Ao H, Zhang J, et al. Plant physiological and biochemical technology and principle[M].HarbinNortheast Forestry University Press2003:133-136.)

[3]陈少裕. 膜脂过氧化与植物逆境胁迫[J].植物学通报, 1990(6):211-217.(Chen S Y. Lipid peroxidation and plant stress[J]. Bulletin of Botany, 1990(6):211-217.)

[4]Pantuwan G, Fukai S, Cooper M, et al. Yield response of rice(Oryza sativaL.) genotypes to drought under rainfed lowlands:4 Vegetative stage screening in the dry season[J].Field Crops Reseach,2004,89:281-297.

[5]Mitchell I HSiamhan D, Wamala M H. The use of seedling leaf death score for evaluation of drought resistance of rice[J]. Field Crops Research, 1998, 55:129-139.

[6]张美云,钱吉,郑师章.渗透胁迫下野生大豆游离脯氨酸和可溶性糖的变化[J].复旦学报,2001,40(5):558-561.(Zhang M Y, Qian J, Zheng S Z. Osmotic stress under wild soybean free proline and soluble sugar changes[J]. Journal of Fudan University,2001,40(5):558-561.)

[7]Singh T N, Aspinall D, Palag L G.Proline accumulation and varietal adaptability to drought in barley: A potential metabolic meature of drough resistance[J].Nature New Boilogy, 1972,236: 188-190.

[8]王瑞云,王玉国,杨晓霞.大豆抗旱的生理生态基础[J].山西农业大学学报,2001,21(3):305-307.(Wang R Y, Wang Y G, Yang X X. Physio-ecological foundation of drought-resistance of Soybean[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University, 2001, 21(3): 305-307.)

[9]王士强,胡银岗,佘奎军,.小麦抗旱相关农艺性状和生理生化性状的灰色关联度分析[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(11):2452-2459.(Wang S QHu Y G, She K J, et al. Gray relational grade analysis of agronomical and physi-biochemical traits related to drought tolerance in wheat[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2007, 40(11):2452-2459.)

[10]岳爱琴,杜维俊,赵晋忠,.不同大豆品种抗旱性的研究[J].山西农业大学学报,2005,25(2):157-160.(Yue A Q, Du W J, Zhao J Z, et al. Study on analysis of drought resistance in soybean[J].Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University, 2005, 25(2):157-160.)




Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-09-11