|Table of Contents|

Variation of Leaf Pubescence Status and Its Association with Resistance to Bean Pyralid(Lamprosema indicata Fabricius)in Soybean(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2009年05期
Page:
768-773
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Variation of Leaf Pubescence Status and Its Association with Resistance to Bean Pyralid(Lamprosema indicata Fabricius)in Soybean
Author(s):
XING Guang-nan; ZHAO Tuan-jie; WANG Jian-ren; GAI Jun-yi
Soybean Research Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University,National Center for Soybean Improvement,National Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement，Nanjing 210095，Jiangsu，China
Keywords:
Soybean; Pubescence status; Lamprosema indicata（Fabricius); Resistance to insects; Selection effect
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2009.05.0768
Abstract:
It was found that the pubescence status on leaf blades was different from that on leaf petioles.According to a survey on 392 cultivars from all the six eco-regions of soybeans in China，the status of pubescence on leaf blade was classified as prostrate，semi-prostrate and skewed and that on leaf petiole as appressed，semi-appressed and erect.It was found that the ratio of skewed leaf blade pubescence and erect leaf petiole pubescence increased along with the increase of geographic latitude，indicating the status of leaf pubescence being related with their geographic sources.Significant correlations were detected between status of leaf blade pubescence and that of leaf petiole pubescence
between status of leaf blade pubescence and resistance to bean pyralid（Lamprosema indicate)，and between status of leaf petiole and resistance to bean pyralid，with χ2values as 164.72，187.46 and 123.44，respectively.There showed significant differences of percentage of rolled leaves（PRL）and number of rolled leaves（NRL）between different leaf blade and petiole pubescence types.The PRL of prostrate and semi-prostrate leaf blade pubescence were 51.37% and 6.98% lower than，while those of NRL were 32.25% and 3.72% lower than the skewed leaf blade pubescence，respectively.The PRL of appressed and semi-appressed leaf petiole pubescence were 42.20% and 62.81% lower than，while those of NRL were 25.93% and 46.40% lower than the erect leaf petiole pubescence，respectively.Therefore，the results showed both the leaf blade pubescence type and the leaf petiole pubescence type can be used as the indicators of resistance to bean pyralid in germpasm evaluation and breeding programs.

References:

[1]崔章林，盖钧镒，吉东风，等.南京地区大豆食叶性害虫种类调查与分析[J].大豆科学，1997，16(1)：12-20.(Cui Z L，Gai J Y，Ji D F，et al.A study on leaf-feeding insect species on soybeans in Nanjing area[J].Soybean Science，1997，16(1):12-20.)

