|Table of Contents|

EFFECTS OF NITROGEN FORMS ON THE ROOT MORPHOLOGY ANDPROTON EXTRUSION IN SOYBEAN(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2006年03期
Page:
265-269
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
EFFECTS OF NITROGEN FORMS ON THE ROOT MORPHOLOGY ANDPROTON EXTRUSION IN SOYBEAN
Author(s):
Qiao Yunfa 1  Miao Shujie 12Han Xiaozeng 1
(1. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agro-ecology , Chinese Academy of Sciences Harbin , 150081;2. Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing , 150039)
Keywords:
Nitrogen form Soybeanroot morphology H+
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2006.03.0265
Abstract:
Solution culture experiment with soybean was made to study the effect of nitrogen forms on theroot morphology and proton extrusion from roots. The results showed that there were significant differ-ences between the effects of nitrogen forms and soybean root morphology. NO 3 -N and NH 4 NO 3 -N inducedroot surfacearea increased;NH?4+?-N inhibited root grow th , however, the root morphology of N 2 -fixationtreatment nearly did not have changes, except tips of root increased with time. The H+extrusion fromroot indicated that NH 4+ -N increased H +extrusion, but the poison symptom when NH 4+-N was an nitro-gen source and amount of H+extrusion from NH 4 NO 3 -N treatment was in the middle of NO 3 -N 、NH 4+ -Nand NH 4 NO 3 -N. At early stage , N 2 -fixation treatment had low nitrogenase activity so that inhibited plantgrow th and low biomass.

References:

1  Von Wiren N, Gagarrini S , Frommer W B. Regulation of mineralnitrogen uptake in plants[ J] . Plant and Soil, 1997, 96:191 - 199.

2  Markus L , Alberto S, Peter S et al. Root development of maize(Zea may s L.) as observed with Minirhizotrons in Lysimeters[ J] . Crop Sci. , 2000, 40:1665- 1672.
3  傅金民, 董钻. 大豆根系生长与产量的关系[ J] . 大豆科学, 1987, 6(4):261- 279.
4  Gijsman A J. RhizospHere pH along different root zones ofDoug hlas-fir(Pseudotsuag menxiesiti), as affected by source ofnitrogen[ J] . Plant Soil, 1990, 124:161 - 167.
5  Silber A , Ganmore-neumann R, Ben-Jaacov J. Effects of nutrientaddition on growth and rhizospHere pH of Leucadendron , vSafarisunset[ J] . Plant Soil, 1998, 199:205- 211.
6  陈永亮. 不同氮源处理对红松苗木根际 pH 及养分有效性的影响[ J] . 南京林业大学学报, 2004, 28(1):42- 46.
7  马新明, 王志强, 王小纯,等. 氮素形态对不同专用型小麦根系及氮素利用率影响的研究[ J] . 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(4):655-658.
8  陆景陵主编. 植物营养学[ M] . 北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003, 2.
9  张福锁. 环境胁迫与根际营养[ M] . 北京:农业出版社, 1998.
10 Gazzarrini S, Lejay L, Cojon A , et al. T hree functional trans-porters for constitutive, diurnally regulated, and starvation-in-duced uptake of ammonium into Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell ,1999, 11:937- 948.
11 Bhat K K S. Nutrient inflows into apple roots. Plant Soil , 1983,71:371- 380.
12 Costa C, Dwyer LM , Hamilton RI, et al. A sampling method formeasurement of large root sy stems with scanner-based image a-nalysis[ J] . Agron. J. 2000, 92:621 - 627.
13 金剑,刘晓冰, 王光华, 等. 大豆生殖生长期根系形态性状与产量关系研究[ J] . 大豆科学, 2004, 23(4):253- 257.
14 曹翠玲, 李生秀. 氮素表态对玉米幼苗碳水化合物及养分累积的影响[ J] . 华中农业大学学报, 2003, 22(5):457 - 461.
15 曹翠玲, 李生秀. 氮素表态对作物生理特性及生长的影响[ J] . 华中农业大学学报, 2004, 23(5):581 - 586.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2016-12-15