|Table of Contents|

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PHOSPHORUS REGIMES ON ROOT MORPHOLOGICALCHARACTERISTICS OF SOYBEAN SEEDLING(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2006年04期
Page:
360-364
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
EFFECT OF DIFFERENT PHOSPHORUS REGIMES ON ROOT MORPHOLOGICALCHARACTERISTICS OF SOYBEAN SEEDLING
Author(s):
Jin Jian 12  Wang Guanghua 1Liu Xiaobing1 Chen Xueli 1Li Xingguo 3
(1. Key lab of black soil , Northeast Institute of Geography and Agro-ecology , Chinese Academyof Science , Harbin 150081;2. Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences ,Beijing 100039;3. Northeast Agricultural university , Harbin 153000)
Keywords:
SoybeanPhosphorus Root morphology
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2006.04.0360
Abstract:
The response of soybean root morphology to different phosphorus regimes was researched bya pot experiment. The results showed that phosphorus significantly increased root dry weight , rootlength , root surface area and root volume. In the treatment of low phosphorus, i. e. P50(50 mg /kg), rootdry weight , root length, root surface area and root volume were 88. 0%, 97. 1%, 101. 7% and 104. 9%higher than P0 (0 mg /kg)treatment. This indicated that suitable phosphorus may accelerate root grow thresulting in root exploring more soil space for nutrient absorption. The variation of root morphology byphosphorus was root mass and root length, rather than root percentage at different ranges of root diame-ters. The root morphology in P 1 00(100 mg /kg)treatment was worse than that in P50 treatment , sugges-ting that there was a threshold for phosphorus application to stimulate root growth, therefore , too muchphosphorus may limit root growth but enhance it as expect.

References:

1   Fo rde B, Lorenzo H. The nutritional control of root development[ J] . Plant Soil, 2001, 232:51- 68.

2  Robinson D. The responses of plants to non-uniform supplies ofnutrients[ J] . New Phytol. , Robinson, 1994, 127:635- 674.
3  Williamson L. C. , Ribrioux P. C. P. , Fitter A. H. , et al. Phos-phate availability regulates root system architecture in Arabidop-sis [ J] . Plant Physiology , 2001, 126:875- 882.
4   Mackay A. D. , Barber S. A. Soil temperature effects on rootgrowth and phosphorus uptake by corn [ J] . Soil Sci. Soc. Am.J. , 1984, 48:818 - 523.
5  Chassot A. , Richner W. Root characteristics and phosphorusuptake of maize seedlings in a Bilayered soil [ J] . Ag ron. J. ,2002, 94:118 - 127.
6  廖红, 戈振扬, 严小龙. 水磷耦合胁迫下植物磷吸收的理想根构型:模拟与应用[ J] . 科学通报, 2001, 46(8):641 - 646.
7  Bates T. R. , Lynch J. P. Root hairs confer a competitive advan-tage under low phosphorus availability [ J] . Plant Soil, 2001,236:243 - 250.
8  廖红, 严小龙. 菜豆根构型对低磷胁迫的适应性变化及基因型差异 [ J] . 植物学报, 2000, 42(2):158 - 163.
9  Gahoonia T. S. , Nielsen N. E. Variation in root hairs of barleycultivars doubled soil phosphorus uptake [ J] . Euphytica , 1997,98:177 - 182.
10 Bey routy C. A. , Wells B. R. , Norman R. J. , et al. Root growthdynamics of a rice cultivar grown at two locations [ J] . Ag ron.J. , 1988, 80:1001- 1004.
11 Liedgens M. , Soldati A. , Stamp P , et al. Root development ofmaize (Zea mays L.) as observed with Minirhizotrons in Ly sime-ters [ J] . Crop Science, 2000, 40:1665- 1672.
12 Stutte G. W. , Stryjewski E. C. Computer classification of rootsfrom digitized video images [ J] . Ho rt. Sci. , 1995, 30:906.
13 Kaspar T. C. , Ewing R. P. Rootedge:Software for measuringroot length from desktop scanner images [ J] . Agron. J. , 1997,89:932 - 940.
14 金剑, 王光华, 刘晓冰, 等. 利用根箱法解析大豆苗期氮磷吸收及其在根际分布的特征[ J] . 大豆科学, 2005, 24(4):281 - 285.
15 Himmelbauer M. L. , Puschenreiter M. , Schnepf A. , et al. Rootmorphology of Thlaspi goesingense Hálácsy grown on a serpentinesoil[ J] . J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. , 2005, 168:138- 144.
16 Whiting S. N , Neumann P. M , Baker A. J. M. Applying a solutetransfer model to phytoex traction:Zinc acquisition by Thaspicaerulescens [ J] . Plant Soil, 2003, 249:45- 56.
17 Hodge A. , Robinson D. , Griffiths B. S. , et al. Why plantsbother:root proliferation results in increased nitrogen capturefrom an organic patch when two g rasses compete [ J] . Plant CellEnviron. , 1999, 22:811 - 820.
18 Abel S. , Ticconi C. A. , Delatorre C. A. Phosphorus sensing inhigher plants [ J] . Phy siol. Plant , 115(1):1- 8.
19 Lynch J. L. , Brown K. M. Topsoil foraging-an architectural ad-aptation of plants to low phosphorus availability [ J] . Plant Soil ,2001, 237:225 - 237.
20 Bilbrough C. J. , Caldwell M. M. The effects of shading and Nstatus on root proliferation in nutrient patches by the perennialgrass Agropyron desertorum in the field [ J] . Oecologia, 1995,103, 10 - 16.
21  Robinson D. , Rorison I. H. A comparison of the responses ofLolium perenne L. , Holcus lanatus L. and Deschampsia flexuosa(L.) T rin. to a localized supply of nitrogen [ J] . New Phytol. ,1983, 94:263 - 273.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2016-12-16