|Table of Contents|

CLASSIFICATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF STRAIN GROUPS OF SOYBEAN MOSAICVIRUS IN NORTHERN CHINA SPRING PLANTING SOYBEAN REGION(PDF)

《大豆科学》[ISSN:1000-9841/CN:23-1227/S]

Issue:
2005年04期
Page:
263-265
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
CLASSIFICATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF STRAIN GROUPS OF SOYBEAN MOSAICVIRUS IN NORTHERN CHINA SPRING PLANTING SOYBEAN REGION
Author(s):
Wang Yanwei 1 　 Zhi Haijian 1 　 Guo Dongquan 1 　 Gai Junyi 1 Chen Qingshan 2 　 Li Kai 1 　 Li Haichao 1
(1.Soybean Research Institute , Nanjing Agricultural University , National Key Laboratory forCrop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement , Nanjing 210095 ;2.Soybean Research Institute ,Northeast Agricultural University , Harbin 150030)
Keywords:
Soybean mosaic virus; Differential hosts; Strain groups ; Distribution of strain groups
PACS:
-
DOI:
10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2005.04.0263
Abstract:
904 specimens of soybean mosaic virus (SMV)were collected from Heilongjiang , Jilin, Liaon-ing , Hebei , Neimeng and Beijing in Northern China Spring Planting Soybean Region .The symptomatolo-gy and serology were carried out to purify and detect SMV .From them ,112 SMV isolates were obtained.Based on their response to 11 differential hosts such as Hefeng 25, Wenfeng 5, Youbian 30, 8101, Tiefeng25, Davis, Buffalo , Zaoshu 18, Kwanggyo , Kefeng 1 and Qihuang 22, 112 SMV isolates were classifiedinto 8 strain groups.Among them , SC -11 was the widest in Northern China Spring Planting Soybean Re-gion with a proportion of 51.7%, and then SC-8, with a proportion of 17.9%.As far as the proportionof local SMV strain groups are concerned , the distributions of SC -11 and SC -8 were the widest in Hei-longjiang with a proportion of 67.8%and in Liaoning with a proportion of 75.0 %, respectively .The re-sults of comparison of 11 SMV strain groups in present experiment with strain groups identified by LuWenqing showed that , SC -11 was similar with No .1 strain groups, SC -12 and SC -16 were similar withNo .2 , SC -4,SC -7, SC -8,SC -13 and SC -17 were similar with No .3.SC -16 and SC -17 were newstrain groups.

References:

1　 濮祖芹, 曹琦, 房德纯.大豆花叶病毒的株系鉴定[ J] .植物保护学报, 1982, 9(1):31-36.

2　 吕文清, 张明厚, 魏培文, 等.东北三省大豆花叶病毒(SMV)株系的种类与分布[ J] .植物病理学报, 1985, 15(4):225-229.
3　 吕文清, 李延华.大豆花叶病毒的株系划分及株系间的交互作用[ J] .大豆科学1992, 11(4):290-298.
4　 张明厚, 魏培文, 张春泉.我国东北部 SMV 对大豆主栽品种的毒力测定[ J] .植物病理学报, 1998, 28(3):237-242.
5　 王修强, 盖钧镒, 濮祖芹.黄淮和长江中下游地区大豆花叶病毒株系鉴定与分布[ J] .大豆科学, 2003, 22(2):102-107.
6　 杨雅麟.长江中下游地区大豆花叶病毒(SMV)株系组成、分布及抗性研究[ D] .南京农业大学硕士论文, 2002.
7　 战勇.黄淮地区大豆花叶病毒的生物学检测、株系鉴定及大豆抗性的遗传与基因定位[ D] .南京农业大学硕士论文, 2003.
8　 许志刚, Goodman R M , Polston J E.大豆花叶病毒株系的鉴定[ J] .南京农学院学报, 1983, 3:36-40.
9　 余子林.湖北地区大豆花叶病毒的研究[ C] .全国大豆病害学术讨论会论文摘要汇编.1986.
10 罗瑞悟, 杨崇良, 尚佑芬.山东大豆花叶病毒株系鉴定[ J] .山东农业科学, 1990,(5):16-19.
11 尚佑芬, 赵玖华, 杨崇良.黄淮区大豆花叶病毒株系组成与分布[ J] .植物病理学报, 1999, 29(2):115-119.
12 陈永萱, 薛宝娣, 胡蕴珠, 等.大豆花叶病毒两个新株系的鉴定[ J] .植物保护学报, 1986, 13(4):221-226.
13 Milbrath G M , Soong M M .A Local lesion assay fo r soybean mo-saic virus using Phaseolus Vulgaris L .cv .Top Crop[ J] .Phyto-path Z .1976, 87(2):255-259.
14 Jayaram C, Hill J H , Miller W A .Nucleotide Sequence of the coatprotein genes of two aphid -transmissible strains of soy bean mo-saic virus[ J] .Journal of General Virology .1991, 72:1001-1003.
15 Egg rnberger A L , Stark D M , Beachy R N .T he nucleotide se-quence of soybean mosaic virus coat protein-coding region and itsexpression in E.Coli, Agrobacterium tumefaciens and tobaccocallus[ J] .Journal of General Virology , 1989, 70:1853-1860.
16 黎昊雁, 陈炯, 陈剑平.大豆花叶病毒杭州分离物基因组全序列测定及其结构分析[ J] .科技通报, 2003, 3(2):90-93.
17 陈炯, 黎昊雁, 尚佑芬, 等.大豆花叶病毒黄淮 5 号株系的基因组全序列分析[ J] .病毒学报, 2002, 9(3):270-274.
18 储瑞银, 冷晓红, 鲍一明, 等.应用聚合酶链式反应扩增大豆花叶病毒外壳蛋白及其序列分析[ J] .植物学报, 1992, 34(7):523-528.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2017-01-08