Advances in the Establishment of Experimental Systems for the Studies of Photoperiodism in Soybean(PDF)

¡¶´ó¶¹¿Æѧ¡·[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:

2010Äê02ÆÚ

Page:

332-335

Research Field:

Publishing date:

Info

Title:

Advances in the Establishment of Experimental Systems for the Studies of Photoperiodism in Soybean

Author(s):

QU Ming-nan¹; 2;  WU Cun-xiang²;  GUO Yu-hua¹

1.College of Agriculture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, Liaoning;

2.Crop Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

Keywords:

Soybean;  Photoperiodism;  Experimental system

PACS:

S565.1

DOI:

10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2010.02.0332

Abstract:

Soybean has been an important model plant since the discovery of photoperiodism in the date-of-planting tests and artificially daylength control experiments. In the past, many major achievements in photoperiodism studies of plants were obtained by using soybean as material, resulting in the progress of plant developmental physiology. In this review, the experimental system establishment and their application in the researches of photoperiod responses of soybean were summarized, in order to provide information for improving the experimental systems and promoting the further studies of photoperiodism in this typical short-day crop.

References:

[1] º«Ì츻 . ´ó¶¹¹âÖÜÆÚ·´Ó¦ [M]// ÍõÁ¬ï£ , ¹ùÇìÔª . ÏÖ´úÖйú´ó¶¹ . ±±¾© : ½ð¶Ü³ö°æÉç , 2007: 211-220. £¨ Han T F. Photoperiodism of soybean[M]//Wang L Z, Guo Q Y. Contemporary Soybean Resarch in China, Beijing: Jindun Press, 2007: 211-220. £©

[2]Garner W W , Allard H A. Effect of the relative length of day and night and other factors of the environment on growth and reproduction in plants[J]. Journal of Agricutural Research, 1920, 18: 553-606.

[3]Borthwick H A , Parker M W. Effectiveness of photoperiodic treatments of plants of different age[J]. Botanical Gazette, 1938, 100: 245-249.

[4]Parker M W, Borthwick H A. Effect of photoperiod on development and metabolism of the Biloxi soybean[J]. Botanical Gazette, 1939, 100: 651-689.

[5]Parker M W, Hendricks S B, Borthwick H A, et al. Action spectrum for the photoperiodic control of floral initiation of short-day plants[J]. Botanical Gazette, 1946, 108: 1-26.

[6]Downs R J. Photoreversibility of flower initiation[J]. Plant Physiology, 1956, 31: 279-284.

[7]Wareing P F. Experiments on the ¡®light-break¡¯ effect in soybean plants[J]. Physiol Plant, 1954, 7: 157-172.

[8]Nanda K K, Hamner K C. Investigations on the effect of ¡°light break¡± on the nature of the endogenous rhythm in the flowering of Biloxi soybean[J]. Planta, 1962, 58: 164-174.

[9]Borthwick H A , Parker M W. Photoperiodic perception in Biloxi soybeans[J]. Botanical Gazette£¬1938, 100: 374-387.

[10] Heinze P H, Parker M W, Borthwick H A. Floral induction in Biloxi soybean as influenced by grafting[J]. Botanical Gazette, 1942, 103: 518-529.

[11] Kiyosawa S, Kiyosawa K. A study of varietal differences in flowering habits of soybean plants as followed by grafting experiments[J]. Plant Cell Physiol, 1962, 3: 263-273.

[12] Shanmugasundaram S, Wang C C, Toung T S. Photoperiodic response of flowering in two-branched soybean plants[J]. Botanical Gazette. (Chicago), 1979, 140(4): 4141-4147.

[13] Kiihl R A, Hartwig E E, Kilen T C. Grafting as a tool in soybean breeding[J]. Crop Science, 1977, 17:181-182.

[14] Tomasz Przepiorkowski, Steven K St Martin. The effect of grafting on the flowering of near-isogenic lines of soybean[J]. Crop Science, 2003, 43: 1760-1763.

[15] Elroy R Cober, Daniel F Curtis. Both promoters and inhibitors affected flowering time in grafted soybean flowering-time isolines[J]. Crop Science, 2003, 43: 886-891.

[16] º«Ì츻, ¸Ç¾ûï×, Íõ½ðÁê, µÈ. ´ó¶¹¿ª»¨ÄæתÏÖÏóµÄ·¢ÏÖ[J]. ×÷Îïѧ±¨, 1998, 24(2): 168-171.£¨Han T F, Gai J Y, Wang J L, et al. Discovery of flowering reversion in soybean plants[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1998, 24(2): 168-171.£©

[17] Wu C, Ma Q, Yam K M, et al. In situ expression of the GmNMH7 gene is photoperiod-dependent in a unique soybean (Glycine max[L.] Merr.) flowering reversion system[J]. Planta, 2006, 223: 725-735.

[18] McBlain B, Bernard R L. A new gene affecting the time of flowering and maturity in soybean[J]. The Journal of Heredity, 1987, 78: 160-162.

[19] Bernard R L, Nelson R L, Creneens C R. USDA soybean genetic collection[J]. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology, 1991,13: 703-707.

[20] Bernard R L. Two genes for time of flowering and maturity in soybeans[J]. Crop Science, 1971, 11: 242-244.

[21] Buzzell R I. Inheritance of a soybean flowering response to fluorescent daylength conditions[J]. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology, 1971, 13: 703-707.

[22] Buzzell R I, Voldeng H D. Inheritance of insensitivity to long daylength[J]. Soybean Genetics Newsletter, 1980, 7: 26-29.

[23] Bonato E R, Vello N A. ª«E6ª«, a dominant gene conditioning early flowering and maturity in soybeans[J]. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 1999, 22: 229-232.

[24] Cober E R, Voldeng H D. A new soybean maturity and photoperiod-sensitivity locus linked to E1and T[J]. Crop Science, 2001, 41: 698-701.

[25] Ray J D, Hinson K, Manjono J E B, et al. Genetic control of a long-juvenile trait in soybean[J]. Crop Science, 1995, 35: 1001-1006.

[26] Han T, Wu C, Tong Z, et al . Postflowering photoperiod regulates vegetative growth and reproductive development of soybean[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2006, 55: 120-129.

[27] Battey N H , Lyndon R F . Reversion of flowering[J]. Botanical Review, 1990, 56 : 162-189.

[28] Garner W W, Allard H A. Further studies in photoperiodism. The response of the plant to relative length of day and night[J]. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 1923, 23: 871-920.

[29] Battey N H, Lyndon R F. Reversion of flowering[J]. Botanical Review, 1990, 56: 162-189.

[30] Thompson P A. Reversal of photoperiodic induction of strawberries with maleic hydrazide[J]. Nature, 1963, 200: 146-148.

Memo

Memo:

-

Common functions