Comparative on Antinutritional Effect of Two Cultivars Raw Soybean in Rats(PDF)

¡¶´ó¶¹¿Æѧ¡·[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:

2010Äê02ÆÚ

Page:

310-314

Research Field:

Publishing date:

Info

Title:

Comparative on Antinutritional Effect of Two Cultivars Raw Soybean in Rats

Author(s):

PAN Hong-bin¹; 2;  GU Chun-mei¹ ; SUN Ze-wei¹;  QIN Gui-xin¹

1.College of Animal Science and Technology£¬Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118,Jilin£»

2. Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed of Yunnan Province£¬Kunming 650201£¬Yunnan£¬China

Keywords:

Raw soybean;  Cultivars;  Antinutritional;  Rat

PACS:

S816.42

DOI:

10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2010.02.0310

Abstract:

The objective of this study was to investigate the antinutritional effect of two different soybean cultivars in rats. Thirty rats aged 50¡À2 days were randomly divided into three groups, with each group involved 10 replicates. Test groups were fed on the diets containing raw soybean cultivar Jilin 30 and Jinong 7, respectively. Control group diets containing extruded soybean meal(ESM). The whole experiment duration was 30 days, and individual rat weights and feed intakes were recorded weekly. All rats were slaughtered on the 30th day, the rats were collected blood by jugular vein before dissected, the plasma physiological and biochemistry parameters were detected, pancreas, liver, speend, kidney and stomach were collected quickly for weighting£¬ duodenum central region and jejunum1/3 and ileum1/2 were collected to making histological section for light microscope to inspected, respectively.Results showed the gain weight, feed intake£¬the pancreas weight, small intestine length, small intestine weight,the jejunum villus height(JVH),the jejunum crypt depth(JCD), white blood(cell) count(WBC), plasma urea nitrogen(PUN), glutamate-pyruvate transaminase (GPT) and total bilirubin (TBIL)of the rats fed on the diets containing Jilin 30 raw soybean were significantly different compared to the control group(P<0.05). The pancreas weight and jejunum villus height(JVH) of rats fed on the diets containing Jilin 30 raw soybean were 29.1% and 14.4% (P<0.05) higher than those fed on Jinong 7. Results suggest the antinutritional effect of Jilin 30 in feeding rats is higher than that of Jinong 7.

References:

[1]Osborn T B£¬Mendel L B.The use of soybean as food[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1917,32(12)£º369-387.

[2]Liener I E. Implications of antinutritional components in soybean foods[J]. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition,1994,34(1):31-67.

[3]Wang T£¬Xu R. Effect of Colostrum feeding on intestinal development in newborn pigs[J]. Biology of the Neonate,1996,70(6)£º339-348.

[4]Grant G, Dorward PM, Buchan W C, et al.Consumption of diets containing raw soya beans (Glycine max), kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata) or lupin seeds (Lupinus angustifolius) by rats for up to 700 days: effect on body composition and organ weights[J]. British Journal of Nutrition ,1995, 73(1):17-29.

[5]Li Z, Li D, Qiao S, et al. Anti-nutritional effects of a moderate dose of soybean agglutinin in the rats [J].Archives for Tierernahr£¬2003,57(4):267-277.

[6]Tang S, Li D, Qiao S, et al. Effects of purified soybean agglutinin on growth and immune function in rats[J].Archives of Animal Nutrition£¬ 2006,60(5):418-426.

[7]Roy D M,Schneeman B O.Effect of soy protein,casein and trypin inhibitor on cholesterol,bile acids and pancreatic enzymes in mice[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,1981,111(5): 878-885.

[8]Jordinson M, Deprez P H, Playford R J, et al. Soybean lectin stimulates pancreatic exocrine secretion via CCK-A receptors in rats[J]. American Journal of Physiology - Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology,1996,270(4):653-659.

[9]Li Z, Li D, Qiao S. Effects of soybean agglutinin on nitrogen metabolism and on characteristics of intestinal tissues and pancreas in rats[J].Archives for Tierernahr£¬2003,57(5):369-380.

[10] Donatucli D A. The role of the lectin on the nutritional toxicity of raw legumes[D]. Minneapolis: University of Min-nesota,1983.

[11] Pusztai A, George G, Gelencser E, et al. Effects of an orally administered mistletoe (type-2 KIP)lectin on growth, body compostition, small intestinal structure and insulin levels in young rats[J].Journal Nutritional Biochemistry,1998,9(1):31-36.

[12] Grant G. Antinutritional effects of soybean: A Review. Prog [J].Food Nutrition Science,1989, 13(2):317-348.

[13] Ishiguro M,Nakashima H,Tanabe S,et al. Interaction of toxic lectin ricin with epithelial cells of rat small intestine in vitro[J]. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin£¬1992,40(2):441-445.

[14] Huisman J,Jansman A J M.Dietary effects and analytical aspects of antinutritional factors in peas(Pisum sativum)common bean(Phaseolus vulgaris) and soybeans ª«(Glycine maxª« L) in monogastric farm animals.A literaturereview[J]. Nutrition Abstracts & Reviews£¬ 1991,61(B)£º901-921.

[15] Bardocz S, Duguid T J,Brown D S, et al.The importance of dietary polyaes in cell regeneration and growth[J]. Nutrition, 1995, 73(6):819-828.

[16] Qin G.Elst E R£¬Bosch M W,van der Pole A F B . Thermal processing soybean, studies on the inactivation of antinutritional factors ad effects on oral digestibility in piglets [J] Animal Feed Science and Technology,1996, 57(4):313-324.

[17] Pull S P,Pueppke S G,Hymowitz T,et al. Soybean lines lacking 120 000 Da seed lectin[J].Science,1978,200:1277-1278.

[18] Pusztai A£¬Bardocz S£®Biological effects of plant lectins on the gastrointestinal tract£ºmetabolic consequences and applications [J].Trends Glycosci Glycotechnol,1996,8(41):149-165.

Memo

Memo:

-

Common functions