|Table of Contents|

Study on Hypocotyl-based Agrobacterium-mediated Transformation of Soybean(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2010年06期
Page:
925-929
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Study on Hypocotyl-based Agrobacterium-mediated Transformation of Soybean
Author(s):
LUO Qiu-lanZHOU ShiZHAO LinLI Yong-guangLI Wen-bin
Key Laboratory of Soybean Biology in Chinese Ministry of Education,Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, Heilongjiang, China
Keywords:
Soybean organogenesisRegeneration rateRegenerated multi-shootsHypocotyls
PACS:
S565.1
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2010.06.0925
Abstract:
The study successfully transformed the soybean blue light receptor gene promoter pGmPLP1 into soybean genome by hypocotyl-based Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method, and the gene was steady expressed in progenies. Also the comparison between cultivar Heinong 44 transformed by cotyledon nodes and hypocotyls was conducted. The results showed that the cultivars that cannot efficiently transformed by cotyledon nodes method could successfully transformed by hypocotyl method.

References:

[1]武小霞,张淑珍,李文滨. 我国大豆转基因研究进展[J]. 大豆科学,200524(2)144-149. (Wu X X, Zhang S Z, Li W B. The research advance on soybean transgene in China[J]. Soybean Science, 2005, 24(2): 144-149.)

[2]Trick H N, Finer J J. Sonication assisted Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean [Glycine max?(L.) Merrill] embryogenic suspension culture tissue[J]. Plant Cell Report, 1998, 17:482-488.

[3]McCabe D, Christou P. Direct DNA transfer using electric discharge particle acceleration[J]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture, 1993, 33:227-236.

[4]Stewart C N, Adang M J, All J N, et al. Genetic transformation, recovery, and characterization of fertile soybean transgenic for a synthetic Bacillus thuringiensis crylAc gene[J]. Plant Physiology, 1996, 112:121-129.

[5]Olhoft P M, Lin K, Galbraith J, et al. The role of thiol compounds in increasing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean cotyledonary-node cells[J]. Plant Cell Report, 2001, 20:731-737.

[6]Clemente T E, LaVallee B J, Howe A R, et al. Progeny analysis of glyphosate selected transgenic soybeans derived from Agrobacterium-mediated transformation[J]. Crop Science, 2000, 40:797-803.

[7]刘海坤,卫志明. 大豆遗传转化研究进展[J]. 植物生理与分子生物学学报,31 (2) 126-134. (Liu H K, Wei Z M. Recent advances in soybean genetic transformation[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology, 2005, 31 (2): 126-134.)

[8]Hinchee M A W, Connor-Ward D V, Newell C A, et al. Production of transgenic soybean plants using Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer[J]. Nature, 1988, 6: 915-922.

[9]Donaldson P A, Simmonds D H. Susceptibility to Agrobacterium tumefaciens and cotyledonary node transformation in short-season soybean[J]. Plant Cell Report, 2000, 19: 478-484.

[10]Handberg K, Stougaard J. Lotus Japonicus, an autogamous, diploid legume species for classical and molecular genetics[J]. Plant Journal, 1992, 2:487-496.

[11]Dan Y H, Reichert N A. Organogenic regeneration of soybean from hypocotyl explants[J]. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Plant, 1998, 34:14-21.

[12]Ji F Y, Wang G L, Xu Y N. The effects of antioxidants on the transient expression of GUS gene in soybean hypocotyls mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2006, 30:330-334.

[13]Wang G L, Xu Y N. Hypocotyl-based Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean (Glycine max) and application for RNA interference[J]. Plant Cell Report, 2008, 27:1177-1184.

[14]Jefferson R A, Kavanagh T A, Bevan M W. GUS fusions: beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants[J]. The EMBO Journal, 1987, 6:3901-3907.

[15] 刘北东,朱延明,杨谦,等. 大豆再生体系的建立及遗传转化的研究进展[J]. 大豆科学, 2003, 22(1)63-67.(Liu B N, Zhu Y M, Yang Q, et al. Recent advances in soybean tissue culture and gene transformation[J]. Soyeban Science, 2003, 22(1):63-67.)


Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-09-14