[2]孙祖东，杨守臻，陈怀珠，等.南宁大豆食叶性害虫调查[J].广西农业科学，2001，2:104-106.(Sun Z D，Yang S Z，Chen H Z，et al.A study on leaf-feeding insect species on soybeans in Nanning[J].Guangxi Agricultural Science，2001，2：104-106.)
[3]吴梅香，许开腾.福州郊区菜用大豆害虫的初步研究[J].武夷科学，2002，18:27-32.(Wu M X，Xu K T.Preliminary studies on the pests of green soybean in Fuzhou suburbs[J].Wuyi Science Journal，2002，18：27-32.)
[4]孟国玲，邱胜桥.荆州大豆食叶性害虫种类及主要种生态位分化[J].湖北植保，2002，2:3-5.(Meng G L，Qiu S Q.A study on leaf-feeding insect species on soybeans in Jingzhou and ecology location differentiation of important ones[J].Hubei Plant Protection，2002，2:3-5.)
[5]崔章林，盖钧镒，吉东风，等.大豆种质资源对食叶性害虫抗性的鉴定[J].大豆科学，1997，16（2):93-102.(Cui Z L，Gai J Y，Ji D F，et al.Evaluation of soybean germplasm for resistance to leaf-feeding insects[J].Soybean Science，1997，16(2)：93-102.)
[6]孙祖东，杨守臻，陈怀珠，等.大豆对豆卷叶螟的抗性鉴定[J].中国油料作物学报，2005，27(4)：69-71.(Sun Z D，Yang S Z，Chen H Z，et al.Identification of soybean resistance to bean pyralid（Lamprosema indicata Fabricius）and oviposition preference of bean pyralid on soybean varieties[J].Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences，2005，27(4)：69-71.)
[7]龙丽萍，杨守臻，陈怀珠，等.不同基因型大豆品种对豆卷叶螟实验种群的影响[J].中国油料作物学报，2004，26(3):67-70.(Long L P，Yang S Z，Chen H Z et al.Effects of different genotypes of soybean varieties on the experimental population of bean pyralid（Lamprosema indicataFabricius)[J].Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences，2004，26(3):67-70.)
[8]邢光南，赵团结，盖钧镒.大豆对豆卷叶螟(Lamprosema indicate Fabricius)抗性的遗传分析[J].作物学报，2008，34(1):8-16.(Xing G N，Zhao T J，Gai J Y.Inheritance of resistance to Lamprosema indicata(Fabricius）in soybean[J].Acta Agronomica Sinica，2008，34(1)：8-16.)
[9] Boerma H R，Specht J E.Soybeans：Improvement，Production，and Uses（third edition)[M].Madison，Wisconsin USA，2004.
[10]Bernard R L.The inheritance of appressed pubescence[J].Soybean Genetics Newsletters，1973，2：34-36.
[11]Lee J M，Bush A L，Specht J E，et al.Mapping of duplicate genes in soybean[J].Genome，1999，42：829-836.
[12]Broersma D B，Bernard R L，Luckman W H.Some effects of soybean pubescence in populations of the potato leafhopper[J].Journal of Economic Entomology，1972，65：78-82.
[13] Turnipseed S G.Influence of trichome density on populations of small phytophagous insects on soybean[J].Environmental Entomology，1977，6：815-817.
[14] Lee Y I，Kogan M，Lersen Jr J R.Attachment of potato leafhopper to soybean plant surfaces as affected by morphology of the pretarsus[J].Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata,1986，42(2)：101-107.
[15]Hulburt D J，Boerma H R，All J N.Effect of pubescence tip on soybean resistance to lepidopteran insects[J].Journal of Economic Entomology，2004，97(2)：621-627.
[16]刘学义，李淑香.大豆对红蜘蛛抗性研究[J].山西农业大学学报，1994，14(4)：391-393.(Liu X Y，Li S X.Study on insect-resistance of soybean to red spider[J].Journal Shanxi Agricultural University，1994，14(4)：391-393.）
[17]徐冉，张礼凤，王彩洁，等.抗烟粉虱大豆种质资源筛选和抗性机制初探[J].植物遗传资源学报，2005，6(1)：56-58.(Xu R，Zhang L F，Wang C J，et al.Screening of soybean germplasm resistant to whitefly and the resistant mechanism[J].Journal of Plant Genetic Resources，2005，6(1)：56-58.)
[18] Zhao G Y，Wang J，Han Y P,et al.Identification of QTL underlying the resistance of soybean to pod borer，Leguminivora glycinivorella(Mats.）obraztsov，and correlations with plant，pod and seed traits[J].Euphytica，2008，164:275-282.
[19]文自翔，赵团结，郑永战，等.中国栽培和野生大豆农艺品质性状与SSR标记的关联分析I．群体结构及关联标记[J].作物学报，2008，34(7):1169-1178.(Wen Z X，Zhao T J，Zheng Y Z，et al.Association analysis of agronomic and quality traits with SSR markers in Glycine max and Glycine soja in China：I.population structure and associated markers[J].Acta Agronomica Sinica，2008，34(7)：1169-1178.)
[20]盖钧镒，汪越胜.中国大豆品种生态区域划分的研究[J].中国农业科学，2001，34(2)：139-145.(Gai J Y，Wang Y S.A Study on the varietal eco-regions of Soybeans in China[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica，2001，34(2)：139-145.)
[21]邱丽娟，常汝镇.大豆种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M].北京：中国农业出版社，2006.(Qiu L J，Chang R Z.Descriptors and Date Standard for Soybean（Glycine spp.)[M].Beijing：China Agricultural Press，2006.)

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2014-09-13